Friday, March 15, 2013

Egypt's Islamists warn giving women some rights could destroy society

They may be on to something, if Sandra Fluke is an example.


They’re absolutely correct! Look what happened to the US! lol


I think it was Rush Limbaugh who said many years ago that the best way to bring down a repressive enemy regime would be to export radical feminism to that country.

These women are by no means radical feminists, but his observation seems to be largely correct.


Rights are not given by government.


I always wonder where the National Organization Women have been hiding with all the atrocities of the Muslim world occurring on a daily basis. Fluke and such wants free contraceptives, but doesn't say a word about the women of Africa and Middle East being raped, tortured (genital mutilation), honor killings, not to mention having no civil rights. No one does.

Seems only conservatives on boards like this care and are outspoken about the above inhumane acts against women. 


Looking at the direction that Western Civilization has been going since “liberating” women — downhill on a path to self-destruction — one almost can believe that they have a point….

(And I’m absolutely serious with that comment)


Sorry, gals: I side with the Muzzies on this truth. They will eventually conquer us, because their men are strong and ours have abdicated their strength and their responsibilities as men. All the wishful thinking and feminist propaganda in the world is not going to change the fundamental realities involved here.


This affirmative action BS gave us 0bama; The emasculated coward raised by a Feminist single mother and transgender cross-dressing nanny. Generations of boys raised without fathers in the home is costing us dearly. The Female influence and control of the schools, the workplace, the media and politics has disenfranchised males and destroyed the progress of mankind. Stagnation abounds. ‘War on Women’ my azz.

Monday, March 4, 2013

Obama DHS Purchases 2,700 Light-Armored Tanks to Go With Their 1.6 Billion Bullet Stockpile

Excerpt: "The Department of Homeland Security (through the U.S. Army Forces Command) recently retrofitted 2,717 of these ‘Mine Resistant Protected’ vehicles for service on the streets of the United States."


I don’t like where this is going.

Are we headed for a violent takeover?


phase ii/phase iii of freedom from war, state dept pub 5277,tying in agenda 21 goals at the same time.


Who the hell is allowing payment for that stuff?. The U.S. couldn’t buy body arm for our soldiers but can buy this stull for his upcoming civil war. Call your congress dofusses to stop the payment for this stuff. I have no doubt Odumbo is getting ready for his planned civial war that will take place right HERE when he creates his marshall Law event and names himself a King of the U.S.

Enough is enough! (I’m getting piss#d)


Those thing are not going over seas.

They aren’t going to be used on Illegal immigrants.

They are expensive when times are hard.

There are two thing that might happen here. They will sit around and rust or thay will be used against citizens of these United States.


What I don’t get is that the DHS does not have a branch called “Homeland Security”. They have the TSA, US Secret Service, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Coast Guard, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, and US Customs and Border Patrol. Who do the characters driving these things actually work for? Looks like barry’s private army is getting equipped to seal the takeover.


 You have to remember who is going to be running the show when the Left finally bares its fangs... a bunch of affirmative action know-nothings. 

Once they start their assault, we will no longer be restrained by political correctness, and we will have the non-affirmative action types on our side... the ones who actually know how to do things. 

Once they rile the beast, it will devour them.

This is not right! What is the government planning? They’re planning something. Otherwise, what do they need these 2717 vehicles for? The answer is they don’t. I really object to spending this money at a time when we have a budget problem. I would object to it even without the current state of finances of the federal government.

The founding fathers did not want a standing army. These armoured vehicles are the beginnnings of a standing army. Vote Republican next time.


Methinks Lord Zero wanted the sequester all along in order to fund his private army....where else would he get the dough to do this....??


"Your handgun will protect you from your local gang members. When the federal government comes, they will come with a platoon of hit men in armor. You stand no chance what so ever. Welcome to Nazi controlled America."
Sure we do. While they attack our families we attack theirs. All is fair in love and war.

Once they begin any operation, it will be known who they are, where they live, and their families too.

They have to stop to get gas, go to the bank, all those little things done each day.

Getting to work may become a life threatening proposition for anyone on the wrong side of right...


He’s becoming more like Mugabe every day.


Don’t know if true but heard on the inter-web;
Fill mason jars with ammonia, throw at ventilation intakes. There is no way to filter out ammonia. Occupants will exit vehicle, act on threat.


We have to find out how many body bags they have in the warehouse.


the war has already begun
has anyone in Congress/GOP even brought this up as an issue??


"[Responding to "Does the left think they'll be in charge forever?"] Moochie is being groomed to be the RAT Candidate in 2016. She is going to be getting more and more media face time. Put money on it."

No question---but I think it's backfiring bigtime. 

Face it, she's not a very likeable matter how she grooms and adorns herself. 

When she makes w/ that toothy grin and snarl---it's over for her. 

Frankly, I think the bangs were a huge mistake. 

Friday, March 1, 2013

Sarah Palin Says Feds Are Stockpiling Bullets For Civil Unrest

The article barely says anything, so here is her Facebook post, in which Palin says, among other things, that the Feds are stockpiling bullets because they know we're going to default as a country, financially, and they expect there to be riots.

By the way, FR is now firmly split as to how they feel about Palin. Some blame Obama's reelection on her for not running in 2012.

She's always. Sarah Palin is a savvy observer of what's transpiring under the corrupt Obama regime and we best heed her warnings, taking prudent, proactive measures for the coming dire days ahead. 

May God continue to Bless this remarkable patriot, a champion of American Exceptionalism. 


"Sarah is wrong."

How so?

I think she's extremely well informed and is privy to data that is suppressed by the lamestream media. Her love of America is unquestioned and I believe, much like Paul Revere, she's letting "We the People" know about the looming crisis. Obama and his evil sycophants will use all available resources to turn our land into a socialist state, at best, and a Muslim-centered theocracy at worst. I, for one, will not be dismissing the clear warnings now being issued by Mrs. Palin.


This information was in print well before Palin said anything. It was old news by then. I don't disagree with her or the original stories but it doesn't take a political genius to figure this stuff out.  


"So who in Homeland is going to fire on civilians Sarah? Who in our government are you calling potential Nazis?"

 Obama is driving out the good men from the ranks of the military and replacing them with sodomites and Muslims. It's quite plausible -- in fact inevitable -- that firing on civilians will occur. As was the case in Germany, Hitler molded the Wehrmacht to achieve his diabolical ends. In his crafty way, Obama (the Hitler of our times, a fascist in every way) is transforming our once proud and patriotic military and law enforcement agencies into one that can and will suppress real Americans. Sarah Palin is sounding the alarm. 


How awesome would it be if our President cared about OUR Liberty as much as this lady. Mmm?


[Responding to a debate on whether the National Guard would side with the government or the patriots]

Not to put too fine a point on it, and by no means to be disagreeable with your many valid points or you, but regarding the National Guard I think there may be a difference. A couple of things, I noticed Mao-Bama photo ops during the ‘12 campaign that featured people in uniform and started paying attention to the demographics. Nothing scientific and presuming they were in fact Guard or even military related people and not props, those people in his background were often largely africanhyphenamerican and/or women. Given that that demographic is very loyal to Hussein Mao-Bama, are they likely to hold fire on people who are obviously not his rabid supporters?

Another point, two Novembers ago I was in Charleston SC visiting my daughter. We went to the Veterans Day Parade. There were a lot of well disciplined formations from the armed forces in the parade but, there were also formations from local JROTC programs from high schools outside Charleston consisting largely of africanhyphenamericans and/or women. Not all, but most were strikingly undisciplined. They were not marching in formation as one would expect a well trained outfit to march rather swaying along chanting different chants by the “formation” sometimes even dancing past the Exchange Building where we were viewing. This reminded me of reports a few years back that were posted here about africanhyphenamerican leaders sponsoring JROTC formations of young ahyphenas who it was posited were being trained to be a sort of a militia to take on the white man.

I truly don’t mean to make this stuff racist, it is what I have observed. My only point being that I would not be so sure about the National Guard. I would also point out that there is another paramilitary organization, the blue shirts of the TSA who are only too happy to perform invasive searches on specific groups of people not including those of the islamic persuasion.


Why isn't any other so called Republicans speaking out about this? Why does she always have to take the lead? 


Good thing she is not with FauxNews anymore. They would not have let her say this

No secret that fed agencies are stockpiling bullets. You have to be real govt brainwashed or Obama Lover to believe otherwise


“So who in Homeland is going to fire on civilians Sarah?”

Hmmm, Ask Randy Weaver’s wife or his son. Opps, sorry they are dead.

Ask the children in Waco. You might wait a long time to get that response also.

IMHO there will always be someone willing to take that path.


"Quoting Governor Palin: "We’re going to default eventually and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.” 

Have you ever lived through civil unrest in America, seen many thousands of paratroopers and marines at the ready guarding choke points and bridges, been sent to a detainment center without food or beds, held with many thousands and thousands of other people?"

Nope: Haven’t seen it.

The Germans never saw Hitler coming either. The Holocaust? First time for the Jews. Stalin? Russia never had that before either.

Didn’t Obama just ask new Generals if they would fire on Civilians?

They didn’t buy all those bullets for target practice.

Just because something never happened before doesn’t mean it won’t happen.


"How is Sarah wrong? DHS and several other government agencies have been buying up ammunition like never before. For example, why would the Social Security Administration need 174,000 rounds of .357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow point pistol ammunition? What’s with the NOAA ordering 46,000 rounds — also of hollow point ammunition? Since March, DHS has ordered 1.5 billion rounds, nearly half of which are hollow-point and/or wall-penetrating.

If you want to buy the line it’s all for “training,” go on ahead. I’m not so gullible."

Hollow points are used for training that is a fact. DHS has always used hollow points for practice. Hollow points were used for practice by the legacy agencies before DHS was created . I know that doesn’t jive with your CIVIL War II fantasies but it is the fact nonetheless.
Debating the “Sarah is the best American since George Washington crowd” combined with the “Black Helicopter Crowd” would be an exercise in futility.


By reading some of these posts about Palins comment I have to believe that y’all drank some of the Barry Hussein Soeotoro cool-aid. The best thing that could happen to our Country would be Sarah Palin as POTUS, she would clean up the Demorats and the Republicans.

CPAC Unwise to Snub Christie, Gays

Gays in the closet, fine.

Gays kissing in public and clamoring for “gay marriage” and pushing their agendas on me and my business and my house, FUGGEDABOUDIT!!!

Get out of my face with that, ok?

As for Christie, the moslem loving, gun banning, gay marriage “conservative”, I want nothing to do with him.


 Allowing the gays to open up at CPAC resulted in what seemed to be gay dominance.

We know we lost 2006 simply because the public perceived that the Republicans were overrun with homosexuals. They, the public, don't vote for homosexuals in the Republican party ~ at least not knowingly 

So, how many times can you lose 2006 before you figure it out.

Now if the gay folks want to give us money, and write fawning articles about our candidates, or even vote ~ all of that's fine. We do not want to have them identified as chief spokespersons for our candidates, nor do we want them to be our RNC chairmen or women or whatevers.

They keep their distance we'll be writing tax laws that protect the rich guys ~ but they gotta' stay back.

There should be no disagreement on this matter. 


"I don’t have a problem with gays. I have a problem with agenda driven gays."

An agenda driven by commie scumbags with an indeterminate percentage of homosexual involvement.


"Also, CPAC is chockablock with speakers who have a limited future -- or even a limited past -- in the Republican Party."

Yeah, people like Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz and Allen West. /s 

--- I know most of you are aware, but in case you're not, the /s means that the poster was being sarcastic. Which means he thinks that Sarah Palin, Ted Cruz, and Allen West are examples of people who have a long future or long past in the Republican Party. 


I for one am glad that the "C" in "CPAC" still stands for Conservative. 

Christie does not, alas, qualify. And since social conservatism is the basis for all conservatism since it teaches us the difference between right and wrong, CPAC is better off excluding those philosophies which destroy the traditional family unit. 


CPAC is right to ban gays. Any group that defines itself by a certain sex act has no place at a political conference.


The non-conservative sector of the GOP, the part we call the GOP-e, can call upon little more than 15% of the Republican vote, and then most of that is in states where we regularly lose.

What the GOP-e has done is to hunt up and corral wealthy former Democrat donors. They have misrepresented themselves as being the legitimate core of the party. The donors give them the money in the mistaken notion that they are real Republicans.

The result is we end up with a Romney and not a real Republican candidate for President, and a series of folks who run for senate who get plenty of money but who can't win.