Monday, January 30, 2012

People With Low IQ Tend to be Socially Conservative: New Study (Barf, BS & Junk Science Alert)

Requested by hypnoticus ceratophrys.

All you need to do is scan the faces at an Obama rally to disprove this.

*

So this tells me that the well educated are what got us into the mess that we are in today.

*

"We found that lower general intelligence in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood..."

Well, that would mean that democrats supporting their party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow, separate but equal, and non-supporters of the Civil Rights Act are by definition at a lower level of general intelligence.

*

Another government funded, made-to-order liberal report by some of the same people who developed the global warming hockey stick.
This is so patently dishonest that it ought to be dismissed on its face, but undoubtedly the corrupt MSM will herald this as some divine revelation.

Ever wonder why “prizes” such as the Nobel and the Oscars and the Academy Awards always go to those with making a left-wing political statement? Well, here is exhibit “B” in that regard.

*

People with low IQs tend to have a more realistic view of their place in the universe, acknowledge there is a Higher Power and are more willing to submit to His universal Truths and Laws.
People with high IQs tend to have inflated egos, exaggerate their importance in the universe, deny there is anything greater than themselves, reject the notion of a Higher Power and therefore His universal Truths and Laws.

But what do I know - I am just a social conservative with a tested IQ of 147.

*

That a$$hole author is AMRUTHA GAYATHRI, an Indian woman coming from very segregated society. Too much cow pee and vegan in her diet.

*

I guess all those nativist rebels killing the white Afrikaner farmers in Rhodesia were all geniuses.

*

Wasn’t there a study that graded Obama’s SOTU speech at an 8th grade comprehension level? His base is so smart, that he had to dumb the speech down to a middle school comprehension level? Liberals have always been bad, but their propoganda attempts now don’t even have effort put into them anymore

*

there IS something wrong with many inner city blacks though....they are very racist....very violent....and they do carry “conservative” social values against gay marriage, homosexuals in general,etc....

*

let me get this straight..

Democrats are that party of the poor... Republicans are the party of the rich..

Yet... according to this conservatives (ie Republicans) have lower IQ’s

which means they are arguing that Rich people have low IQ’s and poor people have high IQ’s

ROFL

right.


*

****People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb****
So most of the people in the NAALCP are dumb. Gee, I already knew that.

*

This will offend the President. . .after someone explains it to him.

*

Actually it makes perfect sense.

Those who are prejudiced against Conservatives have low IQ’s.

*

This definition fits libs. They stress their hierarchy and are totally resistant to changing their views. To them compromise is when everything goes their way.
Guess this proves what I have always known. Libs are intellectually challenged to the point that they have no moral rudders and cannot live in the real world. Instead, they daydream of their ideal Utopia where all is fair according to their preconceived ideas of fairness.

A pox on all of them.

*

The average Black inner city IQ is 76.

Average Black IQ is 85.

Blacks vote Democrat 95%. And the 5% who don’t - sure aren’t average city folks.

Sorry. Facts are facts.

it is kind of ubsurd what the Left will pay iteself to conclude, to pretend to feel good about themselves and their anti-human insanity.

11 comments:

  1. "which means they are arguing that Rich people have low IQ’s and poor people have high IQ’s

    ROFL"

    Or maybe that even though the rich are 1% of the country, 50% of the country votes to support them. Perhaps you have to have a low IQ to vote against your own interests.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "His base is so smart, that he had to dumb the speech down to a middle school comprehension level?"

    Is this a circular argument or what. You can counter it with "Based on the lack of cooperation the last few years from the opposition, the president realized that they simply couldn't comprehend the message. Therefore, he had to simplify it in order to move the country forward".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ya that's about what I expected... thanks FI!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. adj+genus, viva le Révolution taxonomie, etc

      Delete
  5. So this tells me that the well educated are what got us into the mess that we are in today.

    In summary: Hooray! I'm stupid!

    ReplyDelete
  6. What I'd like to see is a comment about Stephen Colbert

    ReplyDelete
  7. "But what do I know - I am just a social conservative with a tested IQ of 147."

    I don't think those IQ tests you find online really count...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, he was kind of on a roll until that last bit completely blew his own argument out of the water. Assuming it's true, of course. I have doubts.

      Delete
  8. Yeah well... I'm a liberal with an IQ of 437, so what do I know?

    ReplyDelete