Sunday, September 4, 2011

Abstinence preacher Sarah Palin to be a grandma again!

Summary: This article is from July 2011, and it discusses how Sarah Palin's son Track and his wife of two months, Britta, were expecting their first child shortly.

What a headline.....what’s unusual (for DEMOCRATS, that is)is they GOT MARRIED!!!

*

Consider the source.

Daily mail is a leftist rag.

*

What a stupid headline-her son is married that is the perfect time to become a parent.

*

So...let’s see, Republicans should abstain from procreating, not have any ailments that many Americans have(Bachman’s migraines), but if your a democrat, your(gay) boyfriend can run a prostitution ring out of your house(Bwarney Fwank).

OK, I got it.

*

Parents are not the primary influence on their children. The culture it. I’m a parent. I would NEVER criticize another parent if their kids screw up. It WILL HAPPEN.

*

I don’t know. It seems as if the author thinka that Sarah should be ashamed that her son Track and is wife are having a baby. I don’t get it. I bet she is thrilled!

*

"Liberal media disappointed - those Palin’s just refuse to abort!

Speaking of babies - did Chelsea ever get to start that family she wanted so badly? Where’s her husband?"

At least Chelsea hasn’t taken after the sexual proclivities of another prominent female member of her family. LOL

*

That’s just the way life is in America today; the best of parents can’t stop the decline. It’s happened in my family as well.


*

These liberal left assclowns obviously know NOTHING about the laws of human reproduction. Don’t they know that a couple’s first baby can come any time after the wedding; assuming, of course, that there IS a wedding in this day and age. But notwithstanding the new morality, etc: The rest of the children all take nine months, but the first one can come any time. Don’t they know that? What a bunch of maroons!


*

she won’t be the FIRST bride who was ‘already pregnant’

seems to me the Liberals in CA. are all having babies and ‘unmarried’ look at the beautiful Angelina Jolie...six kids and still NOT married....

*

LSM is urinated they did not abort, then had the nerve to get married and are going to raise the child. They are so unlike us, sayeth the lefties.

*

“... did Chelsea ever get to start that family she wanted so badly?”

No doubt, she wants to name her son Webb in memory of her father.

*

One can raise children to the highest of your standards. But when they get out into the real world with peer pressure, many, many youngsters do get/make pregnant before marriage.

*

"I'd be horrified if two of my children got pregnant before they were married."

SARAH doesn’t live in fear like you do. She saves her horrified at how our country is being taken down - not at two children who are healthy and taking care of their own.

*

"...personally I would be horrified if two of my kids got pregnant before they were married."

Do you have kids? If not, keep on living. You may have a surprise or two down the road.

*

If that is true, I find it disturbing. It’s yet something else the liberals can say is hypocrisy on Gov. Palin’s part. Even though obviously, Track was already a grown man, in the military and not living at home when this happened. It’s a good thing that afterwards they did the right thing and got married. Most people shack up these days and don’t even bother to make things right.

In this day and age children rarely live out the values the parents set out for them. However, I still find it sad. What’s even more sad is that I think the girl he married was a preacher’s daughter. If so, wow that stereo type about preacher’s kids is right on the money in this case.

All being said, Gov. Palin is not her grown kids and they are not the ones who would be running for President. I still support her but, it’s still a sad situation.

*

What absolutely infuriates me are the Holier Than Thou social conservatives who will roundly condemn her and her family, but not see their own gluttony or greed or coveting. How they see with those logs in their eyes is beyond me.

*

"This will not help a potential Presidential bid."

You sir have a future as a Tee Vee commentator.

Send in your resume.

*

"But I guarantee if this was a democrap candidate you guys would be tearing that parent to shreds."

Sorry to bring news to your liberal heart - but the commie media doesn't report the private life of others candidates or politicians . You are the one doing the shredding and acting prissy here about a PRIVATE CITIZEN. Shame on you!

*

"But I guarantee if this was a democrap candidate you guys would be tearing that parent to shreds."

If these were the kids of democrat candidates they would not be having a baby, they would be having an abortion, and they would not be getting married unless they were both members of the same sex.

*

I had several friends in high school that HAD to get married. Most of them dropped out of high school and went to work in construction and most of them ended up owning their own constructions companies. I can’t afford to buy one of their houses, much less live in their neighborhoods.

*

Why do you believe speculation on the part of a FOREIGN gay communist writer?

*

Which President had a huge leftist, gay Ballerina son and a lesbian leftwing activist daughter that was a subversive revolutionary... all while he served in the Whitehouse? RONALD REAGAN!

6 comments:

  1. "Daily Mail is a leftist rag"

    Ha hahahah hahahaaaaaaargh!

    In the UK it's known as the "Daily Heil"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, Alistair, they do think that Hitler was a leftist, so.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jesus... the Daily Mail a liberal rag. What's next, the Sun?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Woah it's kittypie. Your blog has officially arrived

    ReplyDelete
  5. Consider the source.

    Daily mail is a leftist rag.


    I genuinely did a spit-take here.

    The Daily Mail is probably the most hard-right tabloid in the UK. They are racist, xenophobic, hardline Conservatives who would oppose sunshine and happiness if it was in some way linked to socialism.

    For anyone to consider them a leftist rag they would have to be somewhere to the right of Hitler.

    ReplyDelete