Excerpt: "Ted Nugent is hitting the pavement for GOP president hopeful Mitt Romney. The rocker called for attendees of the National Rifle Association’s convention to go out and recruit thousands of people to vote for Romney in the coming election. Nugent said, ”Our government is wiping its a– with the Constitution.”"
I love Ted's passion for freedom and RKBA.
It's his wisdom in siding with a Ivy league gun grabbing a$$hole that I take issue with.
I am honestly surprised to be alive right now after the last few years of Zero's Socialist reign. I'd be even more surprised to survive another four year of the same...
*
Asspress reported this with all their attempts at hysteria. What they didn't realize is that the truthfulness of his remarks stand in contrast to the media's daily smokescreen.
*
I don’t get it: Romney is more liberal than even Obama yet Ted is supporting Romney.
*
ABO is a very strong belief. I struggle with it daily. I'm am furious that a weak no conviction lying liberal butthead will possibly garner the GOP-e nomination. And then I consider Zero and the dark minions in his administration and I think ABO.
*
“I don’t get it: Romney is more liberal than even Obama yet Ted is supporting Romney.”
You’re right. You DON’T get it.
*
Anyone seen any bumperstickers reading, “Da Bro’ Gotta Go!”?
*
Four MORE years of Obama would be MUCH worse. A nightmare!
*
Obama is a COMMUNIST not a liberal.
*
I’m with you Ted!...If this disaster gets re-elected it’s over for America as we know it!
*
Romney has made some awful mistakes, and has some awful positions, but there's simply no way that he is as bad as Fauxobama. I'm am seething mad at the lack of choice that we have (and will still vote for Gingrich in the TX primary next month, regardless of whether he's in the race or not), but Fauxbama is the enemy. Just like the US allied with the Soviet Union in WW2 to get rid of Hitler, so must conservatives ally with Mittbots to get rid of Fauxbama. Just like we got rid of the Soviets over the ensuing years, so we will get rid of the Mittbots and restore our Republic - but we must first survive as a modestly free nation before we can do that.
Yeah, Romney rots - but he's not Fauxbama. Besides, if we have a reasonably solid conservative majority in Congress, we can stop the worst aspects of Mitt's liberal tendencies. He, unlike Fauxbama, has some respect for the law and won't be issuing Executive Orders all the time in order to undercut the Congress and all of us. He's at least somewhat persuadable - unlike the Manchurian Candidate in the WH.
*
If you could go back and get rid of the politicians that brought us the Income Tax, or the administrations that brought us SSIP, Medicare, Medicaid and the WOsD programs, would you do it?
Obamacare is all of that rolled into one giant liberty stealing program. Yes, Mitt MIGHT do something, but we all know that Obama WILL do something. He already has. If the USSC does not overturn it, then we MUST repeal it now or it will never be repealed.
I prefer to play russian roulette with one bullet in the chamber instead of filling all of the chambers.
*
Your Russian Roulette analogy is backward. Romney would effectively provide all six rounds. If Obama won, the very fact that Republicans had so soundly rejected liberal Romney, would empty most of the cylinders.
You say Mitt might do something? THIS IS THE MAN WHO DESIGNED AND IMPLEMENTED THE MODEL FOR OBAMACARE! Hello???? Observation indicates that it's probable that his vanity and pride are as wrapped up in seeing it pass as Obama's. Romney's registration as a Republican is a beard that, sadly, few are willing to allow themselves to see through becasue they are so blindly fearful of Obama, and they are paralyzed with fear because they have fallen for all the hype attributing omnipotent powers to Obama. But because Romney is a Republican, HE would have the greater power (and would very likely use it) in destroying limited government conservatism, which is the ONLY political defender of our freedom.
The most substantial thing better about Obama than Romney, is that Obama is a Democrat.
Romney has a long, documented record of PROMOTING liberal policies on the five major issues -- cap-and-trade, nationalized health care, subsidized abortion on demand, activist liberal judges, and the homosexual agenda.
And it's just SAD to see folks here hanging on to the ridiculous hope that "If we can just maintain a conservative majority in Congress, we can hold Romney's feet to the fire." Yeah -- and if we can just talk enough sense into cats, we can get them to love going to NASCAR races.
Fear makes people do stupid things -- like vote to surrender everything the Republican party needs to DEFEND.
Showing posts with label romney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label romney. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Saturday, April 14, 2012
We will not waste our limited resources on FR in support for a liberal progressive LIAR
Well, Jim Robinson can't make his lack of an endorsement any more clear. The number of Freepers who will openly vote for Romney is still around half from what I can tell, and while I don't think they're being banned quite yet, I think some are leaving because they're being called "wusses" and "liberal scum". You know, as adults do.
Anyway, we'll have to wait and see if Mitt's VP choice can energize the base like McCain's did.
Excerpts from Jim Robinson's vanity piece:
A reminder for those who are not receiving the message:
Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesn’t even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue. Funny thing, the man actually seems to believe his own latest lies and simply ignores the glaring record of his past actions/lies. And you have true blue establishment elite RINO Republicans like Karl Rove enabling and backing up his lies. Their motivation is simply to hang on to power (and riches) any way they can.
I’ve stated many times since Romney started running for the presidency way back when that I’d never vote for him and I will not. He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike.
...
There will be no campaign for this Massachusetts liberal liar on FR!!
Damn the libs and RINOS, full steam ahead!!
But no matter what happens we must turn out in November to vote IN as many conservatives and vote OUT as many rats as possible at all levels of government. If we don't have a conservative at the top of the ticket we must turn out anyway and vote straight conservative DOWN ticket!! Just think of it an off cycle election and pour on the TEA!! It'll be doubly important that we control both houses of congress and as many statehouses as possible.
Restore the 10th amendment!! Impeach the leftist president whoever he may be!! Restore Liberty!! Rebellion comes from the bottom up!!
Comments:
This newbie is RIGHT THERE. No Romney votes coming from this house.
*
Thank you. Yappers have been nipping at my heels all day long because as a conservative on a conservative web site, I'm saying that I'm going to vote for a conservative.
Which isn't Romney.
Listen to them and you'd think I singlehandledly am re-electing Obama.
*
I’m all in Jim.
Hey, it’s like consevatives are now the subversive
revolutionaries. I’m going to go out and but a beret and some sharp but funky boots!
*
"Forgive me if I misunderstood your post, but you’re telling us to absolutely insure the Generalisimo gets reelected. Just stay out of the presidential election altogether. I’d vote for just about anyone to bid adieu to President Worse-Than-Carter, Lyndon Johnson, and FDR combined. Are you insane?"
Both Obama and Romney are pro-SodomyIsMarriage, pro-abortion,anti-gun, pro-socialized medicine and will appoint liberal judges.
I’d rather have that liberal agenda labeled as Democrat than Republican. Two years later the congressional elections will swing away from the party that gained the POTUS. That means we will have a chance to block Obama in 2 years. But if Romney gets in, neither the rats nor the establishment republicans are going to stand in the way of Romney’s liberal agenda.
The only downside I see to letting Obama win over Romney is that Israel might fare better under Romney.
But the upside is that faced with another 4 years of Obama, Congress might get serious with him and start enforcing the checks and balances that are supposed to be there.
I can’t in good conscience vote for either candidate because of their pro-abortion pro-sodomy stances.
*
Since 2nd Amendment issues have been and always will be my number One priority, Mittens will not get my vote.
I will be there to vote the Down Ticket, but will vote Constitutional Party at the Top.
I heard that Mittens was speaking at the NRA today.
WHAT THE HELL IS THE NRA HAVING THIS POS SPEAK AT THEIR EVENT!!!!!!
NRA ... selling out once again.
*
"I’m no fan of mitt’s ether, but you need to get over it and put your country first. If things pan out the way it looks, you can ether help obumber get re-elected. Or you can help mitt get elected, it’s just that simple."
You are one dumb wuss. A vote for mitt is a stamped vote for barry. He's not winning any debate with him - you have some major pie in the sky thinking with NOTHING TO BACK IT! Vetting him will be a cake walk for the liberals - it's no contest. He has NOTHING to debate the one you fear the most with!! Get a grip man! You have been duped!
The only way one can put their country first is $upport NEWT!! It's that simple.
*
As much as I dislike Romney you would have to be insane not to vote for him if he is the nominee
*
Are you kidding me?
You actually believe we would be better off voting in as many conservatives as possible and having Obama in office than if we voted in as many conservatives as possible and had Romney?
If that's your position then something has gone dreadfully wrong in your thinking. We have an undocumented, unvetted, full blown commie in the white house. We must rid the country of this fraud of a man no matter who the Republican Nominee may be. We can't elect enough conservatives to make the country safe from 4 more years of Obama, Holder, and all the rest of the commie thugs he brought along.
Wake up!
*
I AM WITH YOU 1000%! IN FACT... LET THE ROMNEY-BOT PURGE BEGIN.
romney is evil... if he were a good Christian man, we could believe in his redemption... but he is not... he is a member of a cult and the more that I learn of his religion... the more that I understand what it is not... and it is NOT a Christian religion. He says that he has had a change of heart... but I hear no apology for the murders of the innocent that he has enabled. He owes all of us apologies for every single progressive thing that he has done and every single progressive action he took as governor... but do not hold your breath... he is a progressive and only lies today for power and money. I will not vote for him under any circumstance whatsoever. I will vote for every single Conservative down ballot... but romney will never see a vote from my hand.
*
"and how many of us voted for Perot? which got rid of Bush I and got us Bubba"
Which exposed liberalism to the world and brought us Speaker Newt Gingrich 2 years later in response and his balanced budgets, booming economy and budget surplus. Then the Repugs nominated Bob Don't and lost the White House. Notice they're repeating history here...1992-1994-1996...2008-2010-2012. All we have to do like Jim says is gridlock Obama the way we gridlocked Clinton. It won't make government conservative of course but it will lessen the damage and set the stage to retake the White House in 2016.
*
ABO means what it means. Anybody but Obama. That includes Newt. But since this thread has turned into some kind of harsh 'FU' thread, it seems pointless to continue.
This is not a discussion, it is a tantrum.
Anyway, we'll have to wait and see if Mitt's VP choice can energize the base like McCain's did.
Excerpts from Jim Robinson's vanity piece:
A reminder for those who are not receiving the message:
Romney is a pathological compulsive liar. Lie after lie papered over with more lies. Doesn’t even flinch when caught in bald faced lies, simply tells another big whopper to cover up or dodge the issue. Funny thing, the man actually seems to believe his own latest lies and simply ignores the glaring record of his past actions/lies. And you have true blue establishment elite RINO Republicans like Karl Rove enabling and backing up his lies. Their motivation is simply to hang on to power (and riches) any way they can.
I’ve stated many times since Romney started running for the presidency way back when that I’d never vote for him and I will not. He cannot lie his way out of his decades long record of support for abortion, Roe v Wade, planned parenthood, gay rights, gun control, global warming, amnesty, liberal judges, big government, compulsory or socialized health care (RomneyCommieCare), mandates, Keynesian economics, support and approval of TARP, bailouts, stimulus packages, i.e, every damn liberal progressive issue that comes down the pike.
...
There will be no campaign for this Massachusetts liberal liar on FR!!
Damn the libs and RINOS, full steam ahead!!
But no matter what happens we must turn out in November to vote IN as many conservatives and vote OUT as many rats as possible at all levels of government. If we don't have a conservative at the top of the ticket we must turn out anyway and vote straight conservative DOWN ticket!! Just think of it an off cycle election and pour on the TEA!! It'll be doubly important that we control both houses of congress and as many statehouses as possible.
Restore the 10th amendment!! Impeach the leftist president whoever he may be!! Restore Liberty!! Rebellion comes from the bottom up!!
Comments:
This newbie is RIGHT THERE. No Romney votes coming from this house.
*
Thank you. Yappers have been nipping at my heels all day long because as a conservative on a conservative web site, I'm saying that I'm going to vote for a conservative.
Which isn't Romney.
Listen to them and you'd think I singlehandledly am re-electing Obama.
*
I’m all in Jim.
Hey, it’s like consevatives are now the subversive
revolutionaries. I’m going to go out and but a beret and some sharp but funky boots!
*
"Forgive me if I misunderstood your post, but you’re telling us to absolutely insure the Generalisimo gets reelected. Just stay out of the presidential election altogether. I’d vote for just about anyone to bid adieu to President Worse-Than-Carter, Lyndon Johnson, and FDR combined. Are you insane?"
Both Obama and Romney are pro-SodomyIsMarriage, pro-abortion,anti-gun, pro-socialized medicine and will appoint liberal judges.
I’d rather have that liberal agenda labeled as Democrat than Republican. Two years later the congressional elections will swing away from the party that gained the POTUS. That means we will have a chance to block Obama in 2 years. But if Romney gets in, neither the rats nor the establishment republicans are going to stand in the way of Romney’s liberal agenda.
The only downside I see to letting Obama win over Romney is that Israel might fare better under Romney.
But the upside is that faced with another 4 years of Obama, Congress might get serious with him and start enforcing the checks and balances that are supposed to be there.
I can’t in good conscience vote for either candidate because of their pro-abortion pro-sodomy stances.
*
Since 2nd Amendment issues have been and always will be my number One priority, Mittens will not get my vote.
I will be there to vote the Down Ticket, but will vote Constitutional Party at the Top.
I heard that Mittens was speaking at the NRA today.
WHAT THE HELL IS THE NRA HAVING THIS POS SPEAK AT THEIR EVENT!!!!!!
NRA ... selling out once again.
*
"I’m no fan of mitt’s ether, but you need to get over it and put your country first. If things pan out the way it looks, you can ether help obumber get re-elected. Or you can help mitt get elected, it’s just that simple."
You are one dumb wuss. A vote for mitt is a stamped vote for barry. He's not winning any debate with him - you have some major pie in the sky thinking with NOTHING TO BACK IT! Vetting him will be a cake walk for the liberals - it's no contest. He has NOTHING to debate the one you fear the most with!! Get a grip man! You have been duped!
The only way one can put their country first is $upport NEWT!! It's that simple.
*
As much as I dislike Romney you would have to be insane not to vote for him if he is the nominee
*
Are you kidding me?
You actually believe we would be better off voting in as many conservatives as possible and having Obama in office than if we voted in as many conservatives as possible and had Romney?
If that's your position then something has gone dreadfully wrong in your thinking. We have an undocumented, unvetted, full blown commie in the white house. We must rid the country of this fraud of a man no matter who the Republican Nominee may be. We can't elect enough conservatives to make the country safe from 4 more years of Obama, Holder, and all the rest of the commie thugs he brought along.
Wake up!
*
I AM WITH YOU 1000%! IN FACT... LET THE ROMNEY-BOT PURGE BEGIN.
romney is evil... if he were a good Christian man, we could believe in his redemption... but he is not... he is a member of a cult and the more that I learn of his religion... the more that I understand what it is not... and it is NOT a Christian religion. He says that he has had a change of heart... but I hear no apology for the murders of the innocent that he has enabled. He owes all of us apologies for every single progressive thing that he has done and every single progressive action he took as governor... but do not hold your breath... he is a progressive and only lies today for power and money. I will not vote for him under any circumstance whatsoever. I will vote for every single Conservative down ballot... but romney will never see a vote from my hand.
*
"and how many of us voted for Perot? which got rid of Bush I and got us Bubba"
Which exposed liberalism to the world and brought us Speaker Newt Gingrich 2 years later in response and his balanced budgets, booming economy and budget surplus. Then the Repugs nominated Bob Don't and lost the White House. Notice they're repeating history here...1992-1994-1996...2008-2010-2012. All we have to do like Jim says is gridlock Obama the way we gridlocked Clinton. It won't make government conservative of course but it will lessen the damage and set the stage to retake the White House in 2016.
*
ABO means what it means. Anybody but Obama. That includes Newt. But since this thread has turned into some kind of harsh 'FU' thread, it seems pointless to continue.
This is not a discussion, it is a tantrum.
Friday, April 13, 2012
Rosen: 'I Apologize to Ann Romney'
This media circus happened so fast that I'm skipping to the end.
"She wants to put the toothpaste back into the tube."
Nope... she’s trying to recall a stinky release of intellectual flatus.
*
Hey Obama, this girl is an albatross around your neck and you won’t be able to remove it...
*
Hilary Rosen is a trashy gay lesbian!
*
She was FORCED to appolize. This was a disaster for his excellency. At first she stonewalled. After a visit by the imperial enforcer, she RELUCTANTLY issued a mia culpa for HAVING SAID IT, not for thinking it.
*
Panther symp Michelle Williams apologized for her racist tirade the other day, now Hilary Rosen gets her mea culpa going. At the risk of sounding sexist, are liberal “womyn” in need of anger management therapy?
*
That ship has sailed. Rosen blew this whole phoney issue for the Rats. It was all they had to distract from Obummers record. Rosen is going to be persona non grats at the DNC headquarters for sure.
Good to see we exposed and destroyed this BS meme they were selling about the GOP hating women.
*
Disdain for stay at home moms is so common among leftie femists that she didn’t think twice about saying it in the first place. The fact that many familes make economic sacrifices so they don’t have to have strangers caring for their kids is alien to her,
*
It just goes along with everything else of the left -
if God values it, they hate it.
*
A LESBIAN PSYCHOTIC attacking someone for being a full time mother? How bout Moochelle making almost 400 K for doing nothing at the University of Chicago???
Then we have Jay Carney who couldn't live without a script just like Barry can't speak without a teleprompter.
And I don't consider that lesbian fascist as a mother. Her children will turn into lunatics from being raised by a creature like her...
And are her "children" adopted or created with a turkey baster?
*
The real problem that these radical lesbian Democrat dingbats don’t understand, is that a LOT of women who are not stay-at-home-moms WOULD LIKE TO BE, and envy those who can do it.
It’s backfiring in their faces, and they don’t understand why.
They were told this would be a perfectly good attack line!
*
it is disgusting that some creature like that is going to criticize a stay at home mom.
How bout the stay at home welfare bums who wait each day for more Obamabucks???
*
So just wondering out loud if the “StopRush” group who was mad that Rush called Fluke a “SLUT” will form a “StopRosen” group and demand she be taking off the air for her slap in the face to All women!
*
Hillary Rosen is a vicious viper. All of her kind are in need of therapy. They all are baby killers and that’s where all their problems start. They hate babies so they want to abort all of them. All of their other foolish thinking stems from this basic non-Christian value of killing defenseless human beings.
*
I would guess Rosen as she is playing the role of a sterotypical male sexist pig trashing women. She probably splits and scratches her crouch a lot,too.
*
Goodie for you.
Now apologize to the millions of OTHER stay at home moms you insulted, you worthless POS!
*
Oh yea, Moochelle has defended Ann Romney....I’m sure she doesn’t want people to start to talk about the fact that she is a millionaire.....who had a fairly wealthy upbringing, has no job.....and still can’t be bothered to raise her own children, instead using her mother as an indentured servant while she runs around in boob belts trying to become a television star.....
*
"I have to admit that I agreed with some of what Rosen said concerning Anne Romney.
I was a homemaker for many years before entering the work force...and I can attest to the fact very little of homemaking prepared me for the world outside my home....though I had volunteered in various organizations, and did fund-raising etc. And also participated in my husbands business... It is a another beast altogether to adjust simply punching a time clock! Getting “permission to take a bathroom break”...Let alone work for someone else which your income and such is dependent on your performance.
I don't believe that Mrs. Romney has a clue to the emotional and mental impact a woman has when she alone, or with her husband, has to do to make life work at home AND in the workplace. Not even remotely.
She speaks of how difficult work raising a family is....well most woman do that ‘in addition’ to working a 40 hr. week. They do not have the “leisure” of working their own schedule, but are fixed on times and places in order to juggle the work load of both home and Work.
So no...I don't think Anne Romney does understand the plight of many woman....she was and is, as I later saw myself,...”protected and sheltered” from having to deal with
the realities of “provision” and making ends meet along with raising a family. Further it's much doubtful Anne has ever known basic needs going unmet....so her world is vastly different then most. She and Romney are of the elite...and that's a far cry from the average working class man or woman."
I find your post despicable. I don’t care how much money her husband has or how liberal you claim she is. She stayed home and raised five children, has dealt with cancer and has MS. Let me know when you do the same.
Some of you people really make me think some conservatives are as bad, if not worse, than some liberals. I guess you’re just mad she was smart enough to pick a spouse who could support them so she could stay home and raise the children they decided to have.
Are you aware that the Romney’s never had any money until his work at Bain paid off? They weren’t always wealthy and had no help from their parents.
*
Well, Rosen is stupid, and Obama deserves it. It’s what happens when you prop up the like of slut Fluke. They open their mouth and defeat the democrate strategy of portraying conservatives as being at war against women.
*
The real name of that game is...say what you want, get the word out..create havoc...then apologise after the fact.
Interesting factoids on how Rosen is tied to the Obama Adminisration:
Hilary Rosen Visited The Obama White House At Least 35 Times.
Former CIA director and current Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, 12 times.
Perhaps most surprisingly, the name “Joseph R. Biden” appears . . . 6 times.
Geitner 40 times...so she’s close to as significant as Geitner.
the notion that Rosen is just some Democrat talking head, completely disconnected from the Obama administration and campaign is . . . not plausible.
*
"The undeniable truth is that the vast majority of the “elite” inside the beltway mom’s, whether they stay at home and raise children or work for a paycheck, or whether they have a “R” or a “D” after their name, have no comprehension of what life is like on Main Street."
That's exactly right.....but this does not mean we go to war against those who've earned and worked for their wealth....which is what Obamas pushing...class warfare.
He's successfully got the nation, along with the media complying, talking about Zimmerman, (race), religion is now on the table and causing division, and now woman. None of which these have to do with his dismal record but all have to do with playing the piped pipers tune to see who goes along....and the nation yields. How foolish and ignorant we truly are.
*
Ann Romney can’t comment about working moms but Big Ears is quailified to comment about military, owning a business, being an American, holding a real job, the Supreme Court rulings, transparency, etc.
"She wants to put the toothpaste back into the tube."
Nope... she’s trying to recall a stinky release of intellectual flatus.
*
Hey Obama, this girl is an albatross around your neck and you won’t be able to remove it...
*
Hilary Rosen is a trashy gay lesbian!
*
She was FORCED to appolize. This was a disaster for his excellency. At first she stonewalled. After a visit by the imperial enforcer, she RELUCTANTLY issued a mia culpa for HAVING SAID IT, not for thinking it.
*
Panther symp Michelle Williams apologized for her racist tirade the other day, now Hilary Rosen gets her mea culpa going. At the risk of sounding sexist, are liberal “womyn” in need of anger management therapy?
*
That ship has sailed. Rosen blew this whole phoney issue for the Rats. It was all they had to distract from Obummers record. Rosen is going to be persona non grats at the DNC headquarters for sure.
Good to see we exposed and destroyed this BS meme they were selling about the GOP hating women.
*
Disdain for stay at home moms is so common among leftie femists that she didn’t think twice about saying it in the first place. The fact that many familes make economic sacrifices so they don’t have to have strangers caring for their kids is alien to her,
*
It just goes along with everything else of the left -
if God values it, they hate it.
*
A LESBIAN PSYCHOTIC attacking someone for being a full time mother? How bout Moochelle making almost 400 K for doing nothing at the University of Chicago???
Then we have Jay Carney who couldn't live without a script just like Barry can't speak without a teleprompter.
And I don't consider that lesbian fascist as a mother. Her children will turn into lunatics from being raised by a creature like her...
And are her "children" adopted or created with a turkey baster?
*
The real problem that these radical lesbian Democrat dingbats don’t understand, is that a LOT of women who are not stay-at-home-moms WOULD LIKE TO BE, and envy those who can do it.
It’s backfiring in their faces, and they don’t understand why.
They were told this would be a perfectly good attack line!
*
it is disgusting that some creature like that is going to criticize a stay at home mom.
How bout the stay at home welfare bums who wait each day for more Obamabucks???
*
So just wondering out loud if the “StopRush” group who was mad that Rush called Fluke a “SLUT” will form a “StopRosen” group and demand she be taking off the air for her slap in the face to All women!
*
Hillary Rosen is a vicious viper. All of her kind are in need of therapy. They all are baby killers and that’s where all their problems start. They hate babies so they want to abort all of them. All of their other foolish thinking stems from this basic non-Christian value of killing defenseless human beings.
*
I would guess Rosen as she is playing the role of a sterotypical male sexist pig trashing women. She probably splits and scratches her crouch a lot,too.
*
Goodie for you.
Now apologize to the millions of OTHER stay at home moms you insulted, you worthless POS!
*
Oh yea, Moochelle has defended Ann Romney....I’m sure she doesn’t want people to start to talk about the fact that she is a millionaire.....who had a fairly wealthy upbringing, has no job.....and still can’t be bothered to raise her own children, instead using her mother as an indentured servant while she runs around in boob belts trying to become a television star.....
*
"I have to admit that I agreed with some of what Rosen said concerning Anne Romney.
I was a homemaker for many years before entering the work force...and I can attest to the fact very little of homemaking prepared me for the world outside my home....though I had volunteered in various organizations, and did fund-raising etc. And also participated in my husbands business... It is a another beast altogether to adjust simply punching a time clock! Getting “permission to take a bathroom break”...Let alone work for someone else which your income and such is dependent on your performance.
I don't believe that Mrs. Romney has a clue to the emotional and mental impact a woman has when she alone, or with her husband, has to do to make life work at home AND in the workplace. Not even remotely.
She speaks of how difficult work raising a family is....well most woman do that ‘in addition’ to working a 40 hr. week. They do not have the “leisure” of working their own schedule, but are fixed on times and places in order to juggle the work load of both home and Work.
So no...I don't think Anne Romney does understand the plight of many woman....she was and is, as I later saw myself,...”protected and sheltered” from having to deal with
the realities of “provision” and making ends meet along with raising a family. Further it's much doubtful Anne has ever known basic needs going unmet....so her world is vastly different then most. She and Romney are of the elite...and that's a far cry from the average working class man or woman."
I find your post despicable. I don’t care how much money her husband has or how liberal you claim she is. She stayed home and raised five children, has dealt with cancer and has MS. Let me know when you do the same.
Some of you people really make me think some conservatives are as bad, if not worse, than some liberals. I guess you’re just mad she was smart enough to pick a spouse who could support them so she could stay home and raise the children they decided to have.
Are you aware that the Romney’s never had any money until his work at Bain paid off? They weren’t always wealthy and had no help from their parents.
*
Well, Rosen is stupid, and Obama deserves it. It’s what happens when you prop up the like of slut Fluke. They open their mouth and defeat the democrate strategy of portraying conservatives as being at war against women.
*
The real name of that game is...say what you want, get the word out..create havoc...then apologise after the fact.
Interesting factoids on how Rosen is tied to the Obama Adminisration:
Hilary Rosen Visited The Obama White House At Least 35 Times.
Former CIA director and current Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, 12 times.
Perhaps most surprisingly, the name “Joseph R. Biden” appears . . . 6 times.
Geitner 40 times...so she’s close to as significant as Geitner.
the notion that Rosen is just some Democrat talking head, completely disconnected from the Obama administration and campaign is . . . not plausible.
*
"The undeniable truth is that the vast majority of the “elite” inside the beltway mom’s, whether they stay at home and raise children or work for a paycheck, or whether they have a “R” or a “D” after their name, have no comprehension of what life is like on Main Street."
That's exactly right.....but this does not mean we go to war against those who've earned and worked for their wealth....which is what Obamas pushing...class warfare.
He's successfully got the nation, along with the media complying, talking about Zimmerman, (race), religion is now on the table and causing division, and now woman. None of which these have to do with his dismal record but all have to do with playing the piped pipers tune to see who goes along....and the nation yields. How foolish and ignorant we truly are.
*
Ann Romney can’t comment about working moms but Big Ears is quailified to comment about military, owning a business, being an American, holding a real job, the Supreme Court rulings, transparency, etc.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Notice: FR is and will remain a pro-life, small government conservative site.
Just today, someone on Fark was talking about how they were looking forward to seeing the Freepers start zotting (read: banning) anyone who doesn't toe the line and support Mitt Romney.
They went the other way.
Post by Jim Robinson, founder of FreeRepublic:
To hell with the GOP-e. Barring a miracle, they got their big government, unconstitutional mandate loving, socialist abortionist Obama-lite RINO on the ballot, they can now get him elected.
We are the resistance!!
Shove him down our throats today, we shove him up your donkeys in November!!
I can see November from my house!!
Comments:
That’s some of the best news that Obama has had in a long time. He is now well on the way to getting reelected. I never thought that Free Republic would help to destroy the country. I was wrong.
*
The Republicans will go the way of the Whigs before them, they have thrown a big **** you to their own support, if by the grace of G_D we cannot help Newt put Mittens back down, than we will have no choice to discontinue our support of the Former Grand Old Party.
That is why your base spoken for by Jim Robinson has to say Repubs, what say You!?!?!?!
*
Jim, thank God, and thank YOU!
No longer will I be the establishments prison bitch and do their bidding with contributions and votes only to be told to take it in the ass every four years with THEIR moderate selection.
Resist we must, and I stand on the front line with you!
*
Constitutional Conservatism does not tolerate abortionists, the homosexual agenda and mandated health care. Mitt Romney is a big-government, eastern establishment politician much like the Nelson Rockefeller of 1964 who tried to derail Barry Goldwater. I have a long memory and as a worker for AuH20 nearly 50 years, I can't forgive what the GOP-e did than and is doing now.
Long live the real America! Long live Free Republic!
*
yeah this is terrible news today. I honestly don’t know what to do. I can’t with a clear mind vote for Mittens but what we have now is just abominable.
*
"So what do you propose, Jim? Not vote, vote third party, or vote and hold our nose?"
My question too, what are we supposed to do, let the dictator be re-elected? I don't like this either, we're voting, once again, for the lesser of two evils.
*
I would vote for a wind-blown phonebook hit with a dart over Obama.
Hell, at least you have a chance at getting someone who isn’t trying to destroy this nation for my kids.
*
Ok, I understand Jim, but, if it’s Romney on the ballot in November,do we support him over Obama, or should we just cut our nose off to spite our face and stay home? Seriously, can we afford four more years of Obama? Will there be anything left to salvage in 2016?
*
"My primary reason for voting in November will be to replace Debbie Stabenow with a conservative."
Like the conservatives we voted for in 2010? The ones who are now supporting the resulting nominee?
*
So what is this board going to be talking about on election day 2012? Writing in Duncan Hunter? Everyone was talking that way when McCain got the nomination, but be election night everyone on this board was fully behind McCain. I expect it will be the same way this election.
*
“Republicans” are the last thing you’ll have to worry about!
This attitude will elect Obama and DESTROY America!
*
“So what do you propose, Jim? Not vote, vote third party, or vote and hold our nose?”
Don’t worry, you are about to be presented a THIRD CHOICE, the AmericansElect Party, largely financed with MILLIONS in Democrat money, to peel your votes away from Romney in Swing States.
Remember folks, these aren’t your father’s Democrats we are dealing with, anymore.
*
100% behind you Jim!
I am a conservative first! So what is the plan if Romney is the nominee? How do we register a protest vote so that the elites know how many votes they LOST due to their unwise choice to be a party of moderates?
Do we jump ship and move our party registrations and then send a letter to the GOP?
Do we all vote for or write in another candidate?
What does the Freeper community think? And dont tell me to vote for Romney ‘cause that wont fly.
*
The OP is the most immature statement I have ever read on FR, made at the time of desperation, when all good forces should seek to unite against evil. Sitting out the most important election in history is equivalent to treason in my mind. And what for? To be able to exclaim: “I told you so!”? I am officially disgusted...
*
Romney is 10 times more Liberal than McCain as his record attests to.
Furthermore, Romney won't find anyone as charismatic or as limited-government conservative than Sarah Palin.
Your expectations concerning FreeRepublic are about to be fully proven wrong.
*
Before, I only wanted to get “O” out of the WH in the next national election.
I am so angry and affronted NOW that I want him OUT in the most embarrassing and telling avalanche of American Conservatism in the US history of Presidential elections.
I want a landslide so overwhelming that “O” will spend the rest of his life having gravel surgically removed from his a$#!
I want Liberals humiliated.
I want the score settled.
I want Liberalism to reel for decades.
I want Liberals to consider long and hard about EVER again defrauding and insulting Americans in this way
*
There will be no conservative on the ballot, why should I vote when there is no candidate representing me?
I don’t vote blindly with the party, that is for sheep. I vote based on ideals, and Romney’s ideals are closer to liberalism than conservatism. In fact what scares me is that I can’t even say for sure what his ideals are; he the definition of a politician, he will swear that the moon is made of cheese if it would get him votes.
*
We need a Conservative political party, whether it is called Conservative Party or Tea Party or Constitution Party, I don’t care.
There are so many disenfranchised GOP conservatives, and TONS of independent conservatives who have dumped the GOP over the past 20 years. If we had a unified conservative party that only had conservative cadidates and stuck to a small government platform, I swear it would out-draw the remaining RINO GOP.
For the life of me, I don’t get why Obama and Hannity aren’t demanding this, UNLESS they aren’t genuine conservatives.
We need a conservative national politica party, now!
Are you listening, Sarah?????
*
Obama certainly hopes you’re right. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised to see some “new” members of this board in the form of Daily Kos plants who encourage everyone here to “keep the faith” and stay home on election day.
I favored Santorum over Romney, but the choice between Obama and Romney isn’t even close. Do you choose the guy who will TELL you flat out that he’s going to destroy your country and has proven that he’s trying to do so, or do you take a chance on the guy who at least TELLS he’s going to support lower taxes, smaller govt, etc. Sure, maybe he’s lying, but we KNOW Obama is telling the truth about what he’s going to do.
*
Seriously, can we afford four more years of Obama? Will there be anything left to salvage in 2016?"
There is a strong probability that there will NOT. That’s why this is going to be the MOST critical election in the history of this nation.
I intend to follow Newt’s example and do everything in my power to prevent Obama from getting reelected!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*
Romney will not have the Congressional support to do the things you fear, even if he were so inclined.
Obama’s objective is to destroy the country.
So you can complain about the poor menu or starve, it’s your choice.
*
Mittens is a fraud but he doesn’t hate our country. Obama’s attack on the SCOTUS was the last straw. We can’t afford four more years. Just like Palin says, it’s ABO.
*
First we must make a stand ar the covention. We must let the e-GOP know how angry we are.
Secondly we focus on down ticket races to elect as many conservatives to local, state and especially congressional office.
Third no matter who wins we get more active than ever before. When the going gets tough the tough get going.
*
OK Jim, but what do we do at this point in time?
Do we sit it out and watch Obama sail to another four years or what?
Isn’t anybody better than Obama?
*
I’m a voter, not a hostage.
Why do we now have to work so damn hard to STOP a Romney nomination when the GOP-E, KNEW that Masscare was a FATAL DISQUALIFICATION for the nomination in the first place?
Now Romney’s got Coulter, Drudge, Rove, and dozens of others drooling on his kneecaps this late in the process. Millions of dollars and millions of volunteer hours will have been wasted because somebody couldn’t talk sense to this guy THE DAY MASSCARE PASSED THE MASSSACHUSETTS SENATE!!
All it would have taken was, “Mitt, nice work, but you know you can’t be the nominee, right? You know that was the price, right?”
Nope, like Dole, like McCain, he was next in line.
So, yeah. The GOP picked their candidate over a year ago, and they are PISSED we aren’t going along with it. Peggy Noonan wrote as much about a month ago.
There WAS a nominee. We changed that at the grass roots, but at what point is this party going to get a clue in to the idea that it is time to FINALLY give a conservative a shot at it.
Sorry, but its guys like you that are trying to hang the future of the country on guys like me who WILL NOT STAY ON THE RESERVATION when I WASN’T THE GUY WHO LEFT IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!
Nope, if you get Obama. Do. Not. Blame. Me. You can blame the Cardinals in the GOP college that sent the white smoke up the chimney on this fraud from before the first primary. Romney was a presumption. You are trying to perpetrate that presumption.
For me, I think Gingrich SHOULD stay in. Between Santorum and Gingrich, they should pull every free-thinking, liberty-cherishing conservative left in the party and when they go to broker the convention, they can be a ticket and send Romney back to the People’s Republic of Massachusetts.
Now that Santorum is out, that friggin’ coward, it’s down to Newt. Had Santorum stayed, the possibility of a brokered convention would have been plausible, given the amount of completely justifiable damage Romney’s sustained to this point.
So SICK of the lectures about another four years of Obama.
Can you IMAGINE if McCain had actually won? I’m glad this idiot had to pull the scabs off of all the banks, the CME, ratings agencies, Fannie, Freddie, and Sallie. The D’s created this in the first place during Rubin/Clinton - LET THEM OWN IT!
Obama went so much better than owning the economy. He assaulted the church, bilked taxpayers out of billions, destroyed the commodities market with Corzine, etc.
If we win, let it be a conservative, or let the idiot Obama completely destroy the country. We apparently aren’t smart enough to learn from the last 100 years worth of mistakes. Before its over, I’ll be dead, or we’ll be chasing liberals down in the streets with weapons.
I’d rather not see it come to that, but if Romney gets the nod, Obama wins by default. “Thanks for the idea for Obamacare, Mitt, I couldn’t have done it without you!” And that’s it. That’s the election.
So please, peddle the ‘Obama is going to be your fault’ among McConnell, Cantor, and the rest of the college of Cardinals that picked that charlatan in the first place.
I’m not buying it, and neither should any sentient being still left in the conservative caucus.
Moreover, IF you vote for Romney, you are now personally responsible for what he’s about to perpetrate, which is a half-hearted attempt at repealing Obamacare, (which was his idea), and a temporary liberal lovefest from the press when he gives up and learns to love it.
He’ll bask in the love from the MSM, the narcissist that he is, until he needs them again, and like every other DC Republican, he’ll be shocked to find the press has turned on him.
You want me to get behind Etch-A-Sketch?
*
have to tell you, I was in Washington last week and had not yet seen the WWII Memorial. Upon being there a little while, and seeing the great victory the Lord had granted the allies, being suddenly overcome with the gravity of the peril we faced, I burst into tears. I let the tears flow without shame. A couple women came by and hugged me because they understood. No words were needed. There was also a lovely WWII veteran there that I was blessed to shake hands with and thank. Sir, my beloved grandfather was at Okinawa. I cannot allow my country, Providently birthed and established and standing today from the blood of my elders, to fall at the hands of a hateful (and I believe demonic) man Obama. This is my country and his ilk can’t have it.
*
I’m not voting for Romney.
I’ll vote for the candidate who is closest to my views.
If the Republican party wants me to vote for them, then they have to nominate a candidate worthy of my support.
The real winner today is Obama, this is the day that his campaign finally won.
Congrats Obama on four more years.
*
this countries last chance of salvation before going down Obama's toilet is ASSURED by crybabies not getting their perfect candidate. I'll vote for Mitt, holding my nose. Then when Obama is reelected I'll vacate this formerly great country to my tropical island and enjoy the rest of my God given life.
*
Yep, a complete failure of reason by the "Better Obama than Romney" crowd. Cutting ones nose off to spite his face comes to mind.
Mitt's pretty lousy, but he is worlds better than Obama and anyone who can't see that simple fact has lost all perspective.
*
Jim, Newt has said that if Mittens gets the nomination, he will work to get him elected and work as hard as he were the nominee himself. What say you to this? I fully understand and agree that Romney is Obama lite but I feel I have to close ranks, hold muh nose and vote for him because replacing this regime not only gets OBOZO out but also all the LACKEYS and thugs of his administration. Holder and Big Sis Janet and all the minor officials that are helping to more actively destroy the republic by actually carrying out the edicts of the "Dear Leader." Newt is a much better candidate for sure, but to replace the cabinet with our cabinet has got to be an overriding goal. We're bound to gather up some good conservatives in a Romney administration. Imagine Sarah Palin as Energy Secretary? Maybe Bolton as Secretary of State. I'd personally feel better if Allen West was the veep. Wouldn't you? That's the real reason to vote for a lackluster POTUS nominee.
*
If you reward bad behavior, you're sure to get more of it. The GOP-e has decided they're going to ram Romney down our throats. I'm not about to reward them with my vote for doing so.
To hell with them.
No Obama. No Romney.
Bring on the third option!
*
You still have my support on this! If the Republican party is only concerned about winning to the point they will put forth a RINO to do it then they can do it without my vote. I WILL NOT vote for such a candidate only to then hear the bastard talk about his winning as a “mandate” like we did with Bill Clinton after he won.
*
After 30 years of the GOP working with the commies to defeat conservatives.....
MOST of FR has had enough, Obama and the GOP can have each other.
I want nothing to do with those who hate me and hate my values.
*
Romney is a draft dodger. Cowardly rich boy with connections refused to serve his country. None of his sons ever served either. It’s a family tradition. Romney loathed Reagan-Bush and conservatism. Ran and governed to the left of Ted Kennedy on gay rights, abortion, gun control, socialist healthcare, appoint liberal judges, etc. He’s nothing but a lying two-bit leftist political whore who will screw you in the end. No way in hell will I support him.
*
I will not bow to the GOP e either! We need to organize a massive write- in of one conservative. Newt or Santorum would work for me. The rally around the eventual nominee extortion is not working.
*
Obama vs. Romney seems to come down to one thing: Can we survive 4 more years of Obama?
If we can, then voting 3rd party to send the GOP a firm message about RINOs, is a good strategy. If that short term loss gives us a long term gain, then this is a good strategy.
If we cannot survive another 4 years of Obama, then it matters not what the long term gain is since the game is up and the USA is irretrievably a hard socialist nation, and what follows won’t matter since we won’t be able to vote ourselves back to freedom.
This is why the Obama vs Romney debate is so violent.
You have people adamant that Obama must be removed from office at all cost or doom will occur. This is short-term doom.
You have people adamant that the GOP must be punished for shoving Romney down our throats and to take their boy on top of McCain, is going to entrench the RINOs and we will never again see a conservative Republican. This is long term doom.
So you have the “anybody but Obama” crowd who are terrified of letting him have a 2nd term and can’t see beyond those next 4 years. These are polar opposites to the “anybody but Romney” crowd who prefer Obama to Romney because that sacrifice is necessary to teach the GOP elites to listen to us.
These 2 sides will never reconcile.
If you think our nation will be defacto destroyed by a 2nd Obama term, you can’t think beyond that to whether you are caving to RINOs in the GOP leadership.
If you think the Republican party will be defacto destroyed with the RINO that broke the elephants back, then you can’t think beyond that long term goal to the potential catastrophic damage Obama could incur to the nation, and believe the Dems will have to take the fall for their own policies.
We are irreconcilable. Half of us will win. All of us will lose.
WE NEED A UNIFIED NATIONAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY NOW.
I’M TALKING TO YOU SARAH
I’M TALKING TO YOU DEMINT
I’M TALKING TO YOU RUSH
I’M TALKING TO YOU HANNITY
Where is out Conservative George Soros and William Ayers to fund and push our conservative agenda?????
They went the other way.
Post by Jim Robinson, founder of FreeRepublic:
To hell with the GOP-e. Barring a miracle, they got their big government, unconstitutional mandate loving, socialist abortionist Obama-lite RINO on the ballot, they can now get him elected.
We are the resistance!!
Shove him down our throats today, we shove him up your donkeys in November!!
I can see November from my house!!
Comments:
That’s some of the best news that Obama has had in a long time. He is now well on the way to getting reelected. I never thought that Free Republic would help to destroy the country. I was wrong.
*
The Republicans will go the way of the Whigs before them, they have thrown a big **** you to their own support, if by the grace of G_D we cannot help Newt put Mittens back down, than we will have no choice to discontinue our support of the Former Grand Old Party.
That is why your base spoken for by Jim Robinson has to say Repubs, what say You!?!?!?!
*
Jim, thank God, and thank YOU!
No longer will I be the establishments prison bitch and do their bidding with contributions and votes only to be told to take it in the ass every four years with THEIR moderate selection.
Resist we must, and I stand on the front line with you!
*
Constitutional Conservatism does not tolerate abortionists, the homosexual agenda and mandated health care. Mitt Romney is a big-government, eastern establishment politician much like the Nelson Rockefeller of 1964 who tried to derail Barry Goldwater. I have a long memory and as a worker for AuH20 nearly 50 years, I can't forgive what the GOP-e did than and is doing now.
Long live the real America! Long live Free Republic!
*
yeah this is terrible news today. I honestly don’t know what to do. I can’t with a clear mind vote for Mittens but what we have now is just abominable.
*
"So what do you propose, Jim? Not vote, vote third party, or vote and hold our nose?"
My question too, what are we supposed to do, let the dictator be re-elected? I don't like this either, we're voting, once again, for the lesser of two evils.
*
I would vote for a wind-blown phonebook hit with a dart over Obama.
Hell, at least you have a chance at getting someone who isn’t trying to destroy this nation for my kids.
*
Ok, I understand Jim, but, if it’s Romney on the ballot in November,do we support him over Obama, or should we just cut our nose off to spite our face and stay home? Seriously, can we afford four more years of Obama? Will there be anything left to salvage in 2016?
*
"My primary reason for voting in November will be to replace Debbie Stabenow with a conservative."
Like the conservatives we voted for in 2010? The ones who are now supporting the resulting nominee?
*
So what is this board going to be talking about on election day 2012? Writing in Duncan Hunter? Everyone was talking that way when McCain got the nomination, but be election night everyone on this board was fully behind McCain. I expect it will be the same way this election.
*
“Republicans” are the last thing you’ll have to worry about!
This attitude will elect Obama and DESTROY America!
*
“So what do you propose, Jim? Not vote, vote third party, or vote and hold our nose?”
Don’t worry, you are about to be presented a THIRD CHOICE, the AmericansElect Party, largely financed with MILLIONS in Democrat money, to peel your votes away from Romney in Swing States.
Remember folks, these aren’t your father’s Democrats we are dealing with, anymore.
*
100% behind you Jim!
I am a conservative first! So what is the plan if Romney is the nominee? How do we register a protest vote so that the elites know how many votes they LOST due to their unwise choice to be a party of moderates?
Do we jump ship and move our party registrations and then send a letter to the GOP?
Do we all vote for or write in another candidate?
What does the Freeper community think? And dont tell me to vote for Romney ‘cause that wont fly.
*
The OP is the most immature statement I have ever read on FR, made at the time of desperation, when all good forces should seek to unite against evil. Sitting out the most important election in history is equivalent to treason in my mind. And what for? To be able to exclaim: “I told you so!”? I am officially disgusted...
*
Romney is 10 times more Liberal than McCain as his record attests to.
Furthermore, Romney won't find anyone as charismatic or as limited-government conservative than Sarah Palin.
Your expectations concerning FreeRepublic are about to be fully proven wrong.
*
Before, I only wanted to get “O” out of the WH in the next national election.
I am so angry and affronted NOW that I want him OUT in the most embarrassing and telling avalanche of American Conservatism in the US history of Presidential elections.
I want a landslide so overwhelming that “O” will spend the rest of his life having gravel surgically removed from his a$#!
I want Liberals humiliated.
I want the score settled.
I want Liberalism to reel for decades.
I want Liberals to consider long and hard about EVER again defrauding and insulting Americans in this way
*
There will be no conservative on the ballot, why should I vote when there is no candidate representing me?
I don’t vote blindly with the party, that is for sheep. I vote based on ideals, and Romney’s ideals are closer to liberalism than conservatism. In fact what scares me is that I can’t even say for sure what his ideals are; he the definition of a politician, he will swear that the moon is made of cheese if it would get him votes.
*
We need a Conservative political party, whether it is called Conservative Party or Tea Party or Constitution Party, I don’t care.
There are so many disenfranchised GOP conservatives, and TONS of independent conservatives who have dumped the GOP over the past 20 years. If we had a unified conservative party that only had conservative cadidates and stuck to a small government platform, I swear it would out-draw the remaining RINO GOP.
For the life of me, I don’t get why Obama and Hannity aren’t demanding this, UNLESS they aren’t genuine conservatives.
We need a conservative national politica party, now!
Are you listening, Sarah?????
*
Obama certainly hopes you’re right. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised to see some “new” members of this board in the form of Daily Kos plants who encourage everyone here to “keep the faith” and stay home on election day.
I favored Santorum over Romney, but the choice between Obama and Romney isn’t even close. Do you choose the guy who will TELL you flat out that he’s going to destroy your country and has proven that he’s trying to do so, or do you take a chance on the guy who at least TELLS he’s going to support lower taxes, smaller govt, etc. Sure, maybe he’s lying, but we KNOW Obama is telling the truth about what he’s going to do.
*
Seriously, can we afford four more years of Obama? Will there be anything left to salvage in 2016?"
There is a strong probability that there will NOT. That’s why this is going to be the MOST critical election in the history of this nation.
I intend to follow Newt’s example and do everything in my power to prevent Obama from getting reelected!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*
Romney will not have the Congressional support to do the things you fear, even if he were so inclined.
Obama’s objective is to destroy the country.
So you can complain about the poor menu or starve, it’s your choice.
*
Mittens is a fraud but he doesn’t hate our country. Obama’s attack on the SCOTUS was the last straw. We can’t afford four more years. Just like Palin says, it’s ABO.
*
First we must make a stand ar the covention. We must let the e-GOP know how angry we are.
Secondly we focus on down ticket races to elect as many conservatives to local, state and especially congressional office.
Third no matter who wins we get more active than ever before. When the going gets tough the tough get going.
*
OK Jim, but what do we do at this point in time?
Do we sit it out and watch Obama sail to another four years or what?
Isn’t anybody better than Obama?
*
I’m a voter, not a hostage.
Why do we now have to work so damn hard to STOP a Romney nomination when the GOP-E, KNEW that Masscare was a FATAL DISQUALIFICATION for the nomination in the first place?
Now Romney’s got Coulter, Drudge, Rove, and dozens of others drooling on his kneecaps this late in the process. Millions of dollars and millions of volunteer hours will have been wasted because somebody couldn’t talk sense to this guy THE DAY MASSCARE PASSED THE MASSSACHUSETTS SENATE!!
All it would have taken was, “Mitt, nice work, but you know you can’t be the nominee, right? You know that was the price, right?”
Nope, like Dole, like McCain, he was next in line.
So, yeah. The GOP picked their candidate over a year ago, and they are PISSED we aren’t going along with it. Peggy Noonan wrote as much about a month ago.
There WAS a nominee. We changed that at the grass roots, but at what point is this party going to get a clue in to the idea that it is time to FINALLY give a conservative a shot at it.
Sorry, but its guys like you that are trying to hang the future of the country on guys like me who WILL NOT STAY ON THE RESERVATION when I WASN’T THE GUY WHO LEFT IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!
Nope, if you get Obama. Do. Not. Blame. Me. You can blame the Cardinals in the GOP college that sent the white smoke up the chimney on this fraud from before the first primary. Romney was a presumption. You are trying to perpetrate that presumption.
For me, I think Gingrich SHOULD stay in. Between Santorum and Gingrich, they should pull every free-thinking, liberty-cherishing conservative left in the party and when they go to broker the convention, they can be a ticket and send Romney back to the People’s Republic of Massachusetts.
Now that Santorum is out, that friggin’ coward, it’s down to Newt. Had Santorum stayed, the possibility of a brokered convention would have been plausible, given the amount of completely justifiable damage Romney’s sustained to this point.
So SICK of the lectures about another four years of Obama.
Can you IMAGINE if McCain had actually won? I’m glad this idiot had to pull the scabs off of all the banks, the CME, ratings agencies, Fannie, Freddie, and Sallie. The D’s created this in the first place during Rubin/Clinton - LET THEM OWN IT!
Obama went so much better than owning the economy. He assaulted the church, bilked taxpayers out of billions, destroyed the commodities market with Corzine, etc.
If we win, let it be a conservative, or let the idiot Obama completely destroy the country. We apparently aren’t smart enough to learn from the last 100 years worth of mistakes. Before its over, I’ll be dead, or we’ll be chasing liberals down in the streets with weapons.
I’d rather not see it come to that, but if Romney gets the nod, Obama wins by default. “Thanks for the idea for Obamacare, Mitt, I couldn’t have done it without you!” And that’s it. That’s the election.
So please, peddle the ‘Obama is going to be your fault’ among McConnell, Cantor, and the rest of the college of Cardinals that picked that charlatan in the first place.
I’m not buying it, and neither should any sentient being still left in the conservative caucus.
Moreover, IF you vote for Romney, you are now personally responsible for what he’s about to perpetrate, which is a half-hearted attempt at repealing Obamacare, (which was his idea), and a temporary liberal lovefest from the press when he gives up and learns to love it.
He’ll bask in the love from the MSM, the narcissist that he is, until he needs them again, and like every other DC Republican, he’ll be shocked to find the press has turned on him.
You want me to get behind Etch-A-Sketch?
*
have to tell you, I was in Washington last week and had not yet seen the WWII Memorial. Upon being there a little while, and seeing the great victory the Lord had granted the allies, being suddenly overcome with the gravity of the peril we faced, I burst into tears. I let the tears flow without shame. A couple women came by and hugged me because they understood. No words were needed. There was also a lovely WWII veteran there that I was blessed to shake hands with and thank. Sir, my beloved grandfather was at Okinawa. I cannot allow my country, Providently birthed and established and standing today from the blood of my elders, to fall at the hands of a hateful (and I believe demonic) man Obama. This is my country and his ilk can’t have it.
*
I’m not voting for Romney.
I’ll vote for the candidate who is closest to my views.
If the Republican party wants me to vote for them, then they have to nominate a candidate worthy of my support.
The real winner today is Obama, this is the day that his campaign finally won.
Congrats Obama on four more years.
*
this countries last chance of salvation before going down Obama's toilet is ASSURED by crybabies not getting their perfect candidate. I'll vote for Mitt, holding my nose. Then when Obama is reelected I'll vacate this formerly great country to my tropical island and enjoy the rest of my God given life.
*
Yep, a complete failure of reason by the "Better Obama than Romney" crowd. Cutting ones nose off to spite his face comes to mind.
Mitt's pretty lousy, but he is worlds better than Obama and anyone who can't see that simple fact has lost all perspective.
*
Jim, Newt has said that if Mittens gets the nomination, he will work to get him elected and work as hard as he were the nominee himself. What say you to this? I fully understand and agree that Romney is Obama lite but I feel I have to close ranks, hold muh nose and vote for him because replacing this regime not only gets OBOZO out but also all the LACKEYS and thugs of his administration. Holder and Big Sis Janet and all the minor officials that are helping to more actively destroy the republic by actually carrying out the edicts of the "Dear Leader." Newt is a much better candidate for sure, but to replace the cabinet with our cabinet has got to be an overriding goal. We're bound to gather up some good conservatives in a Romney administration. Imagine Sarah Palin as Energy Secretary? Maybe Bolton as Secretary of State. I'd personally feel better if Allen West was the veep. Wouldn't you? That's the real reason to vote for a lackluster POTUS nominee.
*
If you reward bad behavior, you're sure to get more of it. The GOP-e has decided they're going to ram Romney down our throats. I'm not about to reward them with my vote for doing so.
To hell with them.
No Obama. No Romney.
Bring on the third option!
*
You still have my support on this! If the Republican party is only concerned about winning to the point they will put forth a RINO to do it then they can do it without my vote. I WILL NOT vote for such a candidate only to then hear the bastard talk about his winning as a “mandate” like we did with Bill Clinton after he won.
*
After 30 years of the GOP working with the commies to defeat conservatives.....
MOST of FR has had enough, Obama and the GOP can have each other.
I want nothing to do with those who hate me and hate my values.
*
Romney is a draft dodger. Cowardly rich boy with connections refused to serve his country. None of his sons ever served either. It’s a family tradition. Romney loathed Reagan-Bush and conservatism. Ran and governed to the left of Ted Kennedy on gay rights, abortion, gun control, socialist healthcare, appoint liberal judges, etc. He’s nothing but a lying two-bit leftist political whore who will screw you in the end. No way in hell will I support him.
*
I will not bow to the GOP e either! We need to organize a massive write- in of one conservative. Newt or Santorum would work for me. The rally around the eventual nominee extortion is not working.
*
Obama vs. Romney seems to come down to one thing: Can we survive 4 more years of Obama?
If we can, then voting 3rd party to send the GOP a firm message about RINOs, is a good strategy. If that short term loss gives us a long term gain, then this is a good strategy.
If we cannot survive another 4 years of Obama, then it matters not what the long term gain is since the game is up and the USA is irretrievably a hard socialist nation, and what follows won’t matter since we won’t be able to vote ourselves back to freedom.
This is why the Obama vs Romney debate is so violent.
You have people adamant that Obama must be removed from office at all cost or doom will occur. This is short-term doom.
You have people adamant that the GOP must be punished for shoving Romney down our throats and to take their boy on top of McCain, is going to entrench the RINOs and we will never again see a conservative Republican. This is long term doom.
So you have the “anybody but Obama” crowd who are terrified of letting him have a 2nd term and can’t see beyond those next 4 years. These are polar opposites to the “anybody but Romney” crowd who prefer Obama to Romney because that sacrifice is necessary to teach the GOP elites to listen to us.
These 2 sides will never reconcile.
If you think our nation will be defacto destroyed by a 2nd Obama term, you can’t think beyond that to whether you are caving to RINOs in the GOP leadership.
If you think the Republican party will be defacto destroyed with the RINO that broke the elephants back, then you can’t think beyond that long term goal to the potential catastrophic damage Obama could incur to the nation, and believe the Dems will have to take the fall for their own policies.
We are irreconcilable. Half of us will win. All of us will lose.
WE NEED A UNIFIED NATIONAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY NOW.
I’M TALKING TO YOU SARAH
I’M TALKING TO YOU DEMINT
I’M TALKING TO YOU RUSH
I’M TALKING TO YOU HANNITY
Where is out Conservative George Soros and William Ayers to fund and push our conservative agenda?????
Mitt Romney: The Liberal
Well, against all odds, it looks like the Anyone But Obama movement (now called ABO on FreeRepublic) is losing to those opposed to Mitt Romney. There have been a series of 4 threads called Mitt Romney: Liberal citing various evidence of his supposedly progressive views.
Comments:
A liberal, a Conservative, and a Moderate go into this bar. What did the bartender say?
Scroll down:
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Hello Mitt
*
While there isn't much difference between a pro-big government, pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-homosexual liberal from Massachusetts, and a pro-big government, pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-homosexual liberal from Chicago, you ought to vote in the other races.
Me, I will only vote for somebody who is truly a Conservative. That means I'll find somebody else to vote for/write-in if the Republican is not a Conservative.
*
Unfortunately, it’s either Romney or Obama. Romney is a plastic political weathervane who believes in nothing but his nown ambition, while Obama is a willing tool of people who want to destroy the United States. It sucks that it’s come to this. Your complaints about Romney are accurate, but now, bringing them up accomplishes nothing constructive. There is one big difference between the two. I’m confident that can survive a President Romney. I don’t think we can survive four more years of President Obama.
*
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
Besides, I have no interest in the race if it is Romney vs Obama. *yawn*. That is like going to be like watching the DU Party primary. I'll probably sleep in on election day.
*
Furthermore, for those of us who are holding true to our conservative and Christian principles and unwilling and unable to accept a Lying, Left-Wing, Progressive Liberal as our nominee, this is very constructive if, even if the chances are small, we help to force a nominating convention.
Even if we don't, we won't be voting for your boy, and there are still a lot of lurkers that are not aware of Romney's record, so we are providing them a service as well.
Finally, it provides an eventual innoculation and firewall about the inevitable complaints and accusations from posters such as yourself that when Mitt loses, and he will, we are blamed for said loss when it was Mitt's fault all along and those supporting him.
The only thing inevitable about Mitt Romney is he is the only candidate who guarantees the re-election of Obama because of the record we are posting and you are complaining about.
*
Romney, McCain, Dole, Bush 1, Ford and most likely Nixon. The RNC does not represent me, although I must say I no longer send them a dime. I have also been thinking of re registering my political affiliation as Independent as I am not much interested in them.
*
Since 1988, with George H. W. Bush, Bob Dole, George W. Bush, and John McCain, we've got a 24 year stretch of moderate candidates who support big government, lost to Democrats or turned the White House over to Democrats. Until Obama decided to break his record, George W. Bush gave us the biggest, most expensive, most intrusive, and most powerful government in our nation's history, and he did it with the support of a Republican Congress!
And God forbid, now we have Romney who is far more liberal than all of them.
*
Folks making the stay home or third-party argument are fools without a clue as to what Obama is. Romney and Obama are both true believers. The difference is that Obama is a true believer in the International Communist Revolution, whereas Romney is a true believer in ... Willard Mitt Romney. As President, Romney will do his best to accomplish whatever he thinks will enhance his resume, whereas Obama, no longer facing reelection, will work to complete his agenda to cut America down to size (relay that to Vladimir) and realize his father's dream of a socialist paradise.
If, as now seems highly likely, Romney is the nominee, it will be up to us to drag him across the finish line, along with enough conservative congress critters to make sure he etches the right sketch in 2013.
*
“What will you do if Romney becomes the candidate? Will you continue to bash him?”
I asked him that very same question and “yes” was the answer that came back. Come August 27th when the convention in Tampa opens, IMO if SoConPubbie is still flooding FR with anti-GOP ticket post then he becomes nothing less than a reelect Obama activist, working FR.
*
Anyone saying they'll vote for romney is being completely dishonest about having looked into the guy's background.
He's a disaster and I will have nothing to do with him whatsoever.
*
Anybody who thinks that the left-wing MSM has not been salivating at the prospect of facing off against Romney and that they don't already a myriad of hit-pieces against Romney piled up and ready to go is a political neophyte.
Furthermore, the only people helping Obama win re-election are those pimping such a sure-fired left-wing, progressive Liberal like Mitt Romney.
If he wins the nomination, we lose the election, because the left-wing Media is not goint to be bashful of using the following Mitt ROmney record against him like a baseball bat to bludgeon his candidacy into a bloody pulp:
1. Implemented Gay Marriage (Father of Gay Marriage in America)
2. Supported Abortion.
3. Implemented state level cap-and-trade Carbon trading system
4. Implemented a state-level "Assault Weapons" Ban AFTER the federal AWB was allowed to expire.
5. Whole-Heartedly Supported the Gay Agenda while Governor.
6. Whole-Heartedly supported the Abortion Agenda while Governor
7. Supported the Brady Bill.
8. Supported McCain-Kennedy (Amnesty)
9. Supported TARP
10. Implemented a Socialistic Healthcare program called RomneyCare that included an individual mandate and $50 abortions.
11. Increased Taxes/Fees by 300% as Governor.
Add to that his constant lying and bearing false witness against the actual conservatives in the race and all you have is a recipe for electoral disaster come November if Romney is the nominee.
*
So what if he's philosophically and historically pro nationalized health care, pro on-demand cheap taxpayer-funded abortion, pro gay agenda of forcing Americans to accept open homosexuality in everything from children's schools to our military, pro cap-and-trade global warming edicts, and has a documented record of appointing extremely liberal activist judges???? SO WHAT???
I tell you, he can't be as bad as Obama because he's a Republican. Only an idiot doesn't think it's OKAY to vote for a person with a political record of promoting every single major liberal issue, when the guy is a Republican!!!! Because he's a Republican, he can't be as bad as Obama!!!! If Obama himself re-registered as a Republican, he wouldn't be as bad as Obama!!!
/sarcasm
If it's R vs O, I pray that all Americans who comprehend just how fatal Romney would be for conservatism, the GOP, and therefore the hope of America, resist the temptation to sit out the election, and instead crawl over broken glass to VOTE THIRD PARTY for the sole purpose of diluting the vote percentage of whichever government bondage-pushing socialist wins, to the smallest plurality possible.
Vote ABOOR and that vote WILL COUNT against both Obama and Romney, and thus will make whichever one wins weaker politically. We HAVE TO FIGHT BACK, and the way we fight liberalism in THIS election, if it's R v O, is to VOTE THIRD PARTY. It's the ONLY CHANCE.
The more who vote ABOOR and go third party, the more likely we'll be looking at a socialist president (Romney or Obama) elected by, ideally, only 34-39 percent of the vote. If it was Obama who won on 34 percent, the liberal wing of the Replican party will have had its asses kicked, it would greatly help strengthen the conservative movement, would make Obama extremely vulnerable, and would probably make 43-percent-plurality Clinton's mid-term Republican Revolution ass-kicking look like child's play.
People, if you vote for Romney and the bastard wins, YOU AND AMERICA WILL GET WHAT YOU VOTED FOR: socialized medicine, global warming regulation, on-demand abortion funded by YOU, liberal activist judges, and punishment for resisting open homosexuality anywhere in your or your child's life. That's the price of voting "against" Obama by voting FOR Romney. VOTE ABOOR INSTEAD.
*
And I will still vote for him over the guy who hates America and wants to start a race war.....
*
That SOB Romney is running an ad here in PA (Johnstown, Ebensburg) in which he invokes Katie Couric, Gloria Borger and other MSM scum reporters to blast Santorum.
It's a dirty, filthy ad.
I will never vote for Romney!
I will write in Sarah Palin instead. I don't care. I can't vote for him.
*
What is the point and what are we to do??? Romney is probably going to be the nominee, so what are we to do? If we don’t vote for him we get Obama for another 4 years, can we really risk that? I don’t like Romney anymore then you do, but having Obama re-elected just can’t happen. So what is your plan? Please tell us, continual bashing of the nominee isn’t helping our cause. If there were any chance anyone else could grab the nomination, I would be the first in line to help, but we have done all we can do and we still have Romney. It will be ABO for most everyone, but if we continue to bash what we have, then what. Please explain your reasoning for this. I feel lost in the woods in regards to this election, but front and foremost is not re-electing Obama.
*
1. If you are a conservative, Nominating a left-wing, Progressive Liberal doesn't help your cause.
2. If you are a conservative, and if he wins, he won't help your cause either, because like he did in MA and Arnold did in CA, progressive Liberals with an R next to their name in executive positions destroy their party.
*
REMEMBER that Clinton got in with a plurality of 43 percent, proving that the majority of voters REJECTED him and helping Republicans take back Congress to the degree that it was called the Republican Revolution. If Obama wins with 34-40 percent of the vote, it will be a huge blow to liberalism in BOTH PARTIES. If Romney wins with 34-40 percent of the vote, however, there'd be a powerful agent in the White House working to castrate conservatives in the Republican Party.
THAT is what we do: vote AGAINST LIBERALISM by voting third party, making the plurality victor as politically weak and vulnerable as possible.
*
This is why I made up the nickname Robamney for him.
Once again, the establishment globalists give us a false choice.
The etch-a-sketch comment has me really considering third-party. We’re screwed either way and I’m not sure I want to be a part of it.
*
We have to make hard decisions. You are right, glossing over or painting Romney's liberal past as rosy will not change the future we now face of what Romney is capable of. But if faced with either Obama or Romney, I have to choose ABO.
Comments:
A liberal, a Conservative, and a Moderate go into this bar. What did the bartender say?
Scroll down:
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Hello Mitt
*
While there isn't much difference between a pro-big government, pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-homosexual liberal from Massachusetts, and a pro-big government, pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-homosexual liberal from Chicago, you ought to vote in the other races.
Me, I will only vote for somebody who is truly a Conservative. That means I'll find somebody else to vote for/write-in if the Republican is not a Conservative.
*
Unfortunately, it’s either Romney or Obama. Romney is a plastic political weathervane who believes in nothing but his nown ambition, while Obama is a willing tool of people who want to destroy the United States. It sucks that it’s come to this. Your complaints about Romney are accurate, but now, bringing them up accomplishes nothing constructive. There is one big difference between the two. I’m confident that can survive a President Romney. I don’t think we can survive four more years of President Obama.
*
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
Besides, I have no interest in the race if it is Romney vs Obama. *yawn*. That is like going to be like watching the DU Party primary. I'll probably sleep in on election day.
*
Furthermore, for those of us who are holding true to our conservative and Christian principles and unwilling and unable to accept a Lying, Left-Wing, Progressive Liberal as our nominee, this is very constructive if, even if the chances are small, we help to force a nominating convention.
Even if we don't, we won't be voting for your boy, and there are still a lot of lurkers that are not aware of Romney's record, so we are providing them a service as well.
Finally, it provides an eventual innoculation and firewall about the inevitable complaints and accusations from posters such as yourself that when Mitt loses, and he will, we are blamed for said loss when it was Mitt's fault all along and those supporting him.
The only thing inevitable about Mitt Romney is he is the only candidate who guarantees the re-election of Obama because of the record we are posting and you are complaining about.
*
Romney, McCain, Dole, Bush 1, Ford and most likely Nixon. The RNC does not represent me, although I must say I no longer send them a dime. I have also been thinking of re registering my political affiliation as Independent as I am not much interested in them.
*
Since 1988, with George H. W. Bush, Bob Dole, George W. Bush, and John McCain, we've got a 24 year stretch of moderate candidates who support big government, lost to Democrats or turned the White House over to Democrats. Until Obama decided to break his record, George W. Bush gave us the biggest, most expensive, most intrusive, and most powerful government in our nation's history, and he did it with the support of a Republican Congress!
And God forbid, now we have Romney who is far more liberal than all of them.
*
Folks making the stay home or third-party argument are fools without a clue as to what Obama is. Romney and Obama are both true believers. The difference is that Obama is a true believer in the International Communist Revolution, whereas Romney is a true believer in ... Willard Mitt Romney. As President, Romney will do his best to accomplish whatever he thinks will enhance his resume, whereas Obama, no longer facing reelection, will work to complete his agenda to cut America down to size (relay that to Vladimir) and realize his father's dream of a socialist paradise.
If, as now seems highly likely, Romney is the nominee, it will be up to us to drag him across the finish line, along with enough conservative congress critters to make sure he etches the right sketch in 2013.
*
“What will you do if Romney becomes the candidate? Will you continue to bash him?”
I asked him that very same question and “yes” was the answer that came back. Come August 27th when the convention in Tampa opens, IMO if SoConPubbie is still flooding FR with anti-GOP ticket post then he becomes nothing less than a reelect Obama activist, working FR.
*
Anyone saying they'll vote for romney is being completely dishonest about having looked into the guy's background.
He's a disaster and I will have nothing to do with him whatsoever.
*
Anybody who thinks that the left-wing MSM has not been salivating at the prospect of facing off against Romney and that they don't already a myriad of hit-pieces against Romney piled up and ready to go is a political neophyte.
Furthermore, the only people helping Obama win re-election are those pimping such a sure-fired left-wing, progressive Liberal like Mitt Romney.
If he wins the nomination, we lose the election, because the left-wing Media is not goint to be bashful of using the following Mitt ROmney record against him like a baseball bat to bludgeon his candidacy into a bloody pulp:
1. Implemented Gay Marriage (Father of Gay Marriage in America)
2. Supported Abortion.
3. Implemented state level cap-and-trade Carbon trading system
4. Implemented a state-level "Assault Weapons" Ban AFTER the federal AWB was allowed to expire.
5. Whole-Heartedly Supported the Gay Agenda while Governor.
6. Whole-Heartedly supported the Abortion Agenda while Governor
7. Supported the Brady Bill.
8. Supported McCain-Kennedy (Amnesty)
9. Supported TARP
10. Implemented a Socialistic Healthcare program called RomneyCare that included an individual mandate and $50 abortions.
11. Increased Taxes/Fees by 300% as Governor.
Add to that his constant lying and bearing false witness against the actual conservatives in the race and all you have is a recipe for electoral disaster come November if Romney is the nominee.
*
So what if he's philosophically and historically pro nationalized health care, pro on-demand cheap taxpayer-funded abortion, pro gay agenda of forcing Americans to accept open homosexuality in everything from children's schools to our military, pro cap-and-trade global warming edicts, and has a documented record of appointing extremely liberal activist judges???? SO WHAT???
I tell you, he can't be as bad as Obama because he's a Republican. Only an idiot doesn't think it's OKAY to vote for a person with a political record of promoting every single major liberal issue, when the guy is a Republican!!!! Because he's a Republican, he can't be as bad as Obama!!!! If Obama himself re-registered as a Republican, he wouldn't be as bad as Obama!!!
/sarcasm
If it's R vs O, I pray that all Americans who comprehend just how fatal Romney would be for conservatism, the GOP, and therefore the hope of America, resist the temptation to sit out the election, and instead crawl over broken glass to VOTE THIRD PARTY for the sole purpose of diluting the vote percentage of whichever government bondage-pushing socialist wins, to the smallest plurality possible.
Vote ABOOR and that vote WILL COUNT against both Obama and Romney, and thus will make whichever one wins weaker politically. We HAVE TO FIGHT BACK, and the way we fight liberalism in THIS election, if it's R v O, is to VOTE THIRD PARTY. It's the ONLY CHANCE.
The more who vote ABOOR and go third party, the more likely we'll be looking at a socialist president (Romney or Obama) elected by, ideally, only 34-39 percent of the vote. If it was Obama who won on 34 percent, the liberal wing of the Replican party will have had its asses kicked, it would greatly help strengthen the conservative movement, would make Obama extremely vulnerable, and would probably make 43-percent-plurality Clinton's mid-term Republican Revolution ass-kicking look like child's play.
People, if you vote for Romney and the bastard wins, YOU AND AMERICA WILL GET WHAT YOU VOTED FOR: socialized medicine, global warming regulation, on-demand abortion funded by YOU, liberal activist judges, and punishment for resisting open homosexuality anywhere in your or your child's life. That's the price of voting "against" Obama by voting FOR Romney. VOTE ABOOR INSTEAD.
*
And I will still vote for him over the guy who hates America and wants to start a race war.....
*
That SOB Romney is running an ad here in PA (Johnstown, Ebensburg) in which he invokes Katie Couric, Gloria Borger and other MSM scum reporters to blast Santorum.
It's a dirty, filthy ad.
I will never vote for Romney!
I will write in Sarah Palin instead. I don't care. I can't vote for him.
*
What is the point and what are we to do??? Romney is probably going to be the nominee, so what are we to do? If we don’t vote for him we get Obama for another 4 years, can we really risk that? I don’t like Romney anymore then you do, but having Obama re-elected just can’t happen. So what is your plan? Please tell us, continual bashing of the nominee isn’t helping our cause. If there were any chance anyone else could grab the nomination, I would be the first in line to help, but we have done all we can do and we still have Romney. It will be ABO for most everyone, but if we continue to bash what we have, then what. Please explain your reasoning for this. I feel lost in the woods in regards to this election, but front and foremost is not re-electing Obama.
*
1. If you are a conservative, Nominating a left-wing, Progressive Liberal doesn't help your cause.
2. If you are a conservative, and if he wins, he won't help your cause either, because like he did in MA and Arnold did in CA, progressive Liberals with an R next to their name in executive positions destroy their party.
*
REMEMBER that Clinton got in with a plurality of 43 percent, proving that the majority of voters REJECTED him and helping Republicans take back Congress to the degree that it was called the Republican Revolution. If Obama wins with 34-40 percent of the vote, it will be a huge blow to liberalism in BOTH PARTIES. If Romney wins with 34-40 percent of the vote, however, there'd be a powerful agent in the White House working to castrate conservatives in the Republican Party.
THAT is what we do: vote AGAINST LIBERALISM by voting third party, making the plurality victor as politically weak and vulnerable as possible.
*
This is why I made up the nickname Robamney for him.
Once again, the establishment globalists give us a false choice.
The etch-a-sketch comment has me really considering third-party. We’re screwed either way and I’m not sure I want to be a part of it.
*
We have to make hard decisions. You are right, glossing over or painting Romney's liberal past as rosy will not change the future we now face of what Romney is capable of. But if faced with either Obama or Romney, I have to choose ABO.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Romney Says He Pays About 15 Percent in Income Tax
"How can that be? We’re paying 35%?"
THAT my friend is one of the problems with the tax code. All us little folks are being taxed at a higer rate because we get paid on income; the rich make their money from dividends and capital gains, so they pay a lower rate. This is why people like Buffett says he pays less taxes than his secretary. Stricly speaking, it’s not true, but he’s taxed at a lower rate than she is because of the way she receives her income.
"Last time I heard this argument I heard it coming from President Obama in a class warfare argument to raise the capital gains tax to 28%. Are you suggesting we raise the capital gains tax and discourage capital investment to achieve growth?"
*
How can that be? Why incorporation. The elitists knew exactly what they were doing when they duped people into supporting an income tax. Abolish the income tax altogether, and return us to duties, excises and tariffs. Taxation of productivity stifles productivity. People don’t care if they’re sheared if the shearing comes out of the income before they ever even see it. Have them see a tax on every receipt and they’re more inclined to care. (Even them, some will baaa and turn back to the TV/Sporting event).
*
And this is why the OWS people want dividend taxes hiked.
Problem is...it would affect millions of middle-class Americans too and bar the way to greater wealth as one climbs the ladder.
Classic class warfare.
*
The problem with the tax code, in addition to how it manipulates the market, is that it deliberately twists and turns to hide things from people. So that Warren Buffet can pay himself less in nominal income than his secretary, and pretend the tax burden is somehow unbalanced. So that Democrats, progressive Republicans, and idiots everywhere can pretend the rich don’t pay their fair share, when we all know, deep down, they pay the lion’s share.
By the way, nevermind double taxation and tricks of the tax code. Does anyone else think it’s ridiculous that we refer to Buffet’s secretary as if she’s a just your regular, old neighborhood secretary? As if she doesn’t get paid way, way over market rate. I have no doubt she’s a one percenter. The only reason Buffet’s specious argument kinda, sorta, almost makes sense is that he uses her as an example, rather than your average secretary.
*
Mitt will get the nomination and THIS issue will torpedo his campaign. Independents will view Mitt as part of the problem and not the solution. Basically another Obama with an R by his name.
Obama will get another 4 years unless an alternative party comes in now. The Republican race for the White House is done. Tea Party where are you at?
*
Oh I would love to see a repeal of the republic-killing 16th Amendment.
*
“So Mitt the “Socialist” fired employees at Bain in order to put more money in his back pocket under the Trojan Horse of trying to save money for the company.
Then this very same guy wants people to pay more in taxes while he dodges taxes and pays a lower rate then the middle class”
Have you ever considered taking a job as a speechwriter for President Obama?
*
“And why are we comparing income tax to gains tax anyway?”
Because without doing so Buffet couldn’t proffer his false argument.
*
What you can’t handle the facts that your flip flopping, gun grabbing, Socialized Health Care pusher Mitt Romney is complete hypocrite???
Here this guy wants tax payers to pay higher taxes for Socialized Health Care. At the very same time Mitt loots a company and then dodges taxes (that he THINKS we should pay) and pays a lower tax than the middle class?
Oh but you think that’s okay right????
*
Texas does just fine without an income tax. I don’t see why the feds require one.
Tax consumption. Say they put a 5 percent tax on every purchase, rather than 300/month that I’m effectively paying, I’d see 300+ net on my check at the end of the month. As my expenses are not 6k a month spending, my expenses come out around 200 a month.
I’d net 280 every single month, and around 3k a year. That’s big, big money for someone like me.
*
“Buffet’s memo shows that federal revenue goes up as you lower tax rates, which still says the wealthy pay more tax than us little people do.”
Funny, I seem to recall Buffet saying more money in the hands of private investers won’t grow the economy. And it wasn’t just that they’d have little effect or a negligible effect. He literally said they’d have no effect. Which goes to show you how stupid Buffet thinks we are.
*
Mitt is worse than our old Robber Barons
The Robber Barons created and ran entire new industries like steel, coal, oil, railroads. They were brutal but they were innovators and creators and perhaps were needed at that stage of America's development. Mitt Romney did not create anything except for minor investments in Staples, Dominoes and Sports Authority. Mitts forte was financial paper shenanigans that enabled him and his partners to mine companies and extract millions from them
*
My biggest expense is rent, closely followed by Obama. It’s like I have a kid and I’m raising Obama...
THAT my friend is one of the problems with the tax code. All us little folks are being taxed at a higer rate because we get paid on income; the rich make their money from dividends and capital gains, so they pay a lower rate. This is why people like Buffett says he pays less taxes than his secretary. Stricly speaking, it’s not true, but he’s taxed at a lower rate than she is because of the way she receives her income.
"Last time I heard this argument I heard it coming from President Obama in a class warfare argument to raise the capital gains tax to 28%. Are you suggesting we raise the capital gains tax and discourage capital investment to achieve growth?"
*
How can that be? Why incorporation. The elitists knew exactly what they were doing when they duped people into supporting an income tax. Abolish the income tax altogether, and return us to duties, excises and tariffs. Taxation of productivity stifles productivity. People don’t care if they’re sheared if the shearing comes out of the income before they ever even see it. Have them see a tax on every receipt and they’re more inclined to care. (Even them, some will baaa and turn back to the TV/Sporting event).
*
And this is why the OWS people want dividend taxes hiked.
Problem is...it would affect millions of middle-class Americans too and bar the way to greater wealth as one climbs the ladder.
Classic class warfare.
*
The problem with the tax code, in addition to how it manipulates the market, is that it deliberately twists and turns to hide things from people. So that Warren Buffet can pay himself less in nominal income than his secretary, and pretend the tax burden is somehow unbalanced. So that Democrats, progressive Republicans, and idiots everywhere can pretend the rich don’t pay their fair share, when we all know, deep down, they pay the lion’s share.
By the way, nevermind double taxation and tricks of the tax code. Does anyone else think it’s ridiculous that we refer to Buffet’s secretary as if she’s a just your regular, old neighborhood secretary? As if she doesn’t get paid way, way over market rate. I have no doubt she’s a one percenter. The only reason Buffet’s specious argument kinda, sorta, almost makes sense is that he uses her as an example, rather than your average secretary.
*
Mitt will get the nomination and THIS issue will torpedo his campaign. Independents will view Mitt as part of the problem and not the solution. Basically another Obama with an R by his name.
Obama will get another 4 years unless an alternative party comes in now. The Republican race for the White House is done. Tea Party where are you at?
*
Oh I would love to see a repeal of the republic-killing 16th Amendment.
*
“So Mitt the “Socialist” fired employees at Bain in order to put more money in his back pocket under the Trojan Horse of trying to save money for the company.
Then this very same guy wants people to pay more in taxes while he dodges taxes and pays a lower rate then the middle class”
Have you ever considered taking a job as a speechwriter for President Obama?
*
“And why are we comparing income tax to gains tax anyway?”
Because without doing so Buffet couldn’t proffer his false argument.
*
What you can’t handle the facts that your flip flopping, gun grabbing, Socialized Health Care pusher Mitt Romney is complete hypocrite???
Here this guy wants tax payers to pay higher taxes for Socialized Health Care. At the very same time Mitt loots a company and then dodges taxes (that he THINKS we should pay) and pays a lower tax than the middle class?
Oh but you think that’s okay right????
*
Texas does just fine without an income tax. I don’t see why the feds require one.
Tax consumption. Say they put a 5 percent tax on every purchase, rather than 300/month that I’m effectively paying, I’d see 300+ net on my check at the end of the month. As my expenses are not 6k a month spending, my expenses come out around 200 a month.
I’d net 280 every single month, and around 3k a year. That’s big, big money for someone like me.
*
“Buffet’s memo shows that federal revenue goes up as you lower tax rates, which still says the wealthy pay more tax than us little people do.”
Funny, I seem to recall Buffet saying more money in the hands of private investers won’t grow the economy. And it wasn’t just that they’d have little effect or a negligible effect. He literally said they’d have no effect. Which goes to show you how stupid Buffet thinks we are.
*
Mitt is worse than our old Robber Barons
The Robber Barons created and ran entire new industries like steel, coal, oil, railroads. They were brutal but they were innovators and creators and perhaps were needed at that stage of America's development. Mitt Romney did not create anything except for minor investments in Staples, Dominoes and Sports Authority. Mitts forte was financial paper shenanigans that enabled him and his partners to mine companies and extract millions from them
*
My biggest expense is rent, closely followed by Obama. It’s like I have a kid and I’m raising Obama...
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Majority of Conservatives See Romney as "Acceptable" (Gallup)
If Romney gets the nomination, I’ll sit this one out. And yes, I’m quite aware that it may give us four more years of Obama*.
*I still do not believe Obama will finish his first term.
*
I have not met a single Conservative in Mississippi that would pee on mitt if he were on fire. Everyone I speak with... unless they are party line hacks... refuse to vote for the rat bastard if he wins the nomination. Most despise mitt as much as obama. I have spoken with hundreds of voters here in the last year. Maybe up north or out west they like lying pos progressives... but mitt will not win the Southern vote and he cannot win the election without us.
Sometimes I think America does not understand us very well. Ask charlie gibson about how we ran his ass off the coast when he tried his anti Bush crap in Biloxi... post Katrina... he got in his car and left the state pronto.
*
Pure BS. As is the notion that these little northern states should have anything to do with picking the Republucan nominee. Iowa? Really? Lol! New Hampshire? Double lol!
We are witnessing a kabuki theatre run by the MSM. What a farce. Too many people simply don’t stop and think what a joke all this is. The Republican Party is run by a bunch of liberals who have no desire to do good for the nation. If they did care about the country they would trash the current system and construct a sensible way to choose a nominee.
*
The solution to our current problems is not political. We are beyond that.
I’ve said that either Obama is a piker, in which case he will go down hard, or he is the antichrist, in which case it will take God to sort it out.
If he goes down and is replaced by Romney, I think Romney fits the bill of the latter even more.
IOW, I LITERALLY consider Obama the less of the two evils.
And to be clear, I consider Obama to be the worst president in our nation’s history.
*
In other words, 41% of all GOP, conservative and RINO consider Romney unacceptable.
59% will hold their nose and pull the lever and the others may not. Great job GOP establishment for pushing another RINO on us while undermining conservatives and allowing a Soros puppet libertarian (a crazy one at that) to screw up the process. And what does the nation get if Romney wins the POTUS? A liberal. No thanks.
It is third party Tea Party time. The GOP left didn't get the message in 2010, maybe they need another lesson.
*
” I’m quite aware that it may give us four more years of Obama*.”
And that means the suspension of the Constitution. A Marxist/socialist government and situations reminisent of Germany 1939.
*
I’m thinking that Hillary gets the nomination - if the Alabama or Georgia case results in Obama’s decertification, all hell will break lose.
I will vote Mitt if forced, but I’d rather have Newt and enjoy the debates.
*
Figures lie and liars figure!
*I still do not believe Obama will finish his first term.
*
I have not met a single Conservative in Mississippi that would pee on mitt if he were on fire. Everyone I speak with... unless they are party line hacks... refuse to vote for the rat bastard if he wins the nomination. Most despise mitt as much as obama. I have spoken with hundreds of voters here in the last year. Maybe up north or out west they like lying pos progressives... but mitt will not win the Southern vote and he cannot win the election without us.
Sometimes I think America does not understand us very well. Ask charlie gibson about how we ran his ass off the coast when he tried his anti Bush crap in Biloxi... post Katrina... he got in his car and left the state pronto.
*
Pure BS. As is the notion that these little northern states should have anything to do with picking the Republucan nominee. Iowa? Really? Lol! New Hampshire? Double lol!
We are witnessing a kabuki theatre run by the MSM. What a farce. Too many people simply don’t stop and think what a joke all this is. The Republican Party is run by a bunch of liberals who have no desire to do good for the nation. If they did care about the country they would trash the current system and construct a sensible way to choose a nominee.
*
The solution to our current problems is not political. We are beyond that.
I’ve said that either Obama is a piker, in which case he will go down hard, or he is the antichrist, in which case it will take God to sort it out.
If he goes down and is replaced by Romney, I think Romney fits the bill of the latter even more.
IOW, I LITERALLY consider Obama the less of the two evils.
And to be clear, I consider Obama to be the worst president in our nation’s history.
*
In other words, 41% of all GOP, conservative and RINO consider Romney unacceptable.
59% will hold their nose and pull the lever and the others may not. Great job GOP establishment for pushing another RINO on us while undermining conservatives and allowing a Soros puppet libertarian (a crazy one at that) to screw up the process. And what does the nation get if Romney wins the POTUS? A liberal. No thanks.
It is third party Tea Party time. The GOP left didn't get the message in 2010, maybe they need another lesson.
*
” I’m quite aware that it may give us four more years of Obama*.”
And that means the suspension of the Constitution. A Marxist/socialist government and situations reminisent of Germany 1939.
*
I’m thinking that Hillary gets the nomination - if the Alabama or Georgia case results in Obama’s decertification, all hell will break lose.
I will vote Mitt if forced, but I’d rather have Newt and enjoy the debates.
*
Figures lie and liars figure!
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
"Obama loses bin Laden bounce; Romney on the move among GOP contenders (Romney 49, Obama 46)"
Article from Washington Post
Give it up lamestream media
Were not falling for you picking Mitt-for-brains Romney for us- like you picked McCain
*
The good news is that Romney is beating Obama. That bad news is that Romney is almost as far to the left as Obama.
*
So the MSM wants Romney, not a surprise. However, what is the difference between obama and Romney? Ok, Romney has better hair and he doesn’t appear to have a royal pain in the a$$ wife.
*
According to this poll, “42% of Republicans say they wouldn’t vote for Sarah Palin. Meanwhile, nearly 2/3 of all Americans say they “definitely would not” vote for her.”
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Let’s see the internals please.
*
If Obama leads everyone but Romney by a landslide with the economy in a depression, put a fork in America.
I’d elect my town councilman over Obama.
*
I’m not voting for RINOmney.
Not now.
Not ever.
So, Repubs, winch up what’s left of your gonads and nominate someone with a brain and morals.
E.g., NOT anyone who Massachusetts idiots have ever elected.
*
I held my nose. I kept my hand over my mouth to keep my stomach from turning over. I took aspirin before I went to the polls for the headache I knew I would have. I prayed to the Lord to forgive me for voting for a man who did not deserve to be president of the Republic. I voted for McCain simply to vote for Sarah and against the chosen one. I am not going to do that again. Voting for the lesser of two evils IS STILL VOTING FOR EVIL. I am not going to do that again. Simply will not do it.
*
Can't help but wonder how Reagan would have handled all this negativity. One thing he did better than anyone else I've ever seen: he talked directly to the American people. Seemed like he bypassed everything else and spoke directly to We the People and We responded. Somehow Reagan's words directly to US drowned out the liberal lies.
Was the Reagan era America's (and this present world's) last hurrah? I hope not, but I'll say something else: if America doesn't stop this 50 million plus slaughter of the unborn, I don't see how God can keep defending America.
*
I wish Palin and Bachman would get together right now and agree to become a Palin/Bachman ticket
They would trounce anyone else in the primaries.
can you imagine 16 years of them?
Even get Hermain Cain involved and promise him it will be Bachman/Cain next
OMG 24 years ~!!!
The three of them together HAVE TO KNOW a Romney pick would be a disaster
Give it up lamestream media
Were not falling for you picking Mitt-for-brains Romney for us- like you picked McCain
*
The good news is that Romney is beating Obama. That bad news is that Romney is almost as far to the left as Obama.
*
So the MSM wants Romney, not a surprise. However, what is the difference between obama and Romney? Ok, Romney has better hair and he doesn’t appear to have a royal pain in the a$$ wife.
*
According to this poll, “42% of Republicans say they wouldn’t vote for Sarah Palin. Meanwhile, nearly 2/3 of all Americans say they “definitely would not” vote for her.”
riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
Let’s see the internals please.
*
If Obama leads everyone but Romney by a landslide with the economy in a depression, put a fork in America.
I’d elect my town councilman over Obama.
*
I’m not voting for RINOmney.
Not now.
Not ever.
So, Repubs, winch up what’s left of your gonads and nominate someone with a brain and morals.
E.g., NOT anyone who Massachusetts idiots have ever elected.
*
I held my nose. I kept my hand over my mouth to keep my stomach from turning over. I took aspirin before I went to the polls for the headache I knew I would have. I prayed to the Lord to forgive me for voting for a man who did not deserve to be president of the Republic. I voted for McCain simply to vote for Sarah and against the chosen one. I am not going to do that again. Voting for the lesser of two evils IS STILL VOTING FOR EVIL. I am not going to do that again. Simply will not do it.
*
Can't help but wonder how Reagan would have handled all this negativity. One thing he did better than anyone else I've ever seen: he talked directly to the American people. Seemed like he bypassed everything else and spoke directly to We the People and We responded. Somehow Reagan's words directly to US drowned out the liberal lies.
Was the Reagan era America's (and this present world's) last hurrah? I hope not, but I'll say something else: if America doesn't stop this 50 million plus slaughter of the unborn, I don't see how God can keep defending America.
*
I wish Palin and Bachman would get together right now and agree to become a Palin/Bachman ticket
They would trounce anyone else in the primaries.
can you imagine 16 years of them?
Even get Hermain Cain involved and promise him it will be Bachman/Cain next
OMG 24 years ~!!!
The three of them together HAVE TO KNOW a Romney pick would be a disaster
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)