Article here from New York Times
Summary: Anti-Sharia laws actually do affect people, but only in a way that discriminates against freedom of religion.
I have never seen a Muslim anti terrorism rally, they hate America and our laws, they should leave and take the UN with them.
*
This is an article by a faculty member at the University of Chicago. Notice how he threatens us with Muslims not cooperating with counterterrorism efforts if they cannot enforce the Shariah in USA.
*
We must really hate ourselves for letting this cancer in. Sooner or later chemotherapy or surgery will be required on a national scale, unless we are really eager to die.
And Congress just scratches its *ss and looks away.
*
How much does anyone want to bet that there aren’t a few mosques with weapons hidden in them?
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
Sunday, July 10, 2011
Slavery language in the marriage pledge
From various articles.
Summary: In a now famous Marriage Pledge, signed by presidential candidates Bachmann and Santorum, one conservative group sought to define marriage between a man and a woman. However, one controversial passage in the preamble raised some eyebrows:
"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA?s first African-American President."
The social conservative group has retracted that language. Bachmann defended it earlier this weekend.
I am so pissed about this retraction. I have been on Facebook all day defending this clear language that DID NOT say that black children were better off under slavery. Now they retract it. Ridiculous!
*
This slavery horse crap !! I have heard this ridiculous whining all my life and enough!! NO one alive had anything to do with it and the country has been destroyed, Pandering to these Clowns and idiots!
*
The really sad thing is, the Left has no interest whatsoever in bettering the plight of the black family.
If they address this comment at all, they’ll know that it didn’t really say or mean what they will say it did. No, they won’t be defending blacks.
They will simply be attacking people on the right.
The Left is a very evil enterprise as a group.
*
Today’s dysfunctions and misplaced moralities versus yesteryear’s chattel slavery — the conditions of which varied greatly according to locale — this is not something that can be propounded in a sound bite. If they wanted to produce a lengthy discourse on it that explained all the angles possible, that would be a different story.
--- Yeah, you read that right. This guy thinks the problem here is that comparing the problems of modern black Americans to antebellum black Americans is just too complicated and require a long debate.
*
Yes, Virginia, some things are worse than slavery.
*
Some slave manned plantations had more liberal (in a good sense) policies and allowed their slaves to have side businesses and to buy themselves free. Some allowed marriages and families that were preserved as a group. This was due to Christian morality, which some masters honored more than others depending on their personal convictions.
*
Children born into slavery could be separated from their mothers and sold from the moment they were born, could be beaten or whipped, could be worked to exhaustion or death, could be starved, and could be raped. And sometimes they were - that's what slavery is all about. The notion that all this is "better off" than today's conditions is both ridiculous and offensive.
*
This entire episode is a case study in why conservatives (and conservatism) loses in the public forum of ideas.
1. Conservative group or person makes a controversial statement (such as the suggestion that black children enjoyed more stable “families” under slavery than in many situations today - a statement which has the ring of truth).
2. The left screams “racism”, or, what-have-you.
3. The conservative person or group goes wobbly, starts trying to “clarify” his/her/their remarks.
4. The left screams louder.
5. The conservative person or group “apologizes” and retracts his/her/their earlier remarks. The “retraction” has no bearing to the fact that the remarks are based on truth. Rather, it comes with ONE reason: to “save face” and to stop the screaming.
When are conservatives going to stand up to the screamers and say, “I said what I meant and meant what I said, I’m NOT sorry, I’m NOT going to apologize, and I’m NOT going to take back what I said, for truth is truth.” ????
Just sayin’....
*
The other argument is this....Not that the black folks are totally responsible for abortion in this country, however as a group they had the power to prevent many/most of the 60 million plus abortions that have taken place.
Same can be said of American Catholics, they also had the power as a group to prevent the aprox 60 million abortions that have taken place.
Also Black`s/Catholics both have blood on their hands, not just for abortion, but gay marriage, having prayer and God`s Word removed from public square etc.
For full disclosure RINO WASP`s etc that have voted Democrat or for moderate Republicans etc, also have blood on their hands. Not sure if this group alone could have prevented all the death/destruction? But certainly the other 2 groups on their own could have prevented liberal Supreme Court Justices from ever having their say.
Black`s have such a rich Christian heritage, but now when they wave their arms in Church Sunday Morning saying they Love Jesus, it`s all in vain IMHO
*
I understood the meaning of the original pledge's wording as this:
" A black child born today in America has less of a chance, less hope, then a black child born in America when slavery was legal. "
That's simply true. Simply, horribly, brutally true.
*
"Can someone tell me what is inaccurate in this statement? "
Nothing inaccurate at all, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t a stupid thing for a Presidential candidate to sign.
*
When the Irish first came to the U.S. (famine), they were treated worse than the slaves. Strange that no one talks about it much.
*
it was American slavery, versus that in the Caribbean and Brazil, that fostered stable family units among slaves. It was this, among other things, that was principally responsible for American slavery to have been a relatively minor participant in the importation of slaves compared to the Caribbean and Brazil. Though the same thing could be said about black children for almost any time in U.S. history up to about the 1970s.
*
The comparison is stupid, and offensive. Slavery is totally anomalous in a free society. . Those families were not free agents. A better one would have been to compare today with 1960. Free blacks in 1960 were doing much better. Even with the burden of racial segregation, blacks were better able to maintain family life.
Summary: In a now famous Marriage Pledge, signed by presidential candidates Bachmann and Santorum, one conservative group sought to define marriage between a man and a woman. However, one controversial passage in the preamble raised some eyebrows:
"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA?s first African-American President."
The social conservative group has retracted that language. Bachmann defended it earlier this weekend.
I am so pissed about this retraction. I have been on Facebook all day defending this clear language that DID NOT say that black children were better off under slavery. Now they retract it. Ridiculous!
*
This slavery horse crap !! I have heard this ridiculous whining all my life and enough!! NO one alive had anything to do with it and the country has been destroyed, Pandering to these Clowns and idiots!
*
The really sad thing is, the Left has no interest whatsoever in bettering the plight of the black family.
If they address this comment at all, they’ll know that it didn’t really say or mean what they will say it did. No, they won’t be defending blacks.
They will simply be attacking people on the right.
The Left is a very evil enterprise as a group.
*
Today’s dysfunctions and misplaced moralities versus yesteryear’s chattel slavery — the conditions of which varied greatly according to locale — this is not something that can be propounded in a sound bite. If they wanted to produce a lengthy discourse on it that explained all the angles possible, that would be a different story.
--- Yeah, you read that right. This guy thinks the problem here is that comparing the problems of modern black Americans to antebellum black Americans is just too complicated and require a long debate.
*
Yes, Virginia, some things are worse than slavery.
*
Some slave manned plantations had more liberal (in a good sense) policies and allowed their slaves to have side businesses and to buy themselves free. Some allowed marriages and families that were preserved as a group. This was due to Christian morality, which some masters honored more than others depending on their personal convictions.
*
Children born into slavery could be separated from their mothers and sold from the moment they were born, could be beaten or whipped, could be worked to exhaustion or death, could be starved, and could be raped. And sometimes they were - that's what slavery is all about. The notion that all this is "better off" than today's conditions is both ridiculous and offensive.
*
This entire episode is a case study in why conservatives (and conservatism) loses in the public forum of ideas.
1. Conservative group or person makes a controversial statement (such as the suggestion that black children enjoyed more stable “families” under slavery than in many situations today - a statement which has the ring of truth).
2. The left screams “racism”, or, what-have-you.
3. The conservative person or group goes wobbly, starts trying to “clarify” his/her/their remarks.
4. The left screams louder.
5. The conservative person or group “apologizes” and retracts his/her/their earlier remarks. The “retraction” has no bearing to the fact that the remarks are based on truth. Rather, it comes with ONE reason: to “save face” and to stop the screaming.
When are conservatives going to stand up to the screamers and say, “I said what I meant and meant what I said, I’m NOT sorry, I’m NOT going to apologize, and I’m NOT going to take back what I said, for truth is truth.” ????
Just sayin’....
*
The other argument is this....Not that the black folks are totally responsible for abortion in this country, however as a group they had the power to prevent many/most of the 60 million plus abortions that have taken place.
Same can be said of American Catholics, they also had the power as a group to prevent the aprox 60 million abortions that have taken place.
Also Black`s/Catholics both have blood on their hands, not just for abortion, but gay marriage, having prayer and God`s Word removed from public square etc.
For full disclosure RINO WASP`s etc that have voted Democrat or for moderate Republicans etc, also have blood on their hands. Not sure if this group alone could have prevented all the death/destruction? But certainly the other 2 groups on their own could have prevented liberal Supreme Court Justices from ever having their say.
Black`s have such a rich Christian heritage, but now when they wave their arms in Church Sunday Morning saying they Love Jesus, it`s all in vain IMHO
*
I understood the meaning of the original pledge's wording as this:
" A black child born today in America has less of a chance, less hope, then a black child born in America when slavery was legal. "
That's simply true. Simply, horribly, brutally true.
*
"Can someone tell me what is inaccurate in this statement? "
Nothing inaccurate at all, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t a stupid thing for a Presidential candidate to sign.
*
When the Irish first came to the U.S. (famine), they were treated worse than the slaves. Strange that no one talks about it much.
*
it was American slavery, versus that in the Caribbean and Brazil, that fostered stable family units among slaves. It was this, among other things, that was principally responsible for American slavery to have been a relatively minor participant in the importation of slaves compared to the Caribbean and Brazil. Though the same thing could be said about black children for almost any time in U.S. history up to about the 1970s.
*
The comparison is stupid, and offensive. Slavery is totally anomalous in a free society. . Those families were not free agents. A better one would have been to compare today with 1960. Free blacks in 1960 were doing much better. Even with the burden of racial segregation, blacks were better able to maintain family life.
'I can win': Sarah Palin on Cover of Newsweek
Before we continue, I want to mention that I have a new job, which is why these posts are a little slow right now. But once I adjust, I'm sure that we'll be back to our regularly scheduled derp.
Picture on Facebook
A shetland pony should be able to win against Obama. He has made such huge messes. But a shetland pony is not running and neither is Palin. I hope she does run. I believe that not only will she stomp Obama in to the ground it will be the biggest defeat we have seen in modern history.
*
That is a fantastic Photo of Sarah, and this will be only issue of Newsweek Allowed in my house.
RUN SARAH, RUN!!!!!
*
"that’s an unflattering picture.
Take a close look at it. It almost looks like a man’s face.
I wonder if they photoshopped that to look less than flattering."
I agree about the picture.
It must of been hard for them to find a picture that was not good of Sarah.....but they managed to get one.
*
The wrists look masculine too. I’d be surprised if those scumbags didn’t Photoshop that picture.
*
Of course she is running. She just is refusing to play by the “rules” the establishment and the media have set. There isn’t the slightest reason to announce yet, all that would do is give the enemy a fixed target.
It would force every aspect of every thing she does to fit into campaign law.
The bus tour would have been impossible.
If this was the 1980 election,, Reagans announcement would still be several months away. November 13th.
She is Sun Tsu,, refusing to march onto a battlefield that her enemy is standing on, fully prepared, in a location they chose. And she is attacking elsewhere.
It is driving them bats*^t insane. They are running this cover to goad her. They exclude her from every poll to goad her (”see,, we excluded her until she announces”,,, Guliani is in some polls,, but not Sarah)
Meanwhile, she is touring the primary states in the NE,, Touring Iowa,,
etc
Oh yes,, she is running. But she is employing asymetrical warfare.
*
I thought she looks more like her runner magazine Photo, that is still going on my homepage, I guess Newsweek didn't want to make her look presidential, they always try to put the screws to her somehow (and always fail)
*
I find this VERY interesting:
ALL previous pictures I’ve seen on ALL magazine covers,
have highlighted Sarah’s good looks, if not inherent glamor
and ‘youthfullness”.
THAT was in a different era, apparently: all of that was meant to immply that
she SHOULDN’T win. (too good looking)
This NEWSWEEK cover is the only I’ve seen where Sarah looks her age, and is supposed to look her age, and the glamor seems stripped from her.
MESSAGE STILL, with the caption “I CAN WIN” is
SHE SHOULDN’T WIN.(not good looking enough)
*
Sarah's face is not a cutesy girlie face ... it is strong.
No photoshop here or shenanicans.
The lady's tough as nails
*
"can’t worry about looks
if she runs and wins...she will age bigtime...the men sure do"
I don’t think the stresses of the Presidency impact those who are capable. They’re used to crisis management, and don’t doubt themselves because they’re used to doing the right thing. Case in point, Ronald Reagan.
*
Reagan, Jefferson, TR (for better or for worse), Ford, Truman, and even George W. left the office with more or less their same energy level they had when they entered.
It will age you for sure, but if one is ready for it, the aging will be slight and not debilitating.
*
It must have pained NewsWEAK so much to have to show a cover of Sarah saying she can win..ANYONE can beat Obama but having Sarah Palin in the White House would totally destroy the progressives..they might go back into hibernation for another 100 years(Good, hope they never come out!) I think the photo looks fine..of course Newsweek wanted to find the most unflattering photo of her but in all seriousness, is there ever a photo of Sarah that looks bad..of course not..she looks beautiful no matter the photo..
*
0bama has aged about 12 years in 2, which is strange given that he has no conscience.
*
They’ve subtly aged her. Look at her neck. What a bunch of creepy, pernicious liars.
*
Well, if it were me, and I have a bit of slyness in my genes, I would make an announcement on Odumba’s coming 50th birthday as a special gift.
Picture on Facebook
A shetland pony should be able to win against Obama. He has made such huge messes. But a shetland pony is not running and neither is Palin. I hope she does run. I believe that not only will she stomp Obama in to the ground it will be the biggest defeat we have seen in modern history.
*
That is a fantastic Photo of Sarah, and this will be only issue of Newsweek Allowed in my house.
RUN SARAH, RUN!!!!!
*
"that’s an unflattering picture.
Take a close look at it. It almost looks like a man’s face.
I wonder if they photoshopped that to look less than flattering."
I agree about the picture.
It must of been hard for them to find a picture that was not good of Sarah.....but they managed to get one.
*
The wrists look masculine too. I’d be surprised if those scumbags didn’t Photoshop that picture.
*
Of course she is running. She just is refusing to play by the “rules” the establishment and the media have set. There isn’t the slightest reason to announce yet, all that would do is give the enemy a fixed target.
It would force every aspect of every thing she does to fit into campaign law.
The bus tour would have been impossible.
If this was the 1980 election,, Reagans announcement would still be several months away. November 13th.
She is Sun Tsu,, refusing to march onto a battlefield that her enemy is standing on, fully prepared, in a location they chose. And she is attacking elsewhere.
It is driving them bats*^t insane. They are running this cover to goad her. They exclude her from every poll to goad her (”see,, we excluded her until she announces”,,, Guliani is in some polls,, but not Sarah)
Meanwhile, she is touring the primary states in the NE,, Touring Iowa,,
etc
Oh yes,, she is running. But she is employing asymetrical warfare.
*
I thought she looks more like her runner magazine Photo, that is still going on my homepage, I guess Newsweek didn't want to make her look presidential, they always try to put the screws to her somehow (and always fail)
*
I find this VERY interesting:
ALL previous pictures I’ve seen on ALL magazine covers,
have highlighted Sarah’s good looks, if not inherent glamor
and ‘youthfullness”.
THAT was in a different era, apparently: all of that was meant to immply that
she SHOULDN’T win. (too good looking)
This NEWSWEEK cover is the only I’ve seen where Sarah looks her age, and is supposed to look her age, and the glamor seems stripped from her.
MESSAGE STILL, with the caption “I CAN WIN” is
SHE SHOULDN’T WIN.(not good looking enough)
*
Sarah's face is not a cutesy girlie face ... it is strong.
No photoshop here or shenanicans.
The lady's tough as nails
*
"can’t worry about looks
if she runs and wins...she will age bigtime...the men sure do"
I don’t think the stresses of the Presidency impact those who are capable. They’re used to crisis management, and don’t doubt themselves because they’re used to doing the right thing. Case in point, Ronald Reagan.
*
Reagan, Jefferson, TR (for better or for worse), Ford, Truman, and even George W. left the office with more or less their same energy level they had when they entered.
It will age you for sure, but if one is ready for it, the aging will be slight and not debilitating.
*
It must have pained NewsWEAK so much to have to show a cover of Sarah saying she can win..ANYONE can beat Obama but having Sarah Palin in the White House would totally destroy the progressives..they might go back into hibernation for another 100 years(Good, hope they never come out!) I think the photo looks fine..of course Newsweek wanted to find the most unflattering photo of her but in all seriousness, is there ever a photo of Sarah that looks bad..of course not..she looks beautiful no matter the photo..
*
0bama has aged about 12 years in 2, which is strange given that he has no conscience.
*
They’ve subtly aged her. Look at her neck. What a bunch of creepy, pernicious liars.
*
Well, if it were me, and I have a bit of slyness in my genes, I would make an announcement on Odumba’s coming 50th birthday as a special gift.
Friday, July 8, 2011
Ten Black Americans Who Denounced America
Article from NewsOne
Why isn’t Barack H. Obama on this list?
*
"I never understood why we put some of these people on postage stamps (like Paul Robeson) who had such a dislike and hatred of the US."
You don’t understand, communist slavery is the gooood slavery and black racism is the gooood racism. I don’t remember Martin Luther King, Jr., who, like his father, was a Republican, hating America. In fact he repeatedly praised its founding ideals, at least when I heard him speak.
*
The only objection that leftists of any color have against American chattel slavery is that the slaves were privately owned.
*
Harry Belafonte is another vilifier of the U.S.A, as is that actor in the Lethal Weapon films — Danny Glover. Both of them are Chavez/Obama-loving Communists who make arses of themselves on a regular basis.
Why isn’t Barack H. Obama on this list?
*
"I never understood why we put some of these people on postage stamps (like Paul Robeson) who had such a dislike and hatred of the US."
You don’t understand, communist slavery is the gooood slavery and black racism is the gooood racism. I don’t remember Martin Luther King, Jr., who, like his father, was a Republican, hating America. In fact he repeatedly praised its founding ideals, at least when I heard him speak.
*
The only objection that leftists of any color have against American chattel slavery is that the slaves were privately owned.
*
Harry Belafonte is another vilifier of the U.S.A, as is that actor in the Lethal Weapon films — Danny Glover. Both of them are Chavez/Obama-loving Communists who make arses of themselves on a regular basis.
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
Obama Names Openly Gay Veteran to West Point Advisory Board
Article from the Wall Street Journal
Anti-American act of the day by stalinist Dick Obama.
*
Operation Rolling Blunder continues. I’m really starting to wonder if we’ll have 2012 elections.
*
Just barry the bastard boy flipping off conservatives once again. This sick little narcissist cannot help it that he is a degenerate don’tchaknow.
*
Jesus...if someone doesn’t stop this madman we are finished as a Nation...
*
This is a problem with females, she took an academy slot from a man, served five years and then left the service, it was a bad investment that could have been invested in a male career officer.
“Brenda S. “Sue” Fulton is a 1980 graduate of the US Military Academy. She served for five years in the Signal Corps in Germany, as a platoon leader, staff officer, and company commander. After leaving the Army, Sue worked in brand management at Procter & Gamble and Church & Dwight; she also took two years to work in parish renewal programs for the Archdiocese of New York. Sue most recently worked for a pharmaceutical company and lives in North Plainfield, NJ, with her partner Penny Gnesin. Sue is the Executive Director of Knights Out.”
*
Yet another reason why this fraud needs to be removed from office because he’s not eligible; all of these damning appointments and policies will be voided. It’s absolutely imperative.
*
"I can hardly wait to vote this jackball out of office."
So do I, but that won't end the culture war. We'll be fighting the generations (aging Baby Boomers, Gen Xers, and Generation.commers) that put him in office for decades. It may spell the end of our nation as we know it, even if we survive the tyranny of the Obammunist.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
*
It is like conducting a purge of our armed forces, an attempt to drive out the old guard via demoralization.
The ranks of experienced, good men fail to re-up in disgust, and 0bama wants to fill this void with 0bama cronies.
Don't underestimate this guy; he has an agenda to implement, at all costs.
*
Whatever President replaces Obama absolutely must go scorched earth and remove the infestation of leftists/libs/homosexuals and communists from government at every level from Janitor to Aide to military brass.
HUAC top to bottom. And Obama has given any Republican/Indy President the precedence to do it because that’s just what/how he is doing it by installing his people there.
*
Bear in mind that I am not some conspiracy theorist. I do believe in being prepared however.
Many current senior officers retire in disgust. Obama replaces them with those loyal to him.
A reshuffle of senior officers takes place. Placed in roles favorable to Obama.
Obama doesn't like the results of the next election. Or he creates a crisis before that, and implements a state of emergency. His loyal officers support him.
*
I was stunned when he was elected. I am beyond understanding how our Congress and Military are just letting this continue. He’s beyond out of control.
Anti-American act of the day by stalinist Dick Obama.
*
Operation Rolling Blunder continues. I’m really starting to wonder if we’ll have 2012 elections.
*
Just barry the bastard boy flipping off conservatives once again. This sick little narcissist cannot help it that he is a degenerate don’tchaknow.
*
Jesus...if someone doesn’t stop this madman we are finished as a Nation...
*
This is a problem with females, she took an academy slot from a man, served five years and then left the service, it was a bad investment that could have been invested in a male career officer.
“Brenda S. “Sue” Fulton is a 1980 graduate of the US Military Academy. She served for five years in the Signal Corps in Germany, as a platoon leader, staff officer, and company commander. After leaving the Army, Sue worked in brand management at Procter & Gamble and Church & Dwight; she also took two years to work in parish renewal programs for the Archdiocese of New York. Sue most recently worked for a pharmaceutical company and lives in North Plainfield, NJ, with her partner Penny Gnesin. Sue is the Executive Director of Knights Out.”
*
Yet another reason why this fraud needs to be removed from office because he’s not eligible; all of these damning appointments and policies will be voided. It’s absolutely imperative.
*
"I can hardly wait to vote this jackball out of office."
So do I, but that won't end the culture war. We'll be fighting the generations (aging Baby Boomers, Gen Xers, and Generation.commers) that put him in office for decades. It may spell the end of our nation as we know it, even if we survive the tyranny of the Obammunist.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
*
It is like conducting a purge of our armed forces, an attempt to drive out the old guard via demoralization.
The ranks of experienced, good men fail to re-up in disgust, and 0bama wants to fill this void with 0bama cronies.
Don't underestimate this guy; he has an agenda to implement, at all costs.
*
Whatever President replaces Obama absolutely must go scorched earth and remove the infestation of leftists/libs/homosexuals and communists from government at every level from Janitor to Aide to military brass.
HUAC top to bottom. And Obama has given any Republican/Indy President the precedence to do it because that’s just what/how he is doing it by installing his people there.
*
Bear in mind that I am not some conspiracy theorist. I do believe in being prepared however.
Many current senior officers retire in disgust. Obama replaces them with those loyal to him.
A reshuffle of senior officers takes place. Placed in roles favorable to Obama.
Obama doesn't like the results of the next election. Or he creates a crisis before that, and implements a state of emergency. His loyal officers support him.
*
I was stunned when he was elected. I am beyond understanding how our Congress and Military are just letting this continue. He’s beyond out of control.
Casey Anthony Found Not Guilty of 1st-Degree Murder, Acquitted of Manslaughter in Daughter's Death
A verdict already? That was fast. Betcha guilty on all counts.
*
Watch..ALL 12 jurors will come intot he interview room..they will say the evidence was overwhelming, and they were all agreed..I wrote yesterday that they could have done this in 5 minutes, but felt they had to take "some" time..to look like they deliberated..
*
I am about to cry because of poor little Caylee. I think this is the first time that it has hit me that her ‘mother’ just might get the justice she deserves!
*
I bet there is a whole child pimping ring in the area, and Casey would be a link that should have led to them. An "accident" of too much chloroform being used in this type of situation sounds really plausable, and even the placement of duct tape could be explained as it could have been used to muffle the cries or screams of a child being used in such disgusting ways.
Casey's demeanor, although shocking and inhumane in relation to her daughter's death, is also, probably because she is scared to death of the people behind the child pimping. Who knows what they might have threatened...killing her parents, brother, friends, etc. if she mentiones her involvement with them. And, of course, having her own name exposed in relationship to such horrid practices. That is probably more important to her than anything...just having people know the truth about how she used her daughter in such a disgusting, immoral way just to make money is something she does not want told.
*
Maybe. But after over a month of this nightmare I doubt it. I would want to get a unanimous verdict at whatever level of charges and turn it over to the judge and go home. We will see if emotion or logic ruled the day. If murder 1 it is a good indicator Obama will be re-elected.
*
My educated guess is that the verdict will be guilty on all counts. It is a certainty that the majority of the jurors would vote guilty (as 95% of the rest of America) so if there were any jurors favoring acquittal, the rest of the jurors would take days and days to wear them down.
I was on a murder trial myself a few years ago (as a juror) and within a couple of hours of reviewing the evidence, we took a poll and only one of the jurors did not vote guilty the first time around. It took us a couple more days to pound away at the evidence before that last juror finally came around. But no way were we just walking out of there without a fight to set a killer free just because we didn't have unanimous agreement at the get-go. If we had to fight for the guilty verdict for weeks or deadlock, that's what we would have done.
Time for the defendant to modify that tattoo of hers. It is not going to be a beautiful life for her.
*
This whole case is living proof of the wrong way to live one’s life.
The sickening self-absorbed self-centereredness has been passed through the generations of a family leading to the death of this child.
*
I cant look..I left the room too nervous
*
OMG!!!!!!! Not expecting this!!!! WTF!!!!!!
There are a lot of comments, so just assume that the next bunch all look like your facebook page probably did.
No wonder Obama got elected..dumbasses on this jury..no aggravated child abuse u gotta be kidding me
*
It’s called the “female sentencing discount” If this were the child’s FATHER, a guilty on murder one would be assured.
Golden uterus complex strikes again
*
The abortion mentality.
*
Obama is happy..now Casey can vote Democrat in 2012
*
White males=bad (white conservative males=snidley whiplash bad)
Black males, black females, white liberal modern day “facebook” free ranging uteri=good
*
I was struck by the number of childless, unmarried people on the jury.
*
I’m guessing that the jury all had instances in their life where they wanted to murder their kids and probably felt sorry for Casey.....what else could it be?
*
They were probably abortion lovers..looked at Casey and thought “If only your parents had allowed you to abort Caylee this never would have happened”
*
Don’t be surprised..abortion is legal in this country, babies are murdered everyday..to liberals what Casey did is no big deal, she just did it 3 years after the fact
*
WHAT A MEAN VILE PIECE OF WORK!....BAEZ says the death penalty does not work....we need to stop killing people.
TELL THAT TO CASEY!
OH ....just what we need....now he's speaking in Spanish.
*
once again we see our nation is much further down than on a slippery slope...we are now almost on the bottom looking up as far as the mindset. and PC thoughts. and practices. of this nations peoples.
If this jury in a ny way reflects the people...Obama will win the next election. I pray they are not. Cause that too is not over til it’s over.
*
Baez is from Cuba, he probably loves communism..yes let’s stop killing people..hey maybe you should have told that to Casey
*
Watch..ALL 12 jurors will come intot he interview room..they will say the evidence was overwhelming, and they were all agreed..I wrote yesterday that they could have done this in 5 minutes, but felt they had to take "some" time..to look like they deliberated..
*
I am about to cry because of poor little Caylee. I think this is the first time that it has hit me that her ‘mother’ just might get the justice she deserves!
*
I bet there is a whole child pimping ring in the area, and Casey would be a link that should have led to them. An "accident" of too much chloroform being used in this type of situation sounds really plausable, and even the placement of duct tape could be explained as it could have been used to muffle the cries or screams of a child being used in such disgusting ways.
Casey's demeanor, although shocking and inhumane in relation to her daughter's death, is also, probably because she is scared to death of the people behind the child pimping. Who knows what they might have threatened...killing her parents, brother, friends, etc. if she mentiones her involvement with them. And, of course, having her own name exposed in relationship to such horrid practices. That is probably more important to her than anything...just having people know the truth about how she used her daughter in such a disgusting, immoral way just to make money is something she does not want told.
*
Maybe. But after over a month of this nightmare I doubt it. I would want to get a unanimous verdict at whatever level of charges and turn it over to the judge and go home. We will see if emotion or logic ruled the day. If murder 1 it is a good indicator Obama will be re-elected.
*
My educated guess is that the verdict will be guilty on all counts. It is a certainty that the majority of the jurors would vote guilty (as 95% of the rest of America) so if there were any jurors favoring acquittal, the rest of the jurors would take days and days to wear them down.
I was on a murder trial myself a few years ago (as a juror) and within a couple of hours of reviewing the evidence, we took a poll and only one of the jurors did not vote guilty the first time around. It took us a couple more days to pound away at the evidence before that last juror finally came around. But no way were we just walking out of there without a fight to set a killer free just because we didn't have unanimous agreement at the get-go. If we had to fight for the guilty verdict for weeks or deadlock, that's what we would have done.
Time for the defendant to modify that tattoo of hers. It is not going to be a beautiful life for her.
*
This whole case is living proof of the wrong way to live one’s life.
The sickening self-absorbed self-centereredness has been passed through the generations of a family leading to the death of this child.
*
I cant look..I left the room too nervous
*
OMG!!!!!!! Not expecting this!!!! WTF!!!!!!
There are a lot of comments, so just assume that the next bunch all look like your facebook page probably did.
No wonder Obama got elected..dumbasses on this jury..no aggravated child abuse u gotta be kidding me
*
It’s called the “female sentencing discount” If this were the child’s FATHER, a guilty on murder one would be assured.
Golden uterus complex strikes again
*
The abortion mentality.
*
Obama is happy..now Casey can vote Democrat in 2012
*
White males=bad (white conservative males=snidley whiplash bad)
Black males, black females, white liberal modern day “facebook” free ranging uteri=good
*
I was struck by the number of childless, unmarried people on the jury.
*
I’m guessing that the jury all had instances in their life where they wanted to murder their kids and probably felt sorry for Casey.....what else could it be?
*
They were probably abortion lovers..looked at Casey and thought “If only your parents had allowed you to abort Caylee this never would have happened”
*
Don’t be surprised..abortion is legal in this country, babies are murdered everyday..to liberals what Casey did is no big deal, she just did it 3 years after the fact
*
WHAT A MEAN VILE PIECE OF WORK!....BAEZ says the death penalty does not work....we need to stop killing people.
TELL THAT TO CASEY!
OH ....just what we need....now he's speaking in Spanish.
*
once again we see our nation is much further down than on a slippery slope...we are now almost on the bottom looking up as far as the mindset. and PC thoughts. and practices. of this nations peoples.
If this jury in a ny way reflects the people...Obama will win the next election. I pray they are not. Cause that too is not over til it’s over.
*
Baez is from Cuba, he probably loves communism..yes let’s stop killing people..hey maybe you should have told that to Casey
Monday, July 4, 2011
Fox News's hacked Twitter feed declares Obama dead
Keep it classy folks!
*
Have the riots started yet
*
You got that right, this will be viewed as a threat to the President. With this country badly divided as it is, this is the LAST THING the conservatives NEED right now.
*
You can be sure Baraq Sheik Obomba and his posse orchestrated this. They want to shut down opposition news outlets once and for all, just like Hitler and Stalin did.
*
Ohhh Good lord almighty. That is the LAST thing this country needs. The would represent (facilitate) absolute civil war and major US cities would be burnt to the ground. Take that to the bank, national guard in the streets and civil liberties suspended by an irate President Joe Biden
*
This hurts us all and makes a day of celebration
all about Obama.
Whoever did this is lower than low.
*
Sick but I'll guarantee it was an Obama supporter who did this.
*
Obuma did it.
He’s insanely jealous that Americans are celebrating the Founders and not him. He ordered the secret service to hack Fox so people talk about him on July 4. Everything is all him.
*
I would be pleased if the man would just resign and we can start this nation on the correct track.
*
you know for a fact (again, as Ann Coulter points out repeatedly in her books) that liberals are slavering for something like this to use against conservatives and tea party members.
If they had any conscience, values or morals, they would be embarrassed or chagrined by the constant scorching of their faces with exploding cigars, but they have none of those characteristics, so they simply pick up and move on to something else when it turns out to be confirmed liberals...
Just like the “Drive By Media”. (Again, the redundancy)
*
What I was thinking.....a liberal/democratic operative...
...or Soros!
To make conservatives look bad.
*
They definitely did this to plant the idea "conservatives are violent and want to kill Bambi." If they can't find any evidence of this or stir up such a sentiment, they still try to plant the idea.
*
"if you watched KEN BURN’s version of the Civil War you wasted your time."
I've watched it several times, and was given DVDs for birthday a couple years ago, which I still watch and enjoy often. I recommend it to anyone with an interest in that period of our nation's history.
"Well if you like a BS version from a liberal nut like Burns, whatever floats your boat."
*
“We live in a republic, and we are conservatives, not anarchists or revolutionaries. We change our officials by elections, not assassinations. We need to focus on removing President Obama — and yes, he **IS** the president and deserves the respect of the office — by legitimate electoral means.”
Anybody who doesn’t realize we have already become a fascist country (or a socialist country, or a tyranny or dictatorship, take your pick) is living with wool over the eyes and all over the rest of their body too. We change nothing meaningful by elections anymore, except we make it worse.
*
Barack Obama is undoubtedly the worst president this nation has had. (Yep Jimma, you’re off the hook...)
It’s not just his ineptitude, it’s his willingness to trash our allies and kiss the ass of our long term enemies.
He has also done things to seriously damage this nation, and seeing it unsuccessful to turn things around, wants to do more of it.
I detest this sick bastard.
That being said, the person who hacked the FoxNews Twitter account should spend some serious time behind bars for having done this.
You don’t mess around with certain subject matter in conjunction with a president. The very last thing we need right now is to have Obama turned into some sort of god like Kennedy was. And doing something like this, which may be attributed to a group like the Tea Party or Conservatives out of the box, is character assassination by design.
Catch this guy and put him out of our misery.
*
Here was the plan:
1) Announce the death of Obama by Twitter.
2) Watch 4th of July patriotic folks and try to videotape or camera phone conservatives cheering the death of Obama.
3) Use the images to harm the Tea Party and support Obama’s reelection.
It wouldn’t work because Tea Party types don’t behave like that. However, the Liberals don’t know that. They try to catch us in a bad light and this was their ticket. I wouldn’t be surprised if some Obama supporter inside Fox did the twitter.
*
"This could be taken as a threat to the President."
How so? It wasn't a threat when Wikipedia reported Rush's death.
*
Have the riots started yet
*
You got that right, this will be viewed as a threat to the President. With this country badly divided as it is, this is the LAST THING the conservatives NEED right now.
*
You can be sure Baraq Sheik Obomba and his posse orchestrated this. They want to shut down opposition news outlets once and for all, just like Hitler and Stalin did.
*
Ohhh Good lord almighty. That is the LAST thing this country needs. The would represent (facilitate) absolute civil war and major US cities would be burnt to the ground. Take that to the bank, national guard in the streets and civil liberties suspended by an irate President Joe Biden
*
This hurts us all and makes a day of celebration
all about Obama.
Whoever did this is lower than low.
*
Sick but I'll guarantee it was an Obama supporter who did this.
*
Obuma did it.
He’s insanely jealous that Americans are celebrating the Founders and not him. He ordered the secret service to hack Fox so people talk about him on July 4. Everything is all him.
*
I would be pleased if the man would just resign and we can start this nation on the correct track.
*
you know for a fact (again, as Ann Coulter points out repeatedly in her books) that liberals are slavering for something like this to use against conservatives and tea party members.
If they had any conscience, values or morals, they would be embarrassed or chagrined by the constant scorching of their faces with exploding cigars, but they have none of those characteristics, so they simply pick up and move on to something else when it turns out to be confirmed liberals...
Just like the “Drive By Media”. (Again, the redundancy)
*
What I was thinking.....a liberal/democratic operative...
...or Soros!
To make conservatives look bad.
*
They definitely did this to plant the idea "conservatives are violent and want to kill Bambi." If they can't find any evidence of this or stir up such a sentiment, they still try to plant the idea.
*
"if you watched KEN BURN’s version of the Civil War you wasted your time."
I've watched it several times, and was given DVDs for birthday a couple years ago, which I still watch and enjoy often. I recommend it to anyone with an interest in that period of our nation's history.
"Well if you like a BS version from a liberal nut like Burns, whatever floats your boat."
*
“We live in a republic, and we are conservatives, not anarchists or revolutionaries. We change our officials by elections, not assassinations. We need to focus on removing President Obama — and yes, he **IS** the president and deserves the respect of the office — by legitimate electoral means.”
Anybody who doesn’t realize we have already become a fascist country (or a socialist country, or a tyranny or dictatorship, take your pick) is living with wool over the eyes and all over the rest of their body too. We change nothing meaningful by elections anymore, except we make it worse.
*
Barack Obama is undoubtedly the worst president this nation has had. (Yep Jimma, you’re off the hook...)
It’s not just his ineptitude, it’s his willingness to trash our allies and kiss the ass of our long term enemies.
He has also done things to seriously damage this nation, and seeing it unsuccessful to turn things around, wants to do more of it.
I detest this sick bastard.
That being said, the person who hacked the FoxNews Twitter account should spend some serious time behind bars for having done this.
You don’t mess around with certain subject matter in conjunction with a president. The very last thing we need right now is to have Obama turned into some sort of god like Kennedy was. And doing something like this, which may be attributed to a group like the Tea Party or Conservatives out of the box, is character assassination by design.
Catch this guy and put him out of our misery.
*
Here was the plan:
1) Announce the death of Obama by Twitter.
2) Watch 4th of July patriotic folks and try to videotape or camera phone conservatives cheering the death of Obama.
3) Use the images to harm the Tea Party and support Obama’s reelection.
It wouldn’t work because Tea Party types don’t behave like that. However, the Liberals don’t know that. They try to catch us in a bad light and this was their ticket. I wouldn’t be surprised if some Obama supporter inside Fox did the twitter.
*
"This could be taken as a threat to the President."
How so? It wasn't a threat when Wikipedia reported Rush's death.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)