This post was pulled because it's from THE GLOBE, the gossip tabloid.
The post itself:
OK, so it's the Globe, but hey, it's Friday afternoon.
I just read the article at the news stand, and thought I'd share.
Key assertions (from memory):
*She's angry because he got her to support his presidential bid by promising he'd only serve one term and then get out and "make millions like Clinton did."
*But since he's been elected, he's become "power mad" and is really working hard to win a second term. So she's really angry because she hates being trapped in the White House and wants a life out of the public spotlght.
*They sleep in separate bedrooms, have screaming fights behind closed doors, rarely speak to each other, and she avoids being near Barack unless they are required to sit together at an official function, or if there is photo requirement.
*She goes on vacation after vacation to get away from Barack.
*When she's in town, she sneaks out often (giving rise to "outrageous" rumors about an affair with a Secret Service agent.
*When Obama finds out she's sneaked out, he confronts her upon her return, which inevitably leads to a screaming fight.
*She bought a sexy black outfit to try and spice up their marriage, but nothing happened.
The comments:
"Meh. Rumors."
Well, all the items asserted seem perfectly reasonable.
*
[re: the black dress]
Black on black in the dark......... fail
*
"*She bought a sexy black outfit to try and spice up their marriage, but nothing happened."
Gonna take much more den dat, sister
*
The GLOBE cannot believed for anything. Now, if Obama was having a homo affair with the BAT BOY, NOW THAT’S NEWS!
*
Øbama is gay . . ▲
*
Ya mean....Ya mean, Obama, the famous father of teen, racist, gangsta, Trayvon Martin and adoree of the “Muslim Brotherhood” is just simply a gay fella!!! Nah!!! Obama is just obessed with destroying the American Republic, and......Michelle is an even worse America hater then Obama!!! Worthless people, both of them!!! Sad!!! Sad, too.....for Black Americans who back these two flim/flam artists!!! Go figure!!!
*
You should of lissend to yo momma when she toll you not to marry ‘that homo’, girlfren!
*
"One of the grocery-checkout-line papers had the Bushes getting divorced throughout his presidency."
Yes, I remember. In fact, it was the very same Globe Magazine.
*
Its the globe. You can pretty much stop there no matter how much you want it to be true. Kind of like if Alex Jones says something, if you read something in the Globe, most likely the truth is the opposite of what they report.
*
He’s a homo and she knows it. Info even the Globe won’t dare to reveal.
*
Speaking of women, this question is raised at the ObamaFile website re his possible gayness:
How come not one single woman has ever, ever come forward with her "my date with Barack" story, or tender remembrances of their brief, but intense relationship?
Not one -- ever!
*
“*She bought a sexy black outfit to try and spice up their marriage, but nothing happened.”
Ugh! I think I’m gonna spew chunks!
*
A couple who needs a date night to NYC is in BIG trouble.
*
My thought that a black woman wearing a black nightie in the dark would be more or less invisible and the bucks spent on the nightie were wasted.
Showing posts with label marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marriage. Show all posts
Friday, April 6, 2012
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Jessica Simpson Should Be Ashamed
Excerpt: "The 31-year-old songstress, actress and fashion designer is celebrating her impending motherhood for the whole world to see. But it is no cause for celebration when a baby is born out of wedlock – even to a rich and famous mom like Simpson. "
Jessica Simpson used to embrace traditional values. Most notably, she said she was a virgin when she married Nick Lachey. Now she embraces Hollywood values: Moving from one man’s bed to another. Bearing a child by a man who doesn’t even love her enough to marry her.
*
Simpson had a fine husband whom she tossed out for no reason at all. Her life has been a sleazy mess ever since.
*
My mother use to call women like this, SLUTS.
*
"The writer sounds like a typical ‘busybody’ that needs to mind their own damn business. They’d be relieved to not carry around the burdens of worrying about what Jessica Simpson is doing...."
John Adams, founding father and the nation’s second president, stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Was he a “busybody”?
*
Of course she should be ashamed.
However, the concepts of shame and sin, once the bedrock of civilized Christianity, are no longer even considerations.
We can thank the tidal wave of nonjudgmental, moral equivalence wrought by the Leftist counterculture starting in the 1960s, for our current residence in an abject moral sewer.
*
Sounds like a Fluke to me.
*
“.. call me old fashioned, but I don’t see the attractiveness of a nude pregnant woman”.
You aren’t old fashioned. You have a sense of morality and decorum. Are pregnant women beautiful? Yes, of course. They are glowing and beautiful because they are carrying a life. Sexy? NO.
Jessica Simpson used to embrace traditional values. Most notably, she said she was a virgin when she married Nick Lachey. Now she embraces Hollywood values: Moving from one man’s bed to another. Bearing a child by a man who doesn’t even love her enough to marry her.
*
Simpson had a fine husband whom she tossed out for no reason at all. Her life has been a sleazy mess ever since.
*
My mother use to call women like this, SLUTS.
*
"The writer sounds like a typical ‘busybody’ that needs to mind their own damn business. They’d be relieved to not carry around the burdens of worrying about what Jessica Simpson is doing...."
John Adams, founding father and the nation’s second president, stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Was he a “busybody”?
*
Of course she should be ashamed.
However, the concepts of shame and sin, once the bedrock of civilized Christianity, are no longer even considerations.
We can thank the tidal wave of nonjudgmental, moral equivalence wrought by the Leftist counterculture starting in the 1960s, for our current residence in an abject moral sewer.
*
Sounds like a Fluke to me.
*
“.. call me old fashioned, but I don’t see the attractiveness of a nude pregnant woman”.
You aren’t old fashioned. You have a sense of morality and decorum. Are pregnant women beautiful? Yes, of course. They are glowing and beautiful because they are carrying a life. Sexy? NO.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Study: young couples not marrying due to fear of divorce
Article's answer: fear of cost/emotional drain of divorce
Freepers' answer: it's those nasty women/liberals/minorities
““Working-class women, in particular, view marriage less favorably than do their male and middle-class counterparts, in part because they see marriage as hard to exit and are reluctant to assume restrictive gender roles,” the researchers wrote.”
restrictive gender roles? are we still in the 50’s?
*
"That is precisely why Newt is a disaster for President. He has ZERO family values. Sure he might be sorry but he is a dud when it comes to marriage. I don’t like the idea of the First Lady being considered a tramp which is really what she is. People will see what a failure Gingrich is and say the President fails at all his millions of marriages I might too. We need a candidate who is pro-marriage and has a perfect marriage like Santorum, Bachmann, even Perry."
He’s close to his daughters and grandchildren so Newt can’t be as bad as you protrayed him; at least not in the daddy department. In the past, he stinks in the marriage department.
Interesting that he was sexually abused by a teacher in high school; his first wife. That has to be a head trip for a young man.
*
"A simple pre-nup that says neither will fight an amicable divorce would help, wouldn’t it?"
A pre nup is just getting ready for the divorce before you get married in my book.
If one needs a pre nup one does not need a marriage.
*
The Gov taking over and making marriage the equivalent of civil union is what is destroying marriage.
*
So, let’s just screw, have some kids, separate, and there’s less strings? What a turd world we live in!
*
Well see the problem lies in that they are not [actually married unless they are married in a church]! They are just “shacking up”. Playing house so to speak. Society sinking and gov. destroying marriage.
*
A few thoughts:
1. 25 and younger: women have the advantage. 30 and older: men have the advantage. Most modern women are blind to this fact.
2. I see a lot of young women who frankly tell me that marriage is a trap and seem to think they can put off marriage indefinitely. They are totally oblivious to the fact that marriage benefits them a lot more then the man. They will wake in their mid-late 30s and realize that they are past their prime. But, of course, its too late by then. If they want a guy at that point, they probably have to go long (e.g., someone at least 15 years their senior).
3. Imagine how high marriage rate would be if women only consented to sex if they were married?
-- Women, this is all of your aging, stuck-up, slutty faults.
*
Unfortunately that’s what the leftists and liberals want, they want regular men and women not to marry. They’ve made it that way.
On the one end, they’ve told women they don’t need men, or babies or anything like that. You can do it all and you deserve it all. And you can walk away if it doesn’t work and take half his stuff in the process.
They’ve set the “family” courts up to crush men.
At the same time they’ve screwed up regular boys and men by drugging them through school to prevent them from being boys. They have totally focused everything in schools on girls now to the point the boys are suffering academically and nobody gives a sh1t because you can’t have independent, thinking men that might resist what the liberals are doing to them. Get married to a self-centered narcissistic woman who thinks she deserves better than you and it’s a recipe for disaster.
*
Multiculturalism has designed race cultures and the Hispanic and Black race cultures are not based in Christianity; rather Marxism. That is an ideal of welfare that is amoral.
The marriage rates of Hispanics and Blacks, which they are referring to as ‘working class”, has always been lower than for whites and Asians - what they refer to as the “middle class.”
Hispanics are making a huge mistake to permit the Left to indoctrinate their children into a angry welfare race tribe. They should demand their kids be interacted with, culturally, as the American middle class. That more matches the cultural values and aspirations of Hispanics.
*
What was wrong with the 50s?
We had exponentially less social ills than we do today.
*
three words. no fault divorce.
the only mechanism of any American legal system where you can take half someone's stuff and their kids and through no fault of their own and no proof of any wrongdoing.
*
I tell my daughter to get married, and my son not to.
*
"why couples don't get married – they fear divorce."
BS. It's all about the welfare payment.
Single mothers shamelessly wear their status as a badge of honor.
They also use it as a way to claim victim-hood.
*
It would seem that they fear divorce more than they fear God.
*
You quite literally have better odds playing Russian Roulette.
On the bright side, if you lose at Russian Roulette, it’s over.
A divorce is never quite over as any change in your or her circumstances tears open the scar tissue and restarts the calculations for alimony and child support.
With a spiteful woman, the only thing that needs to change is her acquisitiveness and vengefulness (and sometimes just her lawyer).
Oh, and there’s nothing requiring her to let you know that she boinked everything in sight before saving her virtue for your marriage. That did not happen to me, but I might have decided differently had I known that the time she spent in mental institutions wasn’t always as staff...
*
I believe we are destroying the actual maternal instinct that was a part of every woman's fabric.
Also, men have been shown that cheating and multiple partners are acceptable to society.
We are just in the early stages. Once gay marriage is weaved into our society, people will see even more casual relationships, group sex, swapping, etc as perfectly acceptable.
*
The goal is to use America’s own systems to destroy everything good and decent America once stood for.
Divorce court is a rip-roaring success story.
*
I was 18 and have been married for 22 years, you are correct one does change quite a bit, but there is something to be said for getting married before one is too independent, especially for women.
*
After reading through some of these replies, I wonder if it’s more a case of women not wanting to marry bitter, whiny, baby-men. Just wondering....
-- Oh snap!
*
Marriage won’t make any difference in their lives. They are shacked up, making money, working their careers, and enjoying life without children. There are no sex sins any more. God made them male and female so they would increase and multiply but we figured out how to beat that. Sure we did.
*
To: ought-six
I grew up in the 50’s as well. Though I wouldn’t say it was exactly a paradise, it is surely as close as humans have gotten in a thousand years!
*
btw...this is an issue we better fix
the lack of marriage in minorities has shown precisely what this produces
a dependent culture of drooges
I blame the Pill....that is where things went astray
We threw consequence out the door and women along with it...pushed them right out the front door of the home
*
Remember, men age like wine. Women age like milk.
*
They are not getting married because there is a generation of immoral women and female teens. They hop into bed not even a dinner date is needed. The women are worse than the men these days. And they think nothing of having children at the age of 18 or 19 without being married.
*
I fully agree; so many women are completely out of control and while it’s fun, the funny part ends after a while. If it’s easy for one man, how many more men will it be easy for and how many men before? Women treat everything like a game and act like these Sex in the City tarts and while it’s funny on television, it’s not funny in real life.
Freepers' answer: it's those nasty women/liberals/minorities
““Working-class women, in particular, view marriage less favorably than do their male and middle-class counterparts, in part because they see marriage as hard to exit and are reluctant to assume restrictive gender roles,” the researchers wrote.”
restrictive gender roles? are we still in the 50’s?
*
"That is precisely why Newt is a disaster for President. He has ZERO family values. Sure he might be sorry but he is a dud when it comes to marriage. I don’t like the idea of the First Lady being considered a tramp which is really what she is. People will see what a failure Gingrich is and say the President fails at all his millions of marriages I might too. We need a candidate who is pro-marriage and has a perfect marriage like Santorum, Bachmann, even Perry."
He’s close to his daughters and grandchildren so Newt can’t be as bad as you protrayed him; at least not in the daddy department. In the past, he stinks in the marriage department.
Interesting that he was sexually abused by a teacher in high school; his first wife. That has to be a head trip for a young man.
*
"A simple pre-nup that says neither will fight an amicable divorce would help, wouldn’t it?"
A pre nup is just getting ready for the divorce before you get married in my book.
If one needs a pre nup one does not need a marriage.
*
The Gov taking over and making marriage the equivalent of civil union is what is destroying marriage.
*
So, let’s just screw, have some kids, separate, and there’s less strings? What a turd world we live in!
*
Well see the problem lies in that they are not [actually married unless they are married in a church]! They are just “shacking up”. Playing house so to speak. Society sinking and gov. destroying marriage.
*
A few thoughts:
1. 25 and younger: women have the advantage. 30 and older: men have the advantage. Most modern women are blind to this fact.
2. I see a lot of young women who frankly tell me that marriage is a trap and seem to think they can put off marriage indefinitely. They are totally oblivious to the fact that marriage benefits them a lot more then the man. They will wake in their mid-late 30s and realize that they are past their prime. But, of course, its too late by then. If they want a guy at that point, they probably have to go long (e.g., someone at least 15 years their senior).
3. Imagine how high marriage rate would be if women only consented to sex if they were married?
-- Women, this is all of your aging, stuck-up, slutty faults.
*
Unfortunately that’s what the leftists and liberals want, they want regular men and women not to marry. They’ve made it that way.
On the one end, they’ve told women they don’t need men, or babies or anything like that. You can do it all and you deserve it all. And you can walk away if it doesn’t work and take half his stuff in the process.
They’ve set the “family” courts up to crush men.
At the same time they’ve screwed up regular boys and men by drugging them through school to prevent them from being boys. They have totally focused everything in schools on girls now to the point the boys are suffering academically and nobody gives a sh1t because you can’t have independent, thinking men that might resist what the liberals are doing to them. Get married to a self-centered narcissistic woman who thinks she deserves better than you and it’s a recipe for disaster.
*
Multiculturalism has designed race cultures and the Hispanic and Black race cultures are not based in Christianity; rather Marxism. That is an ideal of welfare that is amoral.
The marriage rates of Hispanics and Blacks, which they are referring to as ‘working class”, has always been lower than for whites and Asians - what they refer to as the “middle class.”
Hispanics are making a huge mistake to permit the Left to indoctrinate their children into a angry welfare race tribe. They should demand their kids be interacted with, culturally, as the American middle class. That more matches the cultural values and aspirations of Hispanics.
*
What was wrong with the 50s?
We had exponentially less social ills than we do today.
*
three words. no fault divorce.
the only mechanism of any American legal system where you can take half someone's stuff and their kids and through no fault of their own and no proof of any wrongdoing.
*
I tell my daughter to get married, and my son not to.
*
"why couples don't get married – they fear divorce."
BS. It's all about the welfare payment.
Single mothers shamelessly wear their status as a badge of honor.
They also use it as a way to claim victim-hood.
*
It would seem that they fear divorce more than they fear God.
*
You quite literally have better odds playing Russian Roulette.
On the bright side, if you lose at Russian Roulette, it’s over.
A divorce is never quite over as any change in your or her circumstances tears open the scar tissue and restarts the calculations for alimony and child support.
With a spiteful woman, the only thing that needs to change is her acquisitiveness and vengefulness (and sometimes just her lawyer).
Oh, and there’s nothing requiring her to let you know that she boinked everything in sight before saving her virtue for your marriage. That did not happen to me, but I might have decided differently had I known that the time she spent in mental institutions wasn’t always as staff...
*
I believe we are destroying the actual maternal instinct that was a part of every woman's fabric.
Also, men have been shown that cheating and multiple partners are acceptable to society.
We are just in the early stages. Once gay marriage is weaved into our society, people will see even more casual relationships, group sex, swapping, etc as perfectly acceptable.
*
The goal is to use America’s own systems to destroy everything good and decent America once stood for.
Divorce court is a rip-roaring success story.
*
I was 18 and have been married for 22 years, you are correct one does change quite a bit, but there is something to be said for getting married before one is too independent, especially for women.
*
After reading through some of these replies, I wonder if it’s more a case of women not wanting to marry bitter, whiny, baby-men. Just wondering....
-- Oh snap!
*
Marriage won’t make any difference in their lives. They are shacked up, making money, working their careers, and enjoying life without children. There are no sex sins any more. God made them male and female so they would increase and multiply but we figured out how to beat that. Sure we did.
*
To: ought-six
I grew up in the 50’s as well. Though I wouldn’t say it was exactly a paradise, it is surely as close as humans have gotten in a thousand years!
*
btw...this is an issue we better fix
the lack of marriage in minorities has shown precisely what this produces
a dependent culture of drooges
I blame the Pill....that is where things went astray
We threw consequence out the door and women along with it...pushed them right out the front door of the home
*
Remember, men age like wine. Women age like milk.
*
They are not getting married because there is a generation of immoral women and female teens. They hop into bed not even a dinner date is needed. The women are worse than the men these days. And they think nothing of having children at the age of 18 or 19 without being married.
*
I fully agree; so many women are completely out of control and while it’s fun, the funny part ends after a while. If it’s easy for one man, how many more men will it be easy for and how many men before? Women treat everything like a game and act like these Sex in the City tarts and while it’s funny on television, it’s not funny in real life.
Thursday, January 19, 2012
ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife (She could "end his career")
Another article title is "Former Gingrich Wife Says He Asked for ‘Open Marriage’"
Hahahahahaha...and thought she would wait until now to “talk about it.”
Check’s in the mail Maryanne.
Love,
Barry
*
OH LOOK!!!!! An Ex-wife with an ax to grind.....something we can ALL believe!
The critics are gonna regret this move......put an angry ex wife on tv and just WATCH all the men RUN to Gingrich's side...
*
Did Ms. Bitter get this on tape or in writing?
I don't see Newt wanting to stay married to her bitter butt and keep Callista in hiding.
So far...the BS meter is going way off on this.
*
The diff is that Gingrich asked.
Clinton just did it anyway.
Oh, forgot, dim-bulb-crats don’t have moral restrictions.
*
It has been no secret that all of Newt's marriages began and ended with an affair. So Newt likes the ladies.......I can appreciate this attribute. I've got two words for the professional left and liberal finger pointers: Bill Clinton.
*
This plays to 0bama’s supporters. Next time you’re driving notice how many times you see an 0bama sticker on a car being driven an ugly, bitter-looking woman.
*
This is wife #2, right?
What was she thinking when she was the mistress against wife #1, that she's so outraged now?
*
Private issue between a married couple.
*
And he was the married man whose family she helped wreck.
*
The real question is did Obama front the cash or Romney?
For an ex-mistress to get on a moral high horse is just absurd.
*
Well at the very least we know that Newt’s wife WASN’T a “beard” like our current POTUS.
*
Mud is Mud, and Newts getting covered in it.
For some reason, Ronald Reagan's Ex didn't do this.
Its called respect. The Ex didn't get it, and she ain't giving it.
*
When a man leaves his wife for a mistress she should expect the same thing to her - it’s called poetic justice.
*
Reminds me of Grover Cleveland who had a illegitimate child in the Victorian morality era. the Republicans conned the phrase...”Ma, Ma, Where's my Pa?”
After Cleveland got elected President his party members shot back...”Gone to the White House, Ha ha ha!”
Oh by the way, Cleveland was a Democrat.
*
Bill Clinton practiced an open marriage! That was OKEEEDOKEEE with the media and Mrs.Clinton.
So what we have here is outrage because his wife was a prudish non-lesbian woman with a low libido? Well, that's a 99% group.
*
Well...my inclination is to not care. It might not be true, it was a long time ago, he said he asked God for forgiveness, I’m not voting for a husband...but for someone to turn this ship around.
What a bitter witch he was married to.
*
If this was a Democrat, this would never see the light of day. Larry Sinclair? Hello.
This will FAIL completely. Newt will respond forcefully and just move on. "End his career" hyperbole by a dnc sycophant media that hopes it would be so. America will completely reject it.
---Larry Sinclair reference. It's amazon, but still derpy.
*
What does Obama’s ex have to say? The press doesn’t want to know if he has an ex. If he does, the press is not interested in what she has to say... would probably bump her (or him) off with joy of heart to protect the One.
*
To: massgopguy
“But, but, everybody said she died from cancer.”
Wrong wife,that is wife No. 1 that Newt cheated on that had the cancer. This interview is with wife No. 2, whom he cheated on with Callista his current wife. Wife No. 2 was diagnosed with MS (multiple sclerosis) when Newt dumped her.
*
I don’t in any way, shape or form, endorse infidelity. Its one of my major beefs with Newt.
HOWEVER...if all this is true, there’s a teeny, tiny part of me that can’t blame him for dumping her if she acted this way during their marriage.
Just a teeny bit.
*
Classic case of a woman scorned. She is probably thinking she could have been the First Lady had Newt not divorced her and she’ll be damned if she lets some other woman have that honor in her place.
*
Newt has no problem drawing votes from men who vote with their minds.
He has a big problem drawing votes from women who vote with their feelings.
There is no way this will help him. It could very well be his Jack Ryan moment
*
I'm tired of this BS that Romney cant beat Obama.
By election day, Obama will own almost half the national debt, 6 trillion dollars, and 8 percent unemployment.
The only thing he will have to show for all that debt is pictures of his Hawaiian vacations.
He will have established two new Islamic nations that vow to destroy us. Egypt and Libya.
Jimmy Carter could beat Obama in 2012.
Walter Mondale could beat Obama in 2012.
Jessy Jackson could beat Obama in 2012.
*
“He has a big problem drawing votes from women who vote with their feelings.”
You have to remember the judgement of women can run both ways. This is not a young, attractive victim. This is an old, ugly bitter adulteress. She has held bitter interview after bitter interview and this is just another. It’s going to be *very* hard to pass Marianne Gingrich off as a victim to women, especially since she was the “other woman” in the highly fictionalized hospital-bed divorce.
*
Not saying I disagree but the same thing was said about Cain for weeks.We are dealing with an evil man named Obama with a radical mob machine; that eliminated his competition to gain his senate seat after he emerged from hell to ruin America.They will allow Romney to win the nomination and then Caininize him.We better pray that enough seats are taken to impeach Obama.
Hahahahahaha...and thought she would wait until now to “talk about it.”
Check’s in the mail Maryanne.
Love,
Barry
*
OH LOOK!!!!! An Ex-wife with an ax to grind.....something we can ALL believe!
The critics are gonna regret this move......put an angry ex wife on tv and just WATCH all the men RUN to Gingrich's side...
*
Did Ms. Bitter get this on tape or in writing?
I don't see Newt wanting to stay married to her bitter butt and keep Callista in hiding.
So far...the BS meter is going way off on this.
*
The diff is that Gingrich asked.
Clinton just did it anyway.
Oh, forgot, dim-bulb-crats don’t have moral restrictions.
*
It has been no secret that all of Newt's marriages began and ended with an affair. So Newt likes the ladies.......I can appreciate this attribute. I've got two words for the professional left and liberal finger pointers: Bill Clinton.
*
This plays to 0bama’s supporters. Next time you’re driving notice how many times you see an 0bama sticker on a car being driven an ugly, bitter-looking woman.
*
This is wife #2, right?
What was she thinking when she was the mistress against wife #1, that she's so outraged now?
*
Private issue between a married couple.
*
And he was the married man whose family she helped wreck.
*
The real question is did Obama front the cash or Romney?
For an ex-mistress to get on a moral high horse is just absurd.
*
Well at the very least we know that Newt’s wife WASN’T a “beard” like our current POTUS.
*
Mud is Mud, and Newts getting covered in it.
For some reason, Ronald Reagan's Ex didn't do this.
Its called respect. The Ex didn't get it, and she ain't giving it.
*
When a man leaves his wife for a mistress she should expect the same thing to her - it’s called poetic justice.
*
Reminds me of Grover Cleveland who had a illegitimate child in the Victorian morality era. the Republicans conned the phrase...”Ma, Ma, Where's my Pa?”
After Cleveland got elected President his party members shot back...”Gone to the White House, Ha ha ha!”
Oh by the way, Cleveland was a Democrat.
*
Bill Clinton practiced an open marriage! That was OKEEEDOKEEE with the media and Mrs.Clinton.
So what we have here is outrage because his wife was a prudish non-lesbian woman with a low libido? Well, that's a 99% group.
*
Well...my inclination is to not care. It might not be true, it was a long time ago, he said he asked God for forgiveness, I’m not voting for a husband...but for someone to turn this ship around.
What a bitter witch he was married to.
*
If this was a Democrat, this would never see the light of day. Larry Sinclair? Hello.
This will FAIL completely. Newt will respond forcefully and just move on. "End his career" hyperbole by a dnc sycophant media that hopes it would be so. America will completely reject it.
---Larry Sinclair reference. It's amazon, but still derpy.
*
What does Obama’s ex have to say? The press doesn’t want to know if he has an ex. If he does, the press is not interested in what she has to say... would probably bump her (or him) off with joy of heart to protect the One.
*
To: massgopguy
“But, but, everybody said she died from cancer.”
Wrong wife,that is wife No. 1 that Newt cheated on that had the cancer. This interview is with wife No. 2, whom he cheated on with Callista his current wife. Wife No. 2 was diagnosed with MS (multiple sclerosis) when Newt dumped her.
*
I don’t in any way, shape or form, endorse infidelity. Its one of my major beefs with Newt.
HOWEVER...if all this is true, there’s a teeny, tiny part of me that can’t blame him for dumping her if she acted this way during their marriage.
Just a teeny bit.
*
Classic case of a woman scorned. She is probably thinking she could have been the First Lady had Newt not divorced her and she’ll be damned if she lets some other woman have that honor in her place.
*
Newt has no problem drawing votes from men who vote with their minds.
He has a big problem drawing votes from women who vote with their feelings.
There is no way this will help him. It could very well be his Jack Ryan moment
*
I'm tired of this BS that Romney cant beat Obama.
By election day, Obama will own almost half the national debt, 6 trillion dollars, and 8 percent unemployment.
The only thing he will have to show for all that debt is pictures of his Hawaiian vacations.
He will have established two new Islamic nations that vow to destroy us. Egypt and Libya.
Jimmy Carter could beat Obama in 2012.
Walter Mondale could beat Obama in 2012.
Jessy Jackson could beat Obama in 2012.
*
“He has a big problem drawing votes from women who vote with their feelings.”
You have to remember the judgement of women can run both ways. This is not a young, attractive victim. This is an old, ugly bitter adulteress. She has held bitter interview after bitter interview and this is just another. It’s going to be *very* hard to pass Marianne Gingrich off as a victim to women, especially since she was the “other woman” in the highly fictionalized hospital-bed divorce.
*
Not saying I disagree but the same thing was said about Cain for weeks.We are dealing with an evil man named Obama with a radical mob machine; that eliminated his competition to gain his senate seat after he emerged from hell to ruin America.They will allow Romney to win the nomination and then Caininize him.We better pray that enough seats are taken to impeach Obama.
Monday, July 25, 2011
Two grandmothers wed in New York's first legal gay marriage
were they married before? do they lose their social security benefits now? what happens?
*
I know that the State can establish marriages, but it seems under the eyes of any Christian church that holds to its received faith, this marriage is invalid automatically. What does one do?
*
effing repuslive..but not as disgusting as teaching faggot crap in our schools in mexifornia.
*
why do homosexuals have to have the attention
on themselves all the time? I would have just gotten married
in a quiet way, no media.
*
Two middle-aged woman pretending they’re ‘married’ while everyone goes along with the farce is pathetic. The left knows full well that two guys smooching each other is repulsive to most sane humans so they put middle age females out front to soften the image of ‘same-sex marriage’ The never-ending effort by homosexual advocacy groups to normalize sexual perversion that was once recognized by mental health professionals as (and continues to be, recognized or not) a form of mental illness is gaining ground and nothing good will come of it. STDs are already climbing at a rapid rate within the homosexual ‘population’. Homosexual men account for nearly half of the more than one million people living with HIV in the U.S. (48%, or an estimated 532,000 persons). State legislatures sanctioning ‘same-sex marriage’ are bowing to special-interest group pressure and a misguided sense of ‘fairness’ and a desire for ‘equality’ demanded by ‘gay’ groups. Marrying ‘gay’ grandmas aside, this will not end we
*
so are these two old ladies independently wealthy? they just forfeited their husbands social security benefits...
weird bunch of messed up folks.
*
BTW, that fellow with the microphone is the Mayor of Niagara Falls, NY and he was just so excited to be able to perform that ceremony. Let’s see how excited he gets when he runs for reelection.
*
I know that the State can establish marriages, but it seems under the eyes of any Christian church that holds to its received faith, this marriage is invalid automatically. What does one do?
*
effing repuslive..but not as disgusting as teaching faggot crap in our schools in mexifornia.
*
why do homosexuals have to have the attention
on themselves all the time? I would have just gotten married
in a quiet way, no media.
*
Two middle-aged woman pretending they’re ‘married’ while everyone goes along with the farce is pathetic. The left knows full well that two guys smooching each other is repulsive to most sane humans so they put middle age females out front to soften the image of ‘same-sex marriage’ The never-ending effort by homosexual advocacy groups to normalize sexual perversion that was once recognized by mental health professionals as (and continues to be, recognized or not) a form of mental illness is gaining ground and nothing good will come of it. STDs are already climbing at a rapid rate within the homosexual ‘population’. Homosexual men account for nearly half of the more than one million people living with HIV in the U.S. (48%, or an estimated 532,000 persons). State legislatures sanctioning ‘same-sex marriage’ are bowing to special-interest group pressure and a misguided sense of ‘fairness’ and a desire for ‘equality’ demanded by ‘gay’ groups. Marrying ‘gay’ grandmas aside, this will not end we
*
so are these two old ladies independently wealthy? they just forfeited their husbands social security benefits...
weird bunch of messed up folks.
*
BTW, that fellow with the microphone is the Mayor of Niagara Falls, NY and he was just so excited to be able to perform that ceremony. Let’s see how excited he gets when he runs for reelection.
Sunday, July 10, 2011
Slavery language in the marriage pledge
From various articles.
Summary: In a now famous Marriage Pledge, signed by presidential candidates Bachmann and Santorum, one conservative group sought to define marriage between a man and a woman. However, one controversial passage in the preamble raised some eyebrows:
"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA?s first African-American President."
The social conservative group has retracted that language. Bachmann defended it earlier this weekend.
I am so pissed about this retraction. I have been on Facebook all day defending this clear language that DID NOT say that black children were better off under slavery. Now they retract it. Ridiculous!
*
This slavery horse crap !! I have heard this ridiculous whining all my life and enough!! NO one alive had anything to do with it and the country has been destroyed, Pandering to these Clowns and idiots!
*
The really sad thing is, the Left has no interest whatsoever in bettering the plight of the black family.
If they address this comment at all, they’ll know that it didn’t really say or mean what they will say it did. No, they won’t be defending blacks.
They will simply be attacking people on the right.
The Left is a very evil enterprise as a group.
*
Today’s dysfunctions and misplaced moralities versus yesteryear’s chattel slavery — the conditions of which varied greatly according to locale — this is not something that can be propounded in a sound bite. If they wanted to produce a lengthy discourse on it that explained all the angles possible, that would be a different story.
--- Yeah, you read that right. This guy thinks the problem here is that comparing the problems of modern black Americans to antebellum black Americans is just too complicated and require a long debate.
*
Yes, Virginia, some things are worse than slavery.
*
Some slave manned plantations had more liberal (in a good sense) policies and allowed their slaves to have side businesses and to buy themselves free. Some allowed marriages and families that were preserved as a group. This was due to Christian morality, which some masters honored more than others depending on their personal convictions.
*
Children born into slavery could be separated from their mothers and sold from the moment they were born, could be beaten or whipped, could be worked to exhaustion or death, could be starved, and could be raped. And sometimes they were - that's what slavery is all about. The notion that all this is "better off" than today's conditions is both ridiculous and offensive.
*
This entire episode is a case study in why conservatives (and conservatism) loses in the public forum of ideas.
1. Conservative group or person makes a controversial statement (such as the suggestion that black children enjoyed more stable “families” under slavery than in many situations today - a statement which has the ring of truth).
2. The left screams “racism”, or, what-have-you.
3. The conservative person or group goes wobbly, starts trying to “clarify” his/her/their remarks.
4. The left screams louder.
5. The conservative person or group “apologizes” and retracts his/her/their earlier remarks. The “retraction” has no bearing to the fact that the remarks are based on truth. Rather, it comes with ONE reason: to “save face” and to stop the screaming.
When are conservatives going to stand up to the screamers and say, “I said what I meant and meant what I said, I’m NOT sorry, I’m NOT going to apologize, and I’m NOT going to take back what I said, for truth is truth.” ????
Just sayin’....
*
The other argument is this....Not that the black folks are totally responsible for abortion in this country, however as a group they had the power to prevent many/most of the 60 million plus abortions that have taken place.
Same can be said of American Catholics, they also had the power as a group to prevent the aprox 60 million abortions that have taken place.
Also Black`s/Catholics both have blood on their hands, not just for abortion, but gay marriage, having prayer and God`s Word removed from public square etc.
For full disclosure RINO WASP`s etc that have voted Democrat or for moderate Republicans etc, also have blood on their hands. Not sure if this group alone could have prevented all the death/destruction? But certainly the other 2 groups on their own could have prevented liberal Supreme Court Justices from ever having their say.
Black`s have such a rich Christian heritage, but now when they wave their arms in Church Sunday Morning saying they Love Jesus, it`s all in vain IMHO
*
I understood the meaning of the original pledge's wording as this:
" A black child born today in America has less of a chance, less hope, then a black child born in America when slavery was legal. "
That's simply true. Simply, horribly, brutally true.
*
"Can someone tell me what is inaccurate in this statement? "
Nothing inaccurate at all, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t a stupid thing for a Presidential candidate to sign.
*
When the Irish first came to the U.S. (famine), they were treated worse than the slaves. Strange that no one talks about it much.
*
it was American slavery, versus that in the Caribbean and Brazil, that fostered stable family units among slaves. It was this, among other things, that was principally responsible for American slavery to have been a relatively minor participant in the importation of slaves compared to the Caribbean and Brazil. Though the same thing could be said about black children for almost any time in U.S. history up to about the 1970s.
*
The comparison is stupid, and offensive. Slavery is totally anomalous in a free society. . Those families were not free agents. A better one would have been to compare today with 1960. Free blacks in 1960 were doing much better. Even with the burden of racial segregation, blacks were better able to maintain family life.
Summary: In a now famous Marriage Pledge, signed by presidential candidates Bachmann and Santorum, one conservative group sought to define marriage between a man and a woman. However, one controversial passage in the preamble raised some eyebrows:
"Slavery had a disastrous impact on African-American families, yet sadly a child born into slavery in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA?s first African-American President."
The social conservative group has retracted that language. Bachmann defended it earlier this weekend.
I am so pissed about this retraction. I have been on Facebook all day defending this clear language that DID NOT say that black children were better off under slavery. Now they retract it. Ridiculous!
*
This slavery horse crap !! I have heard this ridiculous whining all my life and enough!! NO one alive had anything to do with it and the country has been destroyed, Pandering to these Clowns and idiots!
*
The really sad thing is, the Left has no interest whatsoever in bettering the plight of the black family.
If they address this comment at all, they’ll know that it didn’t really say or mean what they will say it did. No, they won’t be defending blacks.
They will simply be attacking people on the right.
The Left is a very evil enterprise as a group.
*
Today’s dysfunctions and misplaced moralities versus yesteryear’s chattel slavery — the conditions of which varied greatly according to locale — this is not something that can be propounded in a sound bite. If they wanted to produce a lengthy discourse on it that explained all the angles possible, that would be a different story.
--- Yeah, you read that right. This guy thinks the problem here is that comparing the problems of modern black Americans to antebellum black Americans is just too complicated and require a long debate.
*
Yes, Virginia, some things are worse than slavery.
*
Some slave manned plantations had more liberal (in a good sense) policies and allowed their slaves to have side businesses and to buy themselves free. Some allowed marriages and families that were preserved as a group. This was due to Christian morality, which some masters honored more than others depending on their personal convictions.
*
Children born into slavery could be separated from their mothers and sold from the moment they were born, could be beaten or whipped, could be worked to exhaustion or death, could be starved, and could be raped. And sometimes they were - that's what slavery is all about. The notion that all this is "better off" than today's conditions is both ridiculous and offensive.
*
This entire episode is a case study in why conservatives (and conservatism) loses in the public forum of ideas.
1. Conservative group or person makes a controversial statement (such as the suggestion that black children enjoyed more stable “families” under slavery than in many situations today - a statement which has the ring of truth).
2. The left screams “racism”, or, what-have-you.
3. The conservative person or group goes wobbly, starts trying to “clarify” his/her/their remarks.
4. The left screams louder.
5. The conservative person or group “apologizes” and retracts his/her/their earlier remarks. The “retraction” has no bearing to the fact that the remarks are based on truth. Rather, it comes with ONE reason: to “save face” and to stop the screaming.
When are conservatives going to stand up to the screamers and say, “I said what I meant and meant what I said, I’m NOT sorry, I’m NOT going to apologize, and I’m NOT going to take back what I said, for truth is truth.” ????
Just sayin’....
*
The other argument is this....Not that the black folks are totally responsible for abortion in this country, however as a group they had the power to prevent many/most of the 60 million plus abortions that have taken place.
Same can be said of American Catholics, they also had the power as a group to prevent the aprox 60 million abortions that have taken place.
Also Black`s/Catholics both have blood on their hands, not just for abortion, but gay marriage, having prayer and God`s Word removed from public square etc.
For full disclosure RINO WASP`s etc that have voted Democrat or for moderate Republicans etc, also have blood on their hands. Not sure if this group alone could have prevented all the death/destruction? But certainly the other 2 groups on their own could have prevented liberal Supreme Court Justices from ever having their say.
Black`s have such a rich Christian heritage, but now when they wave their arms in Church Sunday Morning saying they Love Jesus, it`s all in vain IMHO
*
I understood the meaning of the original pledge's wording as this:
" A black child born today in America has less of a chance, less hope, then a black child born in America when slavery was legal. "
That's simply true. Simply, horribly, brutally true.
*
"Can someone tell me what is inaccurate in this statement? "
Nothing inaccurate at all, but that doesn’t mean it wasn’t a stupid thing for a Presidential candidate to sign.
*
When the Irish first came to the U.S. (famine), they were treated worse than the slaves. Strange that no one talks about it much.
*
it was American slavery, versus that in the Caribbean and Brazil, that fostered stable family units among slaves. It was this, among other things, that was principally responsible for American slavery to have been a relatively minor participant in the importation of slaves compared to the Caribbean and Brazil. Though the same thing could be said about black children for almost any time in U.S. history up to about the 1970s.
*
The comparison is stupid, and offensive. Slavery is totally anomalous in a free society. . Those families were not free agents. A better one would have been to compare today with 1960. Free blacks in 1960 were doing much better. Even with the burden of racial segregation, blacks were better able to maintain family life.
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Part 3; "NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo Signs State's Marriage Equality Bill"
No article.
That was fast. Must have signed it in his boxer shorts.
Garbage politicians throw the entire electorate overboard for less than 2% of the population for this ridiculous insanity.
*
Burn in hell NY.
*
"So I have a question. If I wanted to marry a male friend ( I’m a male) with no sex involved, I could do it in NY and the other states that have passed similar laws. You don’t have to prove a sexual relationship. There are several reasons why this might make sense to do. Citizenship rights is just one of them. Of course it would be a sham deal, but so what. This is going to lead to a lot of complications."
You are on to something there. Especially as it relates the immigration.
*
I’m anxious for “married” gays to start taking on the responsibilities of married regular people....especially the TAXES that they’ve skirted all these years...
*
So, why couldn’t they put this crap up for a popular vote? Were they afraid the little people would not support this? Aren’t there enough welfare cases in NY to pimp this out? What a pathetic state, roads suck, NYC seems like a third-world country in most parts, too expensive.
*
Next up: Polygamy. Guaranteed within 10 years the islamists will have forced the dems and RINOS to legalize polygamy.
*
The good news is this can be changed but the bad news it will take even more work than in Iowa where I’m certain that we are going to succeed in reversing it there. I’m glad that groups like NOM are getting better and better at going on the offensive the problem is the core of the gay rights fiction and its big govt orwellian goals has to be hit over and over again. Also the idea that someone can be “born gay” has to be destoryed in much the same way the idea of AGW has been destoryed in the minds of everyone but those in the political, media, and academic classes.
The problem with these big fictions under the guise of liberty is granted by govt rather than a function of the absence of govt. Homosexual marriage was not banned in NY. It simply was not licensed in NY by the state govt. There is just so much wrong with the juvenile unreasoned ideas and propaganda that has led to this type of thing.
People think they can hide from or ignore these social issues because it makes them uncomfortable or they want to be hip but it is exactly these issues that will allow the govt to eventually censor even the free exercise of your conscience.
*
I hate my state. On to your commnet - Of freaking course ! This ain't no I now pronounce you chuck and larry scenario. Imagine if my brother is unemployed now and needs a life saving operation and such. why can't I marry him and get him on my insurance plan ? Or better yet, my beautiful St. Bernard Sasha is gonna need an amputation and a lifetime of therapy and drug products. How bout I make her my better half to get her on my plan. This is totally AFU for so many reasons. Not the LEAST of which is the fact that it's just wrong.
*
So now they get to “play house” under the official state recognition. Their legislative and judicial victories amount to nothing in God`s eyes. To Him, they`re just “playing house.”
Those pro-homo “marriage” senators and legislators will have some `splainin` to do someday.
*
I hate NY , too . Even though my mother , 4 sisters , + cousins , nephews and nieces live on Long Island , I haven’t been back ( from Japan ) in 7 years , and have no plans to visit . I did arrange to see my Mom and youngest sister in Hawaii ( Big Island ) 4 years ago , though . NY , CT , MA , VT , ME , NJ....the whole place sucks a big one . Couldn’t pay me to live there again .
*
There is a far better argument from history and religion for polygamy than for homosexuality.
The idea that guys butt-plugging each other needs recognition by society as the equivalent of marriage is stupid. The idea that God will not notice or respond is even more amazing, but then, I tend to think Obama is part of God’s judgment on an increasingly evil America.
*
I fully expect N.A.M.B.L.A. to follow the successful example of the sodomites. And to any liberal that laughs that idea off, no one in the 50’s would ever have taken seriously the notion that two men could openly kiss one another. Suggesting two men marry would more than likely ended in a trip to a Sanitarium.
*
How dare these elitists do this. They can afford to send their children to the best private schools, their children won’t be hit with the truama of being taught lies that it is ok to be perverted in your personal life. My heart cries for the little children in the inner cities who must suffer the cruelty of everyday life, only to be hit with more assualts to their innocent minds that are already under attack, when they attend school and their minds are assualted in this cruel way. I am mad about this. Is anyone thinking about the defenseless amoung us? The children. This is so wrong!
That was fast. Must have signed it in his boxer shorts.
Garbage politicians throw the entire electorate overboard for less than 2% of the population for this ridiculous insanity.
*
Burn in hell NY.
*
"So I have a question. If I wanted to marry a male friend ( I’m a male) with no sex involved, I could do it in NY and the other states that have passed similar laws. You don’t have to prove a sexual relationship. There are several reasons why this might make sense to do. Citizenship rights is just one of them. Of course it would be a sham deal, but so what. This is going to lead to a lot of complications."
You are on to something there. Especially as it relates the immigration.
*
I’m anxious for “married” gays to start taking on the responsibilities of married regular people....especially the TAXES that they’ve skirted all these years...
*
So, why couldn’t they put this crap up for a popular vote? Were they afraid the little people would not support this? Aren’t there enough welfare cases in NY to pimp this out? What a pathetic state, roads suck, NYC seems like a third-world country in most parts, too expensive.
*
Next up: Polygamy. Guaranteed within 10 years the islamists will have forced the dems and RINOS to legalize polygamy.
*
The good news is this can be changed but the bad news it will take even more work than in Iowa where I’m certain that we are going to succeed in reversing it there. I’m glad that groups like NOM are getting better and better at going on the offensive the problem is the core of the gay rights fiction and its big govt orwellian goals has to be hit over and over again. Also the idea that someone can be “born gay” has to be destoryed in much the same way the idea of AGW has been destoryed in the minds of everyone but those in the political, media, and academic classes.
The problem with these big fictions under the guise of liberty is granted by govt rather than a function of the absence of govt. Homosexual marriage was not banned in NY. It simply was not licensed in NY by the state govt. There is just so much wrong with the juvenile unreasoned ideas and propaganda that has led to this type of thing.
People think they can hide from or ignore these social issues because it makes them uncomfortable or they want to be hip but it is exactly these issues that will allow the govt to eventually censor even the free exercise of your conscience.
*
I hate my state. On to your commnet - Of freaking course ! This ain't no I now pronounce you chuck and larry scenario. Imagine if my brother is unemployed now and needs a life saving operation and such. why can't I marry him and get him on my insurance plan ? Or better yet, my beautiful St. Bernard Sasha is gonna need an amputation and a lifetime of therapy and drug products. How bout I make her my better half to get her on my plan. This is totally AFU for so many reasons. Not the LEAST of which is the fact that it's just wrong.
*
So now they get to “play house” under the official state recognition. Their legislative and judicial victories amount to nothing in God`s eyes. To Him, they`re just “playing house.”
Those pro-homo “marriage” senators and legislators will have some `splainin` to do someday.
*
I hate NY , too . Even though my mother , 4 sisters , + cousins , nephews and nieces live on Long Island , I haven’t been back ( from Japan ) in 7 years , and have no plans to visit . I did arrange to see my Mom and youngest sister in Hawaii ( Big Island ) 4 years ago , though . NY , CT , MA , VT , ME , NJ....the whole place sucks a big one . Couldn’t pay me to live there again .
*
There is a far better argument from history and religion for polygamy than for homosexuality.
The idea that guys butt-plugging each other needs recognition by society as the equivalent of marriage is stupid. The idea that God will not notice or respond is even more amazing, but then, I tend to think Obama is part of God’s judgment on an increasingly evil America.
*
I fully expect N.A.M.B.L.A. to follow the successful example of the sodomites. And to any liberal that laughs that idea off, no one in the 50’s would ever have taken seriously the notion that two men could openly kiss one another. Suggesting two men marry would more than likely ended in a trip to a Sanitarium.
*
How dare these elitists do this. They can afford to send their children to the best private schools, their children won’t be hit with the truama of being taught lies that it is ok to be perverted in your personal life. My heart cries for the little children in the inner cities who must suffer the cruelty of everyday life, only to be hit with more assualts to their innocent minds that are already under attack, when they attend school and their minds are assualted in this cruel way. I am mad about this. Is anyone thinking about the defenseless amoung us? The children. This is so wrong!
Part 2: "NY Legislature legalizes gay marriage"
Article from AP, via Breitbart
The idiots didn’t legalize homosexual marriage, they’re laying the groundwork to persecute those that don’t support it!
*
Making perversion legal - the end of a once great Republic. Obozo will finish us off once and for all.
*
Welcome to the GAY APPLE, folks. Everything Guliani did to clean up the city is now going to be undone over time.
Yes, Democrats, screwing the American people, one vote at a time. And we thought that Anthony Weiner was crazy!
*
One of the shortest verses in the Bible ... just 3 words.
Luke 17:32 KJV
Remember Lot’s wife.
*
And the homosexual pride parades will be extra special this year because of the desire to celebrate this history.
Has any culture in history ever recognized homosexual marriage? Until recent years? I was talking to someone who said homosexuality was very open in ancient Rome and ancient Greece. They took issue with me saying that while tolerated, it was not put on the same legal status as male/female marriage.
I always wonder where it will end. Homosexual marriage was inconceivable even less than 20 years ago. It makes you wonder what will be normalized and/or forced through courts in the next 20 years.
In addition to this, though, I wonder about the survival of our culture and society, when we have normalized so many negative behaviors. The “baby mama” culture, the gang culture, the pornography culture, the idiocracy of the entertainment business, etc.
*
Well, I always thought that if the tragic scenario occurred in which Al-Qaeda got its hands on a nuke, for me the least upsetting place for it to be set off would be in Hollywood. But, I’m really thinking right now that New York is pulling to the forefront.
To repeat, burn in hell, New York!!
*
New York, lol. It's been a corrupt, mob-controlled government for decades.
Whatever... Those sick scumbags can't force me to recognize sodomite marriage.
*
If I recall correctly, NY was one of the first states to legalize abortion.
The apostacy and end time as described in the New Testament is being played out before us. And the pace is picking up. This means that all of this will end much sooner than later.
Marriage was ordained by God right after the creation of Eve, at the dawn of civilization. It came before the fall of man and even God’s promise to Abraham the nation of Israel. That is how important marriage (between a man and a woman) is to God. These secural, empty and soul-less people have NO IDEA with whom they are dealing with and with the wrath that is awaiting them.
*
"(to the nuke post)
Ya know it is very easy to tap out words in this type of a forum...should not professing conservatives be conservative in our words? I have two wonderful children living and working in New York and you have just smirked at the possibility of their deaths in a nuclear blast."
-They need to leave. Whatever the cost. Seriously.
-Well, if you don’t appreciate my little imaginary musing ‘as is,’ then perhaps I’ll add a little imaginary grace period for all the remaining decent folks to safely evacuate. Does that make it any more palatable?
Because, truthfully, after this vote, I don’t give one single, solitary iota of concern for the survival of New York. It can burn in blazes, and I will react by grinning from ear to ear. It’s no longer a state, but a damned cancer.
*
I am sad that I am giving my grandchildren a different country than the one I grew up in.
May God have mercy on our nation. God knows we need it.
*
I’d much rather they go back into their closets. Their PDA’S are sickening and disgusting to say the least...it’s perversion on the street corner and needs to go back inside the privacy of their homes.
*
When will New Yorkers learn they can't keep mocking God? (followed by a picture from 9/11)
*
I am having a “discussion” with some homosexuals on Facebook. They are too happy. I posted a study about homosexuality and depression/suicide. That seemed to upset them. I no longer care if I am called names. I will not bow down to this PC crap. Homosexuality is morally and spiritually wrong and trying to teach children it is normal is child abuse!
*
Well, frankly, I hope every Senator who voted for this depravity goes home, eats a good meal, gets a good night’s sleep, and then wakes up with a debilitating stroke that makes the rest of their lives a long, miserable, unending hell. That’s exactly what these pieces of human garbage deserve.
*
A real blanket of evil has descended upon the country. I’m really beginning to believe some kind of secession is the only option left.
*
I will never spend another dime in NY state. NYC is fun to visit but I’m done. I refuse to support sodomites. NY will be judged no doubt. This is a perversion.
The idiots didn’t legalize homosexual marriage, they’re laying the groundwork to persecute those that don’t support it!
*
Making perversion legal - the end of a once great Republic. Obozo will finish us off once and for all.
*
Welcome to the GAY APPLE, folks. Everything Guliani did to clean up the city is now going to be undone over time.
Yes, Democrats, screwing the American people, one vote at a time. And we thought that Anthony Weiner was crazy!
*
One of the shortest verses in the Bible ... just 3 words.
Luke 17:32 KJV
Remember Lot’s wife.
*
And the homosexual pride parades will be extra special this year because of the desire to celebrate this history.
Has any culture in history ever recognized homosexual marriage? Until recent years? I was talking to someone who said homosexuality was very open in ancient Rome and ancient Greece. They took issue with me saying that while tolerated, it was not put on the same legal status as male/female marriage.
I always wonder where it will end. Homosexual marriage was inconceivable even less than 20 years ago. It makes you wonder what will be normalized and/or forced through courts in the next 20 years.
In addition to this, though, I wonder about the survival of our culture and society, when we have normalized so many negative behaviors. The “baby mama” culture, the gang culture, the pornography culture, the idiocracy of the entertainment business, etc.
*
Well, I always thought that if the tragic scenario occurred in which Al-Qaeda got its hands on a nuke, for me the least upsetting place for it to be set off would be in Hollywood. But, I’m really thinking right now that New York is pulling to the forefront.
To repeat, burn in hell, New York!!
*
New York, lol. It's been a corrupt, mob-controlled government for decades.
Whatever... Those sick scumbags can't force me to recognize sodomite marriage.
*
If I recall correctly, NY was one of the first states to legalize abortion.
The apostacy and end time as described in the New Testament is being played out before us. And the pace is picking up. This means that all of this will end much sooner than later.
Marriage was ordained by God right after the creation of Eve, at the dawn of civilization. It came before the fall of man and even God’s promise to Abraham the nation of Israel. That is how important marriage (between a man and a woman) is to God. These secural, empty and soul-less people have NO IDEA with whom they are dealing with and with the wrath that is awaiting them.
*
"(to the nuke post)
Ya know it is very easy to tap out words in this type of a forum...should not professing conservatives be conservative in our words? I have two wonderful children living and working in New York and you have just smirked at the possibility of their deaths in a nuclear blast."
-They need to leave. Whatever the cost. Seriously.
-Well, if you don’t appreciate my little imaginary musing ‘as is,’ then perhaps I’ll add a little imaginary grace period for all the remaining decent folks to safely evacuate. Does that make it any more palatable?
Because, truthfully, after this vote, I don’t give one single, solitary iota of concern for the survival of New York. It can burn in blazes, and I will react by grinning from ear to ear. It’s no longer a state, but a damned cancer.
*
I am sad that I am giving my grandchildren a different country than the one I grew up in.
May God have mercy on our nation. God knows we need it.
*
I’d much rather they go back into their closets. Their PDA’S are sickening and disgusting to say the least...it’s perversion on the street corner and needs to go back inside the privacy of their homes.
*
When will New Yorkers learn they can't keep mocking God? (followed by a picture from 9/11)
*
I am having a “discussion” with some homosexuals on Facebook. They are too happy. I posted a study about homosexuality and depression/suicide. That seemed to upset them. I no longer care if I am called names. I will not bow down to this PC crap. Homosexuality is morally and spiritually wrong and trying to teach children it is normal is child abuse!
*
Well, frankly, I hope every Senator who voted for this depravity goes home, eats a good meal, gets a good night’s sleep, and then wakes up with a debilitating stroke that makes the rest of their lives a long, miserable, unending hell. That’s exactly what these pieces of human garbage deserve.
*
A real blanket of evil has descended upon the country. I’m really beginning to believe some kind of secession is the only option left.
*
I will never spend another dime in NY state. NYC is fun to visit but I’m done. I refuse to support sodomites. NY will be judged no doubt. This is a perversion.
Part 1: "New York Gay Marriage Bill Needs Only One More GOP Nod For It To Pass"
Also, let me know what you think of the new layout. I'm not in love with it, but I wanted to switch things up.
Article from LA Times
Here’s what I never understand.
We’re told that homosexual marriage and “gay” issues in general are the civil rights battle of our time.
If this is the civil rights battle of our time, why are so few mainstream politicians on board supporting homosexual marriage?
In the civil rights movement of the ‘50s and ‘60s, many mainstream politicians, including many Republicans (which surprises liberals today, but facts are stubborn things), supported the civil rights movement, and Congress passed major civil rights laws.
But today, this liberal president is afraid to say he supports same-sex marriage.
During the civil rights movement, while there was stiff opposition, esp. among southern Democrats, many mainstream politicians were openly in support of the movement. But today’s movement for homosexual marriage does not have such support. In fact, given the silence, I’m sure many politicos wish the issue would go away.
While a liberal state such as New York may pass a law on homosexual marriage, where’s the leadership among liberals in Washington on this issue? Why are they afraid to proclaim their support, if this is the civil rights battle of this generation, and liberals tell us we want to be on the right side of history and all that???????
--- Facts sure are stubborn things.
*
Any homosexual marriage bill — even with so-called religious protections — will be a disaster!
If the bill passes, the homosexual agenda will grow like cancer. Liberal bureaucrats, lawyers and judges will chip away at the faith protections. Churches will be threatened with lawsuits and cave in at the slightest opportunity.
We can only hope and pray that it fails. God willing.
*
The fix is in. If they wanted to kill it they wouldn’t have brought it to the floor. The filthy stinking sodomites have bought off enough senators to get this to pass. Now the sodomites and their allies in the media will crow and dance with their perversion in your face and use the deviants in New Yawk to force the immorality in other states. America is dead.
*
We’re told that gays are only 2 to 4 % of the population. How many of that small percentage want to get married?
I’m not in favor of the bill, but I can’t believe it will have that much of an impact on society in general.
*
"...but yet the majority of Black people voted AGAINST same-sex “marriage” in CA."
Yeah, well these very same Black people consistently vote for politicians who let this happen. They share in the blame as far as I am concerned.
*
Homosexuals and those who support their lifestyle want to bring America down. The GOP is no better than dems. NY deserves what it already has and will get in the future.
--- Nevar forget?
*
This is all predicted in the Bible. We’re one day closer to Paradise!
Article from LA Times
Here’s what I never understand.
We’re told that homosexual marriage and “gay” issues in general are the civil rights battle of our time.
If this is the civil rights battle of our time, why are so few mainstream politicians on board supporting homosexual marriage?
In the civil rights movement of the ‘50s and ‘60s, many mainstream politicians, including many Republicans (which surprises liberals today, but facts are stubborn things), supported the civil rights movement, and Congress passed major civil rights laws.
But today, this liberal president is afraid to say he supports same-sex marriage.
During the civil rights movement, while there was stiff opposition, esp. among southern Democrats, many mainstream politicians were openly in support of the movement. But today’s movement for homosexual marriage does not have such support. In fact, given the silence, I’m sure many politicos wish the issue would go away.
While a liberal state such as New York may pass a law on homosexual marriage, where’s the leadership among liberals in Washington on this issue? Why are they afraid to proclaim their support, if this is the civil rights battle of this generation, and liberals tell us we want to be on the right side of history and all that???????
--- Facts sure are stubborn things.
*
Any homosexual marriage bill — even with so-called religious protections — will be a disaster!
If the bill passes, the homosexual agenda will grow like cancer. Liberal bureaucrats, lawyers and judges will chip away at the faith protections. Churches will be threatened with lawsuits and cave in at the slightest opportunity.
We can only hope and pray that it fails. God willing.
*
The fix is in. If they wanted to kill it they wouldn’t have brought it to the floor. The filthy stinking sodomites have bought off enough senators to get this to pass. Now the sodomites and their allies in the media will crow and dance with their perversion in your face and use the deviants in New Yawk to force the immorality in other states. America is dead.
*
We’re told that gays are only 2 to 4 % of the population. How many of that small percentage want to get married?
I’m not in favor of the bill, but I can’t believe it will have that much of an impact on society in general.
*
"...but yet the majority of Black people voted AGAINST same-sex “marriage” in CA."
Yeah, well these very same Black people consistently vote for politicians who let this happen. They share in the blame as far as I am concerned.
*
Homosexuals and those who support their lifestyle want to bring America down. The GOP is no better than dems. NY deserves what it already has and will get in the future.
--- Nevar forget?
*
This is all predicted in the Bible. We’re one day closer to Paradise!
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
"Is Marriage for White People?"
Article here from The Root
Summary: New book suggests black women should marry outside of their race for marital bliss.
Acting “ghetto” has consequences.
*
” ... that black women should shift the power balance by opening themselves to interracial marriage”
Along the same lines... those that are failing second grade should just enroll in college, that will fix the problem!
The problem is the urban culture. Urbanized black women are about as desirable as a WWE wrestler. They are very aggressive, very opinionated, and loud. They tend to expect a man who can and will “put them in their place”.
Fix the problem, not the symptom.
*
I have known some black women that I would consider marriage material (or at least dating). Good personality, tall, exotic looks, ambitious and hardworking. Unfortunately, my experience has been that they are VASTLY outnumbered by the black women who seem to have a constant chip on their shoulder, view everything through the lens of race and have a huge entitlement mentality and zero work ethic. I really don't blame black men for looking outside their race. Who want’s to put up with that all their life?
*
the problem usually comes when they start identifying themselves by their race. i have known and dated some very beautiful women, it never really occurs to me that they’re black- or asian, hispanic, native american, middle eastern, what ever- they’re just a beautiful woman, until they start spouting off about race issues.
when they start displaying the sterotypical charectaristics of their race, that’s when i notice, and when i walk away.
*
Has there ever been a scientific study that accurately reveals the percentage of black men that prefer to bed and wed white women? Maybe in an issue of 'Politically Incorrect Scientific American'??
I've often asked (silently to myself...) how much of the 'attitude' that spews from so many black women is due to their hatred and jealousy of white women?
*
Remember “Guess who’s coming to dinner”? A Black man marrying a white women is 1000 times less intimidating to whites as a black women marrying a white man is in the black culture today.
The life expectancy of a white man in Harlem in this scenario is about 30 seconds.
--- More proof that Freepers are permenantly stuck in 1985.
Summary: New book suggests black women should marry outside of their race for marital bliss.
Acting “ghetto” has consequences.
*
” ... that black women should shift the power balance by opening themselves to interracial marriage”
Along the same lines... those that are failing second grade should just enroll in college, that will fix the problem!
The problem is the urban culture. Urbanized black women are about as desirable as a WWE wrestler. They are very aggressive, very opinionated, and loud. They tend to expect a man who can and will “put them in their place”.
Fix the problem, not the symptom.
*
I have known some black women that I would consider marriage material (or at least dating). Good personality, tall, exotic looks, ambitious and hardworking. Unfortunately, my experience has been that they are VASTLY outnumbered by the black women who seem to have a constant chip on their shoulder, view everything through the lens of race and have a huge entitlement mentality and zero work ethic. I really don't blame black men for looking outside their race. Who want’s to put up with that all their life?
*
the problem usually comes when they start identifying themselves by their race. i have known and dated some very beautiful women, it never really occurs to me that they’re black- or asian, hispanic, native american, middle eastern, what ever- they’re just a beautiful woman, until they start spouting off about race issues.
when they start displaying the sterotypical charectaristics of their race, that’s when i notice, and when i walk away.
*
Has there ever been a scientific study that accurately reveals the percentage of black men that prefer to bed and wed white women? Maybe in an issue of 'Politically Incorrect Scientific American'??
I've often asked (silently to myself...) how much of the 'attitude' that spews from so many black women is due to their hatred and jealousy of white women?
*
Remember “Guess who’s coming to dinner”? A Black man marrying a white women is 1000 times less intimidating to whites as a black women marrying a white man is in the black culture today.
The life expectancy of a white man in Harlem in this scenario is about 30 seconds.
--- More proof that Freepers are permenantly stuck in 1985.
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
"Ex-GOP State Senator To Announce Pro-Gay Marriage Group"
Article here
Summary: In Iowa, a former Republican State Senator is building an advocacy group for gay marriage, arguing it is aligned with conservative values.
Hell’s fires await you sodomite accomodator.
*
Iowa Republicans for Moral Bondage.
No conservative defends or promotes this wickedness.
But this is an indicator that very, very many people define conservatism as being merely an economic thing.
A nation with free enterprise (or capitalism), free trade, minimal taxation, pro-business and pro-growth policies, will still fail and decline and be tossed on the trash heap of history, if it repudiates its Biblical-Christian, traditional and moral heritage.
While the nation declines, many people will say, “Oh, the problem must still be economic, what more can we do to have more business and trade opportunities?”
1. Open borders, where the invaders are not seeking to live consistent with America's Christian heritage;
2. the murder of the unborn;
3. the tolerance of sodomy, the sodomite agenda, and the parading of degenerates naked in our streets before our children;
4. drugs, and the devilish youth culture that drugs and the accompanying sex-promoting music has been producing for a full generation.
and a short list of other anti-God, anti-family, anti-Christian trends (Gangs are a symptom of these things), . . . .
. . . these things will all take down America, while mere economic conservatives, including libertarians, stand around as say, . . . “But, but, but, we had free enterprise, low taxes, pro-business, open trade, etc., etc., etc. . . WHAT HAPPENED????”
Blind as bats flying in backward, they are.
*
"So Jeff Angelo is a turd burglar. I guess it’s good he finally came out. A known enemy is easier to deal with."
Exactly. You never see a straight person who suddenly embraces this nonsense for no reason. It is a 100% precursor to coming out.
Summary: In Iowa, a former Republican State Senator is building an advocacy group for gay marriage, arguing it is aligned with conservative values.
Hell’s fires await you sodomite accomodator.
*
Iowa Republicans for Moral Bondage.
No conservative defends or promotes this wickedness.
But this is an indicator that very, very many people define conservatism as being merely an economic thing.
A nation with free enterprise (or capitalism), free trade, minimal taxation, pro-business and pro-growth policies, will still fail and decline and be tossed on the trash heap of history, if it repudiates its Biblical-Christian, traditional and moral heritage.
While the nation declines, many people will say, “Oh, the problem must still be economic, what more can we do to have more business and trade opportunities?”
1. Open borders, where the invaders are not seeking to live consistent with America's Christian heritage;
2. the murder of the unborn;
3. the tolerance of sodomy, the sodomite agenda, and the parading of degenerates naked in our streets before our children;
4. drugs, and the devilish youth culture that drugs and the accompanying sex-promoting music has been producing for a full generation.
and a short list of other anti-God, anti-family, anti-Christian trends (Gangs are a symptom of these things), . . . .
. . . these things will all take down America, while mere economic conservatives, including libertarians, stand around as say, . . . “But, but, but, we had free enterprise, low taxes, pro-business, open trade, etc., etc., etc. . . WHAT HAPPENED????”
Blind as bats flying in backward, they are.
*
"So Jeff Angelo is a turd burglar. I guess it’s good he finally came out. A known enemy is easier to deal with."
Exactly. You never see a straight person who suddenly embraces this nonsense for no reason. It is a 100% precursor to coming out.
Sunday, May 22, 2011
"For First Time, Majority of Americans Support Gay Marriage"
Article from Fox News
If true, just shows how sick we are in America.
*
If you believe it, you need some fresh air. You’ve been teleported to the SRM parallel universe.
*
Even in the uber-liberal state of Kalifornistan voters approved Proposition 8, which said, "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California" by over 52%.
This poll is a fraud. The only polls that count and the only polls that are believable are those taken in the polling booths on election day.
*
Wgere did they take this poll?
The Castro Street Fair in San Francisco, the queer bathhouses in NY City and the cloak room in the US Senate?
---Bathhouses? Dude, have you seriously not left your house since Reagan stopped being president?
*
My conclusion is that the poll is lying because in EVERY state where the people have a chance to vote on it, they overwhelmingly reject gay marriage.
*
"I don’t believe it for a second"
Me neither. Nobody I know was polled. Everyone I know is against permitting sexual deviants from marrying -- without exception. It's an abomination and we all know how God deals with it.
*
BF Skinner at work in the school system with the Marxists conditioning young children through the public school system and media to think good is evil and evil is good. Kill Christianity and the Natural family (and the Constitution).
Sex Education is to destroy morality in the sex act—make it into something meaningless and just a commodity to make marriage impossible== and convince children that man and woman are interchangeable....they condition and brainwash with nonsensical books (biological lies) Heather has Two Mommies. Cognitive Dissonance—so people’s foundational knowledge is so screwed up they can not recognize Truth.
Marxism is designed to destroy all traditions (marriage) to destroy the transmission of culture so that Truth becomes meaningless so that the elites can become gods and redesign the world into their vision of “utopia”. Of course, the masses will all be slaves. There is no Universal Truth.....no Natural Law Theory.....No USA...no property rights. No God. They have totalitarian control over all aspects of your life.
Homosexual marriage is all about making up, down, right, wrong....destroying logic and reason and creating a totally irrational world so elites can dictate their own vision of reality which is evil because it denies the laws of nature and nature’s God.
*
Does that mean that homosexual men can marry their gerbils?
*
I was thinking about this this morning. Almost every prime time show has gay characters, especially the shows pushed to younger ones.
I figured out the reason. With the general consensus to abortion, genocide, population reduction, etc......gays don’t breed.
Simple really. It works for the world view.
*
But the Cali polls showed Prop 8 losing and it’s passage was unexpected according to the Obama state media!
--- Apparently Obama has a hot tub time machine and was president when that happened.
*
When you survey the gay community sir, which is better, a dead queer or a dangerous AIDS Queer.
*
Homosexual polls are like homosexuals —liars all!
If true, just shows how sick we are in America.
*
If you believe it, you need some fresh air. You’ve been teleported to the SRM parallel universe.
*
Even in the uber-liberal state of Kalifornistan voters approved Proposition 8, which said, "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California" by over 52%.
This poll is a fraud. The only polls that count and the only polls that are believable are those taken in the polling booths on election day.
*
Wgere did they take this poll?
The Castro Street Fair in San Francisco, the queer bathhouses in NY City and the cloak room in the US Senate?
---Bathhouses? Dude, have you seriously not left your house since Reagan stopped being president?
*
My conclusion is that the poll is lying because in EVERY state where the people have a chance to vote on it, they overwhelmingly reject gay marriage.
*
"I don’t believe it for a second"
Me neither. Nobody I know was polled. Everyone I know is against permitting sexual deviants from marrying -- without exception. It's an abomination and we all know how God deals with it.
*
BF Skinner at work in the school system with the Marxists conditioning young children through the public school system and media to think good is evil and evil is good. Kill Christianity and the Natural family (and the Constitution).
Sex Education is to destroy morality in the sex act—make it into something meaningless and just a commodity to make marriage impossible== and convince children that man and woman are interchangeable....they condition and brainwash with nonsensical books (biological lies) Heather has Two Mommies. Cognitive Dissonance—so people’s foundational knowledge is so screwed up they can not recognize Truth.
Marxism is designed to destroy all traditions (marriage) to destroy the transmission of culture so that Truth becomes meaningless so that the elites can become gods and redesign the world into their vision of “utopia”. Of course, the masses will all be slaves. There is no Universal Truth.....no Natural Law Theory.....No USA...no property rights. No God. They have totalitarian control over all aspects of your life.
Homosexual marriage is all about making up, down, right, wrong....destroying logic and reason and creating a totally irrational world so elites can dictate their own vision of reality which is evil because it denies the laws of nature and nature’s God.
*
Does that mean that homosexual men can marry their gerbils?
*
I was thinking about this this morning. Almost every prime time show has gay characters, especially the shows pushed to younger ones.
I figured out the reason. With the general consensus to abortion, genocide, population reduction, etc......gays don’t breed.
Simple really. It works for the world view.
*
But the Cali polls showed Prop 8 losing and it’s passage was unexpected according to the Obama state media!
--- Apparently Obama has a hot tub time machine and was president when that happened.
*
When you survey the gay community sir, which is better, a dead queer or a dangerous AIDS Queer.
*
Homosexual polls are like homosexuals —liars all!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)