The Gender Gap

Summary: Polls show Obama has a 20%+ lead among women over Romney.

Hold on to your hats, folks.

"Repeal the 19th."

I’m with you, and I’m a woman. If most women are that dumb, they don’t deserve to vote.

*

When the real campaign starts, there won’t be a person in America that doesn’t recognize Obama and his party as the party of the angry black man....bank on it.

*

The state run “media” sure is making women look dumb. Women need to rise up and tell them to knock it off with this kind of lying crap.

*

"As my political mentor Mary Jane Hollyday said about the earlier days of this Republic, “you all had the right thing going...women and %*^^@#s should have stayed out of it”."

Yep.

The 19th Amendment was the turning point in the history of the US. After that, government just got bigger and bigger and more intrusive... because women kept up the drumbeat for more, more, more, more.

It isn’t just the US, BTW. If you can read German or French, check out some of the writing on this topic in Switzerland. Same results. Women want government to be their Sugar Daddy. There are, of course, exceptions, but where we’re talking about the majority of women... they like their Sugar Daddy big and intrusive.

*

My own daughter warned me about this when she was in high school, a good conservative as I raised her. I tried to defend the 19th Amendment by pointing out smart girls such as her. She retorted that the airheads in her class had her kind outnumbered at least 2-1.

*

Fake poll with fake results.

Look at the source and look at the lack of internals. Let’s just remember the devastatingly poor polls that came out on Obummer last week with Likely Voters. This is the Obummer MSM manufacturing news to make him look electable. He is not.

*

Separate this into “married” and “single/divorced” and you’ll see where the problem lies.

Women are wired to seek a provider and protector, and if it’s not their father or husband, they look to the government.

*

Women have always voted 60-40% for the democrat. The founding fathers knew that women would instinctively vote for security over freedom which is why they didn’t give them the right to vote.

They can’t help it. It’s primordial instinct. Fortunately, 40% of them have evolved but that’s still the minority.

*

I think it’s pretty common among liberal women and SOME very gullible independent women. I have discussed this and overheard some conversations among women I go to school with that have them asserting that the Republicans are evil and out to “send women back to the dark ages,” kind of talk.

Republican women — much less gullible and not easily swayed, of course.

Some women, seriously, seem to have brains the size of peas.

*

The real gap is the marriage gap. The so-called gender gap is mostly caused by single women. Married women are more Republican than single men. The biggest gap of all is between single men and single women.

*

My sister-in-law, a terrific person, always voted Dem until she married my brother and brought a son in the world. She has used words such as “embarrassed” when she remembers some of the libs she help elect.

*

Santorum not only split the vote, he is now determined to drag this out, knowing that he can't even force a contested convention now.
This guy is the most clueless, arrogant, self absorbed jerk in the history of American Politics. He will ruin us all.

*

Unfortunately, to some women, especially single ones, government is Daddy, Husband, Lover and Provider all rolled up into one.

*

Women are “wired” that way.
The ‘rats and their mentor, Satan, knew what they were doing when they destroyed the support structure called “marriage” and “family”.

The title should say “Boosted by SINGLE AND DIVORCED women voters...”

*

Women have been voting for Democrats for years. If it weren't for this gender gap Democrats would lose every presidential election. Anyone who dismisses this poll is kidding themselves. Is it likely to be this bad come November? No. Is it possibly really this bad now? Yes. And come election day Obama will win the women's vote - probably by at least 5 points or more.

A simple look at wikipedia shows this persistence of this gender gap:

"In every presidential election year from 1980 - 2008 women have outnumbered men in voting Democratic and the same is true for men outnumbering women voting Republican. From 1980 forward there is a definitive difference in partisanship between male and female voters."

Part of the problem right now is Rick Santorum's actual opposition to contraception ended up confusing what should have been a winning issue for Republicans. Instead of talking about why Republicans support protecting religious organizations from being forced to cover contraception, the debate ended up being about why some Republicans (most notably Santorum) believe contraception is "not okay". If the question is whether birth control is "not okay", Republicans lose and lose big. If it is about protecting religious institutions from having to cover it, we win.

*

A lot of the women I know politically are mostly selfish, self centered, ditzes who only care about abortion, birth control, etc.

*

“Women. Can’t live with them, can’t ship them to Canada...”

No, but we can import better models. :)

Sure glad we gave them the vote.

*

Want to see the OBAMA voters? Simply tune in and check out the audiences on WWE, Maury Povich, Steve Wilkos, and Jerry Springer Shows and you will see all the OBAMA voters you will ever want to see in your lifetime.

*

Young single women want to go on killing their unborn babies. And now they really believe evil Republicans are going to completely ban contraception. The Fluke contraception deception worked perfectly.

*

"Women voters in general are easily scammed."

That they are. I’m here to tell you — they’re buying this issue hook, line, and sinker. Bunches of women I know are convinced that EVIL Republicans have only one agenda ...and that is to make birth control ILLEGAL in this country.

I kid you not. They are convinced. Rational, otherwise intelligent women. This flat out LIE has worked like a charm.

But, who is surprised. America has and is going down due to this very issue at the heart of it. We’ve contracepted ourselves so much that we’ve had to import workers. We have aborted so many we dont’ have a tax paying base anymore to support all the elderly OR the freeloading immigrants. Radical feminism has done its trick on this country ...and continues to do so, destroying marriage, family, and a strong moral base. Why be surprised? Many Women are in love with themselves and their own power and new-found freedom to screw up their lives with oblivion.

*

"Read the results closer. It points out that the main reason is because of the rhetoric Santorum is spewing, is giving these women the idea that Republicans will take away Contraceptives.."

Santorum is a bad reflection on all Republican candidates. His yammering on about having a national conversation about why contraception is "not okay" hurts all Republicans.

*

Santorum needs to man up, stop being selfish and get the hell out.
If Santorum were an actual good conservative candidate that didn't yammer on about contraception being "not okay", then I'd think it was great he was staying in and forcing Romney to earn the nomination. Unfortunately, Rick's belief that it is the President's job to have a national conversation on why contraception is "not okay" confuses the issue of the healthcare mandate and tarnishes all Republicans. His continued presence in the race just makes it easy for the media to lampoon all Republicans as being a party of backward old prudes that want to stop people from using rubbers and birth control pills. Once Santorum leaves the national stage and we can focus on the real problem of forcing religious organizations to insure that which they have a religious objection to, the gender gap problem will subside somewhat.

*

Radical feminism has done its trick on this country ...
And it all began with Betty Friedan, a Communist cadre who left college to work for a big Communist labor-union newspaper.

(She said later in a women's-magazine story I read, that she left college to follow a man, her boyfriend, who dumped her. Bullshine. She was a Communist, and the Party called her and put her to work on Feminism.)

*

This is why the Democrats want there to be as many "single mothers" as possible.
Government is their Sugar Daddy.

*

I think we are buying into the media narrative that MOST women are reflexively pro government supplied-abortion and birth control. The reality is more complicated. For example, polls indicate that a majority of married women are opposed to government subsidized abortion. Women DO tend to lean toward politicians who are for “peace” and “helping the poor.” And a candidate who displays “emotion” is likely to garner the distaff vote: Romney and Obummer are a wash there. And why this obsession with the women’s vote? Don't men count at all?

*

All Republicans are being tarred by Santorum’s ignorant rhetoric. The sooner he’s gone, the better.

*

I know I sound a bit harsh, but I cannot believe the Left has us conditioned to be so fearful and accepting of their bull sh*t!

Sorry, but this notion that women (with the exception of liberal hags) are all of a sudden supporting our Marxist-in-Cheif is complete and utter B.S.! I still cannot believe how compliant FReepers are to this crap!

Just wow.

*

Woman — Being fooled by snakes since the garden.

*

Another lie. What woman wants to be ruled by men and wear a burka?

*

Where do they find these women that will rally around a fool that is destroying the future of their children? I’m beside myself.

*

“Where do they find these women that will rally around a fool that is destroying the future of their children?”

The women I know that have children will be angrily voting against him because of those children; the few women I know that will still vote for Obama happen to be childless (and spinsters).

What do these freaks think we tell our children about Obama, his policies, and his followers? My kids are all ears; they find it fascinating.

Sandra Fluke’s Recreational Sex Partner (Barf Alert)

Main post: In case you’re wondering who is helping Sandra Fluke run up the allegedly unaffordable birth control bills she demands other people pay, there’s no need to wait for her amen corner in the “mainstream” media to look into it. The Graph has the answer: adam_mutterperl

The name is Adam Mutterperl, of the zillionaire moonbat Mutterperl clan. Some background:

The Mutterperl family, via Adam’s great grandfather Sol’s handbag fortune, established the “Mutterperl Scholarship Endowment Fund” in 1951 for Brandeis University. This school, as some people call it, is named for Louis Brandeis, a secular Jew, Zionist, and United States Supreme Court Justice appointed by Woodrow Wilson. Brandeis was a self-proclaimed socialist. Herbert Marcuse, the famous Frankfurt School Marxist, came to Brandeis in 1954, three years after the Mutterperl fund was created. Brandeis University is one of the nation’s leading petri dishes for anti-American and neo-Marxist thought.

It figures Adam would hit it off with Ms. Fluke. I wonder if she lets him call her “cutie pants”:

Just when I thought the Sandra Fluke spectacle could not possibly get any more pathetic.

On a tip from Ghost of FA Hayek.


Comments:



First we were told she was a 23-year-old student. Then it was revealed she was actually a 30-year-old radical leftwing activist. Is it just me or does she really look more like a 40-year-old frump?

*

"As long as she and her fellow N.A.G.s do not have any children while Conservatives have them I think long-term we’re going to be just fine."

In principle, yes. As long as the Conservative parents don't turn their children over to the brain-washers at the Government School Institutes - without proper training and protection. And they also need to guard their exposure to the atheistic and marxist pollutants that exudes out of their television sets.
Tough job for parents nowadays. Many predators out there trying to get at their children.

*

WOOF!

*

"Maybe I’m missing it, but why is this pertinent to the discussion?"

You are not missing it.

Nothing democrats do are pertinent to the discussion.

All the same just as with Miss Fluke’s mum, I would like to see Mr. Mutterperl’s mum come out and say that “she is proud her son is sleeping with...with...that woman”

Don’t hold your breath.

*

That dress is definitely a fashion no-no for this woman.

*

In general, I am not a fan of denigrating someone b/c of who they are vacationing/sleeping with.

Snookie excepted.

*

There comes a point in every woman's life, when her boobs are no longer governed by "anti-gravity" and no longer have to be held down lest their perkiness cause them to fly off into space.

Instead, they become content to sit in place and more or less point forward.

Some time after that, "gravity" takes over and effort is required to keep them up lest they drop to the waist.

Under no circumstances should that sort of "wrap-over-the-boobs" dress be worn by a woman who is no longer in the first category. Dear Sandra has moved into category two. If not three.

*

"This is the kind of woman beer-goggles were invented for."

Look at those arms, and the hands, are you sure she is a woman?

*

Mutterperl before swine?

Normally the name is Perlmutter. Did someone switch it at immigration or can’t they just spell properly?

What do you get when you mix a Fluke with a Mutterperl? - Two parasites instead of one.

If Fluke wants a 3 year supply of contraceptives, and she is attending law school, when does she have time to study?

This is a match made in Hell.

*

If she traded that DRESS in for a SOLID BLUE DRESS and wore it for the purpose in which a past BLUE DRESS was worn, she wouldn’t have to worry about birth control. But, she would probably start screaming for free knee pads and bibs.

I know I've been hitting the Fluke thing a lot, but it has been the subject of many a discussion over there, and I think it proves my theory that if Clinton had beat Obama in the primary and went on to become president, the meme would go "But don't call them sexist!"

How Did Rush Calling Fluke A Slut Make Her Feel?

The punchline to the title, by the way, is "whorrific".

Proud.

*

Actually when Rush called her a slut her boyfriend said that she “had made the big time!” He seemed proud.

*

She’s a professional Dem/leftist operative. It made her feel good because she was achieving her objective, which was to get a response that the left could use for cover for Obama.

Doesn’t matter if it was deserved, doesn’t matter if the behavior she describes and is promoting fits the definition of the word. Doesn’t matter if her cohorts on the left do far worse.

They believe the American people are basically stupid and easy to lead around by the nose...and they are willing to lie, decieve, fornicate, blackmail, and do whatever else it takes to push their agenda along at our expense.

I pray in the fall we show them how wrong they are, like we did in 2010.

*

> They believe the American people are basically stupid and
> easy to lead around by the nose.

They are correct in sufficient proportions to achieve their goals.

If we conservatives have many children, educate them ourselves or in school cooperatives with like-minded friends, relatives, and neighbors, keep them out of the looney left alternate-universe colleges, we have a chance of recovering this in a generation, if it’s not too late by then.

But for now, I fear that we are truly outnumbered.

*

She was worried.

She’s a submissive female that worries what guys think of her.

*

For her it was like winning the lottery. Her future is now secure. She will get her law degree, some marxist president in the future will make her a federal judge and she will use her position to help eviscerate the constitution and basic American values.

*

Probably made her feel good. When you are an attention whore you don't care too much where it is coming from.

*

Special!

Female Combat Pilot Wants to Kick Santorum 'in the Jimmy' for Remarks on Women

Excerpt: "A retired female fighter pilot running for former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' open seat in Congress said Friday that Rick Santorum's recent remarks on women in combat make her want to "go kick him in the jimmy."

Martha McSally, a retired US Air Force colonel and a veteran of the war in Afghanistan, is running in Arizona's congressional special election as a Republican. According to her Facebook page, she was the first American woman to fly in combat since the 1991 lifting of a ban on women in that role."

Great, we need more women on the front lines of combat. Let’s be like the muslims and put our women in harm’s way.

*

""Let’s be like the muslims and put our women in harm’s way."

The Israelis do it, too."

They used to, didn’t work. Now feminazis are trying again. I’m not going to bother finding links, did it a few days ago, and people who don’t want to know the facts won’t read them.

*

Many men get raped when they are in enemy hands. War is hell and terrible things happen to captured combatants.

However, it’s the simple fact that it’s reality that military readiness goes to pot when a femles screams and the males are reacting to the screams.

It wouldn’t surprise me, if some of the battles lost in Iraq and Afghanistan had to do with this simple fact.

There is room in the military for females, just not field combat conditions.

*

My question to her would be simple. Since she is a woman, how in the hell would she know what a man thinks or feels in such a situation?

*

I guess McSilly is entitled to her opinion. Doesn’t make it right.

*

I think we should make the feminazis who scream the loudest should be put right in the front lines(i.e., Hitlery Rotten Clinton, Patsy Schroeder, Gloria Steinman, Nancy Lugosi, etc.)

*

There are already legless females who piloted combat aircraft over Iraq and Afghanistan.

Our women folk need to be home raising the next generation of moral, charactered, Christian patriots. They should not be out on the front lines ; ESPECIALLY not those who have husbands and children back home.

*

Our womenfolk should be NOWHERE in harms way ; it speaks very poorly for our country that we send our women out to fight our wars in ANY capacity. It does not lead to sound home or family life either.

*

We keep seeing this chivalry angle about women in combat. I think it’s a losing argument because it’s mostly hypothetical. I think it’s much better to bring up what is already occuring and that is troops are humping like rabbits. Anytime a women is introduced into an all male unit the dynamic of unit cohesion is changed. Now the men in the unit have to be concerned about everthing they say lest they be charged with sexual harassment and have their careers ended. When the chick has sex with one member of the unit, it creates hostility and jealousy among the other troops. One woman, even at the very bottom of military heirarchy can destroy moral and cohesion of an entire unit.

*

She should kick Anthony in the wiener who married a Muslim assistant to Hillary Clinton.

*

" I am of the wrong generation, brought up to believe it didn’t matter what I was skilled at, not to waste my time with an education. I was just going to be a wife and mother. I have been married 41 years, and have raised a set of twins, boy and girl (who was in the Navy), now 37. I accomplished what my parents wanted for me. And I would not change a thing that would have not allowed me to raise these amazing children of mine.

However, I believe women are capable of a variety of skills much better than men. My own daughter was 5’4”, and could take down of man of 200+ pounds with her boot at his throat in a matter of seconds. Women are much more capable that they are given credit for."

Ya see the problem is, they give people like you the right to vote...To prove my point, just look at the state of affairs and your own words.

Ya got the same attitude the leftist do in big cities, when the send 5'4" females into the brutal senseless murder districts where extremely violent people rule.

Anyone thinking this is a good idea has brain rot.

*

I have no problem with Santorum’s rhetoric. It’s often taken out of context, misrepresenting his views. Contrary to what the antagonists say, he’s not a Rightwing hard ass. He has an affable heart, and wants the best for everyone. He’s not the mean-spirited troglodyte the Left is painting him out to be. He’s really a good guy.

My issue with Rick is Liberty, how he votes, and his inability to win the General.

I know many here don’t like Newt, but I’m convinced he’s the only candidate at this point that has the ability to turn things around.

I want my damn Country back. I don’t need to feel good about who I’m voting for.

*

I think women should go into combat and carry a rifle, they should be grunts. But they have to register for the draft and not be eligible for any student aid if they do not. They will simple get pregnant and the men will do the fighting. It happens in every unit the deploys.

*

I think women should go into combat and carry a rifle, they should be grunts. But they have to register for the draft and not be eligible for any student aid if they do not. They will simple get pregnant and the men will do the fighting. It happens in every unit the deploys.

*

If Rick Santorum becomes President Santorum, this woman should think twice about threatening to kick him in the “jimmy” or anywhere else. She might have the Secret Service knocking on her door.

*

Women shouldn’t be in combat, period...For numerous reasons mentioned thousands of times.

In fact, there are plenty of men that can pilot that same aircraft and do it better, and have better chances of survival/escape going down behind enemy lines.

PC and leftist idiotic thinking, gets people killed all the time.

*

Just the emotional response you’d expect from a woman.

*

Women in the FREE and CHRISTIAN world are FREE and men don’t use them as tools and shelters.

We are not muslims

*

When a people lose their child bearing age women, then they lose the ability to reproduce, that is why female life is so precious, not to mention that if Western man ever truly comes to see the weaker sex as nothing special and not due any special consideration, then we will have become savages, and the weaker sex would not like to actually see that goofy fantasy, be reality.

Might makes right, a sexually unaware warrior culture of ranking based purely on strength and successful aggression, would make women lowly indeed.

*

She sounds like one of those feminist types.....how precious.

When you can run as fast as me, carry as much as me, have the same (as in the same; not the same-same but different crap), physical fitness test standards as me, combat fitness test standards as me, go thorough the same infantry schooling as me.....then we'll talk.

Until then, STFU and make dinner.

*

In fact, McSally’s remarks are sexist in the extreme. What would happen if a male threatened to assault sensitive parts of a woman’s anatomy?

*

Combat pilots have historically experienced relatively high rates of imprisonment in anything less than completely asymmetrical warfare. The tragic burden of Col. McSally's poorly thought out policy will be born by future female P.O.W.s. They may end up getting something far worse that being "kicked in their Jimmy's" many times each day for years at a time.

*

Obviously this woman cannot think/reason beyond her vagina.

*

How many have perished because female cops and firefighters didn't have the upper body strength to rescue them?
How many have died for a politically correct ideology that denies simple biological fact.
And how many will die because women are mixed with men in combat?
There was an entire fire crew out West several years ago who were all burned to death in a fast moving brush fire because the men waited for the women—this stuff happens a lot but it's un PC to report it.

"Historic Marine base gets 1st-ever female general"

Article from AP via Google

Feminization of the country proceeds, closely followed by homosexualization.

*

I do not feel more secure.

*

"The Times They Are a'Changing... "

And definitely not for the better.

*

Parallel with Rome?

I sure feel better now that she is in charge don’t you? Isn’t it just wonderful?

Makes me retch.

*

"While this matters to the diversity crowd, it matters not at all to the military. I served under any number of competent and capable women in the military. Though what mattered to me was the rank on their hat or collar, not their sex."

But their sex DID matter in their recruitment and all along the line in the standards lowered for them to be placed and “succeed” and advance ahead of better qualified males "Competence" is nice but it used to be the absolute bottom line. Now it's a great reference. The feminization of the force and our culture is finshed.

*

It'll be hard for her to insult them about “sucking di*ks” and stuff like that. This is wrong on so many levels.

*

It’s a good thing we don’t have a real peer enemy right now. We’d lose a major war.