Link to the batshit article, which is as hilarious as it is disturbing.
For those not interested, here are some excerpts:
Obama, we now know, believes homosexual men have a "right" to marry other men, and homosexual women have a "right" to marry other women. So, who does he believe bisexuals have a "right" to marry?
In Obama's world, does a bisexual man have a "right" to enter into a bigamous union with one other man and one woman? Or can the state force him to limit his marriage to the union of just two people?
And if that is the case, how would Obama, within his philosophy of government, justify prohibiting a bisexual from forming a tripartite marriage?
When the Founders created this country, they rightfully pointed for justification to the "Laws of Nature and Nature's God." They said that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
No rational person could argue that there is a God-given right to same-sex marriage or bisexual behavior. To justify such things, as Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote only a quarter-century ago, one must "cast aside millennia of moral teaching."
The final question seems rhetorical? IMO Obama already thinks he is god.—and that he American people -and Congress have
replaced God with Obama—Faith with his hope and change.
Bisexual IS homosexual. Andrew Dice Clay had this subject right. This is purely semantics. They’ll pave the way for polygamy in the name of love and tolerance.
I still think this open declaration on Obama’s part may have set him back in the culture wars, and may cost him the election.
“Among the places our president said he wanted “equality not just for some, but for all” — that is, presumably, including “bisexuals” — is in the institution of marriage.”
One has to assume, he also includes polygamists, pedophiles and lovers of beasts who all believe in the same ideasls as this president.,
Has any other president in out history so refused to uphold the law? How can he refuse to do his duty this way?
From the Constitution: “...he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed...”
shows like “Big Love” were also an attempt to test the waters.
I do not think it is only Obama who is not upholding the law; I think this is the general and inevitable point the Liberals have reached in the 21st century ( “changing times and laws”).
"The waters are being tested by things like “Sister Wives.”"
This does present an interesting inconsistency. One man with 2 heterosexual women, is illegal polygamy. One man with 2 bisexual women, is acceptable!? Or does the guy have to be bi too?
"Yes, and it could also be one bisexual man, married to a heterosexual wife, seeing a gay man on the side, who is married to another gay man. The waters become muddied, and yet the gay movement goes under the “LGBTQ” umbrella hence the door is opened for a myriad of possible equal rights lawsuits and amendments."
“More foolishness. The bisexual would select a single spouse without regard to gender.
Homosexuals conceitedly believe there is no distinction, that a bisexual is just someone unwilling to accept their own homosexuality but those who identify as bisexuals argue they are attracted to individuals without regard to gender.”
I understand what you are saying here, but this assumes that the bisexual simply picks a beloved irrespective of gender. That is a nice theory, but those of us who have known bisexual people know that they like to, and need to, sleep with both men and women. Many psychological profiles have been written about the man who loves his wife but likes to indulge in occasional sex with men, etc. I am not buying into “we pick the person, not the gender.” mantra of the bisexual movement. This, from experience.
“Bisexual” - there’s really no such thing. It’s the politically correct word for being a slut.
In the case of marriage, it doesn’t even matter if gays were “born that way”. Marriage is civilization’s method, under natural and eternal law, of bringing the 2 genders together for chaste sexuality for the purpose of building families and protecting children until they are adults. Even if it is NOT a choice, in the realm of marriage , it’s simply excess and burden to add homosexuals into the equation. They know this. And it makes them even more determined to push their way in.
"Andrew Dice Clay had this subject right."ReplyDelete
I don't think anyone doubts the wisdom of Andrew Dice Clay. Also,considering the subject;
"And it makes them even more determined to push their way in."
Seriously, some of these folks should read what they type out loud.
I know! What windbags, am I right?Delete