This media circus happened so fast that I'm skipping to the end.
"She wants to put the toothpaste back into the tube."
Nope... she’s trying to recall a stinky release of intellectual flatus.
*
Hey Obama, this girl is an albatross around your neck and you won’t be able to remove it...
*
Hilary Rosen is a trashy gay lesbian!
*
She was FORCED to appolize. This was a disaster for his excellency. At first she stonewalled. After a visit by the imperial enforcer, she RELUCTANTLY issued a mia culpa for HAVING SAID IT, not for thinking it.
*
Panther symp Michelle Williams apologized for her racist tirade the other day, now Hilary Rosen gets her mea culpa going. At the risk of sounding sexist, are liberal “womyn” in need of anger management therapy?
*
That ship has sailed. Rosen blew this whole phoney issue for the Rats. It was all they had to distract from Obummers record. Rosen is going to be persona non grats at the DNC headquarters for sure.
Good to see we exposed and destroyed this BS meme they were selling about the GOP hating women.
*
Disdain for stay at home moms is so common among leftie femists that she didn’t think twice about saying it in the first place. The fact that many familes make economic sacrifices so they don’t have to have strangers caring for their kids is alien to her,
*
It just goes along with everything else of the left -
if God values it, they hate it.
*
A LESBIAN PSYCHOTIC attacking someone for being a full time mother? How bout Moochelle making almost 400 K for doing nothing at the University of Chicago???
Then we have Jay Carney who couldn't live without a script just like Barry can't speak without a teleprompter.
And I don't consider that lesbian fascist as a mother. Her children will turn into lunatics from being raised by a creature like her...
And are her "children" adopted or created with a turkey baster?
*
The real problem that these radical lesbian Democrat dingbats don’t understand, is that a LOT of women who are not stay-at-home-moms WOULD LIKE TO BE, and envy those who can do it.
It’s backfiring in their faces, and they don’t understand why.
They were told this would be a perfectly good attack line!
*
it is disgusting that some creature like that is going to criticize a stay at home mom.
How bout the stay at home welfare bums who wait each day for more Obamabucks???
*
So just wondering out loud if the “StopRush” group who was mad that Rush called Fluke a “SLUT” will form a “StopRosen” group and demand she be taking off the air for her slap in the face to All women!
*
Hillary Rosen is a vicious viper. All of her kind are in need of therapy. They all are baby killers and that’s where all their problems start. They hate babies so they want to abort all of them. All of their other foolish thinking stems from this basic non-Christian value of killing defenseless human beings.
*
I would guess Rosen as she is playing the role of a sterotypical male sexist pig trashing women. She probably splits and scratches her crouch a lot,too.
*
Goodie for you.
Now apologize to the millions of OTHER stay at home moms you insulted, you worthless POS!
*
Oh yea, Moochelle has defended Ann Romney....I’m sure she doesn’t want people to start to talk about the fact that she is a millionaire.....who had a fairly wealthy upbringing, has no job.....and still can’t be bothered to raise her own children, instead using her mother as an indentured servant while she runs around in boob belts trying to become a television star.....
*
"I have to admit that I agreed with some of what Rosen said concerning Anne Romney.
I was a homemaker for many years before entering the work force...and I can attest to the fact very little of homemaking prepared me for the world outside my home....though I had volunteered in various organizations, and did fund-raising etc. And also participated in my husbands business... It is a another beast altogether to adjust simply punching a time clock! Getting “permission to take a bathroom break”...Let alone work for someone else which your income and such is dependent on your performance.
I don't believe that Mrs. Romney has a clue to the emotional and mental impact a woman has when she alone, or with her husband, has to do to make life work at home AND in the workplace. Not even remotely.
She speaks of how difficult work raising a family is....well most woman do that ‘in addition’ to working a 40 hr. week. They do not have the “leisure” of working their own schedule, but are fixed on times and places in order to juggle the work load of both home and Work.
So no...I don't think Anne Romney does understand the plight of many woman....she was and is, as I later saw myself,...”protected and sheltered” from having to deal with
the realities of “provision” and making ends meet along with raising a family. Further it's much doubtful Anne has ever known basic needs going unmet....so her world is vastly different then most. She and Romney are of the elite...and that's a far cry from the average working class man or woman."
I find your post despicable. I don’t care how much money her husband has or how liberal you claim she is. She stayed home and raised five children, has dealt with cancer and has MS. Let me know when you do the same.
Some of you people really make me think some conservatives are as bad, if not worse, than some liberals. I guess you’re just mad she was smart enough to pick a spouse who could support them so she could stay home and raise the children they decided to have.
Are you aware that the Romney’s never had any money until his work at Bain paid off? They weren’t always wealthy and had no help from their parents.
*
Well, Rosen is stupid, and Obama deserves it. It’s what happens when you prop up the like of slut Fluke. They open their mouth and defeat the democrate strategy of portraying conservatives as being at war against women.
*
The real name of that game is...say what you want, get the word out..create havoc...then apologise after the fact.
Interesting factoids on how Rosen is tied to the Obama Adminisration:
Hilary Rosen Visited The Obama White House At Least 35 Times.
Former CIA director and current Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, 12 times.
Perhaps most surprisingly, the name “Joseph R. Biden” appears . . . 6 times.
Geitner 40 times...so she’s close to as significant as Geitner.
the notion that Rosen is just some Democrat talking head, completely disconnected from the Obama administration and campaign is . . . not plausible.
*
"The undeniable truth is that the vast majority of the “elite” inside the beltway mom’s, whether they stay at home and raise children or work for a paycheck, or whether they have a “R” or a “D” after their name, have no comprehension of what life is like on Main Street."
That's exactly right.....but this does not mean we go to war against those who've earned and worked for their wealth....which is what Obamas pushing...class warfare.
He's successfully got the nation, along with the media complying, talking about Zimmerman, (race), religion is now on the table and causing division, and now woman. None of which these have to do with his dismal record but all have to do with playing the piped pipers tune to see who goes along....and the nation yields. How foolish and ignorant we truly are.
*
Ann Romney can’t comment about working moms but Big Ears is quailified to comment about military, owning a business, being an American, holding a real job, the Supreme Court rulings, transparency, etc.
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Friday, April 13, 2012
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Rockwall teacher fired for out-of-wedlock pregnancy
Summary: Christian school fires unwed woman for becoming pregnant.
She signed a contract that probably had clear rules of behavior. My wife works at a private school and has a contract that has things like no drinking, no smoking, etc. There is no mystery, it is just a matter of honoring your word in the contract you agreed to.
*
"I’m a Christian and I don’t believe this is right.
Christians beat their chest about abortion and contraception and then ostracize women who become pregnant out of wedlock.
So much for loving the mother and child...
And I doubt the fourth grader is going to know or care that she was or wasn’t married"
And is it Christian to bring a baby into this world without a husband and the protection of marriage? Just watch Maurie every day to see the ridiculous results of disgusting behavior.
This is basically no different that Obummer trying to force the Christian organizations to provide and pay for abortions, birth control pills, etc., which run against their very dear teachings.
I hope this teacher stays fired because of a signed behavior code and cannot come back.
*
Wouldn’t it have been simpler for her to just get married.
*
This is a Christian school, and every school has a handbook that is handed out every year, to teachers. Among the many requirements is a "Morality Clause". This means, no drunken orgies, no drug use, don't molest students at home, do not be seen by students going into local bars, drinking in public, swearing in public - and many other items.
She knew she was in violation of the school policy - now seems shocked to see that the policy is being enforced. There are other schools with lower standards out there; but is seems pretty hypocritical to tell young teenage girls not to have sex, or to use birth control - then have an unwed and pregnant teacher as a role model.
*
So. You would have no problem with sending your child to a school with hypcrites for teachers?
“Christians beat their chest about abortion and contraception and then ostracize women who become pregnant out of wedlock.”
I guess your solution would be for us to just shut up about abortion and contraception.
Hoo boy.
*
Another example where someone who doesn’t follow the rules, wants everyone else to break theirs so she doesn’t have to take responsibility.
She had the choice to not have sex while being unmarried and knew she had a chance to get pregnant and lose her job. She loses.
Go find baby daddy to get your hospital bill and pre natel care along with child support. Instead she chooses to do it with a lawsuit so we all pay.
*
we’ll be paying a lot more when she receives welfare and food stamps.
*
You are way off. The school has an obligation and a privilege to provide the students with walking talking examples of “practicing what they preach”. Her job is not charity! She is obviously a walking contradiction and the children should not be exposed to her or her fouled witness.
*
"What if she was raped and decided to keep the baby? Should she be punished? Your sense of morality is full of holes and you also know nothing about the circumstances here."
What if? Really?
OK, I can play that game. What if she was the Virgin Mary???
Sheesh.
And YOU castigate others for knowing “nothing about the circumstances here”?
*
She should be on her knees giving thanks that this wasn’t a Muslim school.
She signed a contract that probably had clear rules of behavior. My wife works at a private school and has a contract that has things like no drinking, no smoking, etc. There is no mystery, it is just a matter of honoring your word in the contract you agreed to.
*
"I’m a Christian and I don’t believe this is right.
Christians beat their chest about abortion and contraception and then ostracize women who become pregnant out of wedlock.
So much for loving the mother and child...
And I doubt the fourth grader is going to know or care that she was or wasn’t married"
And is it Christian to bring a baby into this world without a husband and the protection of marriage? Just watch Maurie every day to see the ridiculous results of disgusting behavior.
This is basically no different that Obummer trying to force the Christian organizations to provide and pay for abortions, birth control pills, etc., which run against their very dear teachings.
I hope this teacher stays fired because of a signed behavior code and cannot come back.
*
Wouldn’t it have been simpler for her to just get married.
*
This is a Christian school, and every school has a handbook that is handed out every year, to teachers. Among the many requirements is a "Morality Clause". This means, no drunken orgies, no drug use, don't molest students at home, do not be seen by students going into local bars, drinking in public, swearing in public - and many other items.
She knew she was in violation of the school policy - now seems shocked to see that the policy is being enforced. There are other schools with lower standards out there; but is seems pretty hypocritical to tell young teenage girls not to have sex, or to use birth control - then have an unwed and pregnant teacher as a role model.
*
So. You would have no problem with sending your child to a school with hypcrites for teachers?
“Christians beat their chest about abortion and contraception and then ostracize women who become pregnant out of wedlock.”
I guess your solution would be for us to just shut up about abortion and contraception.
Hoo boy.
*
Another example where someone who doesn’t follow the rules, wants everyone else to break theirs so she doesn’t have to take responsibility.
She had the choice to not have sex while being unmarried and knew she had a chance to get pregnant and lose her job. She loses.
Go find baby daddy to get your hospital bill and pre natel care along with child support. Instead she chooses to do it with a lawsuit so we all pay.
*
we’ll be paying a lot more when she receives welfare and food stamps.
*
You are way off. The school has an obligation and a privilege to provide the students with walking talking examples of “practicing what they preach”. Her job is not charity! She is obviously a walking contradiction and the children should not be exposed to her or her fouled witness.
*
"What if she was raped and decided to keep the baby? Should she be punished? Your sense of morality is full of holes and you also know nothing about the circumstances here."
What if? Really?
OK, I can play that game. What if she was the Virgin Mary???
Sheesh.
And YOU castigate others for knowing “nothing about the circumstances here”?
*
She should be on her knees giving thanks that this wasn’t a Muslim school.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
The Gender Gap
Summary: Polls show Obama has a 20%+ lead among women over Romney.
Hold on to your hats, folks.
"Repeal the 19th."
I’m with you, and I’m a woman. If most women are that dumb, they don’t deserve to vote.
*
When the real campaign starts, there won’t be a person in America that doesn’t recognize Obama and his party as the party of the angry black man....bank on it.
*
The state run “media” sure is making women look dumb. Women need to rise up and tell them to knock it off with this kind of lying crap.
*
"As my political mentor Mary Jane Hollyday said about the earlier days of this Republic, “you all had the right thing going...women and %*^^@#s should have stayed out of it”."
Yep.
The 19th Amendment was the turning point in the history of the US. After that, government just got bigger and bigger and more intrusive... because women kept up the drumbeat for more, more, more, more.
It isn’t just the US, BTW. If you can read German or French, check out some of the writing on this topic in Switzerland. Same results. Women want government to be their Sugar Daddy. There are, of course, exceptions, but where we’re talking about the majority of women... they like their Sugar Daddy big and intrusive.
*
My own daughter warned me about this when she was in high school, a good conservative as I raised her. I tried to defend the 19th Amendment by pointing out smart girls such as her. She retorted that the airheads in her class had her kind outnumbered at least 2-1.
*
Fake poll with fake results.
Look at the source and look at the lack of internals. Let’s just remember the devastatingly poor polls that came out on Obummer last week with Likely Voters. This is the Obummer MSM manufacturing news to make him look electable. He is not.
*
Separate this into “married” and “single/divorced” and you’ll see where the problem lies.
Women are wired to seek a provider and protector, and if it’s not their father or husband, they look to the government.
*
Women have always voted 60-40% for the democrat. The founding fathers knew that women would instinctively vote for security over freedom which is why they didn’t give them the right to vote.
They can’t help it. It’s primordial instinct. Fortunately, 40% of them have evolved but that’s still the minority.
*
I think it’s pretty common among liberal women and SOME very gullible independent women. I have discussed this and overheard some conversations among women I go to school with that have them asserting that the Republicans are evil and out to “send women back to the dark ages,” kind of talk.
Republican women — much less gullible and not easily swayed, of course.
Some women, seriously, seem to have brains the size of peas.
*
The real gap is the marriage gap. The so-called gender gap is mostly caused by single women. Married women are more Republican than single men. The biggest gap of all is between single men and single women.
*
My sister-in-law, a terrific person, always voted Dem until she married my brother and brought a son in the world. She has used words such as “embarrassed” when she remembers some of the libs she help elect.
*
Santorum not only split the vote, he is now determined to drag this out, knowing that he can't even force a contested convention now.
This guy is the most clueless, arrogant, self absorbed jerk in the history of American Politics. He will ruin us all.
*
Unfortunately, to some women, especially single ones, government is Daddy, Husband, Lover and Provider all rolled up into one.
*
Women are “wired” that way.
The ‘rats and their mentor, Satan, knew what they were doing when they destroyed the support structure called “marriage” and “family”.
The title should say “Boosted by SINGLE AND DIVORCED women voters...”
*
Women have been voting for Democrats for years. If it weren't for this gender gap Democrats would lose every presidential election. Anyone who dismisses this poll is kidding themselves. Is it likely to be this bad come November? No. Is it possibly really this bad now? Yes. And come election day Obama will win the women's vote - probably by at least 5 points or more.
A simple look at wikipedia shows this persistence of this gender gap:
"In every presidential election year from 1980 - 2008 women have outnumbered men in voting Democratic and the same is true for men outnumbering women voting Republican. From 1980 forward there is a definitive difference in partisanship between male and female voters."
Part of the problem right now is Rick Santorum's actual opposition to contraception ended up confusing what should have been a winning issue for Republicans. Instead of talking about why Republicans support protecting religious organizations from being forced to cover contraception, the debate ended up being about why some Republicans (most notably Santorum) believe contraception is "not okay". If the question is whether birth control is "not okay", Republicans lose and lose big. If it is about protecting religious institutions from having to cover it, we win.
*
A lot of the women I know politically are mostly selfish, self centered, ditzes who only care about abortion, birth control, etc.
*
“Women. Can’t live with them, can’t ship them to Canada...”
No, but we can import better models. :)
Sure glad we gave them the vote.
*
Want to see the OBAMA voters? Simply tune in and check out the audiences on WWE, Maury Povich, Steve Wilkos, and Jerry Springer Shows and you will see all the OBAMA voters you will ever want to see in your lifetime.
*
Young single women want to go on killing their unborn babies. And now they really believe evil Republicans are going to completely ban contraception. The Fluke contraception deception worked perfectly.
*
"Women voters in general are easily scammed."
That they are. I’m here to tell you — they’re buying this issue hook, line, and sinker. Bunches of women I know are convinced that EVIL Republicans have only one agenda ...and that is to make birth control ILLEGAL in this country.
I kid you not. They are convinced. Rational, otherwise intelligent women. This flat out LIE has worked like a charm.
But, who is surprised. America has and is going down due to this very issue at the heart of it. We’ve contracepted ourselves so much that we’ve had to import workers. We have aborted so many we dont’ have a tax paying base anymore to support all the elderly OR the freeloading immigrants. Radical feminism has done its trick on this country ...and continues to do so, destroying marriage, family, and a strong moral base. Why be surprised? Many Women are in love with themselves and their own power and new-found freedom to screw up their lives with oblivion.
*
"Read the results closer. It points out that the main reason is because of the rhetoric Santorum is spewing, is giving these women the idea that Republicans will take away Contraceptives.."
Santorum is a bad reflection on all Republican candidates. His yammering on about having a national conversation about why contraception is "not okay" hurts all Republicans.
*
Santorum needs to man up, stop being selfish and get the hell out.
If Santorum were an actual good conservative candidate that didn't yammer on about contraception being "not okay", then I'd think it was great he was staying in and forcing Romney to earn the nomination. Unfortunately, Rick's belief that it is the President's job to have a national conversation on why contraception is "not okay" confuses the issue of the healthcare mandate and tarnishes all Republicans. His continued presence in the race just makes it easy for the media to lampoon all Republicans as being a party of backward old prudes that want to stop people from using rubbers and birth control pills. Once Santorum leaves the national stage and we can focus on the real problem of forcing religious organizations to insure that which they have a religious objection to, the gender gap problem will subside somewhat.
*
Radical feminism has done its trick on this country ...
And it all began with Betty Friedan, a Communist cadre who left college to work for a big Communist labor-union newspaper.
(She said later in a women's-magazine story I read, that she left college to follow a man, her boyfriend, who dumped her. Bullshine. She was a Communist, and the Party called her and put her to work on Feminism.)
*
This is why the Democrats want there to be as many "single mothers" as possible.
Government is their Sugar Daddy.
*
I think we are buying into the media narrative that MOST women are reflexively pro government supplied-abortion and birth control. The reality is more complicated. For example, polls indicate that a majority of married women are opposed to government subsidized abortion. Women DO tend to lean toward politicians who are for “peace” and “helping the poor.” And a candidate who displays “emotion” is likely to garner the distaff vote: Romney and Obummer are a wash there. And why this obsession with the women’s vote? Don't men count at all?
*
All Republicans are being tarred by Santorum’s ignorant rhetoric. The sooner he’s gone, the better.
*
I know I sound a bit harsh, but I cannot believe the Left has us conditioned to be so fearful and accepting of their bull sh*t!
Sorry, but this notion that women (with the exception of liberal hags) are all of a sudden supporting our Marxist-in-Cheif is complete and utter B.S.! I still cannot believe how compliant FReepers are to this crap!
Just wow.
*
Woman — Being fooled by snakes since the garden.
*
Another lie. What woman wants to be ruled by men and wear a burka?
*
Where do they find these women that will rally around a fool that is destroying the future of their children? I’m beside myself.
*
“Where do they find these women that will rally around a fool that is destroying the future of their children?”
The women I know that have children will be angrily voting against him because of those children; the few women I know that will still vote for Obama happen to be childless (and spinsters).
What do these freaks think we tell our children about Obama, his policies, and his followers? My kids are all ears; they find it fascinating.
Hold on to your hats, folks.
"Repeal the 19th."
I’m with you, and I’m a woman. If most women are that dumb, they don’t deserve to vote.
*
When the real campaign starts, there won’t be a person in America that doesn’t recognize Obama and his party as the party of the angry black man....bank on it.
*
The state run “media” sure is making women look dumb. Women need to rise up and tell them to knock it off with this kind of lying crap.
*
"As my political mentor Mary Jane Hollyday said about the earlier days of this Republic, “you all had the right thing going...women and %*^^@#s should have stayed out of it”."
Yep.
The 19th Amendment was the turning point in the history of the US. After that, government just got bigger and bigger and more intrusive... because women kept up the drumbeat for more, more, more, more.
It isn’t just the US, BTW. If you can read German or French, check out some of the writing on this topic in Switzerland. Same results. Women want government to be their Sugar Daddy. There are, of course, exceptions, but where we’re talking about the majority of women... they like their Sugar Daddy big and intrusive.
*
My own daughter warned me about this when she was in high school, a good conservative as I raised her. I tried to defend the 19th Amendment by pointing out smart girls such as her. She retorted that the airheads in her class had her kind outnumbered at least 2-1.
*
Fake poll with fake results.
Look at the source and look at the lack of internals. Let’s just remember the devastatingly poor polls that came out on Obummer last week with Likely Voters. This is the Obummer MSM manufacturing news to make him look electable. He is not.
*
Separate this into “married” and “single/divorced” and you’ll see where the problem lies.
Women are wired to seek a provider and protector, and if it’s not their father or husband, they look to the government.
*
Women have always voted 60-40% for the democrat. The founding fathers knew that women would instinctively vote for security over freedom which is why they didn’t give them the right to vote.
They can’t help it. It’s primordial instinct. Fortunately, 40% of them have evolved but that’s still the minority.
*
I think it’s pretty common among liberal women and SOME very gullible independent women. I have discussed this and overheard some conversations among women I go to school with that have them asserting that the Republicans are evil and out to “send women back to the dark ages,” kind of talk.
Republican women — much less gullible and not easily swayed, of course.
Some women, seriously, seem to have brains the size of peas.
*
The real gap is the marriage gap. The so-called gender gap is mostly caused by single women. Married women are more Republican than single men. The biggest gap of all is between single men and single women.
*
My sister-in-law, a terrific person, always voted Dem until she married my brother and brought a son in the world. She has used words such as “embarrassed” when she remembers some of the libs she help elect.
*
Santorum not only split the vote, he is now determined to drag this out, knowing that he can't even force a contested convention now.
This guy is the most clueless, arrogant, self absorbed jerk in the history of American Politics. He will ruin us all.
*
Unfortunately, to some women, especially single ones, government is Daddy, Husband, Lover and Provider all rolled up into one.
*
Women are “wired” that way.
The ‘rats and their mentor, Satan, knew what they were doing when they destroyed the support structure called “marriage” and “family”.
The title should say “Boosted by SINGLE AND DIVORCED women voters...”
*
Women have been voting for Democrats for years. If it weren't for this gender gap Democrats would lose every presidential election. Anyone who dismisses this poll is kidding themselves. Is it likely to be this bad come November? No. Is it possibly really this bad now? Yes. And come election day Obama will win the women's vote - probably by at least 5 points or more.
A simple look at wikipedia shows this persistence of this gender gap:
"In every presidential election year from 1980 - 2008 women have outnumbered men in voting Democratic and the same is true for men outnumbering women voting Republican. From 1980 forward there is a definitive difference in partisanship between male and female voters."
Part of the problem right now is Rick Santorum's actual opposition to contraception ended up confusing what should have been a winning issue for Republicans. Instead of talking about why Republicans support protecting religious organizations from being forced to cover contraception, the debate ended up being about why some Republicans (most notably Santorum) believe contraception is "not okay". If the question is whether birth control is "not okay", Republicans lose and lose big. If it is about protecting religious institutions from having to cover it, we win.
*
A lot of the women I know politically are mostly selfish, self centered, ditzes who only care about abortion, birth control, etc.
*
“Women. Can’t live with them, can’t ship them to Canada...”
No, but we can import better models. :)
Sure glad we gave them the vote.
*
Want to see the OBAMA voters? Simply tune in and check out the audiences on WWE, Maury Povich, Steve Wilkos, and Jerry Springer Shows and you will see all the OBAMA voters you will ever want to see in your lifetime.
*
Young single women want to go on killing their unborn babies. And now they really believe evil Republicans are going to completely ban contraception. The Fluke contraception deception worked perfectly.
*
"Women voters in general are easily scammed."
That they are. I’m here to tell you — they’re buying this issue hook, line, and sinker. Bunches of women I know are convinced that EVIL Republicans have only one agenda ...and that is to make birth control ILLEGAL in this country.
I kid you not. They are convinced. Rational, otherwise intelligent women. This flat out LIE has worked like a charm.
But, who is surprised. America has and is going down due to this very issue at the heart of it. We’ve contracepted ourselves so much that we’ve had to import workers. We have aborted so many we dont’ have a tax paying base anymore to support all the elderly OR the freeloading immigrants. Radical feminism has done its trick on this country ...and continues to do so, destroying marriage, family, and a strong moral base. Why be surprised? Many Women are in love with themselves and their own power and new-found freedom to screw up their lives with oblivion.
*
"Read the results closer. It points out that the main reason is because of the rhetoric Santorum is spewing, is giving these women the idea that Republicans will take away Contraceptives.."
Santorum is a bad reflection on all Republican candidates. His yammering on about having a national conversation about why contraception is "not okay" hurts all Republicans.
*
Santorum needs to man up, stop being selfish and get the hell out.
If Santorum were an actual good conservative candidate that didn't yammer on about contraception being "not okay", then I'd think it was great he was staying in and forcing Romney to earn the nomination. Unfortunately, Rick's belief that it is the President's job to have a national conversation on why contraception is "not okay" confuses the issue of the healthcare mandate and tarnishes all Republicans. His continued presence in the race just makes it easy for the media to lampoon all Republicans as being a party of backward old prudes that want to stop people from using rubbers and birth control pills. Once Santorum leaves the national stage and we can focus on the real problem of forcing religious organizations to insure that which they have a religious objection to, the gender gap problem will subside somewhat.
*
Radical feminism has done its trick on this country ...
And it all began with Betty Friedan, a Communist cadre who left college to work for a big Communist labor-union newspaper.
(She said later in a women's-magazine story I read, that she left college to follow a man, her boyfriend, who dumped her. Bullshine. She was a Communist, and the Party called her and put her to work on Feminism.)
*
This is why the Democrats want there to be as many "single mothers" as possible.
Government is their Sugar Daddy.
*
I think we are buying into the media narrative that MOST women are reflexively pro government supplied-abortion and birth control. The reality is more complicated. For example, polls indicate that a majority of married women are opposed to government subsidized abortion. Women DO tend to lean toward politicians who are for “peace” and “helping the poor.” And a candidate who displays “emotion” is likely to garner the distaff vote: Romney and Obummer are a wash there. And why this obsession with the women’s vote? Don't men count at all?
*
All Republicans are being tarred by Santorum’s ignorant rhetoric. The sooner he’s gone, the better.
*
I know I sound a bit harsh, but I cannot believe the Left has us conditioned to be so fearful and accepting of their bull sh*t!
Sorry, but this notion that women (with the exception of liberal hags) are all of a sudden supporting our Marxist-in-Cheif is complete and utter B.S.! I still cannot believe how compliant FReepers are to this crap!
Just wow.
*
Woman — Being fooled by snakes since the garden.
*
Another lie. What woman wants to be ruled by men and wear a burka?
*
Where do they find these women that will rally around a fool that is destroying the future of their children? I’m beside myself.
*
“Where do they find these women that will rally around a fool that is destroying the future of their children?”
The women I know that have children will be angrily voting against him because of those children; the few women I know that will still vote for Obama happen to be childless (and spinsters).
What do these freaks think we tell our children about Obama, his policies, and his followers? My kids are all ears; they find it fascinating.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Pro-life 'October Baby' rejected by major studios, blitzes box office
For some reason, I find the phrase "blitzes box office" to be confusing, since "bombing" means failing. Here, "blitzing" means that the film is doing very well.
The plot is apparently about a young woman who collapses and, while getting a slew of medical tests, finds out that she was the fetus in a failed abortion attempt, and then her mother gave her up for adoption.
Hollyweird is going to find that with the way entertainment is delivered these days, they are irrelevant. With Netflix, On Demand, Roku I don’t need to rely on these toads to see a movie that interests me and disregard their Left wing crap. I am sure there are millions of other doing the same thing. I can’t wait till all the theaters in the country are turned into Olive Gardens and independent movie producers overtake the big studios.
*
"The film almost didn't see the light of day."
As well as the protagonist in the movie. She almost didn't see the light of day, either.
This movie will not be shown at the White House. Well! Maybe in 2013.
*
You know... it's just a shame that a half-white, half-arab mulatto who was trained in socialism and Marxism was elected President and has done such a bad job, and claims to be 'black'. If I were 'black' (and I have been for short periods of time), I would be ashamed of the 'white Negro'.
Couldn't the black part of America's populace find someone better?
Heck, I voted for Herman Cain.
*
The movie is fantastic and not, “Preachy.” My Lovely felt like it was the best movie she has ever seen.
It moved me as much or more (in different ways) than Act of Valor which I also hugely recommend.
*
My husband and I saw this movie Sat. night with friends. Our local paper (leftist) had given it a sour review, but we found the movie to be terrific and give it 4 thumbs up.
The movie is about the survivor of an attempted abortion who finds out that she is adopted, an abortion survivor, and had a twin brother who did not survive — all in one accidental disclosure. Rather than being a downer, the rest of the movie is how this angry teen is treated with love, respect, and kindness by parents, peers, and strangers as she seeks her birth mother and seeks to discovedr who she really is. There are many twists and turns in the plot, but it is well done. And, there are no steamy sex scenes and no bad language. This is family fare, as long as the kids (teen and above) already know about abortion.
It is the antithesis of The Hunger Game where the teens are forced to kill each other.
*
m Critics like:
Excessive Violence, Graphic Violence, Graphic Sex, Foul Language, Nudity, poor plots...
So this film probably has very little of that!
Two very low budget movies I liked were: Bella and The Mighty Macs. Neither of those flicks had much of anything objectionable, though there was one scene in Mighty Macs I found hard to believe.
The worst of Bella was the waitress being fired for being late the 3rd time.
Compare that with your typical bloody/sexy/foul mouthed Hollywood film of today
The plot is apparently about a young woman who collapses and, while getting a slew of medical tests, finds out that she was the fetus in a failed abortion attempt, and then her mother gave her up for adoption.
Hollyweird is going to find that with the way entertainment is delivered these days, they are irrelevant. With Netflix, On Demand, Roku I don’t need to rely on these toads to see a movie that interests me and disregard their Left wing crap. I am sure there are millions of other doing the same thing. I can’t wait till all the theaters in the country are turned into Olive Gardens and independent movie producers overtake the big studios.
*
"The film almost didn't see the light of day."
As well as the protagonist in the movie. She almost didn't see the light of day, either.
This movie will not be shown at the White House. Well! Maybe in 2013.
*
You know... it's just a shame that a half-white, half-arab mulatto who was trained in socialism and Marxism was elected President and has done such a bad job, and claims to be 'black'. If I were 'black' (and I have been for short periods of time), I would be ashamed of the 'white Negro'.
Couldn't the black part of America's populace find someone better?
Heck, I voted for Herman Cain.
*
The movie is fantastic and not, “Preachy.” My Lovely felt like it was the best movie she has ever seen.
It moved me as much or more (in different ways) than Act of Valor which I also hugely recommend.
*
My husband and I saw this movie Sat. night with friends. Our local paper (leftist) had given it a sour review, but we found the movie to be terrific and give it 4 thumbs up.
The movie is about the survivor of an attempted abortion who finds out that she is adopted, an abortion survivor, and had a twin brother who did not survive — all in one accidental disclosure. Rather than being a downer, the rest of the movie is how this angry teen is treated with love, respect, and kindness by parents, peers, and strangers as she seeks her birth mother and seeks to discovedr who she really is. There are many twists and turns in the plot, but it is well done. And, there are no steamy sex scenes and no bad language. This is family fare, as long as the kids (teen and above) already know about abortion.
It is the antithesis of The Hunger Game where the teens are forced to kill each other.
*
m Critics like:
Excessive Violence, Graphic Violence, Graphic Sex, Foul Language, Nudity, poor plots...
So this film probably has very little of that!
Two very low budget movies I liked were: Bella and The Mighty Macs. Neither of those flicks had much of anything objectionable, though there was one scene in Mighty Macs I found hard to believe.
The worst of Bella was the waitress being fired for being late the 3rd time.
Compare that with your typical bloody/sexy/foul mouthed Hollywood film of today
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Jessica Simpson Should Be Ashamed
Excerpt: "The 31-year-old songstress, actress and fashion designer is celebrating her impending motherhood for the whole world to see. But it is no cause for celebration when a baby is born out of wedlock – even to a rich and famous mom like Simpson. "
Jessica Simpson used to embrace traditional values. Most notably, she said she was a virgin when she married Nick Lachey. Now she embraces Hollywood values: Moving from one man’s bed to another. Bearing a child by a man who doesn’t even love her enough to marry her.
*
Simpson had a fine husband whom she tossed out for no reason at all. Her life has been a sleazy mess ever since.
*
My mother use to call women like this, SLUTS.
*
"The writer sounds like a typical ‘busybody’ that needs to mind their own damn business. They’d be relieved to not carry around the burdens of worrying about what Jessica Simpson is doing...."
John Adams, founding father and the nation’s second president, stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Was he a “busybody”?
*
Of course she should be ashamed.
However, the concepts of shame and sin, once the bedrock of civilized Christianity, are no longer even considerations.
We can thank the tidal wave of nonjudgmental, moral equivalence wrought by the Leftist counterculture starting in the 1960s, for our current residence in an abject moral sewer.
*
Sounds like a Fluke to me.
*
“.. call me old fashioned, but I don’t see the attractiveness of a nude pregnant woman”.
You aren’t old fashioned. You have a sense of morality and decorum. Are pregnant women beautiful? Yes, of course. They are glowing and beautiful because they are carrying a life. Sexy? NO.
Jessica Simpson used to embrace traditional values. Most notably, she said she was a virgin when she married Nick Lachey. Now she embraces Hollywood values: Moving from one man’s bed to another. Bearing a child by a man who doesn’t even love her enough to marry her.
*
Simpson had a fine husband whom she tossed out for no reason at all. Her life has been a sleazy mess ever since.
*
My mother use to call women like this, SLUTS.
*
"The writer sounds like a typical ‘busybody’ that needs to mind their own damn business. They’d be relieved to not carry around the burdens of worrying about what Jessica Simpson is doing...."
John Adams, founding father and the nation’s second president, stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Was he a “busybody”?
*
Of course she should be ashamed.
However, the concepts of shame and sin, once the bedrock of civilized Christianity, are no longer even considerations.
We can thank the tidal wave of nonjudgmental, moral equivalence wrought by the Leftist counterculture starting in the 1960s, for our current residence in an abject moral sewer.
*
Sounds like a Fluke to me.
*
“.. call me old fashioned, but I don’t see the attractiveness of a nude pregnant woman”.
You aren’t old fashioned. You have a sense of morality and decorum. Are pregnant women beautiful? Yes, of course. They are glowing and beautiful because they are carrying a life. Sexy? NO.
Friday, March 16, 2012
Sex Strike -- Women United For Reproductive Rights
Summary: The is about the group of women pulling the "If Our Reproductive Rights Are Denied, So Are Yours" strike that I've seen popping up on Facebook.
What I find amusing is that almost all of these women and their ‘’reproductive rights’’ nonsense don’t have kids.
*
I guess nobody bothered to explain to you about the Birds and the Bees and the DDT, ladies, but by engaging in abstinence, you are achieving precisely the same ends as contraception. For that matter, this would make an excellent time to compare the efficacy of contraception to abstinence, with a nod to our Catholic friends.
*
Many women are political morons and vote for morons!
*
if a woman temporarily stops putting out, is she still a slut?
...and just THINK of all the money saved on contraceptions: At $3000 / 3 years (Fluck math), that's $1000 / yr or about $20 / week.
Maybe all the participants can chip in and make a donation to save Carbonite.
*
BTW, did anyone ever tell these intellectual giants that those who are most likely to approve of Limbaugh are conservatives: and therefore, most likely already *MARRIED* and unlikely to be getting any from such sluts anyway?
*
To be just a little bit crude, the gals make their choice when they decide to spread their legs. What they're carrying on about is a second choice because they've changed their mind. And don't give the old rape and incest rant because someone has committed a crime doesn't mean that an Innocent third party should get the death penalty.
*
They are all probably Carpet Munchers anyway.
*
Not even an original feminazi idea. There has been a bumper sticker for at least 20 years which reads, DON'T HAVE SEX WITH PRO-LIFE MEN. That's probably what they are really trying to say. As you noted, this assumes that pro-life men want to have relations with those who value sex above a child's life.
A variation on this is that leftist men would refuse to have sex with conservative women. In one sitcom starring 60 year old uber-lib Larry David, one of the original writers of Seinfeld, he made an agreement with his Prius-driving wife that he could have one and only one extramarital affair during the marriage. He was going to do it but backed out when he saw that the woman had a picture of Dick Cheney (or somebody else the Left hates) in her room.
*
Given the looks of most far left women this threat is a carrot not a stick.
*
It used to be the case that men in most states were not compelled to support their illegitimate children. they could thus signal their unwillingness to have children by not marrying.
This changed in the early 1970's with Supreme Court cases like GOMEZ v. PEREZ (1973) which struck down child-support laws that distinguished between legitimate and illegitimate children.
This was the real beginning of our "single mother" crisis.
Ahh, to return to the days when you could knock up bitches and call it a one night stand...
*
Good. Maybe they can finally stop the rampage of STD s. That would save the taxpayers money for their medical and the cost of some paper bags the guys have to wear for the courage to “hit that”.
*
Umm...liberal women are ugly anyways. Who cares if they abstain?
*
they flock to occupations that amplifies their annoying voices...journalism, academia,...
We’re too busy having sex and going to work to run around squawking all the time! ;)
*
BTW, doesn't this campaign actually represent a confirmation of what conservatives have always claimed -- that, far from "they're going to do it anyway," that if one takes away the contraception, that people will revert to abstinence?
What I find amusing is that almost all of these women and their ‘’reproductive rights’’ nonsense don’t have kids.
*
I guess nobody bothered to explain to you about the Birds and the Bees and the DDT, ladies, but by engaging in abstinence, you are achieving precisely the same ends as contraception. For that matter, this would make an excellent time to compare the efficacy of contraception to abstinence, with a nod to our Catholic friends.
*
Many women are political morons and vote for morons!
*
if a woman temporarily stops putting out, is she still a slut?
...and just THINK of all the money saved on contraceptions: At $3000 / 3 years (Fluck math), that's $1000 / yr or about $20 / week.
Maybe all the participants can chip in and make a donation to save Carbonite.
*
BTW, did anyone ever tell these intellectual giants that those who are most likely to approve of Limbaugh are conservatives: and therefore, most likely already *MARRIED* and unlikely to be getting any from such sluts anyway?
*
To be just a little bit crude, the gals make their choice when they decide to spread their legs. What they're carrying on about is a second choice because they've changed their mind. And don't give the old rape and incest rant because someone has committed a crime doesn't mean that an Innocent third party should get the death penalty.
*
They are all probably Carpet Munchers anyway.
*
Not even an original feminazi idea. There has been a bumper sticker for at least 20 years which reads, DON'T HAVE SEX WITH PRO-LIFE MEN. That's probably what they are really trying to say. As you noted, this assumes that pro-life men want to have relations with those who value sex above a child's life.
A variation on this is that leftist men would refuse to have sex with conservative women. In one sitcom starring 60 year old uber-lib Larry David, one of the original writers of Seinfeld, he made an agreement with his Prius-driving wife that he could have one and only one extramarital affair during the marriage. He was going to do it but backed out when he saw that the woman had a picture of Dick Cheney (or somebody else the Left hates) in her room.
*
Given the looks of most far left women this threat is a carrot not a stick.
*
It used to be the case that men in most states were not compelled to support their illegitimate children. they could thus signal their unwillingness to have children by not marrying.
This changed in the early 1970's with Supreme Court cases like GOMEZ v. PEREZ (1973) which struck down child-support laws that distinguished between legitimate and illegitimate children.
This was the real beginning of our "single mother" crisis.
Ahh, to return to the days when you could knock up bitches and call it a one night stand...
*
Good. Maybe they can finally stop the rampage of STD s. That would save the taxpayers money for their medical and the cost of some paper bags the guys have to wear for the courage to “hit that”.
*
Umm...liberal women are ugly anyways. Who cares if they abstain?
*
they flock to occupations that amplifies their annoying voices...journalism, academia,...
We’re too busy having sex and going to work to run around squawking all the time! ;)
*
BTW, doesn't this campaign actually represent a confirmation of what conservatives have always claimed -- that, far from "they're going to do it anyway," that if one takes away the contraception, that people will revert to abstinence?
Sandra Fluke’s Recreational Sex Partner (Barf Alert)
Main post: In case you’re wondering who is helping Sandra Fluke run up the allegedly unaffordable birth control bills she demands other people pay, there’s no need to wait for her amen corner in the “mainstream” media to look into it. The Graph has the answer: adam_mutterperl
The name is Adam Mutterperl, of the zillionaire moonbat Mutterperl clan. Some background:
The Mutterperl family, via Adam’s great grandfather Sol’s handbag fortune, established the “Mutterperl Scholarship Endowment Fund” in 1951 for Brandeis University. This school, as some people call it, is named for Louis Brandeis, a secular Jew, Zionist, and United States Supreme Court Justice appointed by Woodrow Wilson. Brandeis was a self-proclaimed socialist. Herbert Marcuse, the famous Frankfurt School Marxist, came to Brandeis in 1954, three years after the Mutterperl fund was created. Brandeis University is one of the nation’s leading petri dishes for anti-American and neo-Marxist thought.
It figures Adam would hit it off with Ms. Fluke. I wonder if she lets him call her “cutie pants”:
Just when I thought the Sandra Fluke spectacle could not possibly get any more pathetic.
On a tip from Ghost of FA Hayek.
Comments:
First we were told she was a 23-year-old student. Then it was revealed she was actually a 30-year-old radical leftwing activist. Is it just me or does she really look more like a 40-year-old frump?
*
"As long as she and her fellow N.A.G.s do not have any children while Conservatives have them I think long-term we’re going to be just fine."
In principle, yes. As long as the Conservative parents don't turn their children over to the brain-washers at the Government School Institutes - without proper training and protection. And they also need to guard their exposure to the atheistic and marxist pollutants that exudes out of their television sets.
Tough job for parents nowadays. Many predators out there trying to get at their children.
*
WOOF!
*
"Maybe I’m missing it, but why is this pertinent to the discussion?"
You are not missing it.
Nothing democrats do are pertinent to the discussion.
All the same just as with Miss Fluke’s mum, I would like to see Mr. Mutterperl’s mum come out and say that “she is proud her son is sleeping with...with...that woman”
Don’t hold your breath.
*
That dress is definitely a fashion no-no for this woman.
*
In general, I am not a fan of denigrating someone b/c of who they are vacationing/sleeping with.
Snookie excepted.
*
There comes a point in every woman's life, when her boobs are no longer governed by "anti-gravity" and no longer have to be held down lest their perkiness cause them to fly off into space.
Instead, they become content to sit in place and more or less point forward.
Some time after that, "gravity" takes over and effort is required to keep them up lest they drop to the waist.
Under no circumstances should that sort of "wrap-over-the-boobs" dress be worn by a woman who is no longer in the first category. Dear Sandra has moved into category two. If not three.
*
"This is the kind of woman beer-goggles were invented for."
Look at those arms, and the hands, are you sure she is a woman?
*
Mutterperl before swine?
Normally the name is Perlmutter. Did someone switch it at immigration or can’t they just spell properly?
What do you get when you mix a Fluke with a Mutterperl? - Two parasites instead of one.
If Fluke wants a 3 year supply of contraceptives, and she is attending law school, when does she have time to study?
This is a match made in Hell.
*
If she traded that DRESS in for a SOLID BLUE DRESS and wore it for the purpose in which a past BLUE DRESS was worn, she wouldn’t have to worry about birth control. But, she would probably start screaming for free knee pads and bibs.
I know I've been hitting the Fluke thing a lot, but it has been the subject of many a discussion over there, and I think it proves my theory that if Clinton had beat Obama in the primary and went on to become president, the meme would go "But don't call them sexist!"
The name is Adam Mutterperl, of the zillionaire moonbat Mutterperl clan. Some background:
The Mutterperl family, via Adam’s great grandfather Sol’s handbag fortune, established the “Mutterperl Scholarship Endowment Fund” in 1951 for Brandeis University. This school, as some people call it, is named for Louis Brandeis, a secular Jew, Zionist, and United States Supreme Court Justice appointed by Woodrow Wilson. Brandeis was a self-proclaimed socialist. Herbert Marcuse, the famous Frankfurt School Marxist, came to Brandeis in 1954, three years after the Mutterperl fund was created. Brandeis University is one of the nation’s leading petri dishes for anti-American and neo-Marxist thought.
It figures Adam would hit it off with Ms. Fluke. I wonder if she lets him call her “cutie pants”:
Just when I thought the Sandra Fluke spectacle could not possibly get any more pathetic.
On a tip from Ghost of FA Hayek.
Comments:
First we were told she was a 23-year-old student. Then it was revealed she was actually a 30-year-old radical leftwing activist. Is it just me or does she really look more like a 40-year-old frump?
*
"As long as she and her fellow N.A.G.s do not have any children while Conservatives have them I think long-term we’re going to be just fine."
In principle, yes. As long as the Conservative parents don't turn their children over to the brain-washers at the Government School Institutes - without proper training and protection. And they also need to guard their exposure to the atheistic and marxist pollutants that exudes out of their television sets.
Tough job for parents nowadays. Many predators out there trying to get at their children.
*
WOOF!
*
"Maybe I’m missing it, but why is this pertinent to the discussion?"
You are not missing it.
Nothing democrats do are pertinent to the discussion.
All the same just as with Miss Fluke’s mum, I would like to see Mr. Mutterperl’s mum come out and say that “she is proud her son is sleeping with...with...that woman”
Don’t hold your breath.
*
That dress is definitely a fashion no-no for this woman.
*
In general, I am not a fan of denigrating someone b/c of who they are vacationing/sleeping with.
Snookie excepted.
*
There comes a point in every woman's life, when her boobs are no longer governed by "anti-gravity" and no longer have to be held down lest their perkiness cause them to fly off into space.
Instead, they become content to sit in place and more or less point forward.
Some time after that, "gravity" takes over and effort is required to keep them up lest they drop to the waist.
Under no circumstances should that sort of "wrap-over-the-boobs" dress be worn by a woman who is no longer in the first category. Dear Sandra has moved into category two. If not three.
*
"This is the kind of woman beer-goggles were invented for."
Look at those arms, and the hands, are you sure she is a woman?
*
Mutterperl before swine?
Normally the name is Perlmutter. Did someone switch it at immigration or can’t they just spell properly?
What do you get when you mix a Fluke with a Mutterperl? - Two parasites instead of one.
If Fluke wants a 3 year supply of contraceptives, and she is attending law school, when does she have time to study?
This is a match made in Hell.
*
If she traded that DRESS in for a SOLID BLUE DRESS and wore it for the purpose in which a past BLUE DRESS was worn, she wouldn’t have to worry about birth control. But, she would probably start screaming for free knee pads and bibs.
I know I've been hitting the Fluke thing a lot, but it has been the subject of many a discussion over there, and I think it proves my theory that if Clinton had beat Obama in the primary and went on to become president, the meme would go "But don't call them sexist!"
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Study: young couples not marrying due to fear of divorce
Article's answer: fear of cost/emotional drain of divorce
Freepers' answer: it's those nasty women/liberals/minorities
““Working-class women, in particular, view marriage less favorably than do their male and middle-class counterparts, in part because they see marriage as hard to exit and are reluctant to assume restrictive gender roles,” the researchers wrote.”
restrictive gender roles? are we still in the 50’s?
*
"That is precisely why Newt is a disaster for President. He has ZERO family values. Sure he might be sorry but he is a dud when it comes to marriage. I don’t like the idea of the First Lady being considered a tramp which is really what she is. People will see what a failure Gingrich is and say the President fails at all his millions of marriages I might too. We need a candidate who is pro-marriage and has a perfect marriage like Santorum, Bachmann, even Perry."
He’s close to his daughters and grandchildren so Newt can’t be as bad as you protrayed him; at least not in the daddy department. In the past, he stinks in the marriage department.
Interesting that he was sexually abused by a teacher in high school; his first wife. That has to be a head trip for a young man.
*
"A simple pre-nup that says neither will fight an amicable divorce would help, wouldn’t it?"
A pre nup is just getting ready for the divorce before you get married in my book.
If one needs a pre nup one does not need a marriage.
*
The Gov taking over and making marriage the equivalent of civil union is what is destroying marriage.
*
So, let’s just screw, have some kids, separate, and there’s less strings? What a turd world we live in!
*
Well see the problem lies in that they are not [actually married unless they are married in a church]! They are just “shacking up”. Playing house so to speak. Society sinking and gov. destroying marriage.
*
A few thoughts:
1. 25 and younger: women have the advantage. 30 and older: men have the advantage. Most modern women are blind to this fact.
2. I see a lot of young women who frankly tell me that marriage is a trap and seem to think they can put off marriage indefinitely. They are totally oblivious to the fact that marriage benefits them a lot more then the man. They will wake in their mid-late 30s and realize that they are past their prime. But, of course, its too late by then. If they want a guy at that point, they probably have to go long (e.g., someone at least 15 years their senior).
3. Imagine how high marriage rate would be if women only consented to sex if they were married?
-- Women, this is all of your aging, stuck-up, slutty faults.
*
Unfortunately that’s what the leftists and liberals want, they want regular men and women not to marry. They’ve made it that way.
On the one end, they’ve told women they don’t need men, or babies or anything like that. You can do it all and you deserve it all. And you can walk away if it doesn’t work and take half his stuff in the process.
They’ve set the “family” courts up to crush men.
At the same time they’ve screwed up regular boys and men by drugging them through school to prevent them from being boys. They have totally focused everything in schools on girls now to the point the boys are suffering academically and nobody gives a sh1t because you can’t have independent, thinking men that might resist what the liberals are doing to them. Get married to a self-centered narcissistic woman who thinks she deserves better than you and it’s a recipe for disaster.
*
Multiculturalism has designed race cultures and the Hispanic and Black race cultures are not based in Christianity; rather Marxism. That is an ideal of welfare that is amoral.
The marriage rates of Hispanics and Blacks, which they are referring to as ‘working class”, has always been lower than for whites and Asians - what they refer to as the “middle class.”
Hispanics are making a huge mistake to permit the Left to indoctrinate their children into a angry welfare race tribe. They should demand their kids be interacted with, culturally, as the American middle class. That more matches the cultural values and aspirations of Hispanics.
*
What was wrong with the 50s?
We had exponentially less social ills than we do today.
*
three words. no fault divorce.
the only mechanism of any American legal system where you can take half someone's stuff and their kids and through no fault of their own and no proof of any wrongdoing.
*
I tell my daughter to get married, and my son not to.
*
"why couples don't get married – they fear divorce."
BS. It's all about the welfare payment.
Single mothers shamelessly wear their status as a badge of honor.
They also use it as a way to claim victim-hood.
*
It would seem that they fear divorce more than they fear God.
*
You quite literally have better odds playing Russian Roulette.
On the bright side, if you lose at Russian Roulette, it’s over.
A divorce is never quite over as any change in your or her circumstances tears open the scar tissue and restarts the calculations for alimony and child support.
With a spiteful woman, the only thing that needs to change is her acquisitiveness and vengefulness (and sometimes just her lawyer).
Oh, and there’s nothing requiring her to let you know that she boinked everything in sight before saving her virtue for your marriage. That did not happen to me, but I might have decided differently had I known that the time she spent in mental institutions wasn’t always as staff...
*
I believe we are destroying the actual maternal instinct that was a part of every woman's fabric.
Also, men have been shown that cheating and multiple partners are acceptable to society.
We are just in the early stages. Once gay marriage is weaved into our society, people will see even more casual relationships, group sex, swapping, etc as perfectly acceptable.
*
The goal is to use America’s own systems to destroy everything good and decent America once stood for.
Divorce court is a rip-roaring success story.
*
I was 18 and have been married for 22 years, you are correct one does change quite a bit, but there is something to be said for getting married before one is too independent, especially for women.
*
After reading through some of these replies, I wonder if it’s more a case of women not wanting to marry bitter, whiny, baby-men. Just wondering....
-- Oh snap!
*
Marriage won’t make any difference in their lives. They are shacked up, making money, working their careers, and enjoying life without children. There are no sex sins any more. God made them male and female so they would increase and multiply but we figured out how to beat that. Sure we did.
*
To: ought-six
I grew up in the 50’s as well. Though I wouldn’t say it was exactly a paradise, it is surely as close as humans have gotten in a thousand years!
*
btw...this is an issue we better fix
the lack of marriage in minorities has shown precisely what this produces
a dependent culture of drooges
I blame the Pill....that is where things went astray
We threw consequence out the door and women along with it...pushed them right out the front door of the home
*
Remember, men age like wine. Women age like milk.
*
They are not getting married because there is a generation of immoral women and female teens. They hop into bed not even a dinner date is needed. The women are worse than the men these days. And they think nothing of having children at the age of 18 or 19 without being married.
*
I fully agree; so many women are completely out of control and while it’s fun, the funny part ends after a while. If it’s easy for one man, how many more men will it be easy for and how many men before? Women treat everything like a game and act like these Sex in the City tarts and while it’s funny on television, it’s not funny in real life.
Freepers' answer: it's those nasty women/liberals/minorities
““Working-class women, in particular, view marriage less favorably than do their male and middle-class counterparts, in part because they see marriage as hard to exit and are reluctant to assume restrictive gender roles,” the researchers wrote.”
restrictive gender roles? are we still in the 50’s?
*
"That is precisely why Newt is a disaster for President. He has ZERO family values. Sure he might be sorry but he is a dud when it comes to marriage. I don’t like the idea of the First Lady being considered a tramp which is really what she is. People will see what a failure Gingrich is and say the President fails at all his millions of marriages I might too. We need a candidate who is pro-marriage and has a perfect marriage like Santorum, Bachmann, even Perry."
He’s close to his daughters and grandchildren so Newt can’t be as bad as you protrayed him; at least not in the daddy department. In the past, he stinks in the marriage department.
Interesting that he was sexually abused by a teacher in high school; his first wife. That has to be a head trip for a young man.
*
"A simple pre-nup that says neither will fight an amicable divorce would help, wouldn’t it?"
A pre nup is just getting ready for the divorce before you get married in my book.
If one needs a pre nup one does not need a marriage.
*
The Gov taking over and making marriage the equivalent of civil union is what is destroying marriage.
*
So, let’s just screw, have some kids, separate, and there’s less strings? What a turd world we live in!
*
Well see the problem lies in that they are not [actually married unless they are married in a church]! They are just “shacking up”. Playing house so to speak. Society sinking and gov. destroying marriage.
*
A few thoughts:
1. 25 and younger: women have the advantage. 30 and older: men have the advantage. Most modern women are blind to this fact.
2. I see a lot of young women who frankly tell me that marriage is a trap and seem to think they can put off marriage indefinitely. They are totally oblivious to the fact that marriage benefits them a lot more then the man. They will wake in their mid-late 30s and realize that they are past their prime. But, of course, its too late by then. If they want a guy at that point, they probably have to go long (e.g., someone at least 15 years their senior).
3. Imagine how high marriage rate would be if women only consented to sex if they were married?
-- Women, this is all of your aging, stuck-up, slutty faults.
*
Unfortunately that’s what the leftists and liberals want, they want regular men and women not to marry. They’ve made it that way.
On the one end, they’ve told women they don’t need men, or babies or anything like that. You can do it all and you deserve it all. And you can walk away if it doesn’t work and take half his stuff in the process.
They’ve set the “family” courts up to crush men.
At the same time they’ve screwed up regular boys and men by drugging them through school to prevent them from being boys. They have totally focused everything in schools on girls now to the point the boys are suffering academically and nobody gives a sh1t because you can’t have independent, thinking men that might resist what the liberals are doing to them. Get married to a self-centered narcissistic woman who thinks she deserves better than you and it’s a recipe for disaster.
*
Multiculturalism has designed race cultures and the Hispanic and Black race cultures are not based in Christianity; rather Marxism. That is an ideal of welfare that is amoral.
The marriage rates of Hispanics and Blacks, which they are referring to as ‘working class”, has always been lower than for whites and Asians - what they refer to as the “middle class.”
Hispanics are making a huge mistake to permit the Left to indoctrinate their children into a angry welfare race tribe. They should demand their kids be interacted with, culturally, as the American middle class. That more matches the cultural values and aspirations of Hispanics.
*
What was wrong with the 50s?
We had exponentially less social ills than we do today.
*
three words. no fault divorce.
the only mechanism of any American legal system where you can take half someone's stuff and their kids and through no fault of their own and no proof of any wrongdoing.
*
I tell my daughter to get married, and my son not to.
*
"why couples don't get married – they fear divorce."
BS. It's all about the welfare payment.
Single mothers shamelessly wear their status as a badge of honor.
They also use it as a way to claim victim-hood.
*
It would seem that they fear divorce more than they fear God.
*
You quite literally have better odds playing Russian Roulette.
On the bright side, if you lose at Russian Roulette, it’s over.
A divorce is never quite over as any change in your or her circumstances tears open the scar tissue and restarts the calculations for alimony and child support.
With a spiteful woman, the only thing that needs to change is her acquisitiveness and vengefulness (and sometimes just her lawyer).
Oh, and there’s nothing requiring her to let you know that she boinked everything in sight before saving her virtue for your marriage. That did not happen to me, but I might have decided differently had I known that the time she spent in mental institutions wasn’t always as staff...
*
I believe we are destroying the actual maternal instinct that was a part of every woman's fabric.
Also, men have been shown that cheating and multiple partners are acceptable to society.
We are just in the early stages. Once gay marriage is weaved into our society, people will see even more casual relationships, group sex, swapping, etc as perfectly acceptable.
*
The goal is to use America’s own systems to destroy everything good and decent America once stood for.
Divorce court is a rip-roaring success story.
*
I was 18 and have been married for 22 years, you are correct one does change quite a bit, but there is something to be said for getting married before one is too independent, especially for women.
*
After reading through some of these replies, I wonder if it’s more a case of women not wanting to marry bitter, whiny, baby-men. Just wondering....
-- Oh snap!
*
Marriage won’t make any difference in their lives. They are shacked up, making money, working their careers, and enjoying life without children. There are no sex sins any more. God made them male and female so they would increase and multiply but we figured out how to beat that. Sure we did.
*
To: ought-six
I grew up in the 50’s as well. Though I wouldn’t say it was exactly a paradise, it is surely as close as humans have gotten in a thousand years!
*
btw...this is an issue we better fix
the lack of marriage in minorities has shown precisely what this produces
a dependent culture of drooges
I blame the Pill....that is where things went astray
We threw consequence out the door and women along with it...pushed them right out the front door of the home
*
Remember, men age like wine. Women age like milk.
*
They are not getting married because there is a generation of immoral women and female teens. They hop into bed not even a dinner date is needed. The women are worse than the men these days. And they think nothing of having children at the age of 18 or 19 without being married.
*
I fully agree; so many women are completely out of control and while it’s fun, the funny part ends after a while. If it’s easy for one man, how many more men will it be easy for and how many men before? Women treat everything like a game and act like these Sex in the City tarts and while it’s funny on television, it’s not funny in real life.
Friday, March 2, 2012
Woman called 'slut' by Limbaugh is 'stunned, outraged'
Do the Commie Pinkos in the MSM realize that the more this sluts story comes out, the worse it looks for their stupid cause? This loser is a hack activist.
*
What about HER insult to OUR intelligence, that this self-important young female should have HER sex life subsidized?
Not all sexual expression has to be concerned with contraception. Abstinence is also a form of sexual expression.
And contraception.
*
Walks like a slut, talks like a slut, lifts legs in the air like a slut...
*
If she didn’t see this coming, she isn’t going to make much of a lawyer.
And while some firms might hire her on as an associate, just for laughs, I really don’t see her on a partnership track.
So I’m guessing that she’ll end up in some half-assed federal agency like Health and Human Services.
*
The Poster Girl for the free-wheeling-no-consequences-sex-with-anybody crowd is now making the rounds of the Liberal Talk Show Circuit. She can use the money for her birth control pills, and screw her brains out now (if she has any LEFT).
*
"msnbc just had her on and said “She had just got off the phone with the president” who called her to see if she was ok."
Notice, she didn't specify which president?
My money's on president Bill Clinton.
*
You’re kidding, right? No way this broad is attracted to men. Or they to her.
*
She should shut her mouth and her tw@t. The combination is making her look pathologically stupid.
*
I don’t think Sandra Fuke is getting paid thereby disqualifying her as a professional prostitute. I shudder to think at the disease load she must be carrying.
*
Each moment of airtime given to condoms is less airtime to talk about gas prices and the unemployment rate. This entire controversy is a coordinated campaign strategy by the DNC and the MSM. And the fact is, they will probably win if we don't get our crapola together.
Fact, the woman is a slut. Fact, contraception is not be a taxpayer funded right. Fact, none of this will be comprehended in terms of socialist fascism vs individual personal responsibility.
By November, the average voter will walk into the booth with the entire argument boiled down to this: republicans don't want me to have sex and democrats want to give me free condoms. This will be a winning issue by the democrats unless the republicans get real smart real fast.
-- My dreams have been realized. I've found Dwight Schrute on FR. I just need to keep looking for Ron Swanson.
*
She’s in Law School?
What is this sleeping with so many men? A part-time job? Will eff for food? Or for good grades in her contract classes?
Oh, and one more thing....when does she study? Before? During? After?
*
What does Ms. Fluke say after sex?
NEXT!
*
"Here is a link to her testimony. Care to point out where she "spoke about how active her tw@t is"?"
Responses to this comments:
- She did get in front of a micro-phone. Surprised she didn't go down on that too.
-You’re really grasping at straws. If a 400 pound slob starts ranting about how food is too expensive and is costing him too much, he doesn’t need to explicitly talk about how much he eats for the audience to infer - correctly - that he eats way too much.
Similarly, if this unattractive woman will go in front of Congress to talk about how she spends $3 a day on contraception, the audience can correctly infer that she is quite sexually active. Birth control pills are about 30 cents a day. Condoms average about 50 cents a piece on Amazon. Even if she’s doubling up, she’s having sex an average of more than five times a day. Do the math. It’s not hard.
-"Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary."
She adds herself to the debate, she makes herself part of the argument. You can play word games but at the end of the day, she's still a slut.
*
She could save a lot of money on BC by buying a 100 watt lightbulb. Leave it on in her bedroom and there is no chance she would get knocked-up.
*
"Do the math from what she said contraception costs."
EXACTLY! It's a math problem. And she invited this scrutiny as much as she invites stud-mares into her dorm room.
*
wondering if this sexually active person knows that it is dangerous to have multiply sex partners..
Not at all healthy for a female, at least that is what an OBGYN has stated..
personally for a woman to get on national TV and let people know she prefers SEX to anything...dang her mom must be really proud of her...
and did the president really call her???? he needs to take care of the cost of gas and food that is hurting ALL Americans and the condition of this Nation...
*
Honey, that face of yours is the best birth control device I’ve ever seen.
*
In other words, what she is actually saying is, “quit calling me a slut, just because I have so much sex that I can’t afford the condom supply!”
LOL...seriously laughing out loud here!
*
Here’s the real kicker with this woman’s BS. She claims that she uses birth control pills but she has so much sex it costs her too much to buy them. This is a crock. One pack of BC pills per month, one pill per day, regardless of how many guys she has sticking it to her in that month. It costs the same. This is just one of the many lies that lefties tell to try and get sympathy for their idiotic causes. Rush was right to call her a slut, she labeled her self as a slut out of her own mouth and I hope Rush points this out today or at least next week. Any woman who says she has sex on a massive scale and is not married is, by definition, a slut, whore or whatever name you can think to call her. Any woman that wants to be paid for having sex, even if it is in the form of free BC pills, is a prostitute.
*
Outraged??? The taxpayers who would foot the bill for her excessive sex drive (her own admission) are the ones who should be outraged.
The worthless slut can screw all she wants and buy all of the birth control she wants on her time and her dime. The rest of us have no obligation to support her sex/prostitution habits.
Aside from that, if birth control pills at worst, cost her $30 a month then her cost of BC would be $360 which is far from $3000. So, if she is spending the other $2640 on condoms then assuming an average cost of $10 for a box of 12 premium condoms then she’s buying 264 boxes of 12 which spread (pardon the reference) over 12 months then that is approximately 264 condoms a month or 8.8 condoms per day.
Wow! That really is a lot of sex, more than most prostitutes would put up with for a single day much less every day.
Now that her name and institution is out there, how long before her address is out there and the phone calls and long lines of men start forming to help her use all of those condoms?
She is a self-described slut who is pandering to the taxpayer to “pay” for her habits; thus fitting the label of prostitute.
I think it is time for the press to take this to the next level and interview her parents so they can express solidarity with her and tell us all how happy they are that she is getting laid so much.
*
Damn, she’s an uglier slut than I first thought...
*
She is a slut. She tells the world how much she has sex. Don’t know what you call an unmarried woman who talks like this but a slut. And she wants you and me to pay for her “protection” from getting pregnant. Her parents must be sticking their head in the sand. What a loser.
*
already commented on this on the Rush thread yesterday.
Honestly, anyone who screws outside their marriage is a “slut”. It’s time we had that kind of shame again. There would be a lot less trouble in the world if we went back to chastity is a VIRTUE, instead of shameful. Today we call an ox a bull rather than what it is.
This woman had the gaul to complain about sex-pill costs and that someone else should pay for it (which has NOTHING to do with “health care”) when all she has to do is stop screwing. (Yes, it can be done.)
She has put herself out in public as obviously ready to screw and worse, wanting others to pay for it; an obvious target. Don’t expect not to be fired upon.
*
"What happened to my party?
Like nobodies mother ever used hormonal birth control while married to their father nor for other medical reasons. But that qualifies to call millions of peoples mothers sluts?
There was a time when it took a heck of alot more to convict someone that what we have here."
You are ridiculous.
That is NOT what the Left is pushing here.
The Left wants to destroy personal freedom and religious liberty.
The Left wants to force the responsible to pay for the irresponsible.
*
Ms.Fluke, your moral compass is broken. Might wanna get that checked...along with your crotch. ((Shudder))
*
And why is she begging for birth control pills? Not condoms- (which are probably free at the infirmary)? In this day and age, aren’t she and her fellow fornicators worried about stds? And how much funding is going to/being wasted on AIDS research and prevention??!!
For what??!
These whores??!!
Fluke- if that is her real name- is an embarrassment and a disgrace. She is the one her momma should have swallowed. I’m jes’ sayin’.
*
She’s a paid for whore, likely ideologically as well as sexually...and while we’re at it, she isn’t employed so she’s not a contributing working American - just a leech.
*
At the heart of the matter, egocentric people like her want the public to pay for their pleasures that result from their wanton behaviors.
In her case, the sausage-hole wants her recreational sex on our dime.
Lovely, that.
The next time she's called before Congress to testify her hedonism for public view, she might also wish to demand that we all pay for her booze and smokes as those two and her recreational sex are nothing but a behavioral means to an end, physical pleasure.
Selfish, smarmy, skanky slut she is.
*
Again, she's a stupid liberal activist, but she said nothing of her own sex life. "Certainly nothing to suggest that she's buying dozens of condoms a day."
Thank you for injecting some balance and rationality into this thread. I thought freepers were generally better than this. She is on the opposite side, not a demon. This thread reminds me of something you could find on DU.
*
No no no, the woman is a whore.
A slut gives it away for free, a whore wants to be paid.
*
I liked how he kept suggesting to college age men that they should really consider transferring to Georgetown, since all the women there “go”.
*
she’s an effing’ whore! See, conservatives don’t dwell on BS adjectives.
We don’t call abortion “contraception” or whatever pc crap..
*
Um...slut vs. whore debate aside, this woman is stupid. Birth control pills cost the same regardless of number of times a person has sex, and must be taken at least one full month before it takes effect. So, even if she wasn’t a slut, it would cost the same.
Also, Planned Parenthood only charges about $5 a month for pills (according to a friend) so the slut probably pays more for a night out than pills would cost for a YEAR.
More evidence that the new math is a fail.
*
Why in the hell does she need birth control when she's playing with plastic shaped fists?
If she's sleeping with men, then I'm the Queen of England!
This woman looks like an angry lesbian.
*
She has very masculine hands. I'll bet she goes both ways. If she wants to cut down on costs for birth control, just embrace the gayness.
*
I’m more concerned about the amount she spends on alcohol to get men drunk enough to sleep with her - maybe she can get some sort of tax break on that.
*
She is not only a slut.
She is an ignorant slut.
She’s going to Bubba’s school...a school that used to have a good reputation. Georgetown law...what a joke.
Good job, Jesuits.
When are you gonna eject the slut?
*
I saw her testimony. Based on what she said, if true, there are a lot of Georgetown Law Student “Sluts”. If you are having so much sex that you cannot afford contraceptives, it says something about your life style. I’ll bet her parents are real proud of her!
*
Following up on the previous ‘thoughtline’, if a woman being supplied the pill by the government actually does get pregnant, then the resulting abortion must also be government funded. They provide the pill, it must be ‘their’ fault.
*
There was a time, in America, when people exercised a modicum of discretion and decorum.
Thanks to liberalism, we have plummeted to disgraceful social lows and, not being satisfied with that, we have started to dig.
An ordered society cannot exist with this. We are rapidly approaching the levels of failed societies such as those of ancient Rome and Greece.
Is that REALLY who we are and what we want to be??
*
A Hoor, who’s graduated to Attention Hoor.
*
What about HER insult to OUR intelligence, that this self-important young female should have HER sex life subsidized?
Not all sexual expression has to be concerned with contraception. Abstinence is also a form of sexual expression.
And contraception.
*
Walks like a slut, talks like a slut, lifts legs in the air like a slut...
*
If she didn’t see this coming, she isn’t going to make much of a lawyer.
And while some firms might hire her on as an associate, just for laughs, I really don’t see her on a partnership track.
So I’m guessing that she’ll end up in some half-assed federal agency like Health and Human Services.
*
The Poster Girl for the free-wheeling-no-consequences-sex-with-anybody crowd is now making the rounds of the Liberal Talk Show Circuit. She can use the money for her birth control pills, and screw her brains out now (if she has any LEFT).
*
"msnbc just had her on and said “She had just got off the phone with the president” who called her to see if she was ok."
Notice, she didn't specify which president?
My money's on president Bill Clinton.
*
You’re kidding, right? No way this broad is attracted to men. Or they to her.
*
She should shut her mouth and her tw@t. The combination is making her look pathologically stupid.
*
I don’t think Sandra Fuke is getting paid thereby disqualifying her as a professional prostitute. I shudder to think at the disease load she must be carrying.
*
Each moment of airtime given to condoms is less airtime to talk about gas prices and the unemployment rate. This entire controversy is a coordinated campaign strategy by the DNC and the MSM. And the fact is, they will probably win if we don't get our crapola together.
Fact, the woman is a slut. Fact, contraception is not be a taxpayer funded right. Fact, none of this will be comprehended in terms of socialist fascism vs individual personal responsibility.
By November, the average voter will walk into the booth with the entire argument boiled down to this: republicans don't want me to have sex and democrats want to give me free condoms. This will be a winning issue by the democrats unless the republicans get real smart real fast.
-- My dreams have been realized. I've found Dwight Schrute on FR. I just need to keep looking for Ron Swanson.
*
She’s in Law School?
What is this sleeping with so many men? A part-time job? Will eff for food? Or for good grades in her contract classes?
Oh, and one more thing....when does she study? Before? During? After?
*
What does Ms. Fluke say after sex?
NEXT!
*
"Here is a link to her testimony. Care to point out where she "spoke about how active her tw@t is"?"
Responses to this comments:
- She did get in front of a micro-phone. Surprised she didn't go down on that too.
-You’re really grasping at straws. If a 400 pound slob starts ranting about how food is too expensive and is costing him too much, he doesn’t need to explicitly talk about how much he eats for the audience to infer - correctly - that he eats way too much.
Similarly, if this unattractive woman will go in front of Congress to talk about how she spends $3 a day on contraception, the audience can correctly infer that she is quite sexually active. Birth control pills are about 30 cents a day. Condoms average about 50 cents a piece on Amazon. Even if she’s doubling up, she’s having sex an average of more than five times a day. Do the math. It’s not hard.
-"Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary."
She adds herself to the debate, she makes herself part of the argument. You can play word games but at the end of the day, she's still a slut.
*
She could save a lot of money on BC by buying a 100 watt lightbulb. Leave it on in her bedroom and there is no chance she would get knocked-up.
*
"Do the math from what she said contraception costs."
EXACTLY! It's a math problem. And she invited this scrutiny as much as she invites stud-mares into her dorm room.
*
wondering if this sexually active person knows that it is dangerous to have multiply sex partners..
Not at all healthy for a female, at least that is what an OBGYN has stated..
personally for a woman to get on national TV and let people know she prefers SEX to anything...dang her mom must be really proud of her...
and did the president really call her???? he needs to take care of the cost of gas and food that is hurting ALL Americans and the condition of this Nation...
*
Honey, that face of yours is the best birth control device I’ve ever seen.
*
In other words, what she is actually saying is, “quit calling me a slut, just because I have so much sex that I can’t afford the condom supply!”
LOL...seriously laughing out loud here!
*
Here’s the real kicker with this woman’s BS. She claims that she uses birth control pills but she has so much sex it costs her too much to buy them. This is a crock. One pack of BC pills per month, one pill per day, regardless of how many guys she has sticking it to her in that month. It costs the same. This is just one of the many lies that lefties tell to try and get sympathy for their idiotic causes. Rush was right to call her a slut, she labeled her self as a slut out of her own mouth and I hope Rush points this out today or at least next week. Any woman who says she has sex on a massive scale and is not married is, by definition, a slut, whore or whatever name you can think to call her. Any woman that wants to be paid for having sex, even if it is in the form of free BC pills, is a prostitute.
*
Outraged??? The taxpayers who would foot the bill for her excessive sex drive (her own admission) are the ones who should be outraged.
The worthless slut can screw all she wants and buy all of the birth control she wants on her time and her dime. The rest of us have no obligation to support her sex/prostitution habits.
Aside from that, if birth control pills at worst, cost her $30 a month then her cost of BC would be $360 which is far from $3000. So, if she is spending the other $2640 on condoms then assuming an average cost of $10 for a box of 12 premium condoms then she’s buying 264 boxes of 12 which spread (pardon the reference) over 12 months then that is approximately 264 condoms a month or 8.8 condoms per day.
Wow! That really is a lot of sex, more than most prostitutes would put up with for a single day much less every day.
Now that her name and institution is out there, how long before her address is out there and the phone calls and long lines of men start forming to help her use all of those condoms?
She is a self-described slut who is pandering to the taxpayer to “pay” for her habits; thus fitting the label of prostitute.
I think it is time for the press to take this to the next level and interview her parents so they can express solidarity with her and tell us all how happy they are that she is getting laid so much.
*
Damn, she’s an uglier slut than I first thought...
*
She is a slut. She tells the world how much she has sex. Don’t know what you call an unmarried woman who talks like this but a slut. And she wants you and me to pay for her “protection” from getting pregnant. Her parents must be sticking their head in the sand. What a loser.
*
already commented on this on the Rush thread yesterday.
Honestly, anyone who screws outside their marriage is a “slut”. It’s time we had that kind of shame again. There would be a lot less trouble in the world if we went back to chastity is a VIRTUE, instead of shameful. Today we call an ox a bull rather than what it is.
This woman had the gaul to complain about sex-pill costs and that someone else should pay for it (which has NOTHING to do with “health care”) when all she has to do is stop screwing. (Yes, it can be done.)
She has put herself out in public as obviously ready to screw and worse, wanting others to pay for it; an obvious target. Don’t expect not to be fired upon.
*
"What happened to my party?
Like nobodies mother ever used hormonal birth control while married to their father nor for other medical reasons. But that qualifies to call millions of peoples mothers sluts?
There was a time when it took a heck of alot more to convict someone that what we have here."
You are ridiculous.
That is NOT what the Left is pushing here.
The Left wants to destroy personal freedom and religious liberty.
The Left wants to force the responsible to pay for the irresponsible.
*
Ms.Fluke, your moral compass is broken. Might wanna get that checked...along with your crotch. ((Shudder))
*
And why is she begging for birth control pills? Not condoms- (which are probably free at the infirmary)? In this day and age, aren’t she and her fellow fornicators worried about stds? And how much funding is going to/being wasted on AIDS research and prevention??!!
For what??!
These whores??!!
Fluke- if that is her real name- is an embarrassment and a disgrace. She is the one her momma should have swallowed. I’m jes’ sayin’.
*
She’s a paid for whore, likely ideologically as well as sexually...and while we’re at it, she isn’t employed so she’s not a contributing working American - just a leech.
*
At the heart of the matter, egocentric people like her want the public to pay for their pleasures that result from their wanton behaviors.
In her case, the sausage-hole wants her recreational sex on our dime.
Lovely, that.
The next time she's called before Congress to testify her hedonism for public view, she might also wish to demand that we all pay for her booze and smokes as those two and her recreational sex are nothing but a behavioral means to an end, physical pleasure.
Selfish, smarmy, skanky slut she is.
*
Again, she's a stupid liberal activist, but she said nothing of her own sex life. "Certainly nothing to suggest that she's buying dozens of condoms a day."
Thank you for injecting some balance and rationality into this thread. I thought freepers were generally better than this. She is on the opposite side, not a demon. This thread reminds me of something you could find on DU.
*
No no no, the woman is a whore.
A slut gives it away for free, a whore wants to be paid.
*
I liked how he kept suggesting to college age men that they should really consider transferring to Georgetown, since all the women there “go”.
*
she’s an effing’ whore! See, conservatives don’t dwell on BS adjectives.
We don’t call abortion “contraception” or whatever pc crap..
*
Um...slut vs. whore debate aside, this woman is stupid. Birth control pills cost the same regardless of number of times a person has sex, and must be taken at least one full month before it takes effect. So, even if she wasn’t a slut, it would cost the same.
Also, Planned Parenthood only charges about $5 a month for pills (according to a friend) so the slut probably pays more for a night out than pills would cost for a YEAR.
More evidence that the new math is a fail.
*
Why in the hell does she need birth control when she's playing with plastic shaped fists?
If she's sleeping with men, then I'm the Queen of England!
This woman looks like an angry lesbian.
*
She has very masculine hands. I'll bet she goes both ways. If she wants to cut down on costs for birth control, just embrace the gayness.
*
I’m more concerned about the amount she spends on alcohol to get men drunk enough to sleep with her - maybe she can get some sort of tax break on that.
*
She is not only a slut.
She is an ignorant slut.
She’s going to Bubba’s school...a school that used to have a good reputation. Georgetown law...what a joke.
Good job, Jesuits.
When are you gonna eject the slut?
*
I saw her testimony. Based on what she said, if true, there are a lot of Georgetown Law Student “Sluts”. If you are having so much sex that you cannot afford contraceptives, it says something about your life style. I’ll bet her parents are real proud of her!
*
Following up on the previous ‘thoughtline’, if a woman being supplied the pill by the government actually does get pregnant, then the resulting abortion must also be government funded. They provide the pill, it must be ‘their’ fault.
*
There was a time, in America, when people exercised a modicum of discretion and decorum.
Thanks to liberalism, we have plummeted to disgraceful social lows and, not being satisfied with that, we have started to dig.
An ordered society cannot exist with this. We are rapidly approaching the levels of failed societies such as those of ancient Rome and Greece.
Is that REALLY who we are and what we want to be??
*
A Hoor, who’s graduated to Attention Hoor.
Boehner calls Limbaugh remarks "inappropriate"
The reaction to Fluke has been particularly awful, so I will be doing a second thread about it later today from a separate article.
Well, that didn’t take long.
*
If Boehner only had a spine.
*
When you publicly admit that you have the morals of an alley cat, you shouldn’t be offended when you are appropriately called a ‘slut’. Ms. Fluke’s “problem” is 100% self-inflicted. Rush is RIGHT, Boehner is wrong - again. Boehner needs to step down NOW - we need leadership with morals and a spine, not a go-along-to-get-along RINO.
*
So Boehner is angry because Nancy Pelosi was offended by Limbaugh? What’s new about that? Nancy Pelosi STAYS offended by Limbaugh. Yeah, Limbaugh’s words might have been harsh, but he was just positing the notion that Fluke thinks someone else should pay for her birth control, so she can have sex as much as she wants. I guess that’s kind of like paying her to have sex. Question is, why shouldn’t she pay for her own?
*
She spoke about how active her tw@t is then complains about being called a slut?
*
i’m on hold with Boehner’s office now...I want to ask them where all the comments about “inappropriateness” was when you and i were referred to as “Tea Baggers
*
DOES the speaker have an opinion on the little Miss Fluke’s remarks?
*
Remember people who want to be someone’s friend so bad that they take constant abuse? That’s the GOP.
*
John Boehner is pretty much the epitome of everything that is screwed up and worthless about what is the modern day Republican Party...his cowardice and inability to frame any political issue in a conservative way is pathetic.
God has a plan for all of us, but damn does it hurt when the fighters like Andrew Breitbart are taken from us too soon and gutless wonders like Boehner and the rest of his ilk in the Republican party screw us over for years in Washington DC.
Beyond disgusted.
*
Epic cave. What a wuss. Rush is right.
*
The promiscuous behavior is inappropriate.
*
Any MSM coverage about what Bill Maher just called Sara Palin? [Rhetorical question.]
*
Demanding that others pay for your chosen behaviors is also inappropriate.
*
I find Boners lack of leadership "inappropriate". Which is more dangerous for the country? Rush's remarks calling out a Left wing trick or Boner being a crying loser as House Speaker.
*
"While I certainly agree with Rush on this issue I must say that he either needs to get back on the “Obama is an economic disaster” track and off the social issues or stop critizing the MSM for causing us to lose focus.
IMHO, Rush is a major contributer to that loss of focus on economic issues. He is spending way, way too much time on the social issue themes that only help Obama. It’s amazing to me that Rush would fall into such an obvious trap - and one that he clearly recognizes. It’s time to stop digging. The hole is deep enough already."
The majority of the time Rush does focus on economic issues but also includes the absurdity of the democrat party. This whore perfectly demonstrates the tactics of the left with the added bonus of showing just how obsessed they are with all things sexual. She absolutely epitomizes the left:
1. No personal responsibility
2. Freeloading off of society
3. Rabidly obsessed with all things shameful; including abortion, sexual perversions, and promiscuity.
She IS the democrat party a.k.a. America haters.
*
Get him out of there, get him out of there! Get Bachmann in there (or anyone with a spine).
*
Promisicuous is too polite for the slut. She & her friends sound like bitches in heat shoving their tails into any man’s face that is available. It is beyond disgusting. They are an utter disgrace.
Completely appalling.
*
"As a huge fan and a regular listener, any time Rush starts talking about women and politics, I start to cringe.
Not because he's not correct, but more because he seems to have a knack for undermining his own argument with some unfortunate term or use of language.
He made a brilliant political point yesterday documenting how this women was aware of the rules before enrolling in this particular college. Her goal was to change existing rules to conform to her agenda. He exposed her as anti-Catholic feminist activist trying to disguise herself as just a concerned female student looking out for her fellow students. She's a fraud. And he completely negated his logical cogent point by suggesting she video tape her sexual encounters and post them for our enjoyment. I could only shake my head."
What I find “unfortunate” is the utter lack of understanding simple English terms and the twisting of them into a pejorative when it clearly is not warranted.
The woman is a slut and the term is correct. If she takes umbrage at the term, then she is the one who should change their ways, not Rush. Rush dared to utter the truth and say what the bulk of the thinking populace saw or heard in this self-serving display of Ms. Fluke’s (and I use the term “Ms.” lightly) had in their hearts and minds also.
*
And when the civil war comes (unfortunately I’m more convinced every day) Boehner will be sitting as far away from the front tucked in a ball and weeping about how all of these mean conservatives caused this while the whole time he’s the one who could have tried to stop it.
*
Boehner commenting on the exercise of “FREE SPEECH” by a PRIVATE CITIZEN is INAPPROPRIATE!
*
John Bonehead is a complete f***ing idiot:
Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
While she is described as a “third year law student” they always fail to mention that
she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.
*
Only in the age of Obama are words inappropriate...well if Your not a Democrat...otherwise you can tell the citizenry to ‘go straight to hell’, call em ‘sonsabitches’, and ‘demons’, evenly falsely accuse people of spitting on you..yeah you can use words for that..
*
The slut runs from one interview to another paining a giant mosaic of herself as an out-of-control pig — and the rest of us are supposed to be aggrieved that Rush besmirched her dignity? Give me a break.
The Kadarshian’s America has become a place unfit for decent human beings.
*
Only a slut would want other people to pay for her birth control pills.
I don’t want to work and have to pay for someone else’s birth control. I always paid for my own.
Rush is right, she is a slut and she should have been embarrassed to speak at a congressional hearing.
Only a true tramp would do that.
*
I am sorry, I am with Limbaugh on this. I wanted to tell that twitt in the hearing to PUT HER LEGS TOGETHER and save herself 3K!! I mean DAMN.... if you cannot accept or afford the consequences, DO NOT UNDERTAKE THE ACTIONS! For damn sure don’t FORCE your freaking neighbors to pay for your chlamydia treatments, condoms, birth control pills, morning after pills, and abortions! You are there to get an EDUCATION, not to get laid.
Damn.
Really Rush, is right, the girl came off as a complete slut, and she did it all by herself.
*
Ms Fluke openly revealed her obviously promiscuous life style before the Congressional hearing and Rush’s characterization of her as a slut was perfectly justified. Rep. Boehner should get some backbone.
*
What is now happening is another (women) constituency trying to be BOUGHT with Taxpayer money, for their votes for The Messiah and the Progressive Agenda.
Unions, Blacks, Hispanics, Sex Deviates, Felons, Illegals, Teachers, etc., etc. have been systematically bought via handouts of borrowed-taxpayer dollars.
Think about it...it's all about VOTES.
Do women REALLY think they are above Sharia Law in being USED AT THE WHIM OF GOVERNMENT once they are "bought" to be nothing but tramps and sex receptacles?
Women think this (and abortion) is in THEIR interest? If they do, they truly are being dumb.
*
If this broad is flatbackin’ to the tune of needing subsidized birth control, she IS a slut.
-- This guy doesn't seem to realize that having more sex does not mean that your birth control costs more...
*
This whore would have been totally ostracized just 50 years ago and prior to that, she might have been physically tarred and feathered by both men and women. She represents one of the many destructive forces that families face today and our society overall.
Rush is right and called a spade a spade or in this case a slut a slut. Give me a break is right. His disgust is shared by many of us; the difference is he has the megaphone to voice that disgust.
-- Holy crap, they really DO want to be Saudi Arabia.
*
He did not call her that. He said that her admitted behavior fit the definition of the word.
The MSM complex is playing semantics.
*
She is what she is. She’s taking MY money for her sexual adventures. ‘Sounds like a slut to me.
Well, that didn’t take long.
*
If Boehner only had a spine.
*
When you publicly admit that you have the morals of an alley cat, you shouldn’t be offended when you are appropriately called a ‘slut’. Ms. Fluke’s “problem” is 100% self-inflicted. Rush is RIGHT, Boehner is wrong - again. Boehner needs to step down NOW - we need leadership with morals and a spine, not a go-along-to-get-along RINO.
*
So Boehner is angry because Nancy Pelosi was offended by Limbaugh? What’s new about that? Nancy Pelosi STAYS offended by Limbaugh. Yeah, Limbaugh’s words might have been harsh, but he was just positing the notion that Fluke thinks someone else should pay for her birth control, so she can have sex as much as she wants. I guess that’s kind of like paying her to have sex. Question is, why shouldn’t she pay for her own?
*
She spoke about how active her tw@t is then complains about being called a slut?
*
i’m on hold with Boehner’s office now...I want to ask them where all the comments about “inappropriateness” was when you and i were referred to as “Tea Baggers
*
DOES the speaker have an opinion on the little Miss Fluke’s remarks?
*
Remember people who want to be someone’s friend so bad that they take constant abuse? That’s the GOP.
*
John Boehner is pretty much the epitome of everything that is screwed up and worthless about what is the modern day Republican Party...his cowardice and inability to frame any political issue in a conservative way is pathetic.
God has a plan for all of us, but damn does it hurt when the fighters like Andrew Breitbart are taken from us too soon and gutless wonders like Boehner and the rest of his ilk in the Republican party screw us over for years in Washington DC.
Beyond disgusted.
*
Epic cave. What a wuss. Rush is right.
*
The promiscuous behavior is inappropriate.
*
Any MSM coverage about what Bill Maher just called Sara Palin? [Rhetorical question.]
*
Demanding that others pay for your chosen behaviors is also inappropriate.
*
I find Boners lack of leadership "inappropriate". Which is more dangerous for the country? Rush's remarks calling out a Left wing trick or Boner being a crying loser as House Speaker.
*
"While I certainly agree with Rush on this issue I must say that he either needs to get back on the “Obama is an economic disaster” track and off the social issues or stop critizing the MSM for causing us to lose focus.
IMHO, Rush is a major contributer to that loss of focus on economic issues. He is spending way, way too much time on the social issue themes that only help Obama. It’s amazing to me that Rush would fall into such an obvious trap - and one that he clearly recognizes. It’s time to stop digging. The hole is deep enough already."
The majority of the time Rush does focus on economic issues but also includes the absurdity of the democrat party. This whore perfectly demonstrates the tactics of the left with the added bonus of showing just how obsessed they are with all things sexual. She absolutely epitomizes the left:
1. No personal responsibility
2. Freeloading off of society
3. Rabidly obsessed with all things shameful; including abortion, sexual perversions, and promiscuity.
She IS the democrat party a.k.a. America haters.
*
Get him out of there, get him out of there! Get Bachmann in there (or anyone with a spine).
*
Promisicuous is too polite for the slut. She & her friends sound like bitches in heat shoving their tails into any man’s face that is available. It is beyond disgusting. They are an utter disgrace.
Completely appalling.
*
"As a huge fan and a regular listener, any time Rush starts talking about women and politics, I start to cringe.
Not because he's not correct, but more because he seems to have a knack for undermining his own argument with some unfortunate term or use of language.
He made a brilliant political point yesterday documenting how this women was aware of the rules before enrolling in this particular college. Her goal was to change existing rules to conform to her agenda. He exposed her as anti-Catholic feminist activist trying to disguise herself as just a concerned female student looking out for her fellow students. She's a fraud. And he completely negated his logical cogent point by suggesting she video tape her sexual encounters and post them for our enjoyment. I could only shake my head."
What I find “unfortunate” is the utter lack of understanding simple English terms and the twisting of them into a pejorative when it clearly is not warranted.
The woman is a slut and the term is correct. If she takes umbrage at the term, then she is the one who should change their ways, not Rush. Rush dared to utter the truth and say what the bulk of the thinking populace saw or heard in this self-serving display of Ms. Fluke’s (and I use the term “Ms.” lightly) had in their hearts and minds also.
*
And when the civil war comes (unfortunately I’m more convinced every day) Boehner will be sitting as far away from the front tucked in a ball and weeping about how all of these mean conservatives caused this while the whole time he’s the one who could have tried to stop it.
*
Boehner commenting on the exercise of “FREE SPEECH” by a PRIVATE CITIZEN is INAPPROPRIATE!
*
John Bonehead is a complete f***ing idiot:
Sandra Fluke’s Appearance Is No Fluke
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her.
While she is described as a “third year law student” they always fail to mention that
she is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.
*
Only in the age of Obama are words inappropriate...well if Your not a Democrat...otherwise you can tell the citizenry to ‘go straight to hell’, call em ‘sonsabitches’, and ‘demons’, evenly falsely accuse people of spitting on you..yeah you can use words for that..
*
The slut runs from one interview to another paining a giant mosaic of herself as an out-of-control pig — and the rest of us are supposed to be aggrieved that Rush besmirched her dignity? Give me a break.
The Kadarshian’s America has become a place unfit for decent human beings.
*
Only a slut would want other people to pay for her birth control pills.
I don’t want to work and have to pay for someone else’s birth control. I always paid for my own.
Rush is right, she is a slut and she should have been embarrassed to speak at a congressional hearing.
Only a true tramp would do that.
*
I am sorry, I am with Limbaugh on this. I wanted to tell that twitt in the hearing to PUT HER LEGS TOGETHER and save herself 3K!! I mean DAMN.... if you cannot accept or afford the consequences, DO NOT UNDERTAKE THE ACTIONS! For damn sure don’t FORCE your freaking neighbors to pay for your chlamydia treatments, condoms, birth control pills, morning after pills, and abortions! You are there to get an EDUCATION, not to get laid.
Damn.
Really Rush, is right, the girl came off as a complete slut, and she did it all by herself.
*
Ms Fluke openly revealed her obviously promiscuous life style before the Congressional hearing and Rush’s characterization of her as a slut was perfectly justified. Rep. Boehner should get some backbone.
*
What is now happening is another (women) constituency trying to be BOUGHT with Taxpayer money, for their votes for The Messiah and the Progressive Agenda.
Unions, Blacks, Hispanics, Sex Deviates, Felons, Illegals, Teachers, etc., etc. have been systematically bought via handouts of borrowed-taxpayer dollars.
Think about it...it's all about VOTES.
Do women REALLY think they are above Sharia Law in being USED AT THE WHIM OF GOVERNMENT once they are "bought" to be nothing but tramps and sex receptacles?
Women think this (and abortion) is in THEIR interest? If they do, they truly are being dumb.
*
If this broad is flatbackin’ to the tune of needing subsidized birth control, she IS a slut.
-- This guy doesn't seem to realize that having more sex does not mean that your birth control costs more...
*
This whore would have been totally ostracized just 50 years ago and prior to that, she might have been physically tarred and feathered by both men and women. She represents one of the many destructive forces that families face today and our society overall.
Rush is right and called a spade a spade or in this case a slut a slut. Give me a break is right. His disgust is shared by many of us; the difference is he has the megaphone to voice that disgust.
-- Holy crap, they really DO want to be Saudi Arabia.
*
He did not call her that. He said that her admitted behavior fit the definition of the word.
The MSM complex is playing semantics.
*
She is what she is. She’s taking MY money for her sexual adventures. ‘Sounds like a slut to me.
Sunday, February 19, 2012
Female Combat Pilot Wants to Kick Santorum 'in the Jimmy' for Remarks on Women
Excerpt: "A retired female fighter pilot running for former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' open seat in Congress said Friday that Rick Santorum's recent remarks on women in combat make her want to "go kick him in the jimmy."
Martha McSally, a retired US Air Force colonel and a veteran of the war in Afghanistan, is running in Arizona's congressional special election as a Republican. According to her Facebook page, she was the first American woman to fly in combat since the 1991 lifting of a ban on women in that role."
Great, we need more women on the front lines of combat. Let’s be like the muslims and put our women in harm’s way.
*
""Let’s be like the muslims and put our women in harm’s way."
The Israelis do it, too."
They used to, didn’t work. Now feminazis are trying again. I’m not going to bother finding links, did it a few days ago, and people who don’t want to know the facts won’t read them.
*
Many men get raped when they are in enemy hands. War is hell and terrible things happen to captured combatants.
However, it’s the simple fact that it’s reality that military readiness goes to pot when a femles screams and the males are reacting to the screams.
It wouldn’t surprise me, if some of the battles lost in Iraq and Afghanistan had to do with this simple fact.
There is room in the military for females, just not field combat conditions.
*
My question to her would be simple. Since she is a woman, how in the hell would she know what a man thinks or feels in such a situation?
*
I guess McSilly is entitled to her opinion. Doesn’t make it right.
*
I think we should make the feminazis who scream the loudest should be put right in the front lines(i.e., Hitlery Rotten Clinton, Patsy Schroeder, Gloria Steinman, Nancy Lugosi, etc.)
*
There are already legless females who piloted combat aircraft over Iraq and Afghanistan.
Our women folk need to be home raising the next generation of moral, charactered, Christian patriots. They should not be out on the front lines ; ESPECIALLY not those who have husbands and children back home.
*
Our womenfolk should be NOWHERE in harms way ; it speaks very poorly for our country that we send our women out to fight our wars in ANY capacity. It does not lead to sound home or family life either.
*
We keep seeing this chivalry angle about women in combat. I think it’s a losing argument because it’s mostly hypothetical. I think it’s much better to bring up what is already occuring and that is troops are humping like rabbits. Anytime a women is introduced into an all male unit the dynamic of unit cohesion is changed. Now the men in the unit have to be concerned about everthing they say lest they be charged with sexual harassment and have their careers ended. When the chick has sex with one member of the unit, it creates hostility and jealousy among the other troops. One woman, even at the very bottom of military heirarchy can destroy moral and cohesion of an entire unit.
*
She should kick Anthony in the wiener who married a Muslim assistant to Hillary Clinton.
*
" I am of the wrong generation, brought up to believe it didn’t matter what I was skilled at, not to waste my time with an education. I was just going to be a wife and mother. I have been married 41 years, and have raised a set of twins, boy and girl (who was in the Navy), now 37. I accomplished what my parents wanted for me. And I would not change a thing that would have not allowed me to raise these amazing children of mine.
However, I believe women are capable of a variety of skills much better than men. My own daughter was 5’4”, and could take down of man of 200+ pounds with her boot at his throat in a matter of seconds. Women are much more capable that they are given credit for."
Ya see the problem is, they give people like you the right to vote...To prove my point, just look at the state of affairs and your own words.
Ya got the same attitude the leftist do in big cities, when the send 5'4" females into the brutal senseless murder districts where extremely violent people rule.
Anyone thinking this is a good idea has brain rot.
*
I have no problem with Santorum’s rhetoric. It’s often taken out of context, misrepresenting his views. Contrary to what the antagonists say, he’s not a Rightwing hard ass. He has an affable heart, and wants the best for everyone. He’s not the mean-spirited troglodyte the Left is painting him out to be. He’s really a good guy.
My issue with Rick is Liberty, how he votes, and his inability to win the General.
I know many here don’t like Newt, but I’m convinced he’s the only candidate at this point that has the ability to turn things around.
I want my damn Country back. I don’t need to feel good about who I’m voting for.
*
I think women should go into combat and carry a rifle, they should be grunts. But they have to register for the draft and not be eligible for any student aid if they do not. They will simple get pregnant and the men will do the fighting. It happens in every unit the deploys.
*
I think women should go into combat and carry a rifle, they should be grunts. But they have to register for the draft and not be eligible for any student aid if they do not. They will simple get pregnant and the men will do the fighting. It happens in every unit the deploys.
*
If Rick Santorum becomes President Santorum, this woman should think twice about threatening to kick him in the “jimmy” or anywhere else. She might have the Secret Service knocking on her door.
*
Women shouldn’t be in combat, period...For numerous reasons mentioned thousands of times.
In fact, there are plenty of men that can pilot that same aircraft and do it better, and have better chances of survival/escape going down behind enemy lines.
PC and leftist idiotic thinking, gets people killed all the time.
*
Just the emotional response you’d expect from a woman.
*
Women in the FREE and CHRISTIAN world are FREE and men don’t use them as tools and shelters.
We are not muslims
*
When a people lose their child bearing age women, then they lose the ability to reproduce, that is why female life is so precious, not to mention that if Western man ever truly comes to see the weaker sex as nothing special and not due any special consideration, then we will have become savages, and the weaker sex would not like to actually see that goofy fantasy, be reality.
Might makes right, a sexually unaware warrior culture of ranking based purely on strength and successful aggression, would make women lowly indeed.
*
She sounds like one of those feminist types.....how precious.
When you can run as fast as me, carry as much as me, have the same (as in the same; not the same-same but different crap), physical fitness test standards as me, combat fitness test standards as me, go thorough the same infantry schooling as me.....then we'll talk.
Until then, STFU and make dinner.
*
In fact, McSally’s remarks are sexist in the extreme. What would happen if a male threatened to assault sensitive parts of a woman’s anatomy?
*
Combat pilots have historically experienced relatively high rates of imprisonment in anything less than completely asymmetrical warfare. The tragic burden of Col. McSally's poorly thought out policy will be born by future female P.O.W.s. They may end up getting something far worse that being "kicked in their Jimmy's" many times each day for years at a time.
*
Obviously this woman cannot think/reason beyond her vagina.
*
How many have perished because female cops and firefighters didn't have the upper body strength to rescue them?
How many have died for a politically correct ideology that denies simple biological fact.
And how many will die because women are mixed with men in combat?
There was an entire fire crew out West several years ago who were all burned to death in a fast moving brush fire because the men waited for the women—this stuff happens a lot but it's un PC to report it.
Martha McSally, a retired US Air Force colonel and a veteran of the war in Afghanistan, is running in Arizona's congressional special election as a Republican. According to her Facebook page, she was the first American woman to fly in combat since the 1991 lifting of a ban on women in that role."
Great, we need more women on the front lines of combat. Let’s be like the muslims and put our women in harm’s way.
*
""Let’s be like the muslims and put our women in harm’s way."
The Israelis do it, too."
They used to, didn’t work. Now feminazis are trying again. I’m not going to bother finding links, did it a few days ago, and people who don’t want to know the facts won’t read them.
*
Many men get raped when they are in enemy hands. War is hell and terrible things happen to captured combatants.
However, it’s the simple fact that it’s reality that military readiness goes to pot when a femles screams and the males are reacting to the screams.
It wouldn’t surprise me, if some of the battles lost in Iraq and Afghanistan had to do with this simple fact.
There is room in the military for females, just not field combat conditions.
*
My question to her would be simple. Since she is a woman, how in the hell would she know what a man thinks or feels in such a situation?
*
I guess McSilly is entitled to her opinion. Doesn’t make it right.
*
I think we should make the feminazis who scream the loudest should be put right in the front lines(i.e., Hitlery Rotten Clinton, Patsy Schroeder, Gloria Steinman, Nancy Lugosi, etc.)
*
There are already legless females who piloted combat aircraft over Iraq and Afghanistan.
Our women folk need to be home raising the next generation of moral, charactered, Christian patriots. They should not be out on the front lines ; ESPECIALLY not those who have husbands and children back home.
*
Our womenfolk should be NOWHERE in harms way ; it speaks very poorly for our country that we send our women out to fight our wars in ANY capacity. It does not lead to sound home or family life either.
*
We keep seeing this chivalry angle about women in combat. I think it’s a losing argument because it’s mostly hypothetical. I think it’s much better to bring up what is already occuring and that is troops are humping like rabbits. Anytime a women is introduced into an all male unit the dynamic of unit cohesion is changed. Now the men in the unit have to be concerned about everthing they say lest they be charged with sexual harassment and have their careers ended. When the chick has sex with one member of the unit, it creates hostility and jealousy among the other troops. One woman, even at the very bottom of military heirarchy can destroy moral and cohesion of an entire unit.
*
She should kick Anthony in the wiener who married a Muslim assistant to Hillary Clinton.
*
" I am of the wrong generation, brought up to believe it didn’t matter what I was skilled at, not to waste my time with an education. I was just going to be a wife and mother. I have been married 41 years, and have raised a set of twins, boy and girl (who was in the Navy), now 37. I accomplished what my parents wanted for me. And I would not change a thing that would have not allowed me to raise these amazing children of mine.
However, I believe women are capable of a variety of skills much better than men. My own daughter was 5’4”, and could take down of man of 200+ pounds with her boot at his throat in a matter of seconds. Women are much more capable that they are given credit for."
Ya see the problem is, they give people like you the right to vote...To prove my point, just look at the state of affairs and your own words.
Ya got the same attitude the leftist do in big cities, when the send 5'4" females into the brutal senseless murder districts where extremely violent people rule.
Anyone thinking this is a good idea has brain rot.
*
I have no problem with Santorum’s rhetoric. It’s often taken out of context, misrepresenting his views. Contrary to what the antagonists say, he’s not a Rightwing hard ass. He has an affable heart, and wants the best for everyone. He’s not the mean-spirited troglodyte the Left is painting him out to be. He’s really a good guy.
My issue with Rick is Liberty, how he votes, and his inability to win the General.
I know many here don’t like Newt, but I’m convinced he’s the only candidate at this point that has the ability to turn things around.
I want my damn Country back. I don’t need to feel good about who I’m voting for.
*
I think women should go into combat and carry a rifle, they should be grunts. But they have to register for the draft and not be eligible for any student aid if they do not. They will simple get pregnant and the men will do the fighting. It happens in every unit the deploys.
*
I think women should go into combat and carry a rifle, they should be grunts. But they have to register for the draft and not be eligible for any student aid if they do not. They will simple get pregnant and the men will do the fighting. It happens in every unit the deploys.
*
If Rick Santorum becomes President Santorum, this woman should think twice about threatening to kick him in the “jimmy” or anywhere else. She might have the Secret Service knocking on her door.
*
Women shouldn’t be in combat, period...For numerous reasons mentioned thousands of times.
In fact, there are plenty of men that can pilot that same aircraft and do it better, and have better chances of survival/escape going down behind enemy lines.
PC and leftist idiotic thinking, gets people killed all the time.
*
Just the emotional response you’d expect from a woman.
*
Women in the FREE and CHRISTIAN world are FREE and men don’t use them as tools and shelters.
We are not muslims
*
When a people lose their child bearing age women, then they lose the ability to reproduce, that is why female life is so precious, not to mention that if Western man ever truly comes to see the weaker sex as nothing special and not due any special consideration, then we will have become savages, and the weaker sex would not like to actually see that goofy fantasy, be reality.
Might makes right, a sexually unaware warrior culture of ranking based purely on strength and successful aggression, would make women lowly indeed.
*
She sounds like one of those feminist types.....how precious.
When you can run as fast as me, carry as much as me, have the same (as in the same; not the same-same but different crap), physical fitness test standards as me, combat fitness test standards as me, go thorough the same infantry schooling as me.....then we'll talk.
Until then, STFU and make dinner.
*
In fact, McSally’s remarks are sexist in the extreme. What would happen if a male threatened to assault sensitive parts of a woman’s anatomy?
*
Combat pilots have historically experienced relatively high rates of imprisonment in anything less than completely asymmetrical warfare. The tragic burden of Col. McSally's poorly thought out policy will be born by future female P.O.W.s. They may end up getting something far worse that being "kicked in their Jimmy's" many times each day for years at a time.
*
Obviously this woman cannot think/reason beyond her vagina.
*
How many have perished because female cops and firefighters didn't have the upper body strength to rescue them?
How many have died for a politically correct ideology that denies simple biological fact.
And how many will die because women are mixed with men in combat?
There was an entire fire crew out West several years ago who were all burned to death in a fast moving brush fire because the men waited for the women—this stuff happens a lot but it's un PC to report it.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Openly gay Miss California USA contestants make history
This is indeed “historic.” We should rejoice at such “progress.”
*
I've been personally acquainted with several actual homosexually perverted females over the years.
Some of them are scary.
Most make my skin crawl.
NONE of them are remotely attractive, except (presumably) to each other.
In many cases, the unattractiveness seems to be a deliberate choice.
*
Ugly is “in”; beauty is out. Evil is in. Goodness is out.
Interesting times we live in.
*
Here's the problem. When you see "do's" like this, you know they are screwed up in many ways.
And they commit suicide from bullying?
I'll bet 100 to 1, they are disgusted with themselves for ever engaging in that lifestyle but there really isn't any way you can step BACK in time...
*
I saw a nice, sweet, pretty girl slowly get sucked into lesbianism. She slowly became more and more perverted.
I then saw her convert one other girl, this girl came up to me and told me she thought she was doing wrong. I tried to help both of them but once a lesbian has you in doubt they will stop at nothing to convert you.
Now, this girl who used to be a friend actively tries to find things she can do that are against god. Literally if its good, she makes fun of it and does the opposite.
*
And why is that so many TV shows now insist on including gay men in their character story lines? There are not that many gay men in our population. Talk about being inundated...and propagandized.
Don’t you also kinda wonder why lesbians are so under represented? Power to the Lesbos! But then [their appearance] may be the reason why.
*
I think that their suicide rates are more to do with their internal thinking (as you stated above), not so much a "disgust" with their past actions. I think some people are ostracized because they are "different," and most of those who are ostracized (probably all of us at different times in our lives), simply continue on to live their lives without ever thinking about those who cast us aside. However, there are those who are so NARCISSISTIC (homosexuality is the epitome of narcissism) they think the world should revolve around them and when reality kicks down their charade, they can't handle it! How many schizophrenics commit suicide? A very LARGE number do! Why? Because when their reality cannot explain the truth which others and they themselves start to see, they cannot cope!
*
This girl is mentally ill and should put under the care of a doctor.
*
I've been personally acquainted with several actual homosexually perverted females over the years.
Some of them are scary.
Most make my skin crawl.
NONE of them are remotely attractive, except (presumably) to each other.
In many cases, the unattractiveness seems to be a deliberate choice.
*
Ugly is “in”; beauty is out. Evil is in. Goodness is out.
Interesting times we live in.
*
Here's the problem. When you see "do's" like this, you know they are screwed up in many ways.
And they commit suicide from bullying?
I'll bet 100 to 1, they are disgusted with themselves for ever engaging in that lifestyle but there really isn't any way you can step BACK in time...
*
I saw a nice, sweet, pretty girl slowly get sucked into lesbianism. She slowly became more and more perverted.
I then saw her convert one other girl, this girl came up to me and told me she thought she was doing wrong. I tried to help both of them but once a lesbian has you in doubt they will stop at nothing to convert you.
Now, this girl who used to be a friend actively tries to find things she can do that are against god. Literally if its good, she makes fun of it and does the opposite.
*
And why is that so many TV shows now insist on including gay men in their character story lines? There are not that many gay men in our population. Talk about being inundated...and propagandized.
Don’t you also kinda wonder why lesbians are so under represented? Power to the Lesbos! But then [their appearance] may be the reason why.
*
I think that their suicide rates are more to do with their internal thinking (as you stated above), not so much a "disgust" with their past actions. I think some people are ostracized because they are "different," and most of those who are ostracized (probably all of us at different times in our lives), simply continue on to live their lives without ever thinking about those who cast us aside. However, there are those who are so NARCISSISTIC (homosexuality is the epitome of narcissism) they think the world should revolve around them and when reality kicks down their charade, they can't handle it! How many schizophrenics commit suicide? A very LARGE number do! Why? Because when their reality cannot explain the truth which others and they themselves start to see, they cannot cope!
*
This girl is mentally ill and should put under the care of a doctor.
Monday, October 17, 2011
Why do women still struggle to get to the very top in politics?
Via the Daily Mail.
Men also struggle to get to the very top in politics. There are very few positions there and lots of people fighting for them.
*
I’m not sure you will want to hear the truth but here go’s.
Women are not natural leaders. They are weak compared to men and this is natures way. This is not to degrade women in any way as they have capabilities not found in men. Leadership is simply not their biological role.
This is backed up by thousands of years of human history.
It is also the reason that it is highly unlikely that Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin or even Hilary Clinton had or have any real chance of being elected President of the United States. Of the three Hilary probably had the best chance and I will elaborate only by saying it’s not presidential to look hot in a bikini!
*
For years I had always stated that America would elect a black male president before electing the first woman president. I was right.
After how badly this first experiment has gone, I wonder about the typical white man and his intention in the voting booth.
And I wonder if he’d tell his wife that he will never vote for another candidate based upon race, sex or religion... ever again.
*
I’d vote for Palin in a heartbeat but liberals defeated my last opportunity to put her in office.
*
Ask Sarah Palin this question.
She’s the one who quit.
*
Didn’t a Roman Senator say, “Make women your equal, they will rule you.”
*
Perhaps because women mistake networking for accomplishment. In business it’s not all networking and in politics it’s not networking, it’s about being able to do your job. Throw in that sometimes women base decisions on personal perspectives, not what is good for the country, and you have a voting bloc that doesn’t want anything unpleasant, just a continuation of the good life. A lot of women voters don’t want what is best for the country, but what is ‘fun’ or ‘social,’ or always pleasant. Sarah Palin turns some women off because she likes to handle a gun, shoot animals, and get her hands dirty, something that a lot of women these days think is ‘icky.’ Obama won a huge vote because he is pleasant and doesn’t want Americans to sacrfice anything but their freedom and self respect. There is no point in denying that and there’s also a snippy cliqueish tendency that if a woman is too much of an ‘outsider,’ then she won’t get voted in. I soemtimes think America has been reduced to becoming one big high school campus. Sarah is the ‘out’ girl and as a result she won’t get into office. She might be widely respected and widely admired aroudn the world, but it’s at home where she has to get voted ‘in.’ No vote, no Presidency.
*
They have these pesky things called elections. People (for the most part) can’t just be appointed.
I’ll never forget the liberal I heard once explaining that the Supreme Soviet was more representative than the US Congress brcause they had more women.
*
I’ve noticed at work when I’ve had female bosses, there’s much more emphasis on discussing social activities and one’s personal life. With the male bosses I’ve worked for, it’s much more impersonal and focused on the job at hand which is fine with me since I’ve come to work not to a party.
Men also struggle to get to the very top in politics. There are very few positions there and lots of people fighting for them.
*
I’m not sure you will want to hear the truth but here go’s.
Women are not natural leaders. They are weak compared to men and this is natures way. This is not to degrade women in any way as they have capabilities not found in men. Leadership is simply not their biological role.
This is backed up by thousands of years of human history.
It is also the reason that it is highly unlikely that Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin or even Hilary Clinton had or have any real chance of being elected President of the United States. Of the three Hilary probably had the best chance and I will elaborate only by saying it’s not presidential to look hot in a bikini!
*
For years I had always stated that America would elect a black male president before electing the first woman president. I was right.
After how badly this first experiment has gone, I wonder about the typical white man and his intention in the voting booth.
And I wonder if he’d tell his wife that he will never vote for another candidate based upon race, sex or religion... ever again.
*
I’d vote for Palin in a heartbeat but liberals defeated my last opportunity to put her in office.
*
Ask Sarah Palin this question.
She’s the one who quit.
*
Didn’t a Roman Senator say, “Make women your equal, they will rule you.”
*
Perhaps because women mistake networking for accomplishment. In business it’s not all networking and in politics it’s not networking, it’s about being able to do your job. Throw in that sometimes women base decisions on personal perspectives, not what is good for the country, and you have a voting bloc that doesn’t want anything unpleasant, just a continuation of the good life. A lot of women voters don’t want what is best for the country, but what is ‘fun’ or ‘social,’ or always pleasant. Sarah Palin turns some women off because she likes to handle a gun, shoot animals, and get her hands dirty, something that a lot of women these days think is ‘icky.’ Obama won a huge vote because he is pleasant and doesn’t want Americans to sacrfice anything but their freedom and self respect. There is no point in denying that and there’s also a snippy cliqueish tendency that if a woman is too much of an ‘outsider,’ then she won’t get voted in. I soemtimes think America has been reduced to becoming one big high school campus. Sarah is the ‘out’ girl and as a result she won’t get into office. She might be widely respected and widely admired aroudn the world, but it’s at home where she has to get voted ‘in.’ No vote, no Presidency.
*
They have these pesky things called elections. People (for the most part) can’t just be appointed.
I’ll never forget the liberal I heard once explaining that the Supreme Soviet was more representative than the US Congress brcause they had more women.
*
I’ve noticed at work when I’ve had female bosses, there’s much more emphasis on discussing social activities and one’s personal life. With the male bosses I’ve worked for, it’s much more impersonal and focused on the job at hand which is fine with me since I’ve come to work not to a party.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)