Here is the article
A lot of them are saying it's too early to know what exactly happened yet, so I'm sure I'll be posting another one of these down the line, once they've figured out a narrative (or accepted that a white guy killed a black kid and it was bad, but that isn't likely).
Not everything is a “Trayvon Martin”, where the guy is leaped on and
is on the ground fighting for his life, and is already bloody and
battered as he desperately squeezes off a shot that saves his life.
It isn’t fair to Zimmerman and to extreme self-defense cases, to keep
using this “Trayvon” thing so casually and as a catch phrase.
We don’t know what kind of a weapon (if any) Davis pulled on Dunn. Dunn
claims self-defense, but the story is silent about what he was defending
against Is this silence intended to make the hooded corpse into another
supposedly innocent boy victim?
Notice the pleasant, almost smiling demeanor on the victim as compared to the sullen, frowning face
of the shooter.
Not to mention the victim's first name being used exclusively in the article while only referencing
the shooter by his last name. Pretty easy to see how this story is going to be framed by the MSM....
....regardless of the facts.
Gotta feed the narrative.
"There must be more to the story. Looks like he’s lawyered up for now.
His GF was inside the store, so he couldn’t just leave. If he couldn’t
shut out most of the noise by just keeping his windows rolled up, it
must have been really loud."
Of course it was deafening....enough bass to rattle the store windows. That’s their way; it’s all about them, you see.
See/hear it all the time.
Recently, my lady friend’s boss (they run a security company; he’s a
former 30-year detective) pulls into a convenience store, hears the
same.....but there’s a little toddler strapped in that vehicle with the
windows rolled up, baby mama inside the store. The kid was literally
He called the cops. She was arrested on the spot.
"Gunning someone down at the quick stop and then fleeing the scene and
spending the night in a motel, doesn’t help one to appear like a man
with a clean case of self-defense"
how is that stay and talk defense working out for zimmerman?
Sometimes you go to a convenience store and see something you don’t
like in the parking lot. Could be loud music, could be a couple doing a
severe make-out session, could be a bunch of louts drinking beer, etc.
So, buy what you came to buy and get out of there. I don’t see an
upside to confronting strangers and shooting and killing them over their
obnoxious behavior in a parking lot.
I just don’t.
"I’ve been waiting for this to happen. This is not merely loud music,
This is WAY beyond that. It’s extreme low frequency vibration that
carries for blocks. And nobody is doing anything to stop it. Want to see
what it looks like? Just google images “Subwoofers in Cars”. I knew
somebody was gonna get hurt for this - eventually."
You were waiting for someone to shoot 8 bullets at people who had no guns because their music was too loud?
Anyone who uses self-defense here is trying awfully hard to find it.
Not saying it is not possible but nothing in this story points to it.
“I never, ever, ever read anything on those [liberal] sites about the rampant black on white violence.”
That is why I couldn’t care less why this guy shot this kid; let
somebody else care. I wouldn’t do it or defend it, but I literally
couldn’t care less. It is like reading about 2 life forms on Jupiter
battling it out.
Well, did they turn the music down or not? I can’t believe the article doesn’t even say.
Hey! You can’t blame the man.
When I hear blaring African fertility rites shaking my car and home I go crazy.
From what has come out so far, it sounds like 2nd degree murder. I
hope it does not drag the whole issue of stand your ground down with it
because it is not so based on what has come out so far.
While I agree with the notion the Ramar of the Jungle music is
aggravating, it is not justification to kill anyone not posing a real
threat. The shooting happened in a section of town which is definitely
not “the hood”.
I see a big problem here in that Dunn did not contact the police right after the shooting.
The police tend to take the first people reporting as the “victim”.
Dunn had a lot to consider. There was no body or vehicle to even show
that there was a shooting. If he involves the police, he is likely to
miss his son's wedding. He does not even know if anyone has been hit.
He should have reported it, to get his side on the record, even if it
made him late for the wedding, because criminals often make up stories
that put them in the best possible light.
Jordan's friends in the
SUV had lots of time to consider their story, and plenty of motive to
come up with a good one and to sanitize the scene to their advantage.
They had the whole Trayvon Martin episode to act as an example of what they should concoct.
--- Yes, that's a Freeper straight-up calling unarmed black teenagers who went to the police after their friend was murdered "criminals".
We are only getting the side put out by Jordan’s friends. Dunn says
he saw a gun in the SUV, and the SUV fled the scene after he shot.
If this is true, Dunn did not have any certainty whether he hit
anyone or not. If a gun had been pulled on him, the other people in the
SUV had plenty of time to dispose of it before the police searched the