Article from 2008: link here
We are already seeing the benefit of the divergent practices. It doesn't matter what the candidate says he believes, if it's Massachusetts, or New Jersey, or the areas in Northern Virginia where Northeast coast people have moved in, the fact the "Red State" folks have their babies and the "Blue State" folks kill them results in Republican wins!
This does take a bit of time since the surviving "Red State" babies do have to grow up and start voting.
I'd say that the difference in the degree of biological survival is going to drive the "Blue State" people right off the political stage in a couple of decades.
*
how in the hell, did the RATS ever get to take Blue as their color???
we've been blue since the army of the Republic!!! it's time to take it back and give commie red back to the commie RATS.
*
Take the minority democrat voters out of the red states and take the conservatives out of the blue states and put them where they belong. Then let me know how those statistics come out.
*
"I have lived years in both the south and the northeast, one preparing for life and the other preparing my children for life.
I will say culturally the two have different ideas of success for children. One of which is that in the north college is considered more important, and my college friends had their share of abortions. They delayed marriage until later and had less kids. A libs idea of a successful life.
In the south, the parents were not tied so strongly to the idea of college, although I will say the ones that went were incredibly successful at it - they are at MIT and such. They were much more likely to be happy their children had a successful business in the trades, and the goal was not personal success as much as being able to support a family.
I will say down here I’ve see a lot of girls just being trashy while living at home, and having babies and living off the government. It’s a lot cheaper to live down here, you can get by like that. Up north you better have your act together, or you can’t even pay your taxes, let alone buy a house.
I’d like to see this correlated with income. I’m wondering if the conservatives in this case have less income."
Those parents are quite wise down there. They know they can’t live vicariously through their children like many of the NE (pardon me) snobs do.
If fact.....above someone mentioned condescending.....I think this book was written by a couple of female snob professors who really don’t know about real life!
*
"higher teen pregnancy rates,"
Because most lib teens kill their unborn through abortion.
"more shotgun marriages"
More people of honor means more people trying to do the honorable thing rather than the man disappear into the night, leaving his girl to get an abortion (see above).
"marry earlier and have higher divorce rates"
A direct outfall of the above honorable people trying to do the honorable thing. Meanwhile, liberal couples live together, make kids and never get married. Where is the study showing the blue staters having bastard children in greater numbers when you look at adult unmarried pregnancy and not just teen pregnancy?
Just another study that found data to fit a foregone conclusion.
*
"how in the hell, did the RATS ever get to take Blue as their color???"
They knew damn well that red would match their communist activism and that would not do. I originally was upset that they intentionally avoided giving liberals the communist color they deserved to wear, but I am now VERY good with conservatives having red and liberals having blue.
Red blood transports life-giving oxygen to the body, as conservatives bring life to the body politic. Blue oxygen-depleted blood returns empty and serves no purpose and is dependent on oxygen rich red blood for every cycle it makes. Liberals are the oxygen-depleted blood of the body politic, that are good for nothing until conservatism enriches them for a purpose.
Yes, I am very good with conservatives being symbolized by the rich red oxygenated life-giving blood, while liberals are symbolized by the blue oxygen-depleted blood that only brings death if it is not doon enriched.
*
Interesting how they also point out that “blue families” are better-educated and more affluent. Like for someone to be a conservative they must be a dunce working a minimum-wage job. So I guess having strong religious beliefs that do not include killing your unborn children (or grandchildren) must be indicative of a poorly educated person.
Frankly, it cracks me up that the Dems are always griping that the Republicans are the party of the rich - but then they turn around and publish all these studies that say that libs are smarter and wealthier than we are. Can you really have it both ways?
*
Yow, the Red Family says. JUNIOR...YOU´RE GOING TO GET TO THE TOP.
THE Blue Family says. Junior. Threaten lawsuits, gov´t quotas, racism, and count on ACORN to be there to make sure you get your share.
*
“and the sexual freedom that allows women to fully participate in society”
That right there is why we have legal abortion. Women decided that they needed the “right” to f*ck like bunny rabbits without being “punished with a baby.”
*
And the “red” families encourage their kids to join the military, police, and fire departments, protecting the “blue” faimily kids who are busy doing drugs while in college studying women’s issues and environmental science.
*
All pregnancy statistics should include the number of pregnancies that did not come to term either because of health issues or because of induced abortion. Our infant mortality rates (50+ million babies dead from abortion since 1973) are shockingly high.
*
RED Families tell their children; decide what you want to become and go do it, you cannot be stopped with hard work, determination, and perseveriance.
Blue Families tell their children, not to worry, everyone gets an equal share of the pie; The result is equal poverty for all!
*
As a Political Science major in college a number of years ago, we were taught that socio-economic status (SES) largely determined party identification.
I no longer think this is the case. I think the more religious a family is and the more often they attend religious services, more often than not, is a better indication of that family’s political leanings.
I think it was Whittaker Chambers who once characterized the struggle best as a battle between those who place their faith in God versus those who place their faith in man.
*
In the beginning, the party that held the White House was assigned "blue."
The challenging party was assigned "red."
After 2000, the Philistines took over and misunderstood that red was republican and blue was rat.
The rapid decline in the public's "smarts" is resulting in a new Dark Age.
*
"Those who have embraced the blue family model have low divorce rates, relatively few teen births, and good incomes."
Don't feed me this bs, I know better. I see it ever day.
The Blue families are the ones coming thur my check out line at my 2nd job.
They have 4 kids in tow, his 3rd wife has a black eye today. Hubby uses the Food Stamps card to buy the groceries, then whips out the wallet and dished out $50 bucks to pay for his smokes, his booze and his daily lottery tickets.
When the kids ask for a $.15 sucker, he screams no at them. then they leave.
All the while this "man" is smirking at us thinking "those poor dumb bastards are workin' the cash register instead of workin' the system.
Showing posts with label liberal agenda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liberal agenda. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Friday, March 9, 2012
Liberals are mentally ill
This is a vanity post, written by a freeper.
Here is the post itself:
Was arguing with some of them on a certain site (that I won't say) and they were telling me with dead seriousness that Obama will get reelected with 300 electoral votes. I believe this will be a close 50% vote election for whoever wins.
Even worse, these nutcases were actually going so far as to claim Obama is a centrist (!) and the Republican candidates are all extreme right wing fascist fanatics. All my efforts to explain that they're not anything but meek centrists were in vain.
Frankly, I'm bored as you-know-what about the whole thing and I really don't care who the Republican guy is that runs in the fall. Romney, Santorum, Gingrich. Doesn't matter. I'll vote for any of them if it gets rid of the Kenyan Klown.
Comments:
They think they are the center of the universe, so naturally they think of themselves as "centrists."
Wherever they are is the center, don't you know?
*
Clinton didnt get 50%...
Obama could NEVER get 50% unless He Cheated...and He will.
*
Liberals are not focused on reality. They are in a fantacy world.
They’re not normal.
*
Don’t waste your time. These people worship him as a god. He can do no wrong. If he was to say “I am a muslim and I want to destroy this nation” their response would be “He didn’t mean it” or “The republicans made him say that” or “That’s a fake video tape.”
Or you might get a blank stare. That’s what I got the last time I spoke with a relative who worships obama. I made a point that he couldn’t respond to. I knew right then that he had volunteered to be brainwashed.
*
Due to the State sponsored racism of the New Black Panther voter intimidation case, and overall thuggish behavior of this administration, I feel the term “Klan with a tan” is good description of the Obama/Holder regime.
*
Yeah, they live in their liberal bubble and they won’t hear anything that contradicts the message they’ve been fed by trophallaxis. I was talking to a cousin of mine, who is a lib judge from the East Coast, at a family gathering, and the topic turned to politics. When they started talking about Romney, I tried to explain why most conservatives won’t vote for Romney, and she interrupted me mid-sentence, before I could state the reason and said “Because he’s a Mormon!”.
I just gave her a cold look that said “Shut it, you idiot”, and said “No, it’s because he’s a liberal. Most conservatives don’t see much difference between him and Obama.” She looked as if I had just told her the moon was made of cheese.
*
Liberals are based in fantasy and emotion and conservatives are based in reason and logic. All the reason and logic in the world won’t draw liberals out of their safe, cozy emotional fantasies...only the school of hard knocks does that, and lots of times that doesn’t work either.
If I must associate with liberals at work or family gatherings, I steer clear of politics. My energy is too important to waste it on a pointless exercise. Even if you win on the facts and the argument, they will devolve things into personal attacks or a public tantrum.
I have already seen a couple of liberals becoming unhinged at the mere possibility of an Obama loss. This is going to be the ugliest of ugly elections.
*
As usual, they continue to believe this fantasy that the GOP is so far and extreme right wing that moderates are going to be alienated by them. Because as we all know, the Republican candidate field is the epitome of right wing extremism *sarcasm*.
I of course acknowledge that it’s a very real possibility Obama gets reelected, but it wouldn’t even conceivably be like the 1972 or ‘84-ish landslide some of these kooks think.
*
The key question to ask them: If they are centrists, what would a far left radical try to do, that they are not doing?
I really am curious about what they would come up with for an answer.
*
You basically summarized my theory that liberalism actually causes brain damage. I am NOT joking. They are permanently incapable of recognizing truth or using logic on certain ideas and concepts. The proof lies in the hypothetical that you outlined. If Obama sat down with these people individually and told them he was scamming the American people and that the ideas liberals are selling are all nothing but diabolical deceptions they still would NOT believe it. They would think Obama has been coerced into saying these things or that he had sold out to radical republicans. They would invent some fantasy to fit what they are hearing into their permanently distorted version of reality. There is no hope for 99% of them. Liberalism has damaged the logic/language center of their brains. They will go to their graves never seeing the truth.
This is also the reason that it's a total waste of time to try to convince those that have been damaged by liberalism. Only one out of a hundred or so ever comes out of the fog but when they do it's just something that happens randomly. Usually some event triggers their brain that causes them to see truth and reality clearly and they wonder how in the world they ever believed the lies.
*
I’ve heard stuff like “Oh well, he bailed out insurance companies instead of have single payer health care” and “He’s done nothing to undermine the capitalist system. He’s therefore a capitalist.”
1. Obama and the far left wing of the DNC (Pelosi and all of them) wanted SPHC, but the Tea Party and nervous moderate Democrats prevented it
2. He’s done plenty against the capitalist system, but apparently they think you can’t be a leftist unless you’re waving a red flag and humming the Internationale
*
Do not argue and debate with left wing liberals. These fools have no logic and they do not speak the truth. They cannot be reasoned with. The best way to deal with them is to ridicule them.
Yes left wing liberalism is a mental decease because only people with psychological problems would passionately advocate stupid ideas and then do the opposite in real life because the stupid ideas that they are advocating are against human nature and hence they cannot abide by the foolishness they preach. For example all left wing liberals advocate higher taxes in the name of common goods but the SOB's try every possible way under the sun to pay less taxes.
*
"They cannot be reasoned with. The best way to deal with them is to ridicule them."
I can think of better ways to deal with libs, but folks want to put you in jail for it. Strange, but true.
Here is the post itself:
Was arguing with some of them on a certain site (that I won't say) and they were telling me with dead seriousness that Obama will get reelected with 300 electoral votes. I believe this will be a close 50% vote election for whoever wins.
Even worse, these nutcases were actually going so far as to claim Obama is a centrist (!) and the Republican candidates are all extreme right wing fascist fanatics. All my efforts to explain that they're not anything but meek centrists were in vain.
Frankly, I'm bored as you-know-what about the whole thing and I really don't care who the Republican guy is that runs in the fall. Romney, Santorum, Gingrich. Doesn't matter. I'll vote for any of them if it gets rid of the Kenyan Klown.
Comments:
They think they are the center of the universe, so naturally they think of themselves as "centrists."
Wherever they are is the center, don't you know?
*
Clinton didnt get 50%...
Obama could NEVER get 50% unless He Cheated...and He will.
*
Liberals are not focused on reality. They are in a fantacy world.
They’re not normal.
*
Don’t waste your time. These people worship him as a god. He can do no wrong. If he was to say “I am a muslim and I want to destroy this nation” their response would be “He didn’t mean it” or “The republicans made him say that” or “That’s a fake video tape.”
Or you might get a blank stare. That’s what I got the last time I spoke with a relative who worships obama. I made a point that he couldn’t respond to. I knew right then that he had volunteered to be brainwashed.
*
Due to the State sponsored racism of the New Black Panther voter intimidation case, and overall thuggish behavior of this administration, I feel the term “Klan with a tan” is good description of the Obama/Holder regime.
*
Yeah, they live in their liberal bubble and they won’t hear anything that contradicts the message they’ve been fed by trophallaxis. I was talking to a cousin of mine, who is a lib judge from the East Coast, at a family gathering, and the topic turned to politics. When they started talking about Romney, I tried to explain why most conservatives won’t vote for Romney, and she interrupted me mid-sentence, before I could state the reason and said “Because he’s a Mormon!”.
I just gave her a cold look that said “Shut it, you idiot”, and said “No, it’s because he’s a liberal. Most conservatives don’t see much difference between him and Obama.” She looked as if I had just told her the moon was made of cheese.
*
Liberals are based in fantasy and emotion and conservatives are based in reason and logic. All the reason and logic in the world won’t draw liberals out of their safe, cozy emotional fantasies...only the school of hard knocks does that, and lots of times that doesn’t work either.
If I must associate with liberals at work or family gatherings, I steer clear of politics. My energy is too important to waste it on a pointless exercise. Even if you win on the facts and the argument, they will devolve things into personal attacks or a public tantrum.
I have already seen a couple of liberals becoming unhinged at the mere possibility of an Obama loss. This is going to be the ugliest of ugly elections.
*
As usual, they continue to believe this fantasy that the GOP is so far and extreme right wing that moderates are going to be alienated by them. Because as we all know, the Republican candidate field is the epitome of right wing extremism *sarcasm*.
I of course acknowledge that it’s a very real possibility Obama gets reelected, but it wouldn’t even conceivably be like the 1972 or ‘84-ish landslide some of these kooks think.
*
The key question to ask them: If they are centrists, what would a far left radical try to do, that they are not doing?
I really am curious about what they would come up with for an answer.
*
You basically summarized my theory that liberalism actually causes brain damage. I am NOT joking. They are permanently incapable of recognizing truth or using logic on certain ideas and concepts. The proof lies in the hypothetical that you outlined. If Obama sat down with these people individually and told them he was scamming the American people and that the ideas liberals are selling are all nothing but diabolical deceptions they still would NOT believe it. They would think Obama has been coerced into saying these things or that he had sold out to radical republicans. They would invent some fantasy to fit what they are hearing into their permanently distorted version of reality. There is no hope for 99% of them. Liberalism has damaged the logic/language center of their brains. They will go to their graves never seeing the truth.
This is also the reason that it's a total waste of time to try to convince those that have been damaged by liberalism. Only one out of a hundred or so ever comes out of the fog but when they do it's just something that happens randomly. Usually some event triggers their brain that causes them to see truth and reality clearly and they wonder how in the world they ever believed the lies.
*
I’ve heard stuff like “Oh well, he bailed out insurance companies instead of have single payer health care” and “He’s done nothing to undermine the capitalist system. He’s therefore a capitalist.”
1. Obama and the far left wing of the DNC (Pelosi and all of them) wanted SPHC, but the Tea Party and nervous moderate Democrats prevented it
2. He’s done plenty against the capitalist system, but apparently they think you can’t be a leftist unless you’re waving a red flag and humming the Internationale
*
Do not argue and debate with left wing liberals. These fools have no logic and they do not speak the truth. They cannot be reasoned with. The best way to deal with them is to ridicule them.
Yes left wing liberalism is a mental decease because only people with psychological problems would passionately advocate stupid ideas and then do the opposite in real life because the stupid ideas that they are advocating are against human nature and hence they cannot abide by the foolishness they preach. For example all left wing liberals advocate higher taxes in the name of common goods but the SOB's try every possible way under the sun to pay less taxes.
*
"They cannot be reasoned with. The best way to deal with them is to ridicule them."
I can think of better ways to deal with libs, but folks want to put you in jail for it. Strange, but true.
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
rious, why do liberal so LOVE abortion?
*This is another vanity post. This one is shorter, so I will include the thread starter.*
Post: OK, I'm sure we all have friends or family members that we disagree with who call themselves "pro-choice."
These people will often feel ambigious about when life starts and don't feel it's right to make legal legislation about this. These are not the people I'm talking about.
I'm talking about those that for whatever REALLY REALLY REALLY love abortion. The ones that strongly support funding of abortion left and right, and those who seem obsessed with making it more and more available and considered. Like Obama working to get it into Kenya. Come on, it can't be about "women's rights?" In a third world, high Muslim population nation?
Is there anyone here that used to be pro-abortion? (not just "pro-choice". If so, could you offer some insight on their mentality?
Comments:
Because they are evil.
Notice they want you to pay for it!
You are paying for murdering millions of babies. They want to spread the guilt.
I guess it makes them feel less guilty.
*
They worship Moloch.
*
Honestly, it is this simple.
When you can absolve your conscience from killing a child - when you can rationalize it away, you are a God unto yourself and accountable to none.
The leftists in love with abortion are merely placing their ‘godhood’ above God himself. They refuse the life under his rule and the love of abortion is mere the expression of the most repugnant thing possible.
“F-You God, your most precious creation is NOTHING to me.”
That’s all there is to it.
*
Liberals love abortion because they love to kill the helpless and innocent! They would NEVER stand up to an adult psycho with a knife or a gun because they are COWARDS!
*
Because they view every soul, every life as a burden to society! One more mouth to feed, one more dependant on the state.
It’s also why they endorse euthanasia.
*
Like all liberals, they want all reward and no risk.
Also explains their disdain for capitalism, BTW.
*
How can they enjoy such evil as baby killings? The very thought of it scares the hell right out of me. Being cast into a fiery hell forever is the absolute worst thing imaginable—— gosh that scares me... Thank You Savior Jesus for heaven!
*
Because they hate God.
Seriously.
*
I think it's puzzling that liberals (usually) are trying to kill their own babies while conservatives are trying to save them. That we would care more about their offspring than they do is...unexplainable.
Also, I wonder what the black population (percentage wise)would be in the US had they not aborted so many babies... I wonder if THEY ever wonder that. Seems to me, they made up about 13% 35 years ago and it's about the same now. Maybe I'm mistaken? Surely, they should be at 20% by now?
*
It depends what kind of liberal you’re talking about. They love it for one or more reasons.
Feminists love it for power over men. Supposedly. It’s really just killing off their own children. But if it hurts a guy, that’s what’s important.
Population nuts love it because it reduces the population of people, which they view as the source of all problems in the world.
Certain liberals love it because they use it as a wedge issue to keep certain groups against each other, rather than focusing on them (the liberals).
Some liberals love it because they make a living at it, one way or another.
Some liberals love it because it hurts people.
Some liberals love it because it’s blood sacrifice. ANd there is power in that blood sacrifice.
Some liberals love it because anything they can do to strike at the church and Christians, they will keep doing.
Some love it because they believe it’s better for certain kids not to be born, for any variety of reasons.
Many libs have overlapping reasons.
*
Lesbians run some abortion clinics. It’s a great place to pick up chicks. Abortion torments a woman’s soul. It leaves them vulnerable and hurting. After taking the life of their own flesh and blood, and often feeling abandoned by their husband or boyfriend, they are desperate for love and acceptance. Then they are open to advances by the twisted sexual predators.
*
think some women deeply resent the pressures put upon them by their parents, society or some god-based morality that "irrationally" kept them from guilt-free "taking on" the whole football team, unlike their male counterparts, who were relatively free to get it on with any and all of the women's volleyball team that would have them.
These elite, young sluts lived their youth "knowing" there were dozens if not hundreds (thousands?) of young men that would've bedded them in an instant and they would've loved to reciprocate and notch their own bedposts, but for the fear of "being punished with a baby."
*
What does modern day American and European liberals, the German National Socialist Party (nazis), Russia's Stalin, China's Mao and modern day Chi-coms have in common?
People who based their governing ideal, identity and ambition on coveting their neighbor's good, end up with a lot of innocent blood on their hands.
Maybe God knew what He what he was doing when He banned coveting in the ten commandments. It is a deadly sin that leads it's minions to rationalize and commit genocide.
*
Many liberals are basically selfish, immature people. They tend to see anything that involves an obligation to others over self as an unconscionable burden.
*
They are slaves to the spirit of this world. That spirit demands blood and rewards slaves with power. RATs are modern servants of Molech no matter how enlightened they may feel they are. Killing babies has no sane or moral excuse.
*
Just trying to do a better job than Hitler, Pol pot, Stalin
and every other commie leader that ever walked the face
of the earth. You can’t have communism without murdering
a whole bunch of people. This is the new and improved, PC
version of state sponsored murder.
*
Most of the forgoing is true (I didn’t actually read every comment) and one more reason: They are in bed with the eugenisists. Their deluded brains are dreaming of “purifying the race” - killing or preventing the gestation and/or birth of human beings they consider inferior.
Post: OK, I'm sure we all have friends or family members that we disagree with who call themselves "pro-choice."
These people will often feel ambigious about when life starts and don't feel it's right to make legal legislation about this. These are not the people I'm talking about.
I'm talking about those that for whatever REALLY REALLY REALLY love abortion. The ones that strongly support funding of abortion left and right, and those who seem obsessed with making it more and more available and considered. Like Obama working to get it into Kenya. Come on, it can't be about "women's rights?" In a third world, high Muslim population nation?
Is there anyone here that used to be pro-abortion? (not just "pro-choice". If so, could you offer some insight on their mentality?
Comments:
Because they are evil.
Notice they want you to pay for it!
You are paying for murdering millions of babies. They want to spread the guilt.
I guess it makes them feel less guilty.
*
They worship Moloch.
*
Honestly, it is this simple.
When you can absolve your conscience from killing a child - when you can rationalize it away, you are a God unto yourself and accountable to none.
The leftists in love with abortion are merely placing their ‘godhood’ above God himself. They refuse the life under his rule and the love of abortion is mere the expression of the most repugnant thing possible.
“F-You God, your most precious creation is NOTHING to me.”
That’s all there is to it.
*
Liberals love abortion because they love to kill the helpless and innocent! They would NEVER stand up to an adult psycho with a knife or a gun because they are COWARDS!
*
Because they view every soul, every life as a burden to society! One more mouth to feed, one more dependant on the state.
It’s also why they endorse euthanasia.
*
Like all liberals, they want all reward and no risk.
Also explains their disdain for capitalism, BTW.
*
How can they enjoy such evil as baby killings? The very thought of it scares the hell right out of me. Being cast into a fiery hell forever is the absolute worst thing imaginable—— gosh that scares me... Thank You Savior Jesus for heaven!
*
Because they hate God.
Seriously.
*
I think it's puzzling that liberals (usually) are trying to kill their own babies while conservatives are trying to save them. That we would care more about their offspring than they do is...unexplainable.
Also, I wonder what the black population (percentage wise)would be in the US had they not aborted so many babies... I wonder if THEY ever wonder that. Seems to me, they made up about 13% 35 years ago and it's about the same now. Maybe I'm mistaken? Surely, they should be at 20% by now?
*
It depends what kind of liberal you’re talking about. They love it for one or more reasons.
Feminists love it for power over men. Supposedly. It’s really just killing off their own children. But if it hurts a guy, that’s what’s important.
Population nuts love it because it reduces the population of people, which they view as the source of all problems in the world.
Certain liberals love it because they use it as a wedge issue to keep certain groups against each other, rather than focusing on them (the liberals).
Some liberals love it because they make a living at it, one way or another.
Some liberals love it because it hurts people.
Some liberals love it because it’s blood sacrifice. ANd there is power in that blood sacrifice.
Some liberals love it because anything they can do to strike at the church and Christians, they will keep doing.
Some love it because they believe it’s better for certain kids not to be born, for any variety of reasons.
Many libs have overlapping reasons.
*
Lesbians run some abortion clinics. It’s a great place to pick up chicks. Abortion torments a woman’s soul. It leaves them vulnerable and hurting. After taking the life of their own flesh and blood, and often feeling abandoned by their husband or boyfriend, they are desperate for love and acceptance. Then they are open to advances by the twisted sexual predators.
*
think some women deeply resent the pressures put upon them by their parents, society or some god-based morality that "irrationally" kept them from guilt-free "taking on" the whole football team, unlike their male counterparts, who were relatively free to get it on with any and all of the women's volleyball team that would have them.
These elite, young sluts lived their youth "knowing" there were dozens if not hundreds (thousands?) of young men that would've bedded them in an instant and they would've loved to reciprocate and notch their own bedposts, but for the fear of "being punished with a baby."
*
What does modern day American and European liberals, the German National Socialist Party (nazis), Russia's Stalin, China's Mao and modern day Chi-coms have in common?
People who based their governing ideal, identity and ambition on coveting their neighbor's good, end up with a lot of innocent blood on their hands.
Maybe God knew what He what he was doing when He banned coveting in the ten commandments. It is a deadly sin that leads it's minions to rationalize and commit genocide.
*
Many liberals are basically selfish, immature people. They tend to see anything that involves an obligation to others over self as an unconscionable burden.
*
They are slaves to the spirit of this world. That spirit demands blood and rewards slaves with power. RATs are modern servants of Molech no matter how enlightened they may feel they are. Killing babies has no sane or moral excuse.
*
Just trying to do a better job than Hitler, Pol pot, Stalin
and every other commie leader that ever walked the face
of the earth. You can’t have communism without murdering
a whole bunch of people. This is the new and improved, PC
version of state sponsored murder.
*
Most of the forgoing is true (I didn’t actually read every comment) and one more reason: They are in bed with the eugenisists. Their deluded brains are dreaming of “purifying the race” - killing or preventing the gestation and/or birth of human beings they consider inferior.
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Openly gay Miss California USA contestants make history
This is indeed “historic.” We should rejoice at such “progress.”
*
I've been personally acquainted with several actual homosexually perverted females over the years.
Some of them are scary.
Most make my skin crawl.
NONE of them are remotely attractive, except (presumably) to each other.
In many cases, the unattractiveness seems to be a deliberate choice.
*
Ugly is “in”; beauty is out. Evil is in. Goodness is out.
Interesting times we live in.
*
Here's the problem. When you see "do's" like this, you know they are screwed up in many ways.
And they commit suicide from bullying?
I'll bet 100 to 1, they are disgusted with themselves for ever engaging in that lifestyle but there really isn't any way you can step BACK in time...
*
I saw a nice, sweet, pretty girl slowly get sucked into lesbianism. She slowly became more and more perverted.
I then saw her convert one other girl, this girl came up to me and told me she thought she was doing wrong. I tried to help both of them but once a lesbian has you in doubt they will stop at nothing to convert you.
Now, this girl who used to be a friend actively tries to find things she can do that are against god. Literally if its good, she makes fun of it and does the opposite.
*
And why is that so many TV shows now insist on including gay men in their character story lines? There are not that many gay men in our population. Talk about being inundated...and propagandized.
Don’t you also kinda wonder why lesbians are so under represented? Power to the Lesbos! But then [their appearance] may be the reason why.
*
I think that their suicide rates are more to do with their internal thinking (as you stated above), not so much a "disgust" with their past actions. I think some people are ostracized because they are "different," and most of those who are ostracized (probably all of us at different times in our lives), simply continue on to live their lives without ever thinking about those who cast us aside. However, there are those who are so NARCISSISTIC (homosexuality is the epitome of narcissism) they think the world should revolve around them and when reality kicks down their charade, they can't handle it! How many schizophrenics commit suicide? A very LARGE number do! Why? Because when their reality cannot explain the truth which others and they themselves start to see, they cannot cope!
*
This girl is mentally ill and should put under the care of a doctor.
*
I've been personally acquainted with several actual homosexually perverted females over the years.
Some of them are scary.
Most make my skin crawl.
NONE of them are remotely attractive, except (presumably) to each other.
In many cases, the unattractiveness seems to be a deliberate choice.
*
Ugly is “in”; beauty is out. Evil is in. Goodness is out.
Interesting times we live in.
*
Here's the problem. When you see "do's" like this, you know they are screwed up in many ways.
And they commit suicide from bullying?
I'll bet 100 to 1, they are disgusted with themselves for ever engaging in that lifestyle but there really isn't any way you can step BACK in time...
*
I saw a nice, sweet, pretty girl slowly get sucked into lesbianism. She slowly became more and more perverted.
I then saw her convert one other girl, this girl came up to me and told me she thought she was doing wrong. I tried to help both of them but once a lesbian has you in doubt they will stop at nothing to convert you.
Now, this girl who used to be a friend actively tries to find things she can do that are against god. Literally if its good, she makes fun of it and does the opposite.
*
And why is that so many TV shows now insist on including gay men in their character story lines? There are not that many gay men in our population. Talk about being inundated...and propagandized.
Don’t you also kinda wonder why lesbians are so under represented? Power to the Lesbos! But then [their appearance] may be the reason why.
*
I think that their suicide rates are more to do with their internal thinking (as you stated above), not so much a "disgust" with their past actions. I think some people are ostracized because they are "different," and most of those who are ostracized (probably all of us at different times in our lives), simply continue on to live their lives without ever thinking about those who cast us aside. However, there are those who are so NARCISSISTIC (homosexuality is the epitome of narcissism) they think the world should revolve around them and when reality kicks down their charade, they can't handle it! How many schizophrenics commit suicide? A very LARGE number do! Why? Because when their reality cannot explain the truth which others and they themselves start to see, they cannot cope!
*
This girl is mentally ill and should put under the care of a doctor.
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
A very special philosophical episode of Freep Impact
On Free Republic, there is a vanity section, where posters may create posts that link nowhere and instead just share their thoughts with other Freepers. Usually I skip over these because Freepers tend to write mini-novels in there, but sometimes the derpiness makes it worth it. Here is one such post, entitled "The Fear and Self-loathing of Liberals"
I've often pondered what makes a liberal, a liberal. They tend to do so much damage throughout history and are incredibly difficult to defeat. Figuring out what makes them tick would seem to be priority number one. As I thought about it recently I came to a revelation that others have discovered but never fleshed out to my satisfaction. That revelation is that liberals fear and loathe their own humanity. Liberals loathe their own humanity because well, being human means being naturally flawed or seemingly so. I personally think that if we weren't flawed there wouldn't be any real challenges in life in exceling beyond our limitations.
Liberals apparently can't handle these innate flaws that come with being human and deep down that hurts their pride. They are mortified when they look inward, when they feel racially insecure, or think a sexist thought or feel a need to be greedy. They loathe themselves because of these all too human feelings and because of their shame they feel they must stamp them out and control them in others. They have to feel like they are above their human emotions so they can feel worthy of praise. Liberals fear being judged on their natural feelings.
Liberals don't understand that regardless of the past, that they are no better than their ancestors deep down, that controlling ones negative tendencies gives one character and strength. Ignoring that we are flawed and taking away others' choice to control their own bad behavior leads to a society that lacks self-control and builds resentment and actually encourages bad behavior.
This bad behavior originates because of this lack of self-control and because the aura of "holy purpose" liberals give to their crusades. One need only accuse someone of not being a convert the the liberals' "religion" of political correctness and you risk ostricism in various spheres of life. And so the free-thinking man or woman, where all innovation springs is handcuffed and gagged. Scientific and economic advancement stagnate as a result.
This need to control and regulate, however, leads to a type of totalitarianism that more cynical people would harness to enrich themselves in both wealth and power just for that purpose. Totalitarianism is begun by the well-meaning liberal and then they, being unsophisticated in human nature because they won't look inward, are then manipulated by the more cynical and ambitious among us. This is how freedom ends. I think it's happening now.
Here are some replies:
Yes, there is certainly something wrong with liberals, and I believe clinical depression may be a root cause. But it goes far beyond that. Look, for example, at public policy and the so-called "culture war".
The differences in the way liberals and conservatives reach conclusions comes down to far more than simply differing opinions - - it actually comes down to entirely different thought processes. Conservatives tend to think linearly: “If this, then this”; “Here is what was attempted, here are the results”; “Based on experience, this works and this does not work”. Etc.
Liberals do not think that way. Liberals are easily conned, easily manipulated, and utterly unwilling to admit when they are wrong. (Their obsession with constantly attempting to elicit “apologies” from Republicans is an offshoot of these strained thought processes.) Liberals, when confronted with bare-bones truth that contradicts their irrational world view, will scrunch their eyes shut, shake their heads, and chant “nah-nah-nah-nah-nah-nah” until whatever truth it is they find offensive “goes away”, rather than revise their thoughts and beliefs to conform to a truth that is slapping them in the face. They simply do not have the capacity to revise their thoughts and beliefs to conform to the truth before their very eyes if that truth contradicts the foundation of the beliefs they irrationally hold onto as a weapon in the constant struggle against their own insecurity.
Certainly, there are notable exceptions such as David Horowitz, PJ O’Rourke, Bernie Goldberg, Michael Medved and others who were smart enough to lift themselves out of the mire of self-loathing liberal stupidity but these folks are, unfortunately, rare exceptions.
Being an unabashed liberal is a matter of character (or more accurately, lack of character). Liberals are generally humorless and bitter because, you see, everybody else is (richer, happier, luckier, prettier, fill-in-the-blank) than they deserve to be and that is just not “fair”. (Words like "fair", and phrases such as "social justice", are common favorites used by liberals.) Liberals are social duds who are either chronic malcontents or simply that guilt-ridden subset of white liberals who feel that their own good fortune (and by extension the good fortune of others) is somehow undeserved. In any event, liberals usually see themselves as "victims". They always see anybody beneath their station as "victims".
In this world, there are people (most people, in fact) who look at all other people as their equals in every way, as people who are capable of realizing their personal aspirations and doing the right things, as people who should be treated as equals. Alternatively, there are people who look up adoringly at people they view as somehow better than themselves. These are the same people who look loathingly down on other people they view as their lessers. Guess which kind of people liberals tend to be?
Interestingly, true liberals are often physically slow and unathletic. They were picked last for playground basketball games. They have no interest in competetive sports, especially team sports. “Competetive sports” is, in fact, very much an alien concept to them. To be blunt, true liberals (genuine socialists) are almost always clumsy oafs.
Additionally, true liberals are humorless. Seething, deep seated anger causes an entrenched bitterness that ends up defining them. The evidence of this abounds and can be seen on certain TV stations every day. The liberals have no Rush Limbaugh, or Ann Coulter or Mark Steyn or Howie Carr or Dennis Miller or Ronald Reagan. They have Keith Olbemann and Helen Thomas and Ed Shultz and Lawrence O'Donnell and Barack Ubama.... there is simply not a lot of laughter there. Liberals, in fact, despise laughter. (What's there to laugh about? Look at all the suffering people in this horrible, unjust world.) True liberals don’t “get” jokes, even if they chuckle as if they do. (Test this for yourself - - try to tell a true liberal a joke. For additonal laughs, ask the liberal if he/she/it has a good joke.)
Liberals can appear to be normal people and are often able to handle their jobs and academic endeavors competently. They can usually fake normal socialization with other people, even if their self-centeredness prevents them from ever establishing true friendships. Liberals do not have true friends, merely acquaintances who can be used in some way, especially to affirm their own crazy political notions.
It is their sociopathic selfishness that is the most troubling thing about liberals. They see absolutely no problem with walking into the polling place on election day and voting for big government to confiscate more money - - from their neighbors! Normal people would view this behavior as boorish and rude, but liberals apparently convince themselves that they are somehow accomplishing something; perhaps the exercise soothes their irrational guilt under the tragic misbelief that they are somehow “helping” others (using other people’s money, of course), notably, “the poor”.
So, by voting for thuggish big government to take more money from their neighbors in order to enable their Democrat politicians to buy the votes of society’s losers, bums, and parasites, liberals feel better about themselves. (Don’t ask me about this mindset - - figuring out liberals would best be left to a team of very good psychiatrists.)
Anyway, I believe that the percentage of true liberals in this country is actually very low - - far less than a typical Democrat election-day turnout would indicate. The rats run a good con and there is no shortage of fools littering the countryside (not to mention the concentrated Democrat parasite nests known as "cities") who will continue to buy into the con.
Think about this - - how gullible did you have to be in 2008 to fall for a campaign that could have been formulated by a boardwalk psychic; a campaign based primarily on two essentially meaningless words, “hope” and “change”, words that sound so... positive... and that allow the smiling, naval-gazing listener’s imagination to turn them into whatever he or she wants? Unfortunately, in today’s soundbite world such a campaign can be (and was!) successful. And so we ended up with “community organizer” Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.
Pray for America. In less than one year we shall see if Americans are insistent on committing national suicide.
*
You make some good points here. I would add that many liberals recognize (on some level) that the utopian perfectibility they crave so much is not possible by human effort alone, yet at the same time their ideology prevents them from (a) accepting that weakness and working with it or (b) acknowledging that moral standards come from outside human reason. So, they turn to institutions and causes, sometimes embodied in individuals (e.g. Obama) but more often existing as vagaries like “society” or “the global village” that they can ostensibly use to supersede flawed human effort. Perpetually larger and more powerful governments are a natural outgrowth of this tendency: if God is out of the equation, in other words, then Uncle Sam is the next best thing.
*
"Liberals don't understand that regardless of the past, that they are no better than their ancestors deep down..."
That struck a chord with me. It has been my experience with liberals that they have this (unfounded) sense of superiority. They seem to think they are smarter than their predecessors and contemporaries. This in spite of absolutely no supporting evidence. (other than self-agrandising and mutual admiration societies)
In fact, a case can be easily made that liberals are in fact not as smart as other people, past or present. For you liberal lurkers out there I'll spell it out: don't confuse education and technological advancement with basic intelligence.
In general, liberals tend to have several fundamental failings. They ignore the lessons of the past. Probably due to that self-serving attitude "Things will be different now, we're so much smarter/evolved than they were..." They fail to recognize their own limitations. This is particularly dangerous when they start thinking they should make decisions for the rest of us. They fail to acknowledge human nature. Their ideas and ideals, while stunningly beautiful in theory, fail just as stunningly in the real world, and always will. Finally, they have a remarkable capacity for self-delusion. Everything I've just written is obvious, yet they refuse to see it. Amazing.
*
My idea is that today’s liberal generation is to a large degree solipsistic. I think this is a result of television, whereby all events are subsumed into ones own psyche. Thus each person sees the world as a realm under his or her own control, and stands ready to pronounce judgement and prescription for it. I came to this idea from contemplation of the language habitually employed, which always has a cosmic cast. “We should” or “It should” do or be thus and such, as though the speaker had, as I say, a cosmic perspective. One rarely hears anyone speak in terms of their own interest, presumably because these interests are felt to be largely satisfied. I’ve come to think that it will be quite a shock when this ceases to be the case.
*
There are creatures in our country that walk around in human suits. They can speak our language and have studied our culture. Though they imitate humans, they do not like humans. This is because they are extremely narcissistic. These creatures feel that humans detract from them. Humans steal their living-space, recreation, food, sexual partners, wealth, power and attention from them. Knowing their own inadequacies, these creatures fear that they can never compete fairly to achieve their desires. With concern for only themselves, they feign compassion for others to mask their motives. “Look at this lovely noose,” they tell humans. “Wouldn’t this world be a better place if you and your children were gone? Of course it would. Here, I’ll help you put the noose around your neck and kill your children.” The creatures are known as liberals/socialists/progressives/communist/Nazis/Statist.
- blueunicorn6 (April 01, 2011) (minor edits)
BTW - please never call them liberals.
*
"Most liberals I know have an exaggerated superiority complex."
Yes socialist absolutely do. Look at the Global warming argument it assumes we are gods that we can unwillingly and willingly control the earths environment.
If you try and explain to them that we are not gods they look at you like you're crazy.
*
I think what goes along with this is imbalance in their childhood. Parents have two basic tools to guide children: the carrot (rewards/praise/etc.), and the stick (punishment). When parents don’t balance those two tools they can easily wind up with kids who grow into liberals.
If you only use the carrot approach, you wind up with a selfish, self centered, egotistical brat. If you only use the stick approach you get basically the same thing only with more of a rebelious approach to life.
I know in my own life, my older brother got too much punishment from my Dad (who, because of always working, was rarely home) and then got too much carrot from my Mom to make up for the punishment from my Dad. As a consequence he rebelled at everything that my Dad stood for.
One of the things that has kept him in the liberal camp is that he never became a Dad himself. (That and going to college and now teaching college.)
So I guess one of the causes for liberals being unbalanced is because they were raised that way.
*
The liberal mind has rejected God, rejected the fact that we all have a sinful nature (original sin). The liberal has set himself up as God (or the state or whatever he uses as a moral equivalent to God) so he can decide for himself what is moral or what is not (or the state or whatever “lawgiver”). To the liberal man is perfectible through education and mental discipline. And usually they think of themselves as “born-again” or perfected when they come to believe the religion of liberalism.
The liberal (commie/marxist/nazi/statist, etc) is unsaved!
Granted there are so called liberal Christians, however I’ve found that usually they have fallen away from the whole idea of “sin”. That can be a topic for another day.
*
Liberals embrace and live the Seven Cardinal Sins: wrath (always feel offended), greed (always scheming for OTHEE PEOPLE's MONEY), sloth (unathletic oafs), pride (so much better than all the "little people", lust ( in all its illicit manifestations), envy (of everyhting they don't have cuz "but I DESERVE that! not her!), and gluttony (always over-doing everything).
It is really as simple as that.
*
"For you liberal lurkers out there I'll spell it out: don't confuse education and technological advancement with basic intelligence."
I'm in absolute agreement with that. I've thought the same thing myself.
I've often pondered what makes a liberal, a liberal. They tend to do so much damage throughout history and are incredibly difficult to defeat. Figuring out what makes them tick would seem to be priority number one. As I thought about it recently I came to a revelation that others have discovered but never fleshed out to my satisfaction. That revelation is that liberals fear and loathe their own humanity. Liberals loathe their own humanity because well, being human means being naturally flawed or seemingly so. I personally think that if we weren't flawed there wouldn't be any real challenges in life in exceling beyond our limitations.
Liberals apparently can't handle these innate flaws that come with being human and deep down that hurts their pride. They are mortified when they look inward, when they feel racially insecure, or think a sexist thought or feel a need to be greedy. They loathe themselves because of these all too human feelings and because of their shame they feel they must stamp them out and control them in others. They have to feel like they are above their human emotions so they can feel worthy of praise. Liberals fear being judged on their natural feelings.
Liberals don't understand that regardless of the past, that they are no better than their ancestors deep down, that controlling ones negative tendencies gives one character and strength. Ignoring that we are flawed and taking away others' choice to control their own bad behavior leads to a society that lacks self-control and builds resentment and actually encourages bad behavior.
This bad behavior originates because of this lack of self-control and because the aura of "holy purpose" liberals give to their crusades. One need only accuse someone of not being a convert the the liberals' "religion" of political correctness and you risk ostricism in various spheres of life. And so the free-thinking man or woman, where all innovation springs is handcuffed and gagged. Scientific and economic advancement stagnate as a result.
This need to control and regulate, however, leads to a type of totalitarianism that more cynical people would harness to enrich themselves in both wealth and power just for that purpose. Totalitarianism is begun by the well-meaning liberal and then they, being unsophisticated in human nature because they won't look inward, are then manipulated by the more cynical and ambitious among us. This is how freedom ends. I think it's happening now.
Here are some replies:
Yes, there is certainly something wrong with liberals, and I believe clinical depression may be a root cause. But it goes far beyond that. Look, for example, at public policy and the so-called "culture war".
The differences in the way liberals and conservatives reach conclusions comes down to far more than simply differing opinions - - it actually comes down to entirely different thought processes. Conservatives tend to think linearly: “If this, then this”; “Here is what was attempted, here are the results”; “Based on experience, this works and this does not work”. Etc.
Liberals do not think that way. Liberals are easily conned, easily manipulated, and utterly unwilling to admit when they are wrong. (Their obsession with constantly attempting to elicit “apologies” from Republicans is an offshoot of these strained thought processes.) Liberals, when confronted with bare-bones truth that contradicts their irrational world view, will scrunch their eyes shut, shake their heads, and chant “nah-nah-nah-nah-nah-nah” until whatever truth it is they find offensive “goes away”, rather than revise their thoughts and beliefs to conform to a truth that is slapping them in the face. They simply do not have the capacity to revise their thoughts and beliefs to conform to the truth before their very eyes if that truth contradicts the foundation of the beliefs they irrationally hold onto as a weapon in the constant struggle against their own insecurity.
Certainly, there are notable exceptions such as David Horowitz, PJ O’Rourke, Bernie Goldberg, Michael Medved and others who were smart enough to lift themselves out of the mire of self-loathing liberal stupidity but these folks are, unfortunately, rare exceptions.
Being an unabashed liberal is a matter of character (or more accurately, lack of character). Liberals are generally humorless and bitter because, you see, everybody else is (richer, happier, luckier, prettier, fill-in-the-blank) than they deserve to be and that is just not “fair”. (Words like "fair", and phrases such as "social justice", are common favorites used by liberals.) Liberals are social duds who are either chronic malcontents or simply that guilt-ridden subset of white liberals who feel that their own good fortune (and by extension the good fortune of others) is somehow undeserved. In any event, liberals usually see themselves as "victims". They always see anybody beneath their station as "victims".
In this world, there are people (most people, in fact) who look at all other people as their equals in every way, as people who are capable of realizing their personal aspirations and doing the right things, as people who should be treated as equals. Alternatively, there are people who look up adoringly at people they view as somehow better than themselves. These are the same people who look loathingly down on other people they view as their lessers. Guess which kind of people liberals tend to be?
Interestingly, true liberals are often physically slow and unathletic. They were picked last for playground basketball games. They have no interest in competetive sports, especially team sports. “Competetive sports” is, in fact, very much an alien concept to them. To be blunt, true liberals (genuine socialists) are almost always clumsy oafs.
Additionally, true liberals are humorless. Seething, deep seated anger causes an entrenched bitterness that ends up defining them. The evidence of this abounds and can be seen on certain TV stations every day. The liberals have no Rush Limbaugh, or Ann Coulter or Mark Steyn or Howie Carr or Dennis Miller or Ronald Reagan. They have Keith Olbemann and Helen Thomas and Ed Shultz and Lawrence O'Donnell and Barack Ubama.... there is simply not a lot of laughter there. Liberals, in fact, despise laughter. (What's there to laugh about? Look at all the suffering people in this horrible, unjust world.) True liberals don’t “get” jokes, even if they chuckle as if they do. (Test this for yourself - - try to tell a true liberal a joke. For additonal laughs, ask the liberal if he/she/it has a good joke.)
Liberals can appear to be normal people and are often able to handle their jobs and academic endeavors competently. They can usually fake normal socialization with other people, even if their self-centeredness prevents them from ever establishing true friendships. Liberals do not have true friends, merely acquaintances who can be used in some way, especially to affirm their own crazy political notions.
It is their sociopathic selfishness that is the most troubling thing about liberals. They see absolutely no problem with walking into the polling place on election day and voting for big government to confiscate more money - - from their neighbors! Normal people would view this behavior as boorish and rude, but liberals apparently convince themselves that they are somehow accomplishing something; perhaps the exercise soothes their irrational guilt under the tragic misbelief that they are somehow “helping” others (using other people’s money, of course), notably, “the poor”.
So, by voting for thuggish big government to take more money from their neighbors in order to enable their Democrat politicians to buy the votes of society’s losers, bums, and parasites, liberals feel better about themselves. (Don’t ask me about this mindset - - figuring out liberals would best be left to a team of very good psychiatrists.)
Anyway, I believe that the percentage of true liberals in this country is actually very low - - far less than a typical Democrat election-day turnout would indicate. The rats run a good con and there is no shortage of fools littering the countryside (not to mention the concentrated Democrat parasite nests known as "cities") who will continue to buy into the con.
Think about this - - how gullible did you have to be in 2008 to fall for a campaign that could have been formulated by a boardwalk psychic; a campaign based primarily on two essentially meaningless words, “hope” and “change”, words that sound so... positive... and that allow the smiling, naval-gazing listener’s imagination to turn them into whatever he or she wants? Unfortunately, in today’s soundbite world such a campaign can be (and was!) successful. And so we ended up with “community organizer” Barack Hussein Obama as President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.
Pray for America. In less than one year we shall see if Americans are insistent on committing national suicide.
*
You make some good points here. I would add that many liberals recognize (on some level) that the utopian perfectibility they crave so much is not possible by human effort alone, yet at the same time their ideology prevents them from (a) accepting that weakness and working with it or (b) acknowledging that moral standards come from outside human reason. So, they turn to institutions and causes, sometimes embodied in individuals (e.g. Obama) but more often existing as vagaries like “society” or “the global village” that they can ostensibly use to supersede flawed human effort. Perpetually larger and more powerful governments are a natural outgrowth of this tendency: if God is out of the equation, in other words, then Uncle Sam is the next best thing.
*
"Liberals don't understand that regardless of the past, that they are no better than their ancestors deep down..."
That struck a chord with me. It has been my experience with liberals that they have this (unfounded) sense of superiority. They seem to think they are smarter than their predecessors and contemporaries. This in spite of absolutely no supporting evidence. (other than self-agrandising and mutual admiration societies)
In fact, a case can be easily made that liberals are in fact not as smart as other people, past or present. For you liberal lurkers out there I'll spell it out: don't confuse education and technological advancement with basic intelligence.
In general, liberals tend to have several fundamental failings. They ignore the lessons of the past. Probably due to that self-serving attitude "Things will be different now, we're so much smarter/evolved than they were..." They fail to recognize their own limitations. This is particularly dangerous when they start thinking they should make decisions for the rest of us. They fail to acknowledge human nature. Their ideas and ideals, while stunningly beautiful in theory, fail just as stunningly in the real world, and always will. Finally, they have a remarkable capacity for self-delusion. Everything I've just written is obvious, yet they refuse to see it. Amazing.
*
My idea is that today’s liberal generation is to a large degree solipsistic. I think this is a result of television, whereby all events are subsumed into ones own psyche. Thus each person sees the world as a realm under his or her own control, and stands ready to pronounce judgement and prescription for it. I came to this idea from contemplation of the language habitually employed, which always has a cosmic cast. “We should” or “It should” do or be thus and such, as though the speaker had, as I say, a cosmic perspective. One rarely hears anyone speak in terms of their own interest, presumably because these interests are felt to be largely satisfied. I’ve come to think that it will be quite a shock when this ceases to be the case.
*
There are creatures in our country that walk around in human suits. They can speak our language and have studied our culture. Though they imitate humans, they do not like humans. This is because they are extremely narcissistic. These creatures feel that humans detract from them. Humans steal their living-space, recreation, food, sexual partners, wealth, power and attention from them. Knowing their own inadequacies, these creatures fear that they can never compete fairly to achieve their desires. With concern for only themselves, they feign compassion for others to mask their motives. “Look at this lovely noose,” they tell humans. “Wouldn’t this world be a better place if you and your children were gone? Of course it would. Here, I’ll help you put the noose around your neck and kill your children.” The creatures are known as liberals/socialists/progressives/communist/Nazis/Statist.
- blueunicorn6 (April 01, 2011) (minor edits)
BTW - please never call them liberals.
*
"Most liberals I know have an exaggerated superiority complex."
Yes socialist absolutely do. Look at the Global warming argument it assumes we are gods that we can unwillingly and willingly control the earths environment.
If you try and explain to them that we are not gods they look at you like you're crazy.
*
I think what goes along with this is imbalance in their childhood. Parents have two basic tools to guide children: the carrot (rewards/praise/etc.), and the stick (punishment). When parents don’t balance those two tools they can easily wind up with kids who grow into liberals.
If you only use the carrot approach, you wind up with a selfish, self centered, egotistical brat. If you only use the stick approach you get basically the same thing only with more of a rebelious approach to life.
I know in my own life, my older brother got too much punishment from my Dad (who, because of always working, was rarely home) and then got too much carrot from my Mom to make up for the punishment from my Dad. As a consequence he rebelled at everything that my Dad stood for.
One of the things that has kept him in the liberal camp is that he never became a Dad himself. (That and going to college and now teaching college.)
So I guess one of the causes for liberals being unbalanced is because they were raised that way.
*
The liberal mind has rejected God, rejected the fact that we all have a sinful nature (original sin). The liberal has set himself up as God (or the state or whatever he uses as a moral equivalent to God) so he can decide for himself what is moral or what is not (or the state or whatever “lawgiver”). To the liberal man is perfectible through education and mental discipline. And usually they think of themselves as “born-again” or perfected when they come to believe the religion of liberalism.
The liberal (commie/marxist/nazi/statist, etc) is unsaved!
Granted there are so called liberal Christians, however I’ve found that usually they have fallen away from the whole idea of “sin”. That can be a topic for another day.
*
Liberals embrace and live the Seven Cardinal Sins: wrath (always feel offended), greed (always scheming for OTHEE PEOPLE's MONEY), sloth (unathletic oafs), pride (so much better than all the "little people", lust ( in all its illicit manifestations), envy (of everyhting they don't have cuz "but I DESERVE that! not her!), and gluttony (always over-doing everything).
It is really as simple as that.
*
"For you liberal lurkers out there I'll spell it out: don't confuse education and technological advancement with basic intelligence."
I'm in absolute agreement with that. I've thought the same thing myself.
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Emails Expose #OccupyWallStreet Conspiracy to ‘Destabalize’ Global Markets, Governments
Unsurprisingly, the article is from Big Government.
Freepers are the best at uncovering the real details of any issue...
*
Breitbart is normally right on the money. I hope they expose these communists for who they really are.
*
This whole thing is bigger than "us" against "them". The herd has to be thinned. If we kill each other, those at the very top won't have to do it themselves. The one world government has a plan.
1. MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000 IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE
2. GUIDE REPRODUCTION WISELY - IMPROVING FITNESS AND DIVERSITY
3. UNITE HUMANITY WITH A LIVING NEW LANGUAGE
4. RULE PASSION - FAITH - TRADITION - AND ALL THINGS WITH TEMPERED REASON
5. PROTECT PEOPLE AND NATIONS WITH FAIR LAWS AND JUST COURTS
6. LET ALL NATIONS RULE INTERNALLY RESOLVING EXTERNAL DISPUTES IN A WORLD COURT
7. AVOID PETTY LAWS AND USELESS OFFICIALS
8. BALANCE PERSONAL RIGHTS WITH SOCIAL DUTIES
9. PRIZE TRUTH - BEAUTY - LOVE- SEEKING HARMONY WITH THE INFINITE
10. BE NOT A CANCER ON THE EARTH - LEAVE ROOM FOR NATURE - LEAVE ROOM FOR NATURE
They're working on the "MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000"
By pitting people against each other, they don't have to do the killing. They can rile up Muslim countries against the Jews (done), the Christians against the atheist (done), the young against old (done), male against female (done) race against race (done) rich against poor (done), etc.
Neighbor will rise up against neighbor. Nation will rise up against nation. Kingdom will rise up against kingdom. Eventually, a war will break out that will eliminate 2/3 of the worlds population. The plan will be a success.
The 10, standing in pomp and glitter, head for their vaults.
The people, angry and in disarray, loot the shops.
Which of these knew in advance? The Eagle? The Crown? The Bear? The Sun?
No, fate is not a consideration for this race
*
If Obama is planning on becoming a Tyrant in the vein of the Roman Republic by conjuring up/enabling these useful idiots, he better get millions, probably 10 of millions more lemmings to create conditions of social breakdown.
Martial Law/Suspension clauses would be hard to unilaterally declare within the United States as well as suspending elections. Too many State/County/City laws that will take care of any manufactured insurrections on a local level. All Congress would need to do is quit funding Obama’s delusion of grandeur and shove the Constitution between his big ears.
*
I pray God they fail miserably and that State Governors will be prepared with their National Guards to put it donw quickly should it start up.
*
The email ...calls for the Occupy movement to begin “executing higher-risk actions, civil disobedience and arrests,” and suggests: “We must draw a line, disavow the Democrats explicitly, make our messaging a little uncomfortable.”
This is incredibly important. They want to disavow Democrats. Who the hell are they? They just want to start shit for the sake of starting shit?
*
Hank Williams Jr. is right to equate Obama to Hitler...Hitler disarmed the german citizenry after he was elected in the guise of “public safety”. Once disarmed, the Germans were sheep being slowly led to the slaughter...
We are living in historical times, having the most evil regime in American history trying to fundamentally transform this nation.
*
I think a little psychological warfare is in order...
If multiple vehicles decked out with the loudest speaker systems available could start playing gospel music as loud as possible, and stay mobile, or place speaker systems in strategic unreachable positions, they could have the entire area vacated within hours.
Freepers are the best at uncovering the real details of any issue...
*
Breitbart is normally right on the money. I hope they expose these communists for who they really are.
*
This whole thing is bigger than "us" against "them". The herd has to be thinned. If we kill each other, those at the very top won't have to do it themselves. The one world government has a plan.
1. MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000 IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE
2. GUIDE REPRODUCTION WISELY - IMPROVING FITNESS AND DIVERSITY
3. UNITE HUMANITY WITH A LIVING NEW LANGUAGE
4. RULE PASSION - FAITH - TRADITION - AND ALL THINGS WITH TEMPERED REASON
5. PROTECT PEOPLE AND NATIONS WITH FAIR LAWS AND JUST COURTS
6. LET ALL NATIONS RULE INTERNALLY RESOLVING EXTERNAL DISPUTES IN A WORLD COURT
7. AVOID PETTY LAWS AND USELESS OFFICIALS
8. BALANCE PERSONAL RIGHTS WITH SOCIAL DUTIES
9. PRIZE TRUTH - BEAUTY - LOVE- SEEKING HARMONY WITH THE INFINITE
10. BE NOT A CANCER ON THE EARTH - LEAVE ROOM FOR NATURE - LEAVE ROOM FOR NATURE
They're working on the "MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000"
By pitting people against each other, they don't have to do the killing. They can rile up Muslim countries against the Jews (done), the Christians against the atheist (done), the young against old (done), male against female (done) race against race (done) rich against poor (done), etc.
Neighbor will rise up against neighbor. Nation will rise up against nation. Kingdom will rise up against kingdom. Eventually, a war will break out that will eliminate 2/3 of the worlds population. The plan will be a success.
The 10, standing in pomp and glitter, head for their vaults.
The people, angry and in disarray, loot the shops.
Which of these knew in advance? The Eagle? The Crown? The Bear? The Sun?
No, fate is not a consideration for this race
*
If Obama is planning on becoming a Tyrant in the vein of the Roman Republic by conjuring up/enabling these useful idiots, he better get millions, probably 10 of millions more lemmings to create conditions of social breakdown.
Martial Law/Suspension clauses would be hard to unilaterally declare within the United States as well as suspending elections. Too many State/County/City laws that will take care of any manufactured insurrections on a local level. All Congress would need to do is quit funding Obama’s delusion of grandeur and shove the Constitution between his big ears.
*
I pray God they fail miserably and that State Governors will be prepared with their National Guards to put it donw quickly should it start up.
*
The email ...calls for the Occupy movement to begin “executing higher-risk actions, civil disobedience and arrests,” and suggests: “We must draw a line, disavow the Democrats explicitly, make our messaging a little uncomfortable.”
This is incredibly important. They want to disavow Democrats. Who the hell are they? They just want to start shit for the sake of starting shit?
*
Hank Williams Jr. is right to equate Obama to Hitler...Hitler disarmed the german citizenry after he was elected in the guise of “public safety”. Once disarmed, the Germans were sheep being slowly led to the slaughter...
We are living in historical times, having the most evil regime in American history trying to fundamentally transform this nation.
*
I think a little psychological warfare is in order...
If multiple vehicles decked out with the loudest speaker systems available could start playing gospel music as loud as possible, and stay mobile, or place speaker systems in strategic unreachable positions, they could have the entire area vacated within hours.
Saturday, August 20, 2011
Who Is Behind the ‘US Day of Rage’ to ‘Occupy’ Wall Street this September 17th?
Article from The Blaze
Summary: "A US Day of Rage is the title given to a day of ostensibly “non-violent” civil disobedience orchestrated by a group of radicals — that reportedly include SEIU’s Stephen Lerner and ACORN founder Wade Rathke (who, coincidentally, formerly served as president of SEIU’s local New Orleans branch) — targeting Wall Street and U.S. capitalism. It’s worth noting that the title of the movement — if its intentions are indeed non-violent in nature — appears to contradict itself slightly."
I'd translate that from Beck to reality but I'm too lazy to google.
I hope they burn the entire place down with all the bankers still inside.
Red-on-red can sometimes be a pretty good scenario.
*
Violent flash mobs with a srong melanometric component..
*
"US Day of Rage" huh? Alright; let the good times roll mama. Let's go ahead and get the civil war started between the Liberal/Socialists and the Conservative/Patriots of this nation. Bring it on!!! I'm down for it.
*
First thing that comes to mind: WEATHERMEN DAYS OF RAGE CHICAGO 1968 - unrepentent terrorist & Obama BFF Bill Ayers & wife Bernadine Dohrn. Sale old, same old.
Old radicals never die, they just put one of their own in the WH and continue on with their destruction of America!
*
Yup, Ayers is in this big time.
Coincidentally, he organized a Day of Rage in Egypt just about the time the riots broke out there.Don't hear anyone at the Department of homeland security being concerned about this. I guess Janet Napolitano is too busy is too busy chasing well dressed white women to be bothered.
*
Trust me, it will take exactly one “day of rage “ from the well armed, well trained, well supplied right to get this straight lol
*
There is war coming, trust me.
*
Did you know insider trading is legal for members of Congress and their staffs? I was flabbergasted when I learned this. I had assumed that the portfolio assets of people in those positions would be managed in blind trust.
*
Obama:
“They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
Obama to His Followers:
“Get in Their Faces!”
Obama on ACORN Mobs:
“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
Obama to His Mercenary Army:
“Hit Back Twice As Hard”
Obama on the private sector:
“We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.“
Obama to voters:
Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
Obama to lib supporters:
“It’s time to Fight for it.”
Obama to Latino supporters:
“Punish your enemies.”
Obama to democrats:
“I’m itching for a fight.”
*
Re: war
Mexican, Indian, Chinese, assorted Muslims will not help Whites, will either stay away or help the “oppressed”
Who wins?
The issue is that most of “us” have something to lose, a business, a family, a home, cars, investments, communities, churches, schools, organizations, friends...
These people have nada, they follow their 3rd World genes to hate the people who live in the hills and set the standard.
The true question is will the nation survive? Are you willing to sacrifice all you have to eliminate the Liberals and Globalists?
Many of us will die, and will probably have to do things we never imagined for us and our families to survive...
*
Do any of these guys own a calendar? September 17 is a Saturday this year. The only ones there would be the cleaning and maintenance staff.
It is typical that the ones hurt by these actions are the 'workers' they profess to care so much about.
*
That’ll be about time for another Hussein family and friends vacation.
Summary: "A US Day of Rage is the title given to a day of ostensibly “non-violent” civil disobedience orchestrated by a group of radicals — that reportedly include SEIU’s Stephen Lerner and ACORN founder Wade Rathke (who, coincidentally, formerly served as president of SEIU’s local New Orleans branch) — targeting Wall Street and U.S. capitalism. It’s worth noting that the title of the movement — if its intentions are indeed non-violent in nature — appears to contradict itself slightly."
I'd translate that from Beck to reality but I'm too lazy to google.
I hope they burn the entire place down with all the bankers still inside.
Red-on-red can sometimes be a pretty good scenario.
*
Violent flash mobs with a srong melanometric component..
*
"US Day of Rage" huh? Alright; let the good times roll mama. Let's go ahead and get the civil war started between the Liberal/Socialists and the Conservative/Patriots of this nation. Bring it on!!! I'm down for it.
*
First thing that comes to mind: WEATHERMEN DAYS OF RAGE CHICAGO 1968 - unrepentent terrorist & Obama BFF Bill Ayers & wife Bernadine Dohrn. Sale old, same old.
Old radicals never die, they just put one of their own in the WH and continue on with their destruction of America!
*
Yup, Ayers is in this big time.
Coincidentally, he organized a Day of Rage in Egypt just about the time the riots broke out there.Don't hear anyone at the Department of homeland security being concerned about this. I guess Janet Napolitano is too busy is too busy chasing well dressed white women to be bothered.
*
Trust me, it will take exactly one “day of rage “ from the well armed, well trained, well supplied right to get this straight lol
*
There is war coming, trust me.
*
Did you know insider trading is legal for members of Congress and their staffs? I was flabbergasted when I learned this. I had assumed that the portfolio assets of people in those positions would be managed in blind trust.
*
Obama:
“They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
Obama to His Followers:
“Get in Their Faces!”
Obama on ACORN Mobs:
“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
Obama to His Mercenary Army:
“Hit Back Twice As Hard”
Obama on the private sector:
“We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.“
Obama to voters:
Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
Obama to lib supporters:
“It’s time to Fight for it.”
Obama to Latino supporters:
“Punish your enemies.”
Obama to democrats:
“I’m itching for a fight.”
*
Re: war
Mexican, Indian, Chinese, assorted Muslims will not help Whites, will either stay away or help the “oppressed”
Who wins?
The issue is that most of “us” have something to lose, a business, a family, a home, cars, investments, communities, churches, schools, organizations, friends...
These people have nada, they follow their 3rd World genes to hate the people who live in the hills and set the standard.
The true question is will the nation survive? Are you willing to sacrifice all you have to eliminate the Liberals and Globalists?
Many of us will die, and will probably have to do things we never imagined for us and our families to survive...
*
Do any of these guys own a calendar? September 17 is a Saturday this year. The only ones there would be the cleaning and maintenance staff.
It is typical that the ones hurt by these actions are the 'workers' they profess to care so much about.
*
That’ll be about time for another Hussein family and friends vacation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)