I call BS. This never happened.
*
*
Sounds like a set-up to me...
*
*
And being called an ‘animal’ could NEVER be because they are members of the Commie News Network?
*
*
Sounds like a person has been added, at first it was just one person throwing peanuts. Tomorrow we’ll have the whole state of AL in on it. Agree that’s the creeps were probably either Dem plants, or Paul-tards.
*
*
"Rat plants? "
I'd bet a payceck on it. The Tea Party had similar infiltrators who would carry signs designed to make the TEA Party look racist. People who engage is such deceptions are beneath contempt (i.e., Liberals).
*
Do they have it on tape?
Were the “attendees” affliated with the RNC, or were they “credentialled journalists”, from say, Democratic Underground?
*
Were the “attendees” affliated with the RNC, or were they “credentialled journalists”, from say, Democratic Underground?
*
"CNN did not have any further official comment beyond its short report"
I call BS. If they were really republicans then CNN would be orgasmic in reporting on this story 24/7 and digging into their past and how they were directly related- no- they were TOLD, yeah, thats the ticket- they were TOLD to do this by the Republican Party- no Mitt Romney HIMSELF told them...
I think they don't want anyone looking too closely into it.
*
*
*
Troublemaking at GOP gatherings is usually the work of Dem agents. Last time around the SEIU others were very busy at such activities. One of their favorites was to try to make the Tea Party look racist.
Alternatively, if it was actually conservatives throwing nuts at this guy, was it because the newsman was black, or was it because he was being a typical CNN stooge? Did they really care what color he was, or did they react to his CNN badge? Conservatives certainly have few reasons to love CNN.
*
...could be team obama
*
OK. I call BS as well. This reminds me of when they ran with the story that John Lewis was spit on and called the N word when Tea Partiers were rallying against 0-Care.
Several features:
1. No ID of perpetrators
2. No ID of “multiple witnesses”
3. No ID of “victim”
4. No statement from “victim”
5. No statement from any of the “multiple witnesses”
6. The “victim”, a camera operator, did not get any footage of the “crime”
7. CNN reports a “statement” by the RNC, but there is no link to the statement and no attribution to any particular press office contact, etc.
8. The report comes from CNN
9. David Schuster confirmed the report in a tweet.
2. No ID of “multiple witnesses”
3. No ID of “victim”
4. No statement from “victim”
5. No statement from any of the “multiple witnesses”
6. The “victim”, a camera operator, did not get any footage of the “crime”
7. CNN reports a “statement” by the RNC, but there is no link to the statement and no attribution to any particular press office contact, etc.
8. The report comes from CNN
9. David Schuster confirmed the report in a tweet.
Yes, these last 2 are intentional. Any report by CNN or David Schuster about republicans automatically loses credibility based on their track record.
No comments:
Post a Comment